Correlated electron metal properties of the honeycomb ruthenate Na2RuO3

L. S. I. Veiga, M. Etter, E. Cappelli, H. Jacobsen, J. G. Vale, C. D. Dashwood, D. Le, F. Baumberger, D. F. McMorrow, and R. S. Perry
Phys. Rev. Materials 4, 094202 – Published 14 September 2020
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We report the synthesis and characterization of polycrystalline Na2RuO3, a layered material in which the Ru4+ (4d4 configuration) form a honeycomb lattice. The optimal synthesis condition was found to produce a nearly ordered Na2RuO3 (C2/c phase), as assessed from the refinement of the time-of-flight neutron powder diffraction. Magnetic susceptibility measurements reveal a large temperature-independent Pauli paramagnetism [χ01.42(2)×103 emu/mol Oe] with no evidence of magnetic ordering down to 1.5 K, and with an absence of dynamic magnetic correlations, as evidenced by neutron scattering spectroscopy. The intrinsic susceptibility (χ0) together with the Sommerfeld coefficient of γ=11.7(2) mJ/Ru mol K2 estimated from heat capacity measurements gives an enhanced Wilson ratio of RW8.9(1), suggesting that magnetic correlations may be present in this material. While transport measurements on pressed pellets show nonmetallic behavior, photoemission spectroscopy indicates a small but finite density of states at the Fermi energy, suggesting that the bulk material is metallic. Except for resistivity measurements, which may have been compromised by near-surface and interface effects, all other probes indicate that Na2RuO3 is a moderately correlated electron metal. Our results thus stand in contrast to earlier reports that Na2RuO3 is an antiferromagnetic insulator at low temperatures.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 23 April 2020
  • Revised 16 July 2020
  • Accepted 20 August 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.094202

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

L. S. I. Veiga1,2, M. Etter3, E. Cappelli4, H. Jacobsen5,6, J. G. Vale1, C. D. Dashwood1, D. Le7, F. Baumberger4,8, D. F. McMorrow1, and R. S. Perry9

  • 1London Centre for Nanotechnology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
  • 2Diamond Light Source Ltd., Harwell Science & Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
  • 3Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg 22607, Germany
  • 4Department of Quantum Matter Physics, University of Geneva, 24 Quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
  • 5Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom
  • 6Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory for Neutron Scattering and Imaging, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
  • 7ISIS Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, STFC, Chilton, Didcot OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
  • 8Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
  • 9London Centre for Nanotechnology and Institute for Materials Discovery, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 4, Iss. 9 — September 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Materials

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×