How fast is a quantum jump?
Introduction
It is in a way puzzling that the physics involved in atomic quantum jumps (or single atomic transitions) has remained in almost complete darkness, the more so considering the crucial role spectroscopy has played for more than a century, and the impressive advances in both theoretical and experimental quantum physics. Attention to this intriguing subject has presumably been hindered for a long time by the masterful dogma of the instantaneous character of atomic transitions postulated by Bohr [1]—and bitterly opposed by Schrödinger [2], [3]. One can still come across articles negating quantum jumps—and any other kind of discontinuities, for that matter (e.g. [4])—or taking them as a sudden increase of our knowledge of the system (e.g., [5], [6]) rather than a physical phenomenon.
For atomic and molecular spectroscopists it is clear that quantum jumps exist; this is part of their daily bread. Most spectroscopists are also aware that the time involved in a transition is finite but very short; so short indeed that the Franck-Condon principle applies, which sets an upper limit to their duration, on the order of femtoseconds ( s). Because atomic transitions are so fast, up to recently they were considered “instantaneous”, this term being taken by some in the rigorous sense, and by others as meaning “in an unmeasurably (or unobservably) short time”. This picture, however, is changing thanks to recent calculational and experimental work, notably using attosecond spectroscopy applied to photoionization [7], [8]. Photoionization experiments in bulk materials are known to involve electronic correlations, which makes it difficult to ascertain the time it takes for one atom to lose one electron. With this caveat, chronoscope measurement of the times involved in the photoelectric effect assigns to the primary photoexcitation process a duration on the order of s [9]. Further, although not directly comparable to (natural) atomic transitions, recent experimental work with an artificial atom (a superconducting circuit consisting of two hybridized qubits on a chip) in which a quantum jump is intercepted and reverted by means of an electric pulse, seems to confirm Schrödinger's intuition that the evolution of the jump itself is continuous and needs a finite time to take place [10]. This is in line with Schulman's definition of “jump time” as the time scale such that perturbations occurring at intervals of this duration affect the transition [11]. Based on his definition, Schulman's own estimate made in terms of the “Zeno time” (related to the second moment of the Hamiltonian) and the natural lifetime, results however in a much shorter time than the experimental estimates, as short as s for atomic transitions.
The various computational and experimental estimates have contributed to establish the existence of (finite-time) quantum jumps, and have apparently set tighter bounds on their duration. The basic physics behind the process, however, has not been clarified, so the question remains: what is it that determines the duration of a transition?
In the present work we attempt to throw light on this question via a theoretical analysis that does not rely on specific experimental settings. We do so by invoking the existence of the electromagnetic zero-point radiation field (zpf) and applying the conventional approach followed in stochastic electrodynamics (sed) to the specific problem of the dynamics of the electron during a transition. We start by recalling Schrödinger's work on the zitterbewegung as a rapid oscillation of the Dirac electron, and appeal to sed to identify it as a result of its resonance with the Compton-frequency components of the zpf. The stationary solution of the equation of motion for the rapidly oscillating electron corresponds to the zitterbewegung; the transient solution, in its turn, describes the dynamics of the transition between states. The decay time associated with the transient solution, which we propose to take as an approximate measure of the transition time, is expressed in terms of universal constants and its value is of the order of 10−18 s.
Section snippets
The guiding premise
To put the discussion on track we start by recalling the source of the zitterbewegung as disclosed by Schrödinger [12] in his revision of the properties of the free particle in Dirac's theory of the electron. This will signal the importance of the Compton-frequency modes of the zpf for the dynamics of the electron, and pave the way for their consideration as a central element in the transition.
A well-known result in Dirac's theory of the free electron is that the velocity operator is , where
How fast is a quantum jump?
We turn now to our task of estimating an order of magnitude for the time it takes the atomic electron to make a transition between states, guided by the above considerations. The gist of our argument is, as stated above, the acknowledgement that the electron resonates with the modes of the zpf of Compton's frequency, in addition to the (slow) motion impressed upon it by the external forces and the low frequency components of the zpf. We shall take the simplest nonrelativistic approach to tackle
CRediT authorship contribution statement
All three authors have contributed substantially to this work.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge financial support from DGAPA-UNAM through project PAPIIT IN113720. We are grateful to two open-minded reviewers for their thoughtful and supportive comments.
References (19)
There are no quantum jumps, nor are there particles!
Phys. Lett. A
(1993)On the constitution of atoms and molecules, part I
Philos. Mag.
(1913)Energieaustausch nach der Wellenmechanik
Ann. Phys.
(1927)Are there quantum jumps?
Br. J. Philos. Sci.
(1952)Are there quantum jumps?
- et al.
The quantum-jump approach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics
Rev. Mod. Phys.
(1998) - et al.
Attosecond chronoscopy of photoemission
Rev. Mod. Phys.
(2015) - et al.
Attosecond correlation dynamics
Nat. Phys.
(2017) - et al.
Absolute timing of the photoelectric effect
Nature
(2018)