Efficacy of visual evaluation of insect-damaged kernels of malting barley by Sitophilus granarius from various observation perspectives
Graphical abstract
Introduction
According to FAO statistics (http://www.fao.org/faostat), more than 140 million tonnes of barley are harvested at a global scale annually. Consequently, barley grain is traded and processed as feed, food, and malting products. Each year industrial laboratories around the world analyse hundreds of thousands of barley kernel samples for their quality before grain storage or procession. These inspection facilities are either state-supervised laboratories or laboratories operated by national and international commodity trade-companies and food industry facilities (e.g., mills, distilleries, malting and brewing companies). Stored malting barley grain is prone to infestation and damage caused by multiple pest insect (Tebb, 1968; Buchelos and Athanassiou, 1999; Hagstrum and Subramanayam, 2009; Castane and Riudavets, 2015) and mite (Hubert et al., 2009, 2013) species. Specific damage appearing on stored grain (e.g., dark pin-sized puncture marks) can originate from the field where it is inflicted by sucking field insects (e.g., Armstrong et al., 2019a). Therefore, apart from other quality parameters (e.g., dockage, mycotoxins, moisture and protein content, germination, sprouting, etc.), the laboratories also evaluate arthropod infestation and number of insect-damaged kernels (IDK) (Armitage et al., 2004; Fleurat-Lessard et al., 2005; USDA, 2009, 2016a). In USA, if the number of IDK exceeds the legal threshold (i.e., 32 IDK per 100 g sample; USDA, 2009, 2016a), the inspected batch of cereal commodity must be rejected for food or malting purposes. In addition to kernel damage, pest infestation causes grain weight losses, decreases the germination of grain, and affects malting properties of the stored grain (Lazzari and Lazzari, 2012; MacLeod, 2018). Insects and mites affect food safety as they can introduce physical and chemical contaminants or protein allergens (Trematerra et al., 2011; Hubert et al., 2018). Kernels damaged by internal stored product beetles are susceptible to colonization and infestation by other - notably secondary - pest species (Shah et al., 2020). The stored grain infestation by the granary weevil Sitophilus granarius (L.) may be associated with the specific kernels’ volatiles (Piesik and Wenda-Piesik, 2015; Wenda-Piesik et al., 2018).
How grain quality, arthropod infestation, and insect-damaged kernels are most commonly evaluated under practical conditions in laboratories? During the purchase process, the supplier delivers grain using high-volume transport means (e.g., wagon, train, ship, or truck) to the customer’s premises. Before loading and storage of the delivered commodities into silos or floor warehouses, laboratory workers take a limited number of samples from each lot using a manual hollow spear sampler or automatic suction probes. The samples are then subjected to laboratory analysis. If the sample does not have parameters and characteristics according to the negotiated conditions of a particular contract (commodity quality) (Armitage et al., 2004; Freese et al., 2015) or general legislation (food safety), there will be either a price reduction or rejection and return of the whole consignment. Samples are taken from commodity according to ISO standards (ISO 13690, 1999; ISO 6644, 2002) or according to the contracted conditions (Armitage et al., 2004; Freese et al., 2015). Wilkin (1991) and Wilkin and Fleurat-Lessard (1991) were among the first who experimentally demonstrated low sensitivity of ISO-based sampling standards in relation to pest detection. To date, extensive knowledge has accumulated confirming their results (e.g., Elmouttie and Hamilton, 2010; Jian et al., 2014). The additional detection uncertainty regarding sampling is introduced by the specific methods used to extract pests in the laboratory that differ in their sensitivity and efficacy for different pest species (Krizkova-Kudlikova et al., 2007; Stejskal et al., 2008; Hubert et al., 2009; Lukas et al., 2009; Reboux et al., 2019). Clearly, there is growing evidence that methods of infestation detection are not always sensitive enough to meet current quality demands. However, few if any adequate sensitivity validations are available for methods of insect-damaged kernel detection. Traditionally, for insect-damaged kernel detection, simple visual inspection by plain eye has been used. In recent decades, for the detection of internal infestation and presence of cavities inside grain, several technically advanced methods were developed, including X-ray, near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), conductance mills, magnetic resonance, imaging analysis, etc. (Mahajan et al., 2015; Patrício and Rieder, 2018; Morrison III et al., 2020; Tian et al., 2020). Single kernel assessment of visual cereal grain quality based on automatic image analysis is newly suggested (Armstrong et al., 2019b; McClung et al., 2020). Although the previous methods have been proposed or are under development, the traditional simple visual methods are still prevailing due to their low price and high speed. The procedures follow either various internal company standards or national legislative standards as suggested for example by the USDA in the USA (USDA, 2009, 2016a). Some maximum level of insect damage of cereal grain may also be required (as an additional quality parameter) by customers even when it is not part of any standards or legislation (Flinn et al., 2010).
According to USDA standards, the IDK parameter does not apply to externally feeding grain pests but only to those whose larvae develop inside the kernel, and after eclosion (emergence) the adult beetles leave the kernel through typical round exit (=emergence) holes. For the purpose of grain quality inspection, there are manuals or guidelines with pictures for practitioners for grain sampling and inspecting (e.g., USDA, 2016b). Kernels are inspected by plain eye, simple lens, or under a stereomicroscope (optical camera systems connected with binocular lenses). According to the USDA inspection procedure (2009, 2016a), to detect IDK, a whole surface of the sample kernels must be observed. However, there is little knowledge of impacts on the sensitivity of IDK inspection if the whole surface of each kernel in all samples (or their parts) is not inspected individually and carefully. This situation may occur in the case of misconduct of the official procedure or in a case where IDK is just supportive/side criterion and not the legally required standards, for example, if the kernels can only be observed on a Petri dish or non-transparent tray from the upper side (Fig. 1A). Thorough inspection requires individual spatial rotation of each kernel along two axes (horizontal and vertical) in the sample by tweezers (Fig. 1B and C), which is time-consuming. Occasionally a short time-window may be provided by requirements for the quick processing of multiple samples, containing many hundreds of kernels during a harvest campaign. In addition, a quick upper view inspection approach may be psychologically enforced by “pictorial stereotype” and occasionally the depiction of exit holes of a primary pest, such as Sitophilus spp. or Rhyzopertha sp., mainly on the visible crease/top site of kernels, but rarely on the brush end or germ end.
The objectives of this study included the following goals: (i) To describe and photodocument categories of tunnelling damage (i.e., exit hole; EH) caused by S. granarius; (ii) To estimate and statistically evaluate the distribution of adult exit holes on the kernel surface in three malting barley varieties; (iii) To estimate the size of exit holes at different parts of kernels; and (iv) To compare visibility of the various locations of exit holes from different perspectives; we specifically addressed problems resulting from the impossibility of inspecting the quality of the whole surface of a kernel from one perspective, without grain rotation. (v) The last goal was to test whether automatic shaking could turn kernels with their damaged site up-side to increase visibility.
Section snippets
Beetle selection and rearing
One of the most serious primary beetle pests is a granary weevil, S. granarius, which has been identified as the main internally feeding pest (Stejskal and Kucerova, 1996) of malting barley in Middle Europe (Stejskal et al., 2014, 2015). Laboratory culture of S. granarius (CRI- strain No. 26) was reared on whole wheat kernels at 25 (±0.5) °C and 75 (±5) % relative humidity at the Crop Research Institute (CRI), Prague. The rearing diet consisted of whole wheat kernels which were dried and
Description of topological categories of exit holes according their location on malting barley kernel surface
We described and photo-documented six main topological categories that are characterized in terms of their location on malting barley kernel surface. The exit holes are spatially arranged according to two axes of kernel rotation: dorso-ventral direction (Fig. 3; dorsal, ventral, lateral) or apico-basal directions (Fig. 4; apical, basal, subapical). The six basic topological categories of exit holes were characterized/described as follows: (i) Ventral exit hole is located on the crease
Discussion
Larvae of some species of internally developing granivorous storage beetles, including S. granarius, cause large caverns by feeding activity inside the infested seeds. When leaving the kernels as adults they produce round exit holes on the infested grain surface. Most of the research attention is focused on the description or detection of various stages of arthropods (Subramanyam and Hagstrum, 1996) or their fragments (Trematerra et al., 2011). Although the characteristics and extent of seed
Author’s statement
The authors (VS, TV, ZL, RA) contributed equally to conceptualization, writing and editing of the MS. Data were curated by TV and VS.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Ministerstvo zemědělství, Czech Republic VZ RO0418 and the International Chinese – Czech project INTER-ACTION Ministerstvo školství, tělovýchovy a mládeže, Czech Republic No. LTACH19029 (Crop Research Institute: VS, TV, RA) and project No. 2018YFE0108700 (China Agric. University: ZL). We thank Marcela Frankova (CRI) for critical reading of an early version of the manuscript and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
References (53)
- et al.
Determining damage levels in wheat caused by sunn pest (Eurygaster integriceps) using visible and near-infrared spectroscopy
J. Cereal. Sci.
(2019) - et al.
Unbaited probe traps and grain trier: a comparison of the two methods for sampling Coleoptera in stored barley
J. Stored Prod. Res.
(1999) - et al.
Sampling arthropod pests and natural enemies in stored barley
J. Stored Prod. Res.
(2015) - et al.
Insect population dynamics in commercial grain elevators
J. Stored Prod. Res.
(2010) - et al.
How many kilograms of grain per sample unit is big enough? Part I–Comparison of insect detection and density estimation between manual probe sampling and Insector® system
J. Stored Prod. Res.
(2014) - et al.
Image acquisition techniques for assessment of legume quality
Trends Food Sci. Technol.
(2015) - et al.
Novel implementation of laser ablation tomography as an alternative technique to assess grain quality and internal insect development in stored products
J. Stored Prod. Res.
(2020) - et al.
Computer vision and artificial intelligence in precision agriculture for grain crops: a systematic review
Comput. Electron. Agric.
(2018) - et al.
Sitophilus granarius responses to blends of five groups of cereal kernels and one group of plant volatiles
J. Stored Prod. Res.
(2015) - et al.
Overview of present and past and pest-associated risks in stored food and feed products: European perspective
J. Stored Prod. Res.
(2015)
Computer vision technology in agricultural automation—a review
Inf. Process. Agri.
The monitoring of semolina contamination by insect fragments using the light filth method in an Italian mill
Food Contr.
Malting barley: Europe
Detection of chalk in single kernels of long-grain milled rice using imaging and visible/near-infrared instruments
Cereal Chem.
Neural visual detection of grain weevil (Sitophilus granarius L.)
Agriculture
Resonant phenomena and mechanism in vibrated granular systems
Phys. Rev.
Correlation between the infestation level of Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, 1855 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and the quality factors of stored corn, Zea mays L. (Poaceae)
Rev. Bras. Entomol.
Identification of insect damaged wheat kernels using transmittance images
Electron. Lett.
Review and Gap Analysis of Stored Grain Sampling Strategies
Predicting quality changes in stored grain ecosystems: feasibility of integrated quality management by an Expert System
Sampling of grain and seed to estimate the adventitious presence of biotechnology-derived seeds in a lot
Cereal Foods World
Production of UV-light detectable faeces in house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) after consumption of encapsulated fluorescent pigment in monitoring bait
Pest Manag. Sci.
Stored-product Insect Resource
Differential levels of mite infestation of wheat and barley in Czech grain stores
Insect Sci.
The effect of stored barley cultivars, temperature and humidity on population increase of Acarus siro, Lepidoglyphus destructor and Tyrophagus putrescentiae
Exp. Appl. Acarol.
Cited by (8)
Effect of grain excavation damages by Sitophilus granarius on the efficacy of grain protectant insecticides against Cryptolestes ferrugineus and Tribolium castaneum
2022, Journal of Stored Products ResearchCitation Excerpt :The individual kernels were examined under an Olympus SZX10 stereomicroscope. Based on our previous work (Stejskal et al., 2020), we assumed that the positions of the droplets with insecticide on the kernel may affect the insecticide's efficacy. Thus, we sought to determine if the kernel excavation hole was positioned at the top of the kernel, and if so, if it resulted in a droplet entering the hole.
Geospatial detection of Ommatissus lybicus de Bergevin using spatial and machine learning techniques
2022, Remote Sensing Applications: Society and EnvironmentResearch on stored products: A bibliometric analysis of the leading journal of the field for the years 1965–2020
2022, Journal of Stored Products ResearchCitation Excerpt :About 25% of the documents that could not be classified with any of the unique categories were assigned to the group [OTHER]. These were mostly publications that were categorized without a target organism (NON-TARGET) although in some cases the organism was known; for example, the glycemic index on rice after pest infestation (Kumar et al., 2020), or the visual evaluation of insect-damaged kernels (Stejskal et al., 2020). Fig. 9 shows the countries by author and institution.
TP-YOLO: A Lightweight Attention-Based Architecture for Tiny Pest Detection
2023, Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP