Skip to main content
Log in

Beliefs and needs of academic teachers: a latent class analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Statistical Methods & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last few years, academic guidance services of the Italian universities have been increasingly involved in planning and organising training courses for academic teachers to improve the quality of teaching. In such a context, it is important to collect information on the teachers’ opinions about their belief on traditional and innovative approaches to teaching and learning evaluation as well as on their need of support to take effective teaching practices. In this contribution we aim at studying the structure of academic teachers’ population of an Italian university in order to detect groups of teachers that are homogenous in terms of beliefs and needs. As beliefs and needs may be conceptualised in terms of an unobservable (or latent) variable composed of multiple traits related with different aspects of beliefs and needs (e.g., passion for teaching, beliefs about teaching methods, ...), the proposed analysis is based on a multidimensional Latent Class Item Response Theory model. This type of model allows us to classify teachers in latent classes with respect to their beliefs and needs in the academic didactic activities. Moreover, it also allows us to identify specific aspects of teaching with respect to which academic teachers tend to disagree/agree, and to relate beliefs and needs of teachers with their individual characteristics. The study involves a sample of academic teachers coming from the University of Florence (IT) that took part in a survey based on a new questionnaire composed of Likert-type items concerning beliefs and needs on several aspects of teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For further details on this project see http://paduaresearch.cab.unipd.it/7397/.

References

  • Agresti A, Booth JG, Hobert JP, Caffo B (2000) Random-effects modeling of categorical response data. Sociol Methodol 30:27–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacci S, Bartolucci F (2016) Two-tier latent class IRT models in R. R J 8:139–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacci S, Bartolucci F, Gnaldi M (2014) A class of multidimensional latent class IRT models for ordinal polytomous item responses. Commun Stat Theory Methods 43:787–800

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolucci F (2007) A class of multidimensional IRT models for testing unidimensionality and clustering items. Psychometrika 72:141–157

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolucci F, Bacci S (2016) MLCIRTwithin: latent class item response theory (LC-IRT) models under within-item multidimensionality. R package version 2.10. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MLCIRTwithin. Cited 10 January 2019

  • Bartolucci F, Bacci S, Gnaldi M (2015) Statistical analysis if questionnaires: a unified approach based on R and Stata. Chapman & Hall, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bassi F, Grilli L, Paccagnella O, Rampichini C, Varriale R (2017) New insights on students evaluation of teaching in Italy. In: Petrucci A, Verde R (eds) SIS 2017 statistics and data science: new challenges, new generations. Proceedings of the of the conference of the Italian Statistical Society, Florence, 28–30 June 2017. Firenze University Press, Firenze, IT, pp 129–134

  • Bender B (2003) Student-centered learning: a personal journal. Res Bull EDUCAUSE 11:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertaccini B (2015) Il sistema italiano di valutazione della didattica universitaria: analisi critica della normativa vigente. RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione 63:7–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertaccini B, Giusti A, Petrucci A (2019) Students’ opinions on teaching and services provided by the Italian universities: a proposal for a new evaluation scheme. Qual Quant 53:1037–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs J, Tang C (2011) Teaching for quality learning at university. McGraw Hill, Buckingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalla Zuanna G, Clerici R, Paccagnella O, Paggiaro A, Acquario D, Mazzucco C, Martinoia S, Stocco C, Pierobon S (2014) Il questionario per i docenti: costruzione, implementazione, analisis. Technical Report Series No. 1, Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padua, Italy

  • Dayton CM, Macready GB (1988) Concomitant-variable latent-class models. J Am Stat Assoc 83:173–178

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 39:1–38

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • ESG (2015) ESG (2015) Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area. Belgium, Brussels

  • European Commission (2014) High level group on the modernization of higher education. EU Report. https://publications.europa.eu/en/home. Cited 20 September 2019

  • European Network for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA) (2007) European standards and guidelines for internal quality assurance within higher education institutions. Helsinki http://www.enqa.eu/pubs.lasso

  • Felisatti E, Serbati A (2014) Teacher professionalism and didactic innovation: a proposal by the Uuniversity of Padua for the professional development of academic teachers. Form Insegn 12:137–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Felisatti E, Serbati A (2015) Learning for teaching: educational and professional development for university teachers. An innovative project proposed by the University of Padova. Ital J Educ Res 14:323–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Felisatti E, Del Gobbo G, Di Pietro M, Lombardo BM, Perroteau I, Zabalza M, Capogna S (2018) Linee di indirizzo per lo sviluppo professionale del docente e strategie di valutazione della didattica in università. EU Report. https://publications.europa.eu/en/home. Cited 20 September 2019

  • Formann AK (2007) Mixture analysis of multivariate categorical data with covariates and missing entries. Comput Stat Data Anal 51:5236–5246

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein H (2003) Multilevel statistical models. Arnold, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein H, Healy M (1995) The graphical presentation of a collection of means. J R Stat Soc Ser A 158:175–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman LA (1974) Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika 61:215–231

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H (1996) Item response theory: principles and applications. Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ (1991) Fundamentals of item response theory. Sage Press, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey L, Green D (1993) Defining quality. Assess Eval High Educ 18:9–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hénard F, Roseveare D (2012) Fostering quality teaching in higher education: Policies and practises. OECD IMHE Report. https://www.oecd.org/education/imhe/QT%20policies%20and%20practices.pdf. Cited 20 September 2019

  • Lazarsfeld PF, Henry NW (1968) Latent structure analysis. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lokhoff J, Wagewijs B, Durkin K, Wagenaar R, Gonzalez J, Isaacs AK, Donà dalle Rose L, Gobbi M (2010) A tuning guide to formulating degree programme profiles. Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao

  • McLachlan G, Peel D (2000) Finite mixture models. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reckase MD (2009) Multidimensional item response theory. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rost J (1990) Rasch models in latent classes: an integration of two approaches to item analysis. Appl Psychol Meas 14(3):271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samejima F (1969) Estimation of ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph 17

  • Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S (2004) Generalized latent variable modeling. Multilevel, longitudinal and structural equation models. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ (2012) Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Sage Publications Inc., London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Uskov VL, Howlett R, Jain LC (2019) Smart education and e-learning 2019. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Davier M (2008) A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data. Br J Math Stat Psychol 61(2):287–307

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • von Davier M, Rost J (1995) Polytomous mixed Rasch models. In: Fischer GH, Molenaar IW (eds) Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications. Springer, New York, pp 371–379

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden W, Hambleton R (1997) Handbook of modern item response theory. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the University of Florence and to the local referent of the PRODID project, Prof. Giovanna Del Gobbo, for making the data available. The authors also acknowledge the financial support provided by the “Dipartimenti Eccellenti 2018-2022” ministerial funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Bacci.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bacci, S., Bertaccini, B. & Petrucci, A. Beliefs and needs of academic teachers: a latent class analysis. Stat Methods Appl 29, 597–617 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-019-00495-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-019-00495-5

Keywords

Navigation