Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simple Fabrication of Water Harvesting Surfaces Using Three-Dimensional Printing Technology

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A biomimetic surface for water collection was successfully engineered using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. The fused deposition modeling-type 3D printing was used to create a reusable mold. This was used to cast waveform microstructures on a hydrophobic polymer surface, which was induced by using stacked filaments. The etching was performed on the printed mold by using a chemical solvent to generate nano/micro pores, which enhanced the rolling-off motion of water droplets. To create a hydrophilic region on the hydrophobic surface, the metal deposition was achieved using a 3D-printed mask and the self-masking effect of the tilted tips of waveform microstructures. The metal array served as seeding points for the growth of water droplets in foggy conditions. As a result, the fabricated biomimetic surface exhibited the highest water-collecting performance (average 0.77 g for 10 min) compared with the other four different surfaces. This study demonstrates the use of 3D printing technology to rapidly and simply fabricate engineered (hybrid) surfaces for various applications involving facile control of wettability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stratakis, E., Ranella, A., & Fotakis, C. (2011). Biomimetic micro/nanostructured functional surfaces for microfluidic and tissue engineering applications. Biomicrofluidics, 5, 013411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Malshe, A., Rajurkar, K., Samant, A., Hansen, H. N., Bapat, S., & Jiang, W. (2013). Bio-inspired functional surfaces for advanced applications. CIRP Annals, 62, 607–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yao, L., & He, J. (2014). Recent progress in antireflection and self-cleaning technology – from surface engineering to functional surfaces. Progress in Materials Science, 61, 94–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Müller, F., Kunz, C., & Gräf, S. (2016). Bio-inspired functional surfaces based on laser-induced periodic surface structures. Materials, 9, 476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Myint, M. T. Z., Kumar, N. S., Hornyak, G. L., & Dutta, J. (2013). Hydrophobic/hydrophilic switching on zinc oxide micro-textured surface. Applied Surface Science, 264, 344–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagaoka, S., & Akashi, R. (1990). Low-friction hydrophilic surface for medical devices. Biomaterials, 11, 419–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cole, D. J., Payne, M. C., Csányi, G., Mark Spearing, S., Colombi, L., & Ciacchi. (2007). Development of a classical force field for the oxidized Si surface: application to hydrophilic wafer bonding. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 127, 204704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dong, X., Fu, J., Xiong, X., & Chen, C. (2011). Preparation of hydrophilic mesoporous carbon and its application in dye adsorption. Materials Letters, 65, 2486–2488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Somlo, B., & Gupta, V. (2001). A hydrophobic self-assembled monolayer with improved adhesion to aluminum for deicing application. Mechanics of Materials, 33, 471–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, J., Wei, Y., Huang, Z., Wang, F., Yan, X., & Wu, Z. (2017). Electrohydrodynamic behavior of water droplets on a horizontal super hydrophobic surface and its self-cleaning application. Applied Surface Science, 403, 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Min, T., & Kim, J. (2004). Effects of hydrophobic surface on skin-friction drag. Physics of Fluids, 16, L55–L58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barthwal, S., & Lim, S.-H. (2020). Robust and chemically stable superhydrophobic aluminum-alloy surface with enhanced corrosion-resistance properties. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing - Green Technology, 7, 481–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khayet, M., Mengual, J. I., & Matsuura, T. (2005). Porous hydrophobic/hydrophilic composite membranes: application in desalination using direct contact membrane distillation. Journal of Membrane Science, 252, 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kobayashi, T., Shimizu, K., Kaizuma, Y., & Konishi, S. (2011). Novel combination of hydrophilic/hydrophobic surface for large wettability difference and its application to liquid manipulation. Lab on a Chip, 11, 639–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Troitsky, V., Berzina, T., Shchukin, D., Sukhorukov, G., Erokhin, V., & Fontana, M. P. (2004). Simple method of hydrophilic/hydrophobic patterning of solid surfaces and its application to self-assembling of nanoengineered polymeric capsules. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects , 245, 163–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, S. H., Lee, J. H., Park, C. W., Lee, C. Y., Kim, K., Tahk, D., & Kwak, M. K. (2014). Continuous fabrication of bio-inspired water collecting surface via roll-type photolithography. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing - Green Technology, 1, 119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Park, J., & Kim, S. (2019). Three-dimensionally structured flexible fog harvesting surfaces Inspired by Namib Desert Beetles. Micromachines, 10, 201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, A., Moon, M.-W., Lim, H., Kim, W.-D., & Kim, H.-Y. (2012). Water harvest via dewing. Langmuir, 28, 10183–10191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barron, V., Killion, J. A., Pilkington, L., Burke, G., Geever, L. M., Lyons, J. G., et al. (2016). Development of chemically cross-linked hydrophilic–hydrophobic hydrogels for drug delivery applications. European Polymer Journal, 75, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Parker, A. R., & Lawrence, C. R. (2001). Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature, 414, 33–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. White, B., Sarkar, A., & Kietzig, A.-M. (2013). Fog-harvesting inspired by the Stenocara beetle—an analysis of drop collection and removal from biomimetic samples with wetting contrast. Applied Surface Science, 284, 826–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin, K., Du, H., Dong, X., Wang, C., Duan, J.-A., & He, J. (2017). A simple way to achieve bioinspired hybrid wettability surface with micro/nanopatterns for efficient fog collection. Nanoscale, 9, 14620–14626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu, Z., Yun, F. F., Wang, Y., Yao, L., Dou, S., Liu, K., et al. (2017). Desert beetle-inspired superwettable patterned surfaces for water harvesting. Small, 13, 1701403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, L., Wu, J., Hedhili, M. N., Yang, X., & Wang, P. (2015). Inkjet printing for direct micropatterning of a superhydrophobic surface: toward biomimetic fog harvesting surfaces. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 3, 2844–2852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khare, V., Sonkaria, S., Lee, G.-Y., Ahn, S.-H., & Chu, W.-S. (2017). From 3D to 4D printing – design, material and fabrication for multi-functional multi-materials. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing - Green Technology, 4, 291–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sabahi, N., Chen, W., Wang, C.-H., Kruzic, J. J., & Li, X. (2020). A review on additive manufacturing of shape-memory materials for biomedical applications. JOM, 72, 1229–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharma, A., Mondal, S., Mondal, A. K., Baksi, S., Patel, R. K., & Chu, W.-S. (2017). Pandey, 3D printing: It’s microfluidic functions and environmental impacts. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing - Green Technology, 4, 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jasiuk, I., Abueidda, D. W., Kozuch, C., Pang, S., Su, F. Y., & McKittrick, J. (2018). An overview on additive manufacturing of polymers. JOM, 70, 275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kang, B., Hyeon, J., & So, H. (2020). Facile microfabrication of 3-dimensional (3D) hydrophobic polymer surfaces using 3D printing technology. Applied Surface Science, 499, 143733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dudek, P. (2013). FDM 3D printing technology in manufacturing composite elements. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 58, 1415–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bikas, H., Stavropoulos, P., & Chryssolouris, G. (2016). Additive manufacturing methods and modeling approaches: a critical review. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 83, 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kang, B., Sung, J., & So, H. (2019). Realization of superhydrophobic surfaces based on three-dimensional printing technology. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing - Green Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00163-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sato, S., Gondo, D., Wada, T., Kanehashi, S., & Nagai, K. (2013). Effects of various liquid organic solvents on solvent-induced crystallization of amorphous poly(lactic acid) film. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 129, 1607–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lafuma, A., & Quéré, D. (2003). Superhydrophobic states. Nature Materials, 2, 457–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. He, B., Lee, J., & Patankar, N. A. (2004). Contact angle hysteresis on rough hydrophobic surfaces. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 248, 101–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Miwa, M., Nakajima, A., Fujishima, A., Hashimoto, K., & Watanabe, T. (2000). Effects of the surface roughness on sliding angles of water droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir, 16, 5754–5760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mitra, S., Gunda, N. S. K., & Mitra, S. K. (2017). Wetting characteristics of underwater micro-patterned surfaces. RSC Advances, 7, 9064–9072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Extrand, C. W. (2002). Model for contact angles and hysteresis on rough and ultraphobic surfaces. Langmuir, 18, 7991–7999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Koishi, T., Yasuoka, K., Fujikawa, S., & Zeng, X. C. (2011). Measurement of contact-angle hysteresis for droplets on nanopillared surface and in the Cassie and Wenzel states: a molecular dynamics simulation study. ACS Nano, 5, 6834–6842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea under Grant 20192010106680.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, South Korea

    Sanghu Han, Jaebum Sung & Hongyun So

  2. Institute of Nano Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, South Korea

    Hongyun So

Authors
  1. Sanghu Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaebum Sung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hongyun So
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongyun So.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, S., Sung, J. & So, H. Simple Fabrication of Water Harvesting Surfaces Using Three-Dimensional Printing Technology. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. 8, 1449–1459 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-020-00263-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-020-00263-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation