Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive multi-resolution graph-based clustering algorithm for electrofacies analysis

  • Borehole geophysics and Rock properties
  • Published:
Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Logging facies analysis is a significant aspect of reservoir description. In particular, as a commonly used method for logging facies identification, Multi-Resolution Graph-based Clustering (MRGC) can perform depth analysis on multidimensional logging curves to predict logging facies. However, this method is very time-consuming and highly dependent on the initial parameters in the propagation process, which limits the practical application effect of the method. In this paper, an Adaptive Multi-Resolution Graph-based Clustering (AMRGC) is proposed, which is capable of both improving the efficiency of calculation process and achieving a stable propagation result. More specifically, the proposed method, 1) presents a light kernel representative index (LKRI) algorithm which is proved to need less calculation resource than those kernel selection methods in the literature by exclusively considering those “free attractor” points; 2) builds a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) network with back propagation algorithm (BP) so as to avoid the uncertain results brought by uncertain parameter initializations which often happened by only using the K nearest neighbors (KNN) method. Compared with those clustering methods often used in image-based sedimentary phase analysis, such as Self Organizing Map (SOM), Dynamic Clustering (DYN) and Ascendant Hierarchical Clustering (AHC), etc., the AMRGC performs much better without the prior knowledge of data structure. Eventually, the experimental results illustrate that the proposed method also outperformed the original MRGC method on the task of clustering and propagation prediction, with a higher efficiency and stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrar, B., 2011, Integration of log data analysis and facies core to define electrofacies using multi resolution graph-based clustering: Iranlan Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering- International English Edition, 30(3), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diday, E., 1971, Une nouvelle méthode en classification automatique et reconnaissance des formes la méthode des nuées dynamiques: Revue de statistique appliquée, 19(2), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, Y., and Commenges, D. 2006, The Oxford dictionary of statistical terms: Oxford University Press, England, 119–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J., 2009, The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction: Springer Science & Business Media. 467–468.

  • Hinton, G. E., Salakhutdinov, R. 2006, Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks: Science, 313(5786), 504–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshbakht, F., Mohammadnia, M., 2010, Assessment of clustering methods for predicting permeability in a heterogeneous carbonate reservoir: Journal of Petroleum ence & Technology, 2(2), 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, T., 1990, The self-organizing map: Proceedings of the IEEE, 78(9), 1464–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lance, G. N., and Williams, W. T., 1967, A general theory of classificatory sorting strategies Hierarchical systems: Computer Journal, 9(4), 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukasová, A., 1979, Hierarchical agglomerative clustering procedure: Pattern Recognition, 11(5–6), 365–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourot, G. 1993, Contribution au diagnostic des systèmes industriels par reconnaissance des formes (Doctoral dissertation): Doctorat del’Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourot, G., Bousghiri, S., and Ragot, J., 1993, Pattern recognition for diagnosis of technological systems: a review: International Conference on Systems IEEE, 275–281.

  • Nouri-Taleghani, M., Kadkhodaie-llkhchi, A., & Karimi-Khaledi, M., 2015, Determining hydraulic flow units using a hybrid neural network and multi-resolution graph-based clustering method case study from South Pars Gasfield, Iran: Journal of Petroleum Geology, 38(2), 177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pabakhsh, M., Ahmadi, K. and Riahi, M. A., and et al., 2012, Prediction of PEF and LITH logs using MRGC approach: Life Science Journal, 9(4), 974–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. J., Fang, J. H., Karr, C. L., and et al., 1992, Determination of lithology from well logs using a neural network: AAPG Bulletin, 76(5), 731–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, F., 1958, The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain: Psychological Review, 65(6), 386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutadiwirya, Y., Abrar, B., Henardi, D., and et al., 2008, Using MRGC (multi resolution graph-based clustering) method to integrate log data analysis and core facies to define electrofacies, in the Benua Field. In Central Sumatera Basin, Indonesia: International Gas Union Research Conference(IGRC), Paris. Currans Associates, Inc., 733–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H., Meddaugh, W. S., and Toomey, N., 2011, Using an artificial-neural-network method to predict carbonate well log facies successfully: SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 14(01), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Y., Xu, H. Zhang, X. Y., et al., 2016, Multiresolution graph-based clustering analysis for lithofacies identification from well log data: case study of intraplatform bank gas fields, Amu Darya Basin: Applied Geophysics, 13(4), 598–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Y., Zhang, X. Y., Zhu, G. W., et al., Controlling effects of paleogeomorphology on intraplatform shoal reservoirs distribution and gas reservoirs characteristics: Taking intraplatform shoal gasfields of the Amu Darya basin as examples: Natural Gas Geoscience, 27(2), 320–329.

  • Ye, S. J., and Rabiller, P., 2000, A new tool for electro-facies analysis: multi-resolution graph-based clustering: SPWLA 41st Annual Logging Symposium, Dallas, Texas, USA, Jun 4–7.

  • Zhu, X. J., and Ghahramani, Z. B., 2002, Learning from labeled and unlabeled data with label propagation: Carnegie Mellon University CALD tech report CMU-CALD-02-107.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua-Feng Wang.

Additional information

This work was sponsored by the Science and Technology Project of CNPC (No. 2018D-5010-16 and 2019D- 3808)

Wu Hongliang, senior engineer, received a Ph.D in Earth exploration and information technology from Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development in 2013. He is currently an enterprise expert of China Petroleum Exploration and Development Research Institute, devoted to the research on well logging processing and interpretation methods. Email: wuhongliang@petrochina.com.cn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, H., Wang, C., Feng, Z. et al. Adaptive multi-resolution graph-based clustering algorithm for electrofacies analysis. Appl. Geophys. 17, 13–25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-020-0806-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-020-0806-x

Keywords

Navigation