Abstract
Ants are central-place foragers: they always return to the nest, and this requires the ability to remember relationships between features of the environment, or an individual’s path through the landscape. The distribution of these cognitive responsibilities within a colony depends on a species’ foraging style. Solitary foraging as well as leader-scouting, which is based on information transmission about a distant targets from scouts to foragers, can be considered the most challenging tasks in the context of ants’ spatial cognition. Solitary foraging is found in species of almost all subfamilies of ants, whereas leader-scouting has been discovered as yet only in the Formica rufa group of species (red wood ants). Solitary foraging and leader-scouting ant species, although enormously different in their levels of sociality and ecological specificities, have many common traits of individual cognitive navigation, such as the primary use of visual navigation, excellent visual landmark memories, and the subordinate role of odour orientation. In leader-scouting species, spatial cognition and the ability to transfer information about a distant target dramatically differ among scouts and foragers, suggesting individual cognitive specialization. I suggest that the leader-scouting style of recruitment is closely connected with the ecological niche of a defined group of species, in particular, their searching patterns within the tree crown. There is much work to be done to understand what cognitive mechanisms underpin route planning and communication about locations in ants.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alma AM, Farji-Brener AG, Elizalde L (2017) A breath of fresh air in foraging theory: the importance of wind for food size selection in a central-place forager. Am Nat 190(3):410–419. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n0g90
Arnan X, Gaucherel C, Andersen AN (2011) Dominance and species co-occurrence in highly diverse ant communities: a test of the interstitial hypothesis and discovery of a three-tiered competition cascade. Oecologia 166(3):783–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-1919-y
Atsarkina N, Iakovlev I, Reznikova Zh (2014) Individual behavioural features of scouts and recruits in red wood ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Euroas Entomol J 13(3):209–218
Atsarkina NV, Panteleeva SN, Reznikova ZhI (2017) Myrmica rubra ants are more communicative when young: do they need experience? J Comp Psychol 131(2):163–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000067
Bailey KH, Polis GA (1987) Optimal and central-place foraging theory applied to a desert harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus. Oecologia 72:440–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377577
Barron AB, Plath JA (2017) The evolution of honey bee dance communication: a mechanistic perspective. J Exp Biol 220(23):4339–4346. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.142778
Becker L (1958) Untersuchungen über das Heimfindevermögen der Bienen. Zur Vergleich Physiol 41(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00340239
Beckers R, Goss S, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1989) Colony size, communication and ant foraging strategy. Psyche AJ Entomol 96(3–4):239–256. https://doi.org/10.1155/1989/94279
Beugnon G, Chagné P, Dejean A (2001) Colony structure and foraging behavior in the tropical formicine ant, Gigantiops destructor. Insect Soc 48(4):347–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001788
Beugnon G, Lachaud JP, Chagné P (2005) Use of long-term stored vector information in the neotropical ant Gigantiops destructor. J Insect Behav 18(3):415–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-005-3700-8
Bolton B (2016) Bolton world catalog ants. AntWeb: ants of Bolton world catalog. https://www.antweb.org/project.do?name=worldants. Accessed 4 Dec 2019
Bonser ROB, Wright PJ, Bament S, Chukwu UO (1998) Optimal patch use by foraging workers of Lasius fuliginosus, L. niger and Myrmica ruginodis. Ecol Entomol 23(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998.00103.x
Brown MJ, Gordon DM (2000) How resources and encounters affect the distribution of foraging activity in a seed-harvesting ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47(3):195–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050011
Buehlmann C, Graham P, Hansson BS, Knaden M (2014) Desert ants locate food by combining high sensitivity to food odors with extensive crosswind runs. Curr Biol 24(9):960–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.02.056
Buehlmann C, Fernandes ASD, Graham P (2018) The interaction of path integration and terrestrial visual cues in navigating desert ants: what can we learn from path characteristics? J Exp Biol 221(1):jeb167304. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.167304
Buehlmann C, Mangan M, Graham P (2020) Multimodal interactions in insect navigation. Anim Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01383-2
Buschinger A (1986) Evolution of social parasitism in ants. Trend Ecol Evol 1(6):155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(86)90044-3
Buschinger A (2009) Social parasitism among ants: a review (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 12(3):219–235
Chagné P, Beugnon G (2001) Familiar routes and spatial memory in the tropical ant Gigantiops destructor. In: Proceedings Meeting European Sections IUSSI. Berlin, p. 63
Charbonneau D, Sasaki T, Dornhaus A (2017) Who needs ‘lazy’ workers? Inactive workers act as a “reserve” labor force replacing active workers, but inactive workers are not replaced when they are removed. PLoS ONE 12(9):e0184074. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184074
Cheng K (1986) A purely geometric module in the rats spatial representation. Cognition 23(2):149–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(86)90041-7
Cherix D (1980) Note preliminaire sur la structure, la phenologie et le regime alimentaire d’une super-colonie de Formica lugubris. Insect Soc 27(3):226–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02223666
Cheung A, Hiby L, Narendra A (2012) Ant navigation: fractional use of the home vector. PLoS ONE 7(11):e50451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050451
Chittka L (2017) Bee cognition. Curr Biol 27(19):1049–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.008
Cerdá X, Angulo E, Boulay R, Lenoir A (2009) Individual and collective foraging decisions: a field study of worker recruitment in the gypsy ant Aphaenogaster senilis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63(4):51–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0690-5
Collett M (2012) How navigational guidance systems are combined in a desert ant. Curr Biol 22(10):927–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.049
Collett M, Collett TS (2009) The learning and maintenance of local vectors in desert ant navigation. J Exp Biol 212(7):895–900. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.024521
Collett M, Collett TS, Bisch S, Wehner R (1998) Local and global vectors in desert ant navigation. Nature 394(6690):269–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/28378
Collett M, Collett TS, Chameron S, Wehner R (2003) Do familiar landmarks reset the global path integration system of desert ants? J Exp Biol 206(5):877–882. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00176
Collett TS, Graham P, Harris RA (2007) Novel landmark-guided routes in ants. J Exp Biol 210(12):2025–2032. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.000315
Collett M, Chittka L, Collett TS (2013) Spatial memory in insect navigation. Curr Biol 23(17):789–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.020
Collignon B, Valdivieso LEC, Detrain C (2014) Group recruitment in ants: who is willing to lead? Behav Proc 108:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.033
Detrain C, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1999) Information processing in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7
Dlussky GM (1967) Ants of the genus Formica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Biology, practical importance and use, keys for the species founded in USSR (in Russian). Nauka, Moscow.
Dobrzanska J (1958) Partition of foraging grounds and modes of conveying information among ants. Acta Biol Exp 18:55–67
Dornhaus A, Holley JA, Pook VG, Worswick G, Franks NR (2008) Why do not all workers work? Colony size and workload during emigrations in the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63(1):43–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0634-0
Durier V, Graham P, Collett TS (2003) Snapshot memories and landmark guidance in wood ants. Curr Biol 13(18):1614–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.08.024
Dyer FC (2002) The biology of the dance language. Annu Rev Entomol 47(1):917–949. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145306
Ellis S, Robinson EJH (2014) Polydomy in red wood ants. Insect Soc 61(2):111–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-013-0337-z
Fernandes ASD, Philippides A, Collett TS, Niven JE (2015) Acquisition and expression of memories of distance and direction in navigating wood ants. J Exp Biol 218(22):3580–3588. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.125443
Fleischmann PN, Christian M, Müller VL, Rössler W, Wehner R (2016) Ontogeny of learning walks and the acquisition of landmark information in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J Exp Biol 219(19):3137–3145. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.140459
Fleischmann PN, Grob R, Müller VL, Wehner R, Rössler W (2018) The geomagnetic field is a compass cue in Cataglyphis ant navigation. Curr Biol 28(9):1440–1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.043
Fortelius W, Rosengren R, Cherix D, Chautems D (1993) Queen recruitment in a highly polygynous supercolony of Formica lugubris (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Oikos 67(2):193–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545463
Fourcassie V, Beugnon G (1988) How do red wood ants orient when foraging in a three dimensional system? I Laboratory experiments. Insect Soc 35(1):92–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224142
Franklin EL, Robinson EJ, Marshall JA, Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (2012) Do ants need to be old and experienced to teach? J Exp Biol 215(8):1287–1292. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.064618
Frasnelli E, Iakovlev I, Reznikova Z (2012) Asymmetry in antennal contacts during trophallaxis in ants. Behav Br Res 232(1):7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.03.014
Freas CA, Cheng K (2019) Panorama similarity and navigational knowledge in the nocturnal bull ant Myrmecia midas. J Exp Biol 222(11):jeb193201. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.193201
Freas CA, Narendra A, Cheng K (2017a) Compass cues used by a nocturnal bull ant, Myrmecia midas. J Exp Biol 220(9):1578–1585. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.152967
Freas CA, Narendra A, Lemesle C, Cheng K (2017b) Polarized light use in the nocturnal bull ant, Myrmecia midas. R Soc Open Sci 4(8):170598. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170598
Freas CA, Schultheiss P (2018) How to navigate in different environments and situations: lessons from ants. Front Psychol 9:841. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00841
Fukushi T (2001) Homing in wood ants, Formica japonica: use of the skyline panorama. J Exp Biol 204(12):2063–2072
Fukushi T, Wehner R (2004) Navigation in wood ants Formica japonica: context dependent use of landmarks. J Exp Biol 207(19):3431–3439. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01159
Geva-Sagiv M, Las L, Yovel Y, Ulanovsky N (2015) Spatial cognition in bats and rats: from sensory acquisition to multiscale maps and navigation. Nat Rev Neurosci 16(2):94–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3888
Gibb H, Andersson J, Johansson T (2016) Foraging loads of red wood ants: Formica aquilonia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in relation to tree characteristics and stand age. PeerJ 4:e2049. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2049
Giraldeau LA, Kramer DL (1982) The marginal value theorem: a quantitative test using load size variation in a central place forager, the eastern chipmunk, Tamias striatus. Anim Behav 30(4):1036–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(82)80193-0
Giurfa M (2015) Learning and cognition in insects. Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 6(4):383–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1348
Graham P, Collett TS (2002) View-based navigation in insects: how wood ants (Formica rufa L.) look at and are guided by extended landmarks. J Exp Biol 205(16):2499–2509
Graham P, Collett TS (2006) Bi-directional route learning in wood ants. J Exp Biol 209(18):3677–3684. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02414
Graham P, Mangan M (2015) Insect navigation: do ants live in the now? J Exp Biol 218(6):819–823. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.065409
Grob R, Fleischmann PN, Rössler W (2019) Learning to navigate—how desert ants calibrate their compass systems. Neuroforum 25(2):109–120. https://doi.org/10.1515/nf-2018-0011
Gronenberg W, Hölldobler B (1999) Morphologic representation of visual and antennal information in the ant brain. J Comp Neurol 412(2):229–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990920)412:2<229:AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-E
Grüter C, Czaczkes TJ, Ratnieks FL (2011) Decision making in ant foragers (Lasius niger) facing conflicting private and social information. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65(2):141–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1020-2
Harkness RD, Maroudas NG (1985) Central place foraging by an ant (Cataglyphis bicolor Fab.): a model of searching. Anim Behav 33(3):916–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80026-9
Harris RA, de Ibarra NH, Graham P, Collett TS (2005) Ant navigation: priming of visual route memories. Nature 438(7066):302. https://doi.org/10.1038/438302a
Harrison JF, Fewell JH, Stiller TM, Breed MD (1989) Effects of experience on use of orientation cues in the giant tropical ant. Anim Behav 37(5):869–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(89)90076-6
Heinze J (2008) The demise of the standard ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrm News 11:9–20
Heinze S, Narendra A, Cheung A (2018) Principles of insect path integration. Curr Biol 28(17):1043–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.058
Higashi S (1983) Polygyny and nuptial flight of Formica (Formica) yessensis Forel at Ishikari Coast, Hokkaido, Japan. Insect Soc 30(3):287–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02223986
Hölldobler B (1971) Recruitment behavior in Camponotus socius (Hym. Fromicidae). Z Vergl Physiol 75(2):123–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00335259
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1992.5010169.x
Iakovlev I, Reznikova Z (2019) Red wood ants display natural aversive learning differently depending on their task specialization. Front Psychol 10:710. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00710
Iakovlev IK, Novgorodova TA, Tiunov AV, Reznikova ZI (2017) Trophic position and seasonal changes in the diet of the red wood ant Formica aquilonia as indicated by stable isotope analysis. Ecol Entomol 42(3):263–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12384
Jackson DE, Ratnieks FL (2006) Communication in ants. Curr Biol 16(15):570–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.015
Jayatilaka P, Murray T, Narendra A, Zeil J (2018) The choreography of learning walks in the Australian jack jumper ant Myrmecia croslandi. J Exp Biol 221(20):1jeb85306. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.185306
Judd SPD, Collett TS (1998) Multiple stored views and landmark guidance in ants. Nature 392(6677):710–714. https://doi.org/10.1038/33681
Lanan M (2014) Spatiotemporal resource distribution and foraging strategies of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrm News 20:53–70
Kacelnik A, Houston AI, Schmid-Hempel P (1986) Central-place foraging in honey bees: the effect of travel time and nectar flow on crop filling. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19(1):19–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303838
Kaczmarek W (1953) Badania nad zespołami mrówek leśnych. Ekol Polska 1(2):69–96
Kaspari M (1991) Central place foraging in grasshopper sparrows: opportunism or optimal foraging in a variable environment? Oikos 60(3):307–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545072
Knaden M, Graham P (2016) The sensory ecology of ant navigation: from natural environments to neural mechanisms. Annu Rev Entomol 61:63–76. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023703
Knaden M, Wehner R (2005) Nest mark orientation in desert ants Cataglyphis: what does it do to the path integrator? Anim Behav 70(6):1349–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.03.030
Kohler M, Wehner R (2005) Idiosyncratic route-based memories in desert ants, Melophorus bagoti: how do they interact with path-integration vectors? Neurobiol Learn Mem 83(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2004.05.011
Kolmogorov AN (1965) Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information. Probl Inf Transm 1(1):3–11
Landgraf T, Rojas R, Nguyen H, Kriegel F, Stettin K (2011) Analysis of the waggle dance motion of honeybees for the design of a biomimetic honeybee robot. PLoS ONE 6(8):e21354. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021354
Leonhardt SD, Menzel F, Nehring V, Schmitt T (2016) Ecology and evolution of communication in social insects. Cell 164(6):1277–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.035
Lehrer M (1993) Why do bees turn back and look? J Comp Physiol A 172(5):549–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00213678
Lenoir A (1982) An informational analysis of antennal communication during trophallaxis in the ant Myrmica rubra L. Behav Proc 7:27–35
Lima LD, Antonialli-Junior WF (2013) Foraging strategies of the ant Ectatomma vizottoi (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Rev Bras Entomol 57(4):392–396. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262013005000038
Macquart D, Garnier L, Combe M, Beugnon G (2006) Ant navigation en route to the goal: signature routes facilitate way-finding of Gigantiops destructor. J Comp Physiol A 192(3):221–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-005-0064-7
Mailleux AC, Buffin A, Detrain C, Deneubourg JL (2011) Recruitment in starved nests: the role of direct and indirect interactions between scouts and nestmates in the ant Lasius niger. Insect Soc 58(4):559–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-011-0177-7
Mangan M, Webb B (2012) Spontaneous formation of multiple routes in individual desert ants (Cataglyphis velox). Behav Ecol 23(5):944–954. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars051
Mc Cabe S, Farina WM, Josens RB (2006) Antennation of nectar-receivers encodes colony needs and food-source profitability in the ant Camponotus mus. Insect Soc 53(3):356–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-006-0881-x
Mellgren RL, Misasi L, Brown SW (1984) Optimal foraging theory: prey density and travel requirements in Rattus norvegicus. J Comp Psychol 98(2):142–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.98.2.142
Menzel EW (1973) Chimpanzee spatial memory organization. Science 182(4115):943–945. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.182.4115.943
Menzel CR, Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Menzel EW (2002) Bonobo (Pan paniscus) spatial memory and communication in a 20-hectare forest. Int J Primatol 23(3):601–619. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014925802015
Mercier JL, Lenoir A (1999) Individual flexibility and choice of foraging strategy in Polyrhachis laboriosa F. Smith (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect Soc 46(3):267–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s000400050145
Merkle T, Wehner R (2009) Repeated training does not improve the path integrator in desert ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63(3):391–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0673-6
Michelsen A, Andersen BB, Storm J, Kirchner WH, Lindauer M (1992) How honeybees perceive communication dances, studied by means of a mechanical model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30(3–4):143–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166696
Müller M, Wehner R (2010) Path integration provides a scaffold for landmark learning in desert ants. Curr Biol 20(15):1368–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.035
Narendra A, Ramirez-Esquivel F (2017) Subtle changes in the landmark panorama disrupt visual navigation in a nocturnal bull ant. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 372(1717):20160068. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0068
Narendra A, Si A, Sulikowski D, Cheng K (2007) Learning, retention and coding of nest-associated visual cues by the Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61(10):1543–1553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0386-2
Narendra A, Reid SF, Raderschall CA (2013a) Navigational efficiency of nocturnal Myrmecia ants suffers at low light levels. PLoS ONE 8(3):e58801. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058801
Narendra A, Gourmaud S, Zeil J (2013b) Mapping the navigational knowledge of individually foraging ants, Myrmecia croslandi. Proc Biol Sci 280(1765):20130683. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.0683
Nicholson DJ, Judd SP, Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1999) Learning walks and landmark guidance in wood ants (Formica rufa). J Exp Biol 202(13):1831–1838
Novgorodova TA (2006) Experimental investigation of information transmission in Formica pratensis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) using “binary tree” maze. Entomol Rev 86(3):287–293. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873806030043
Oberhauser FB, Schlemm A, Wendt S, Czaczkes TJ (2019) Private information conflict: Lasius niger ants prefer olfactory cues to route memory. Anim Cogn 22(3):355–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01248-3
Orians GH, Pearson NE (1979) On the theory of central place foraging. In: Horn DJ, Stairs GR, Mitchell DR (eds) Analysis of ecological systems. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, pp 155–177
Palmer TM (2003) Spatial habitat heterogeneity influences competition and coexistence in an African acacia ant guild. Ecology 84(11):2843–2855. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0528
Pasquier G, Grüter C (2016) Individual learning performance and exploratory activity are linked to colony foraging success in a mass-recruiting ant. Behav Ecol 27(6):1702–1709. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw079
Pinter-Wollman N, Hubler J, Holley JA, Franks NR, Dornhaus A (2012) How is activity distributed among and within tasks in Temnothorax ants? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66(10):1407–1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1396-2
Piqueret B, Sandoz JC, d'Ettorre P (2019) Ants learn fast and do not forget: associative olfactory learning, memory and extinction in Formica fusca. R Soc Open Sci 6(6):190778. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190778
Pfeffer SE, Bolek S, Wolf H, Wittlinger M (2015) Nest and food search behaviour in desert ants, cataglyphis: a critical comparison. Anim Cogn 18(4):885–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0858-0
Popp S, Buckham-Bonnett P, Evison SE, Robinson EJH, Czaczkes TJ (2018) No evidence for tactile communication of direction in foraging Lasius ants. Insect Soc 65(1):37–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-017-0583-6
Quque M, Bles O, Bénard A, Héraud A et al (2020) Hierarchical networks of food exchange in the black garden ant Lasius niger. Insect Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12792
Reeves DD, Moreau CS (2019) The evolution of foraging behavior in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Arthropod Syst Phylo 77(2):351–363. https://doi.org/10.26049/ASP77-2-2019-10
Reid SF, Narendra A, Hemmi JM, Zeil J (2011) Polarised skylight and the landmark panorama provide night active bull ants with compass information during route following. J Exp Biol 214:363–370. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.049338
Reznikova Z (1975) Non-antagonistic relationships of ants occupying similar ecological niches. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 54(7):1020–1031 (in Russian with English summary)
Reznikova Z (1979) Different forms of territoriality in ants Formica pratensis Retz. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 58:1490–1499 (in Russian with English summary)
Reznikova Z (1980) Interspecies hierarchy in ants. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 59:1168–1176 (in Russian with English summary)
Reznikova J(Z) (1982) Interspecific communication among ants. Behaviour 80(1–2):84–95. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853982X00454
Reznikova Z (1983) Interspecies relations in ants (in Russian). Nauka, Novosibirsk
Reznikova Z (1999) Ethological mechanisms of population density control in coadaptive complexes of ants. Russ J Ecol 30(3):187–192
Reznikova Z (2003) A new form of interspecies relations in ants: hypothesis of interspecies social control. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 82:816–824 (in Russian with English summary)
Reznikova Z (2007a) Animal intelligence: from individual to social cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.04.004
Reznikova Z (2007b) Dialog with black box: using Information Theory to study animal language behaviour. Acta Ethol 10(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-007-0026-x
Reznikova Z (2008) Experimental paradigms for studying cognition and communication in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrm News 11:201–214
Reznikova Z (2017) Studying animal language without translation: an insight from ants. Springer Nature, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44918-0
Reznikova Z (2018) Ants. Individual and social cognition. In: Bueno-Guerra N, Amici F (eds) Field and laboratory methods in animal cognition: a comparative guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 8–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333191.003
Reznikova Z, Ryabko B (1994) Experimental study of the ants communication system with the application of the Information Theory approach. Mem Zool 48:219–236
Reznikova Z, Novgorodova T (1998) The importance of individual and social experience for interaction between ants and symbiotic aphids. Dokl Biol Sci 359(1):173–175
Reznikova Z, Ryabko B (2000) Using Information Theory approach to study the communication system and numerical competence in ants. In: Meyer JA, Berthoz A, Floreano D, Roitblat H, Wilson SW (eds) From animals to animats 6: Proceeding of the sixth international conference on simulation of adaptive behaviour. The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA), pp 501–506
Reznikova Z, Ryabko B (2011) Numerical competence in animals, with an insight from ants. Behaviour 148(4):405–434. https://doi.org/10.1163/000579511X568562
Riabinina O, de Ibarra NH, Howard L, Collett TS (2011) Do wood ants learn sequences of visual stimuli? J Exp Biol 214(16):2739–2748. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.058537
Riley JR, Greggers U, Smith AD, Reynolds DR, Menzel R (2005) The flight paths of honeybees recruited by the waggle dance. Nature 435(7039):205–207. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03526
Roces F (1990) Leaf-cutting ants cut fragment sizes in relation to the distance from the nest. Anim Behav 40(6):1181–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80185-X
Romiguier J, Rolland J, Morandin C, Keller L (2018) Phylogenomics of palearctic Formica species suggests a single origin of temporary parasitism and gives insights to the evolutionary pathway toward slave-making behaviour. BMC Evol Biol 18(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1159-4
Ronacher B (2008) Path integration as the basic navigation mechanism of the desert ant Cataglyphis fortis (Forel, 1902) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrm News 11:53–62
Rosengren R (1971) Route fidelity, visual memory and recruitment behaviour in foraging wood ants of genus Formica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Acta Zool Fenn 133:1–106
Rosengren R (1977) Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group) I. Age polyethism and topographic traditions. Acta Zool Fenn 149:2–30
Rosengren R (1985) Internest relations in polydomous Formica colonies (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Mitteilungen der deutschen Gesellschaft für allgemeine und angewandte Entomologie 4:288–291
Rosengren R, Fortelius W (1986) Ortstreue in foraging ants of the Formica rufa group—-hierarchy of orienting cues and long-term memory. Insect Soc 33(3):306–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224248
Rosengren R, Fortelius W (1987) Trail communication and directional recruitment to food in red wood ants (Formica). Annales Zoologici Fennici. University of Helsinki, Helsinki pp 137–146.
Rössler W (2019) Neuroplasticity in desert ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)—importance for the ontogeny of navigation. Myrm News 29:1–20
Ryabko B, Reznikova Z (1996) Using Shannon Entropy and Kolmogorov complexity to study the communicative system and cognitive capacities in ants. Complexity 2(2):37–42
Ryabko B, Reznikova Z (2009) The use of ideas of information theory for studying “language” and intelligence in ants. Entropy 11(4):836–853. https://doi.org/10.3390/e11040836
Saar M, Gilad T, Kilon-Kallner T, Rosenfeld A, Subach A, Scharf I (2017) The interplay between maze complexity, colony size, learning and memory in ants while solving a maze: a test at the colony level. PLoS ONE 12(8):e0183753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183753
Salo O, Rosengren R (2001) Memory of location and site recognition in the ant Formica uralensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ethology 107(8):737–752. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00702.x
Sanders NJ, Gordon DM (2003) Resource dependent interactions and the organization of desert ant communities. Ecology 84(4):1024–1031. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1024:RIATOO]2.0.CO;2
Santschi F (1913) Comment s’orientent les fourmis. Rev Suisse Zool 21:347–425
Savolainen R, Vepsäläinen K (1988) A competition hierarchy among boreal ants: impact on resource partitioning and community structure. Oikos 51(2):135–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565636
Schatz B, Lachaud JP, Beugnon G (1997) Graded recruitment and hunting strategies linked to prey weight and size in the ponerine ant Ectatomma ruidum. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40(6):337–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050350
Schmid-Hempel P (1984) Individually different foraging methods in the desert ant Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14(4):263–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299497
Schneirla TC (1933) Motivation and efficiency in ant learning. J Comp Psychol 15(2):243–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0072289
Schultheiss P, Raderschall CA, Narendra A (2015) Follower ants in a tandem pair are not always naïve. Sci Rep 5:10747. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10747
Schwarz S, Mangan M, Zeil J, Webb B, Wystrach A (2017) How ants use vision when homing backward. Curr Biol 27(3):401–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.019
Seeley TD (2009) The wisdom of the hive: the social physiology of honey bee colonies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA)
Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Sys Tech J 27(3):379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Stadler B, Dixon AF (2005) Ecology and evolution of aphid–ant interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:345–372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175531
Steck K, Knaden M, Hansson BS (2010) Do desert ants smell the scenery in stereo? Anim Behav 79(4):939–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.011
Stüger R (1931) Uber das Mitteilungsvermgen der Waldameise beim Auffinden und Transport eines Beutesttickes. Z Wiss Ins 26:125–137
Stürzl W, Mair E, Grixa I, Narendra A, Zeil J (2015) Three-dimensional models of natural environments and the mapping of navigational information. J Comp Physiol A 201(6):563–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-015-1002-y
Tautz J (2008) The buzz about bees: biology of a superorganism. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78729-7
Tinbergen N, Kruyt W (1938) On the orientation of the digger wasp, philanthus triangulum fabr, III. Selective learning of landmarks. The animal in its world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 146–196
Véle A, Modlinger R (2016) Foraging strategy and food preference of Formica polyctena ants in different habitats and possibilities for their use in forest protection. Lesn Cas For J 62(4):223–228. https://doi.org/10.1515/forj-2016-0026
Vollbehr J (1975) Zur Orientierung junger Honigbienen bei ihrem I. Orientierungsflug Zool Jb Physiol 79(1–2):33–69
von Frisch K (1923) Über die Spräche der Bienen. Zool Jahrb Abt allg Zool Physiol Tiere 40:1–119
von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Wasmann E (1899) Die psychischen Fähigkeiten der Ameisen. Zoologica 26(2):1–133
Wehner R (2003) Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks. J Comp Physiol A 189(8):579–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-003-0431-1
Wehner R (2009) The architecture of the desert ant’s navigational toolkit (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). MyrmNews 12:85–96
Wehner R, Srinivasan MV (2003) Path integration in insects. In: Jeffery KJ (ed) The neurobiology of spatial behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198515241.003.0001
Wehner R, Rössler W (2013) Bounded plasticity in the desert ant’s navigational tool kit. In: Menzel R, Benjamin (eds) Handbook of behavioral neuroscience invertebrate learning and memory, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 514–529
Wehner R, Michel B, Antonsen P (1996) Visual navigation in insects: coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. J Exp Biol 199(1):129–140
Wehner R, Meier C, Zollikofer C (2004) The ontogeny of foraging behaviour in desert ants, Cataglyphis bicolor. Ecol Entomol 29(2):240–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00591.x
Wehner R, Boyer M, Loertscher F, Sommer S, Menzi U (2006) Ant navigation: one-way routes rather than maps. Curr Biol 16(1):75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.035
Wehner R, Cheng K, Cruse H (2014) Visual navigation strategies in insects: Lessons from desert ants. In: Werner JS, Chalupa LM (eds) The new visual neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1153–1163
Wilson EO (1959) Communication by tandem running in the ant genus Cardiocondyla. Psyche 66(3):29–34. https://doi.org/10.1155/1959/29093
Wolf H, Wehner R (2000) Pinpointing food sources: olfactory and anemotactic orientation in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J Exp Biol 203(5):857–868
Wolf H, Wittlinger M, Pfeffer SE (2018) Two distance memories in desert ants—modes of interaction. PLoS ONE 13(10):e0204664. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204664
Wright PJ, Bonser R, Chukwu UO (2000) The size-distance relationship in the wood ant Formica rufa. Ecol Entomol 25(2):226–233. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.2000.00253.x
Wystrach A, Graham P (2012) What can we learn from studies of insect navigation? Anim Behav 84(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.017
Wystrach A, Cheng K, Sosa S, Beugnon G (2011) Geometry, features, and panoramic views: ants in rectangular arenas. J Exp Psychol 37(4):420–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023886
Wystrach A, Beugnon G, Cheng K (2012) Ants might use different view-matching strategies on and off the route. J Exp Biol 215(1):44–55. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.059584
Zeil J, Fleischmann PN (2019) The learning walks of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrm News 29:93–110. https://doi.org/10.25849/myrmecol.news_029:093
Zeil J, Hofmann MI, Chahl JS (2003) Catchment areas of panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes. J Opt Soc Am A 20(3):450–469. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.20.000450
Zhang SW, Lehrer M, Srinivasan MV (1999) Honeybee memory: navigation by associative grouping and recall of visual stimuli. Neurobiol Learn Mem 72(3):180–201. https://doi.org/10.1006/nlme.1998.3901
Ziegler PE, Wehner R (1997) Time-courses of memory decay in vector-based and landmark-based systems of navigation in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J Comp Physiol 181(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590050088
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Daniil Ryabko for the helpful discussion and useful comments. I appreciate the efforts and valuable comments of the editors and two anonymous reviewers that helped me to improve the manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded by Russian Fund for Basic Research (No. 20-04-00072) and by The Federal Fundamental Scientific Research Program for 2013–2021 No. VI.51.1.10. (AAAA-A16-116121410120-0) (Grant No. 0-109-2018-0074).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 1117 kb)
Supplementary file2 (MPG 9170 kb)
Supplementary file3 (MPG 2523 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reznikova, Z. Spatial cognition in the context of foraging styles and information transfer in ants. Anim Cogn 23, 1143–1159 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01423-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01423-x