Abstract
Four expressions involving sums of position and velocity coordinates bounding the total angular momentum of particle systems, and by extension of any continuous or discontinuous material systems, are derived which are tighter for any particle configuration than similar inequalities derived by Sundman (Acta Math 36:105, 1913), Saari (Conference board of the mathematical sciences, No. 104, 2005. http://books.google.ch/books?id=uNXgf2X1GeYC) and Scheeres (Celest Mech Dyn Astron 113:291–320, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-012-9416-0). Eight distinct inequalities can thus be ordered according to their tightness to angular momentum.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The double sum has been eliminated using Lagrange’s identity.
References
Binney, J., Tremaine, S.: Galactic Dynamics, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)
Chandrasekhar, S.: Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium. Dover, New York (1987)
Diacu, F.N.: An extension of Sundman inequality. Top. Astrophys. Astron. Space Sci. 3, 67–70 (1987)
Ge, Y.C., Leng, X.: Effective potential, Hill-type stability and Sundman’s inequality. Planet. Space Sci. 42, 231–237 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(94)90086-8
Goldstein, H.: Classical Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1971)
Hill, R.: Principles of Dynamics. Macmillan, London (1964)
Jacobi, C., Borchardt, C., Clebsch, A.: Vorlesungen über Dynamik. G. Reimer, Almonte (1866)
Muller, J.M.: Sundman’s inequality and zero velocity hypersurfaces in the general N-body problem. Astron. Astrophys. 155, L1 (1986)
Ossipkov, L.P.: Upper limit on the angular momentum of galaxies. I. Astrophysics 42, 451 (1999)
Ossipkov, L.P.: Upper limit on the angular momentum of galaxies. II. Astrophysics 43, 40 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02683946
Pfenniger, D.: Mixing transformations of N particles conserving almost all classical integrals. In: Gurzadyan, V.G., Pfenniger, D. (eds.) Ergodic Concepts in Stellar Dynamics, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 430, p. 111. Springer, Berlin (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0058097
Poincaré, H.: Mémoires et observations. Sur l’équilibre d’une masse fluide animée d’un mouvement de rotation. Bull. Astron. Ser. I 2, 109–118 (1885)
Quilghini, D.: Sul problema generale dell’equilibrio spoataneo di una massa fluida gravitante e ruotante. Anali di Mat. Pura ed Appl. 48, 281–303 (1959)
Saari, D.: Collisions, rings, and other Newtonian N-body problems. In: Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, No. 104 (2005)
Scheeres, D.J.: Minimum energy configurations in the N-body problem and the celestial mechanics of granular systems. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 113, 291–320 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-012-9416-0
Sundman, K.: Mémoire sur le problème des trois corps. Acta Math. 36, 105 (1913)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares he has no conflict of interest for publishing this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the topical collection on 50 years of Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
Guest Editors: Editorial Committee.
Appendices
Appendix I: Hill’s inequations
In Hill’s book (1964, pp. 29–30) is proved an important double inequation that we display here in more current notations. For any pair of real three-vector sets \(\{\mathbf {a}_i\}\) and \(\{\mathbf {b}_i\}\), \(i=1\ldots N\), then
The demonstration uses the vector relations
where \(\theta \) is the angle between the vectors \( {\mathbf {a}}\) and \( {\mathbf {b}}\), and a, b are the lengths of \( {\mathbf {a}}\) and \( {\mathbf {b}}\).
Thus, subtracting the right side from the left side in Eq. (52), expanding the squared sums in double sums and using the trigonometric identity \(\cos (\theta -\eta ) = \cos (\theta )\cos (\eta ) + \sin (\theta )\sin (\eta )\), we obtain,
Each diagonal term with \(i=j\) vanishes, and each pair of nondiagonal terms \(i\ne j\) provides a nonnegative contribution to the sum,
The equality in Eq. (52) is reached when all the ratios \(a_i/b_j\) are equal, and all the angles \(\theta _i\) are equal.
Finally, Eq. (53) follows from the triangle inequality \(|a|+|b|\ge |a+b|\).
Using the triangle inequality for the quadratic norm, \((|a|+|b|)^2 \ge a^2+b^2\), one can also express another inequality
which is distinct from Eq. (53), that is, in different cases either the right-hand side of Eq. (53) or that of Eq. (59) is the largest term.
Appendix II: Weighted Binet–Cauchy identities
For m pairs of real or complex N-dimensional vectors \(a_{ki}\) and \(b_{ki}\), \(k \in [1,\ldots m]\), and the real or complex N-dimensional vector \(w_{i}\), \(i \in [1,\ldots N]\), we have the following simplifications of antisymmetric double sums.
1.1 1. Odd m
If m is odd,
This follows from the antisymmetry of the global sum, each term occurring twice with opposite signs.
1.2 2. Even m
If m is even,
This follows from the symmetry of the global sum, each term occurring twice with same signs.
1.3 3. \(m=2\)
For \(m=2\), we have a weighted Binet–Cauchy identity:
If \(b_{1i}=b_{2i}\), we have, dropping the index k for the b’s:
If \(a_{1i}=\bar{a}_{2i}\) and \(b_{1i}=\bar{b}_{2i}\), we have a weighted version of Lagrange’s identity:
For real nonnegative weights \(w_i\), since the left-hand side is nonnegative, a weighted form of Cauchy–Schwarz inequality follows:
Further, if \(b_i=1\), we have
For larger even m, it is straightforward to derive further similar equalities and inequalities.
Appendix III
We can calculate the inverse of the axial moment of inertia, \({\mathop {\mathbf {\mathcal I}}\limits ^{\leftrightarrow }}^{-1}\) (or pseudo-inverse \({\mathop {\mathbf {\mathcal I}}\limits ^{\leftrightarrow }}^{\dagger }\) for degenerate cases) with the following procedure working in all configurations (Pfenniger 1994):
- 1.
Calculate the determinant \(\bigl |{\mathop {\mathbf {\mathcal I}}\limits ^{\leftrightarrow }}\bigr |\) with
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl |{\mathop {\mathbf {\mathcal I}}\limits ^{\leftrightarrow }}\bigr |= & {} {\mathcal I}_{xx} {\mathcal I}_{yy} {\mathcal I}_{zz} + 2 {\mathcal I}_{xy} {\mathcal I}_{yz} {\mathcal I}_{zx} - \left( {\mathcal I}_{xx}{\mathcal I}_{yz}^2 + {\mathcal I}_{yy}{\mathcal I}_{zx}^2 + {\mathcal I}_{zz}{\mathcal I}_{xy}^2 \right) . \end{aligned}$$(67) - 2.
If \(\bigl |{\mathop {\mathbf {\mathcal I}}\limits ^{\leftrightarrow }}\bigr |\ne 0\), the general case, then
$$\begin{aligned} {\mathop {\mathbf {\mathcal I}}\limits ^{\leftrightarrow }}^{-1} = \bigl |{\mathop {\mathbf {\mathcal I}}\limits ^{\leftrightarrow }}\bigr |^{-1} \times \left( \begin{array}{lll} {\mathcal I}_{yy} {\mathcal I}_{zz} \!-\! {\mathcal I}_{yz}^2 &{}\quad {\mathcal I}_{yz} {\mathcal I}_{zx} \!-\! {\mathcal I}_{xy}{\mathcal I}_{zz} &{}\quad {\mathcal I}_{xy} {\mathcal I}_{yz} \!-\! {\mathcal I}_{zx}{\mathcal I}_{yy}\\ {\mathcal I}_{yz}{\mathcal I}_{zx} \!-\! {\mathcal I}_{xy}{\mathcal I}_{zz} &{}\quad {\mathcal I}_{zz} {\mathcal I}_{xx} \!-\! {\mathcal I}_{zx}^2 &{}\quad {\mathcal I}_{zx} {\mathcal I}_{xy} \!-\! {\mathcal I}_{yz}{\mathcal I}_{xx}\\ {\mathcal I}_{xy} {\mathcal I}_{yz} \!-\! {\mathcal I}_{zx}{\mathcal I}_{yy} &{}\quad {\mathcal I}_{zx} {\mathcal I}_{xy} \!-\! {\mathcal I}_{yz}{\mathcal I}_{xx} &{}\quad {\mathcal I}_{xx} {\mathcal I}_{yy} \!-\! {\mathcal I}_{xy}^2 \end{array} \right) \end{aligned}$$(68)Else, i.e., \(\bigl |{\mathop {\mathbf {\mathcal I}}\limits ^{\leftrightarrow }}\bigr |= 0\), all particles are located along a line:
- (a)
If \(I\ne 0\), then
$$\begin{aligned} {\mathop {\mathbf {\mathcal I}}\limits ^{\leftrightarrow }}^{\dagger } = I^{-2} {\mathop {\mathbf {\mathcal I}}\limits ^{\leftrightarrow }}, \end{aligned}$$(69) - (b)
Else, i.e., \(I=0\), all the particles are at the origin,
$$\begin{aligned} {\mathop {\mathbf {\mathcal I}}\limits ^{\leftrightarrow }}^{\dagger } =0. \end{aligned}$$(70)
- (a)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pfenniger, D. Angular momentum bounds in particle systems. Celest Mech Dyn Astr 131, 58 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-019-9936-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-019-9936-y