Accounts of the changes in dynamics of hydrogen-bonded materials by pressure, nanoconfinement, and hyperquenching

K. L. Ngai
Phys. Rev. E 102, 032606 – Published 10 September 2020

Abstract

A hydrogen-bonding network or hydrogen-bonded cluster is formed in many hydrogen-bonded glass formers. It determines the dynamics of structural α relaxation and the Johari-Goldstein (JG) β relaxation because breaking of hydrogen bonds is the prerequisite. However, the networks and clusters can be substantially reduced or totally removed in the liquid state by high temperature accompanying the applied high pressure in experiments, and in the glassy state by hyperquenching the liquid under pressure. By confining the glass former in nanometer spaces, the extended network cannot form, and in addition the finite size effect limits the growth of the length scale of the α relaxation on lowering temperature. Any of these actions will modify the structure of the original hydrogen-bonded glass former, and also the intermolecular interaction governing the relaxation processes. Consequently the dynamics of the structural α relaxation and the JG β relaxation, as well as the relation between the two processes, are expected to change. An important advance in the study of the dynamics of glass-forming materials is the existence of the strong connection between the α relaxation and the JG β relaxation. In particular, the ratio of their relaxation times, tα(T)/tβ(T), is quantitatively determined by the exponent of the Kohlrausch relaxation function of the α relaxation. This property is valid in hydrogen-bonded glass formers as well as in non-hydrogen-bonded glass formers. The interesting question is whether this property continues to hold after the hydrogen-bonded glass former has been modified by high temperature under high pressure, nanoconfinement, and hyperquenching under pressure. Remarkably, the answer is positive as concluded from the analyses of the data in several hydrogen-bonded glass formers reported in this paper. So far the main theoretical explanation of this property has been the coupling model.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
3 More
  • Received 17 July 2020
  • Accepted 20 August 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.032606

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Polymers & Soft MatterInterdisciplinary Physics

Authors & Affiliations

K. L. Ngai*

  • CNR-IPCF, Dipartimento di Fisica, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, I-56127, Pisa, Italy and Silesian Center for Education and Interdisciplinary Research, Institute of Physics, University of Silesia, 75 Pulku Piechoty 1A, 41-500 Chorzow, Poland

  • *kiangai@yahoo.com

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 102, Iss. 3 — September 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×