Elsevier

Lithos

Volumes 376–377, 1 December 2020, 105772
Lithos

Research Article
Chromitites from an Archean layered intrusion in the Western Dharwar Craton, southern India

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2020.105772Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Resingle bondOs TRD and TMA ages of chromitites in ultramafic rocks from Dharwar Craton show 3.1 Ga.

  • Zircon from these rocks preserve tectonic events at 2.9 Ga and ca. 2.5 to 2.4 Ga.

  • Geochemical features suggest high magnesian parent magma with komatiitic affinity.

  • The refractory mantle derived magma witnessed crustal contamination.

Abstract

Chromite deposits hosted in a layered ultramafic–mafic intrusion in the Archean Chithradurga greenstone belt are part of a suture that divides the Western and Central Dharwar craton blocks in southern India. Serpentinised ultramafic rocks including dunite, peridotite, and phlogopite-rich clinopyroxenite occur with massive chromitite. The olivine compositions show two distinct groups, one with Fo ~91–92 olivines in the massive chromitite, and another group with olivine Fo values of ~95–96, in the serpentinised dunite. The chromite occurs as massive chromitite and as an accessory phase in dunite. The former is characterized by high Cr# (Cr/(Cr + Al) × 100 = 67–70) and moderate to high Mg# (Mg/(Mg + Fe) = 52–66); The latter shows a larger variation in Cr which is likely related to sub-solidus re-equilibration of the chromite during the serpentinization event. In the massive chromitites, sub-solidus re-equilibration of chromite is less significant or absent. Bulk-rock major and trace element analyses of the peridotites reveal a composition less magnesian than depleted mantle rocks, with low TiO2, Na2O, CaO and high Cr, Ni content, a general depletion in Sr and enrichment in Th, U. The chromitites contain variable PGE abundances (ΣPGE = 8-244 ppb) with enrichments of Os, Ir and Ru, relative to Pt and Pd . These features suggest that the chromitites are cumulates formed from a highly magnesian parental magma with komatiitic affinity, derived by large degrees of partial melting, , which underwent crustal contamination. The Resingle bondOs isotope data demonstrate a minimum Re-depletion model age (TRD) of 2895 ± 24 Ma for the serpentinized dunite (MY11/3), and a more robust age of 3120 ± 12 Ma for two chromitite samples, which we interpret as the best estimate of the magmatic age of this ultramafic intrusion. Abundant zircon grains also occur within these ultramafic rocks with Usingle bondPb ages spanning from ca. 2.9 Ga to ca. 2.4 Ga, with a dominant age population in the range 2.8–2.6 Ga. We interpret the upper intercept age at ca. 2.9 Ga to represent the initial crystallization of zircon in the ultramafic rocks, potentially as a result of an early stage of metamorphism and hydrothermal alteration. The 2.5–2.4 Ga zircon ages reflect a late-stage high-grade metamorphic overprint.

Introduction

Chromitites and their host rocks provide important constraints on mantle-derived magmas, and are also important indicators of tectonic setting. Chromium is relatively immobile during hydrothermal processes, and chromite is only a minor phase produced during closed-system cotectic crystallization of mafic parent magma (e.g., Irvine, 1977). Chromite has been shown to be a robust petrogenetic tool to characterize diverse settings (Mondal et al., 2007; Mukherjee and Mondal, 2018; Rollinson et al., 2010). This is largely because the chemical composition of chromite is controlled by mantle-melting processes that are characteristic of specific tectonic environment (e.g., Barnes and Roeder, 2001 and references therein).

Chromitites of Archean age are known from a variety of ultramafic–mafic intrusions worldwide (McCallum, 1996; Rollinson, 1997; Stowe, 1994; Szilas et al., 2018). The nearly exclusive association of Archean chromitite with ultramafic–mafic intrusions provide an important window for understanding the secular changes in the early Earth's evolving tectonic systems (Hutchinson, 1981; Rollinson et al., 2017; Stowe, 1994). Chromitite within layered intrusions, such as the well-known Bushveld and Stillwater complexes, host most the world's economic chromium reserves and additionally contain significant platinum group element (PGE) mineralization. The origin and evolution of such chromitite deposits are therefore of prime interest (e.g. González-Jiménez et al., 2014; Junge et al., 2014; Spandler et al., 2005). However, the formation age and tectonic setting of chromitites in the greenstone belts of Western Dharwar remains debated (Mukherjee and Mondal, 2018). In particular, the lack of high-resolution in-situ dating methods has placed limitations on understanding the formation age of the chromitites and their subsequent metamorphic history.

In this study, we investigate chromitites from an Archean layered intrusion in the southern part of the Chithradurga greenstone belt, a suture that divides the Western and Central Dharwar craton blocks in southern India (Jayananda et al., 2020, and references therein). We present results from petrology, mineral chemistry, bulk-rock geochemistry (including platinum-group element data), Resingle bondOs geochronology plus in-situ zircon Usingle bondPb and Hf isotopes, and zircon trace element data from chromitites and the ultramafic host rocks. Our objective is to constrain the formation age, and identify the nature of the parental magma with the aim of reconstructing the tectonic setting. We also attempt a comparison with other similar Archean chromitite occurrences.

Section snippets

Regional geology of the Dharwar Craton

The Dharwar Craton in southern India (Fig. 1) is one of the oldest cratonic blocks on the globe and provides a window to evaluate crustal evolution in the early Earth (Jayananda et al., 2018, Jayananda et al., 2020; Wang and Santosh, 2019, and references therein). This craton comprises vast areas of TTG (tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite) gneiss, two generations of greenstone sequences and at least three generations of potassic to calc-alkaline granitoid intrusions (Bhaskar Rao et al., 1992;

Analytical methods

We carried out detailed petrographic studies, quantitative mineral chemical analysis using electron microprobe, bulk rock major, trace and Rare Earth Element (REE) Analysis, PGE analysis by Nickel Sulphide-Fire Assay (NiS-FA), zircon Usingle bondPb, REE and Lusingle bondHf analysis and Resingle bondOs isotope and isotope dilution PGE analysis (HPA-ID). The detailed analytical techniques, related references, and the precision and accuracy are reported in Appendix A. The results from these studies are reported in the following

Petrography

The chromite in the studied samples can be divided into two types: 1) chromite in serpentinised peridotite occurring as an accessory phase (Fig. 4a-b,f); and 2) chromite as the major phase in chromitite (Fig. 4c-e). Accessory chromite is subhedral to anhedral in shape, fine- to medium-grained, and shows zoning textures with corroded margins, typically surrounded by a chlorite rim (Fig. 4f). Chromite modal proportions are variable (5–10 vol%) in the chromite-bearing peridotite sample, MY11–3.

Petrogenesis and tectonic setting

The composition of chromite in this study generally shows a high-Cr, low-Al character. Chromite in serpentinised dunite sample MY11/3 is an exception, showing clear zoning (Fig. 4f) and a variable in composition in Al, Ti, Cr. Elevated Fe and lower Mg contents, along with the presence of amphibole, talc, and chlorite suggest this is a consequence of amphibolite grade metamorphism. The chromite in MY11–3 shows enrichment in Fe3+ and overlaps with the field of ferritchomit and metamorphic

Conclusions

1. Consistent whole rock Resingle bondOs TRD and TMA ages, and Hf mantle depleted ages measured in zircon, suggest formation of ultramafic rocks in the Archean Chithradurga greenstone belt at ~3.1 Ga. These rocks then underwent at least two major tectonic events at ca. 2.9 Ga, and at ca. 2.5–2.4 Ga, the latter corresponding to amphibolite-facies metamorphism. These events reset the zircon ages and substantially modified mineral chemistry.

2. Chromite compositions, high Fo number olivine, bulk-rock

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

We thank Editor-in-Chief Prof. Michael Roden and two anonymous referees for comments and suggestions which helped to improve this paper. We thank Dr. K. Sajeev and team for help to M. Santosh during field work. This work was supported by Foreign Expert grants from China University of Geosciences Beijing, P.R. China.

References (53)

  • S.K. Mondal et al.

    Os isotope systematics of Mesoarchean chromitite-PGE deposits in the Singhbhum Craton (India): Implications for the evolution of lithospheric mantle

    Chem. Geol.

    (2007)
  • P. Pagé et al.

    The influence of chromite on osmium, iridium, ruthenium and rhodium distribution during early magmatic processes

    Chem. Geol. Elsevier B.V

    (2016)
  • J.-J. Peucat et al.

    The lower crust of the Dharwar Craton, Southern India: Patchwork of Archean granulitic domains

    Precambrian Res.

    (2013)
  • I.S. Puchtel et al.

    Platinum group element geochemistry of komatiites from the Alexo and Pyke Hill areas, Ontario, Canada

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2004)
  • J.J. Rogers et al.

    Supercontinents in Earth history

    Gondwana Res.

    (2003)
  • H. Rollinson et al.

    Archaean chromitites show constant Fe3+/ΣFe in Earth's asthenospheric mantle since 3.8 Ga

    Lithos

    (2017)
  • M. Santosh et al.

    Anorthosites from an Archean continental arc in the Dharwar Craton, southern India: implications for terrane assembly and cratonization

    Precambrian Res.

    (2018)
  • C. Srikantappa et al.

    High-grade regional metamorphism of ultramafic and mafic rocks from the Archaean Sargur Terrane, Karnataka, South India

    Precambrian Res.

    (1985)
  • K. Szilas et al.

    Highly refractory Archaean peridotite cumulates: Petrology and geochemistry of the Seqi Ultramafic Complex, SW Greenland

    Geosci. Front.

    (2018)
  • R.J. Walker et al.

    Os, Sr, Nd, and Pb isotope systematics of southern African peridotite xenoliths: Implications for the chemical evolution of subcontinental mantle

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (1989)
  • R.J. Walker et al.

    Comparative 187Re-187Os systematics of chondrites: Implications regarding early solar system processes

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2002)
  • J.Y. Wang et al.

    Eoarchean to Mesoarchean crustal evolution in the Dharwar craton, India: evidence from detrital zircon U–Pb and Hf isotopes

    Gondwana Res.

    (2019)
  • N.T. Arndt et al.

    Ore deposits associated with mafic magmas in the Kaapvaal craton

    Mineral. Deposita

    (1997)
  • W.E. Bai et al.

    Variations in chemical compositions of chrome spinels from Hongguleleng ophiolites, Xianjing, China and their significance

    Acta Mineral. Sin.

    (1988)
  • S.J. Barnes

    Chromite in Komatiites, 1. Magmatic Controls on Crystallization and Composition

    J. Petrol.

    (1998)
  • S. Barnes et al.

    Deformed chromitite layers in the Coobina intrusion, Pilbara craton, Western Australia

    Econ. Geol.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Relics of 2.6–2.5 Ga oceanic crust from the ultramafic-mafic complex of Goa, western India: Magmatic response to a progressive subduction system

      2022, Lithos
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Dharwar Craton of southern Peninsular India, one of the largest Archean Cratons of the world, preserves variably metamorphosed igneous and sedimentary remnants of ancient proto-continents and ocean basins, and thus provides a ubiquitous time window to thermo-tectonic transition of Precambrian Earth. The geological, geochemical and geochronological evidence from the granite-greenstone terranes of Dharwar Craton provides a potential archive of polychrononous accretionary and collisional orogens that can be equated with the ancient orogenic records of worldwide Archean Cratons in terms of global tectonic evolution (Gao and Santosh, 2020; Jayananda et al., 2018; Manikyamba et al., 2021; Santosh et al., 2020; Sotiriou et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2019). These offer the most conspicuous and sustainable paradigms fingerprinting the validity of the uniformitarian principle endorsing modern style subduction tectonics in Archean and a transitional evolution of early Earth from Hadean-stage stagnant lid convection to short-term episodic style of subduction tectonics concurrent with gradual cooling of mantle and thickening of lithosphere.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text