Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Waterlogging affects the mitigation of soil GHG emissions by biochar amendment in coastal wetland

  • Soils, Sec 1 • Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) have greatly impacted the global warming by altering the composition of the atmosphere. The effect of biochar on GHG mitigation has been mainly studied in amended mineral soils and agricultural soils. However, the interactive effects of waterlogging and biochar application on GHG emissions, in coastal wetlands, are still poorly understood, which is important when considering the application of biochar at specific sites.

Materials and methods

We carried out a soil incubation experiment for 90 days at 25 °C to investigate the effects of two types of biochar (Phragmites communis and Spartina alterniflora) with different application rates (0%, 1%, 5%, and 10%) (w/w) on GHG emissions from soil at two different water levels (unwaterlogged and waterlogged soils). Furthermore, soil pH, organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus contents were analyzed after incubation to gain insights into the underlying mechanisms of the biochar’s effects on CO2, CH4, and N2O evolution.

Results and discussion

Waterlogging significantly reduced the cumulative CO2 flux by 36.27%, had no effect on cumulative CH4 flux, and significantly increased cumulative N2O flux by 50.82%, and the corresponding global warming potential (GWP) significantly decreased by 29.72%. Biochar application reduced not only the cumulative CO2 flux, but also the cumulative CH4 absorption, which may shift soils from being CH4 sinks to sources. After biochar application, the cumulative N2O release increased from unwaterlogged soils but decreased in waterlogged soils. There was no significant difference between biochar type on GHG emissions, but differences were observed among different application rates. The GWP significantly decreased by 27.64–⁠69.39% and 36.11–87.34% after biochar application in the unwaterlogged and waterlogged soils, respectively.

Conclusions

As a consequence, biochar application may significantly decrease GWP of soils due to the large reduction of CO2 release. These results suggest that biochar application is an effective way to reduce GWP in the Yellow River Delta Wetlands, especially when biochar is applied in waterlogged soils at high application rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson CR, Condron LM, Clough TJ, Fiers M, Stewart A, Hill RA, Sherlock RR (2011) Biochar induced soil microbial community change: implications for biogeochemical cycling of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus. Pedobiologia 54:309–320

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biederman LA, Harpole WS (2013) Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 5:202–214

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cayuela M, Van Zwieten L, Singh B, Jeffery S, Roig A, Sánchez-Monedero M (2014) Biochar’s role in mitigating soil nitrous oxide emissions: a review and meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 191:5–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan K, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2008) Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Soil Res 46:437–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang J, Clay DE, Clay SA, Chintala R, Miller JM, Schumacher T (2016) Biochar reduced nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide emissions from soil with different water and temperature cycles. Agron J 108:2214–2221

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, Cai Z, Chang S, Wang J, Zhang J (2012) Wheat straw and its biochar have contrasting effects on inorganic N retention and N2O production in a cultivated black Chernozem. Biol Fertil Soils 48:941–946

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chimner RA, Cooper DJ (2003) Influence of water table levels on CO2 emissions in a Colorado subalpine fen: an in situ microcosm study. Soil Biol Biochem 35:345–351

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clough TJ, Condron LM (2010) Biochar and the nitrogen cycle: introduction. J Environ Qual 39:1218–1223

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clough TJ, Bertram JE, Ray JL, Condron LM, O’Callaghan M, Sherlock RR, Wells N (2010) Unweathered wood biochar impact on nitrous oxide emissions from a bovine-urine-amended pasture soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:852–860

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clough T, Condron L, Kammann C, Müller C (2013) A review of biochar and soil nitrogen dynamics. Agronomy 3:275–293

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan X, Pedroli B, Liu G, Liu H, Song C, Shu L (2011) Potential plant species distribution in the Yellow River Delta under the influence of groundwater level and soil salinity. Ecohydrology 4:744–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C, Lock MA, Reynolds B (1992) Fluxes of CO2, CH4 and N2O from a welsh peatland following simulation of water table draw-down: potential feedback to climatic change. Biogeochemistry 19:51–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Funk DW, Pullman ER, Peterson KM, Crill PM, Billings WD (1994) Influence of water table on carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and methane fluxes from taiga bog microcosms. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 8:271–278

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han G, Xing Q, Yu J, Luo Y, Li D, Yang L, Wang G, Mao P, Xie B, Mikle N (2014) Agricultural reclamation effects on ecosystem CO2 exchange of a coastal wetland in the Yellow River Delta. Agric Ecosyst Environ 196:187–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R, Lacis A, Oinas V (2000) Global warming in the twenty-first century: an alternative scenario. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:9875–9880

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harter J, Weigold P, El-Hadidi M, Huson DH, Kappler A, Behrens S (2016) Soil biochar amendment shapes the composition of N2O-reducing microbial communities. Sci Total Environ 562:379–390

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Zhou X, Jiang L, Li M, Du Z, Zhou G, Shao J, Wang X, Xu Z, Bai SH, Wallace H, Xu C (2016) Effects of biochar application on soil greenhouse gas fluxes: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 9(4):743–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito JA, Laird DA, Busscher WJ (2012) Environmental benefits of biochar. J Environ Qual 41:967–972

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ji C, Jin Y, Li C, Chen J, Kong D, Yu K, Liu S, Zou J (2018) Variation in soil methane release or uptake responses to biochar amendment: a separate meta-analysis. Ecosystems 21:1692–1705

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Jiang Y, van Groenigen KJ, Huang S et al (2017) Higher yields and lower methane emissions with new rice cultivars. Glob Chang Biol 23:4728–4738

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammann C, Ratering S, Eckhard C, Müller C (2012) Biochar and hydrochar effects on greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane) fluxes from soils. J Environ Qual 41:1052–1066

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karhu K, Mattila T, Bergström I, Regina K (2011) Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity – results from a short-term pilot field study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:309–313

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan ML, Megonigal JP (2013) Tidal wetland stability in the face of human impacts and sea-level rise. Nature 504:53–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblauch C, Maarifat AA, Pfeiffer EM, Haefele SM (2011) Degradability of black carbon and its impact on trace gas fluxes and carbon turnover in paddy soils. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1768–1778

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J (2007a) Bio-energy in the black. Front Ecol Environ 5:381–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J (2007b) A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems – a review. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 11:403–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Xia J, Zhao X, Chen Y (2019) Effects of planting Tamarix chinensis on shallow soil water and salt content under different groundwater depths in the Yellow River Delta. Geoderma 335:104–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O’Neill B, Skjemstad JO, Thies J, Luizão FJ, Petersen J, Neves EG (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1719–1730

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Ding W, Liu D, He T, Yoo G, Yuan J, Chen Z, Fan J (2017) Wheat straw-derived biochar amendment stimulated N2O emissions from rice paddy soils by regulating the amoA genes of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Soil Biol Biochem 113:89–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Wu C (2004) Evaluation of methane emissions from Taiwanese paddies. Sci Total Environ 333(1–3):195–207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Yang M, Wu Y, Wang H, Chen Y, Wu W (2011) Reducing CH4 and CO2 emissions from waterlogged paddy soil with biochar. J Soils Sediments 11:930–939

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Bai J, Ding Q, Shao H, Gao H, Xiao R (2012) Effects of water level and salinity on TN and TP contents in marsh soils of the Yellow River Delta, China. Clean-Soil Air Water 40:1118–1124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K, Lal R (2014) Soil organic carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:443–454

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo X, Wang L, Liu G, Wang X, Wang Z, Zheng H (2016) Effects of biochar on carbon mineralization of coastal wetland soils in the Yellow River Delta, China. Ecol Eng 94:329–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma Y, Sun L, Liu C, Yang X, Zhou W, Yang B, Schwenke G, Liu D (2018) A comparison of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from inland mixed-fish and crab aquaculture ponds. Sci Total Environ 637:517–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma T, Li X, Bai J, Ding S, Zhou F, Cui B (2019) Four decades’ dynamics of coastal blue carbon storage driven by land use/land cover transformation under natural and anthropogenic processes in the Yellow River Delta, China. Sci Total Environ 655:741–750

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Major J, Lehmann J, Rondon M, Goodale C (2010) Fate of soil-applied black carbon: downward migration, leaching and soil respiration. Glob Chang Biol 16:1366–1379

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal S, Thangarajan R, Bolan NS, Sarkar B, Khan N, Ok YS, Naidu R (2016) Biochar-induced concomitant decrease in ammonia volatilization and increase in nitrogen use efficiency by wheat. Chemosphere 142:120–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mcleod E, Chmura GL, Bouillon S, Salm R, Björk M, Duarte CM, Lovelock CE, Schlesinger WH, Silliman BR (2011) A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front Ecol Environ 9(10):552–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuta K, Matsumoto T, Hatate Y, Nishihara K, Nakanishi T (2004) Removal of nitrate-nitrogen from drinking water using bamboo powder charcoal. Bioresour Technol 95:255–257

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore T, Knowles R (1989) The influence of water table levels on methane and carbon dioxide emissions from peatland soils. Can J Soil Sci 69:33–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mou X, Sun Z, Wang L, Wang C (2011) Nitrogen cycle of a typical Suaeda salsa marsh ecosystem in the Yellow River estuary. J Environ Sci 23:958–967

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukome FN, Six J, Parikh SJ (2013) The effects of walnut shell and wood feedstock biochar amendments on greenhouse gas emissions from a fertile soil. Geoderma 200:90–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Laird DL, Ahmedna M, Watts DW, Niandou MAS (2009) Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil. Soil Sci 174:105–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Watts DW, Laird DA, Ahmedna MA, Niandou MAS (2010) Short-term CO2 mineralization after additions of biochar and switchgrass to a Typic Kandiudult. Geoderma 154:281–288

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton L, Donato DC, Murray BC, Crooks S, Jenkins WA, Sifleet S, Craft C, Fourqurean JW, Kauffman JB, Marbà N, Megonigal P, Pidgeon E, Herr D, Gordon D, Baldera A (2012) Estimating global “blue carbon” emissions from conversion and degradation of vegetated coastal ecosystems. PLoS One 7(9):e43542

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira RC, Kaal J, Arbestain MC et al (2011) Contribution to characterisation of biochar to estimate the labile fraction of carbon. Org Geochem 42(11):1331–1342

    Google Scholar 

  • Poffenbarger HJ, Needelman BA, Megonigal JP (2011) Salinity influence on methane emissions from tidal marshes. Wetlands 31:831–842

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashidi NA, Yusup S (2016) An overview of activated carbons utilization for the post-combustion carbon dioxide capture. J CO2 Util 13:1–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rondon M, Ramirez J, Lehmann J (2005) Charcoal additions reduce net emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. In: Proceedings of the 3rd USDA Symposium on Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture and Forestry. USDA Baltimore, pp 21-24

  • Shaaban M, Van Zwieten L, Bashir S et al (2018) A concise review of biochar application to agricultural soils to improve soil conditions and fight pollution. J Environ Manag 228:429–440

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng Y, Zhu L (2018) Biochar alters microbial community and carbon sequestration potential across different soil pH. Sci Total Environ 622:1391–1399

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvola J, Alm J, Ahlholm U, Nykanen H, Martikainen PJ (1996) CO2 fluxes from peat in boreal mires under varying temperature and moisture conditions. J Ecol 84:219–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh BP, Cowie AL, Smernik RJ (2012) Biochar carbon stability in a clayey soil as a function of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature. Environ Sci Technol 46:11770–11778

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh C, Tiwari S, Boudh S, Singh JS (2017) Biochar application in management of paddy crop production and methane mitigation. In: Agro-Environmental Sustainability. Springer, pp 123–145

  • Smith P (2016) Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies. Glob Chang Biol 22:1315–1324

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R (2010) Chapter 2 - a review of biochar and its use and function in soil. In: Advances in Agronomy, vol 105. Academic Press, pp 47-82

  • Solomon S et al. (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Summary for Policymakers Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Climate Change 18:95–123

  • Song C, Zhang J, Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhao Z (2008) Emission of CO2, CH4 and N2O from freshwater marsh in northeast of China. J Environ Manag 88:428–436

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spokas KA, Reicosky DC (2009) Impacts of sixteen different biochars on soil greenhouse gas production. Ann Environ Sci 3:179

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spokas KA, Baker JM, Reicosky DC (2010) Ethylene: potential key for biochar amendment impacts. Plant Soil 333:443–452

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK et al (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Subedi R, Taupe N, Pelissetti S, Petruzzelli L, Bertora C, Leahy JJ, Grignani C (2016) Greenhouse gas emissions and soil properties following amendment with manure-derived biochars: influence of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type. J Environ Manag 166:73–83

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taghizadeh-Toosi A, Clough TJ, Condron LM, Sherlock RR, Anderson CR, Craigie RA (2011) Biochar incorporation into pasture soil suppresses in situ nitrous oxide emissions from ruminant urine patches. J Environ Qual 40:468–476

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verheijen F, Jeffery S, Bastos AC, Van der Velde M, Diafas I (2010) Biochar application to soils: a critical scientific review of effects on soil properties, processes and functions. Eur Comm Inst Environ Sustain 24099:162

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Zhang M, Xiong Z, Liu P, Pan G (2011) Effects of biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from two paddy soils. Biol Fertil Soils 47:887–896

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun 1:56

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu F, Jia Z, Wang S, Chang SX, Startsev A (2013) Contrasting effects of wheat straw and its biochar on greenhouse gas emissions and enzyme activities in a Chernozemic soil. Biol Fertil Soils 49:555–565

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Liu G, Ma G, Liu Q, Yu F, Huang C, Zhao Z, Liang L (2019a) Study of the differences in soil properties between the dry season and rainy season in the Mun River Basin. CATENA 182:104103

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Zhang X, Dong Y, Li B, Xiong Z (2019b) Biochar amendment reduced greenhouse gas intensities in the rice-wheat rotation system: six-year field observation and meta-analysis. Agric For Meteorol 278:107625

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Z, Xing G, Zhu Z (2007) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions as affected by water, soil and nitrogen. Pedosphere 17(2):146–155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Liu J, Hu X, Li X, Wang Y, Li H (2013) Effect of water table level on CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions in a freshwater marsh of Northeast China. Soil Biol Biochem 61:52–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo G, Kang H (2012) Effects of biochar addition on greenhouse gas emissions and microbial responses in a short-term laboratory experiment. J Environ Qual 41:1193–1202

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Tang J, Zhang R, Wu Q, Gong M (2013) Effects of biochar application on soil methane emission at different soil moisture levels. Biol Fertil Soils 49:119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Cui L, Pan G, Li L, Hussain Q, Zhang X, Zheng J, Crowley D (2010) Effect of biochar amendment on yield and methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a rice paddy from Tai Lake plain, China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139(4):469–475

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Liu Y, Pan G, Hussain Q, Li L, Zheng J, Zhang X (2012) Effect of biochar amendment on maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions from a soil organic carbon poor calcareous loamy soil from Central China Plain. Plant Soil 351:263–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zeng G, Huang D, Lai C, Chen M, Cheng M, Tang W, Tang L, Dong H, Huang B, Tan X, Wang R (2019) Biochar for environmental management: mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, contaminant treatment, and potential negative impacts. Chem Eng J 373:902–922

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Q, Bai J, Zhang G, Jia J, Wei W, Xin W (2018) Effects of water and salinity regulation measures on soil carbon sequestration in coastal wetlands of the Yellow River Delta. Geoderma 319:S0016706117307899

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H, Wang X, Luo X, Wang Z, Xing B (2018) Biochar-induced negative carbon mineralization priming effects in a coastal wetland soil: roles of soil aggregation and microbial modulation. Sci Total Environ 610-611:951–960

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant number 2017YFC0506203), the National Nonprofit Institute Research Grant (grant numbers CAFYBB2019SY030, CAFYBB2017QB009), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 41701113, 41877421, 31,770,511).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Wetland Research, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, China

    Zhongqing Yan, Jinzhi Wang, Yong Li, Haidong Wu, Kerou Zhang, Liang Yan, Xiaodong Zhang & Xiaoming Kang

  2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Wetland Services and Restoration, Beijing, 100091, China

    Zhongqing Yan, Jinzhi Wang, Yong Li, Haidong Wu, Kerou Zhang, Liang Yan, Xiaodong Zhang & Xiaoming Kang

  3. Sichuan Zoige Wetland Ecosystem Research Station, Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Aba, Sichuan, 624500, China

    Zhongqing Yan, Jinzhi Wang, Yong Li, Haidong Wu, Kerou Zhang, Liang Yan, Xiaodong Zhang & Xiaoming Kang

Authors
  1. Zhongqing Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinzhi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Haidong Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kerou Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Liang Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiaodong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiaoming Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Jinzhi Wang, Yong Li, Haidong Wu, Kerou Zhang, Liang Yan, and Xiaodong Zhang. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Zhongqing Yan, reviewed and edited by Xiaoming Kang, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoming Kang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Weixin Ding

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 884 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, Z., Wang, J., Li, Y. et al. Waterlogging affects the mitigation of soil GHG emissions by biochar amendment in coastal wetland. J Soils Sediments 20, 3591–3606 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02705-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02705-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation