Abstract
Ants and jumping spiders are prominent invertebrate predators in terrestrial ecosystems. Many jumping spiders are thought to avoid ants and their ant mimicking spiders, yet little is known if they discriminate among different species of ants or mimics. Chances of encountering multiple ants, and mimics all in a relatively short stretch of time and space is fairly common in the tropics, but how all these species interact with each other is not known. In a laboratory setup, we first examined the behavioral response of three ant species (Oecophylla smaragdina, the weaver ants; Camponotus sericeus, the golden backed carpenter ants, and Leptogenys processionalis, the procession ants), and their mimics in the genus Myrmarachne towards the non-mimetic jumping spider Plexippus paykulli. We then examined the response of P paykulli towards the three ant species, and their mimics. Our results suggest that weaver ants and procession ants are more aggressive towards non-mimetic jumping spiders as compared to golden backed ants. The three mimics also differed in their response towards the non-mimetic jumping spider: both weaver ant mimics and golden backed ant mimics charged at the non-mimetic jumping spiders as compared to the procession ant mimics. On the other hand, P. paykulli did not treat all ants similarly: while they looked, and approached the black procession ants by visual cues, they stayed away from weaver ants and golden backed ants. However, P. paykulli treated the three ant mimicking spiders similarly: while they looked at the mimics, they rarely approached or attacked them. Jumping spiders and ants are sympatric, and it may be advantageous to selectively avoid some ants over others. Studies, such as ours go a step closer in understanding multispecies predator–prey interactions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bednarski JV, Taylor P, Jakob EM (2012) Optical cues used in predation by jumping spiders, Phidippus audax (Araneae, Salticidae). Anim Behav 84:1221–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.032
Borges RM, Ahmed S, Prabhu CV (2007) Male ant-mimicking salticid spiders discriminate between retreat silks of sympatric females: implications for pre-mating reproductive isolation. J Insect Behav 20:389–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-007-9085-0
Catano LB, Barton MB, Boswell KM, Burkepile DE (2017) Predator identity and time of day interact to shape the risk–reward trade-off for herbivorous coral reef fishes. Oecologia 183:763–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3794-z
Ceccarelli FS (2009) Ant-mimicking spider, Myrmarachne species (Araneae:Salticidae), distinguishes its model, the green ant, Oecophylla smaragdina, from a sympatric Batesian O. smaragdina mimic, Riptortus serripes (Hemiptera:Alydidae). Aust J Zool 57:305. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO08014
Chittka L, Skorupski P, Raine NE (2009) Speed–accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends Ecol Evol 24:400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.010
Coddington JA, Levi HW (1991) Systematics and evolution of spiders (Araneae). Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:565–592
Crowder LB, Cooper WE (1982) Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63:1802. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940122
Cushing PE (1997) Myrmecomorphy and myrmecophily in spiders: a review. Fla Entomol 80:165. https://doi.org/10.2307/3495552
Del-Claro K, Oliveira PS (2000) Conditional outcomes in a neotropical treehopper-ant association: temporal and species-specific variation in ant protection and homopteran fecundity. Oecologia 124:156–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050002
Dolev Y, Nelson X (2016) Biological relevance affects object recognition in jumping spiders. N Z J Zool 43:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2015.1070183
Durkee CA, Weiss MR, Uma DB (2011) Ant mimicry lessens predation on a north American jumping spider by larger salticid spiders. Environ Entomol 40:1223–1231. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN11057
Forster LM (1977) A qualitative analysis of hunting behaviour in jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). N Z J Zool 4:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1977.9517936
Forster L (1985) Target discrimination in jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). In: Barth FG (ed) Neurobiol. Arachn, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 249–274
Halaj J, Ross DW, Moldenke AR (1997) Negative effects of ant foraging on spiders in Douglas-fir canopies. Oecologia 109:313–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050089
Harland DP, Li D, Jackson RR (2012) How jumping spiders see the world. In: Shimizu T, Wasserman EA (eds) Lazareva OF. Anim. See World Comp. Behav. Biol. Evol. Vis. Oxford university press, Oxford; New York, pp 133–164
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap press of Harvard university press, Cambridge, Mass
Hölldobler B, Möglich M, Maschwitz U (1974) Communication by tandem running in the ant Camponotus sericeus. J Comp Physiol 90:105–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00694481
Huang J-N, Cheng R-C, Li D, Tso I-M (2011) Salticid predation as one potential driving force of ant mimicry in jumping spiders. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278:1356–1364. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1896
Ibarra-Isassi J, Oliveira PS (2018) Indirect effects of mutualism: ant–treehopper associations deter pollinators and reduce reproduction in a tropical shrub. Oecologia 186:691–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-4045-7
Jackson RR, Macnab AM (1989) Display, mating, and predatory behaviour of the jumping spider Plexippus paykulli (Araneae: Salticidae). N Z J Zool 16:151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1989.10422565
Jakob E, Skow CD, Long SM (2011) Plasticity, learning and cognition. In: Herberstein ME (ed) Spider Behav. Cambridge university press, Cambridge, New York, Flex. Versatility, pp 307–347
Land MF (1972) Mechanisms of orientation and pattern recognition by jumping spiders (Salticidae). In: Wehner R (ed) Inf. Process. Vis. Syst. Anthr, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 231–247
Li D, Jackson R, Lim M (2003) Influence of background and prey orientation on an ambushing predator’s decisions. Behaviour 140:739–764. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853903322370652
Lima SL (1998) Non-lethal effects in the ecology of predator–prey interactions. Bioscience 48:25–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313225
Maschwitz U, Steghaus-Kovac S, Gaube R, Hänel H (1989) A South East Asian ponerine ant of the genus Leptogenys (Hym., Form.) with army ant life habits. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:305–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290907
Mathew A (1954) Observations on the habits of two spider mimics of the red ant, Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabr.). J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 52:249–263
Mody K, Linsenmair KE (2003) Finding its place in a competitive ant community: leaf fidelity of Camponotus sericeus. Insectes Soc 50:191–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-003-0646-8
Nelson XJ (2012) A predator’s perspective of the accuracy of ant mimicry in spiders. Psyche J Entomol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/168549
Nelson XJ, Card A (2016) Locomotory mimicry in ant-like spiders. Behav Ecol 27:700–707. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv218
Nelson XJ, Jackson RR (2006) A predator from East Africa that chooses malaria vectors as preferred prey. PLoS ONE 1:e132. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000132
Nelson XJ, Jackson RR (2007) Vision-based ability of an ant-mimicking jumping spider to discriminate between models, conspecific individuals and prey. Insectes Soc 54:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-006-0901-x
Nelson XJ, Jackson RR, Li D, Barrion AT, Edwards GB (2006) Innate aversion to ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and ant mimics: experimental findings from mantises (Mantodea). Biol J Linn Soc 88:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00598.x
Nelson XJ, Aguilar-Arguello S, Jackson RR (2020) Widespread army ant aversion among East African jumping spiders (Salticidae). J Ethol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-020-00639-1
Okuyama T (2002) The role of antipredator behavior in an experimental community of jumping spiders with intraguild predation. Popul Ecol 44:121–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101440200014
Pekár S, Petráková L, Bulbert MW, Whiting MJ, Herberstein ME (2017) The golden mimicry complex uses a wide spectrum of defence to deter a community of predators. eLife 6:e22089. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22089
Pohlert T (2014) The pairwise multiple comparison of mean ranks package (PMCMR). R package. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PMCMR. Accessed 17 June 2018
Powell EC, Cook C, Coco J, Brock M, Holian LA, Taylor LA (2019) Prey colour biases in jumping spiders (Habronattus brunneus) differ across populations. Ethology 125:351–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12859
Ramesh A, Vijayan S, Sreedharan S, Somanathan H, Uma D (2016) Similar yet different: differential response of a praying mantis to ant-mimicking spiders. Biol J Linn Soc 119:158–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12793
Roslin T, Hardwick B, Novotny V, Petry WK, Andrew NR, Asmus A, Barrio IC, Basset Y, Boesing AL, Bonebrake TC, Cameron EK, Dáttilo W, Donoso DA, Drozd P, Gray CL, Hik DS, Hill SJ, Hopkins T, Huang S, Koane B, Laird-Hopkins B, Laukkanen L, Lewis OT, Milne S, Mwesige I, Nakamura A, Nell CS, Nichols E, Prokurat A, Sam K, Schmidt NM, Slade A, Slade V, Suchanková A, Teder T, van Nouhuys S, Vandvik V, Weissflog A, Zhukovich V, Slade EM (2017) Higher predation risk for insect prey at low latitudes and elevations. Science 356:742–744. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaj1631
Sanders D, Platner C (2006) Intraguild interactions between spiders and ants and top-down control in a grassland food web. Oecologia 150:611–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0538-5
Sanders D, Nickel H, Grützner T, Platner C (2008) Habitat structure mediates top–down effects of spiders and ants on herbivores. Basic Appl Ecol 9:152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2007.01.003
Shamble PS, Hoy RR, Cohen I, Beatus T (2017) Walking like an ant: a quantitative and experimental approach to understanding locomotor mimicry in the jumping spider Myrmarachne formicaria. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 284:20170308. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0308
Taylor LA, Maier EB, Byrne KJ, Amin Z, Morehouse NI (2014) Colour use by tiny predators: jumping spiders show colour biases during foraging. Anim Behav 90:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.01.025
Taylor LA, Amin Z, Maier EB, Byrne KJ, Morehouse NI (2016) Flexible color learning in an invertebrate predator: Habronattus jumping spiders can learn to prefer or avoid red during foraging. Behav Ecol 27:520–529. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv182
Turner AM, Fetterolf SA, Bernot RJ (1999) Predator identity and consumer behavior: differential effects of fish and crayfish on the habitat use of a freshwater snail. Oecologia 118:242–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050724
Ware DM (1972) Predation by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri): the influence of hunger, prey density, and prey size. J Fish Res Board Can 29:1193–1201. https://doi.org/10.1139/f72-175
World Spider Catalog (2020). World Spider Catalog. Version 21.5. Natural History Museum Bern, online at https://wsc.nmbe.ch, accessed on Aug 21 2020. doi: 10.24436/2
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by a DBT BT/Bio-CARe/04/9809/2013-14, and APU grant to DU. Funding for CC, SV, and PB came from the DBT grant. We would like to thank Aranya Bagchi who helped collect spiders, and the two anonymous reviewers who helped to improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CC, SV, PB, and DU were involved in project design, data collection and analysis. PB, SV, and DU wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Vijayan, S., Balasubramanian, P., Casiker, C. et al. Non-mimetic jumping spider responses towards three species of ants and their mimics. J Ethol 39, 65–72 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-020-00674-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-020-00674-y