Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of bollworm damage and yield loss in seed blends of Bollgard-II with corresponding Non-Bt hybrid as ‘built in refuge’ in cotton

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bt cotton plants, with bollworm resistant trait, have been widely adopted since introduced in India in 2002. As a proactive measure to prevent evolution of resistance to Bt protein(s), it was approved for commercial cultivation with a stipulation of structured refuge of minimum 20% of the Bt area, constituted by plants that do not produce Bt toxins and thus allow growth and development of population of Bt susceptible pests. Though the refuge cotton seeds are provided in a separate pouch within each Bt cotton seed packet, Indian farmers have been reluctant to sow refuge. To find out a method for ensured refuge planting, we experimented with ‘built-in-refuge’ (BIR) in which non-Bt cotton seeds were blended with Bt cotton seeds in various proportions ie 5,10, 50% along with 20% recommended structured refuge and each treatment was evaluated in terms of fruiting body damage by major cotton lepidopterans, relative to the regulator stipulated 20% non-Bt structured refuge at five locations during cotton growing season of 2012–13. A major outcome from this study was that treatments with 5 and 10% non-Bt blends with bollga0rd-II were as effective as the 20% structured refuge, based on fruiting body damage due to bollworms, a key factor in managing Bt resistance without any compromise to the seed cotton yield. It can be concluded that the seed blend technology is a good option to impose refugia compliance to delay resistance in Bt cotton to bollworms in a country having lesser alternate hosts available for the target bollworms during the season and voluntary compliance of refuge is absent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference cited

  • Amy, L., Agi, J. S., Mahaffey, J. R., Bradley, J. J., & Van, D. W. (2001). Efficacy of seed mixes of transgenic Bt and non transgenic cotton against Bollworm, Helicoverpa zea Boddie. Journal Cotton Science, 5, 74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagla P (2010) Hardy cotton-munching pests are latest blow to GM crops. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.327.5972.1439.

  • Brévault, T., Tabashnik, B., & Carrière, Y. A. (2015). Seed mixture increases dominance of resistance to Bt cotton in Helicoverpa zea. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09807.

  • Carrière, Y., Crowder, D. W., & Tabashnik, B. E. (2010). Evolutionary ecology of insect adaptation to Bt crops. Evolutionary Applications, 3, 561–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdary, R. L., Bheemanna, M., Hosamani, A. C., Prabhuraj, A., Naik, M. K., & Nidagundi, J. M. (2014). Built in refuge for the management of Pink Bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella Saunders (Gelichidae: Lepidoptera) in Bt cotton. Journal Application and Nature of Science, 6, 202–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennehy T J, Head G.P., Moar W, Greenplate J T, Mohan K S, Ravi KC (2011) Field failure of first generation Bt cotton documented with pink bollworm in Gujarat state India. Proceeding of Beltwide Cotton Conf, Atlanta, GA USA 1063, 4–7.

  • Dhurua, S., & Gujar, G. T. (2011). Field-evolved resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac in the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) from India. Pest Management Science, 67, 898–903. PMID: 21438121. https://doi.org/10.1002ps.2127.

  • Durant, J.A. (1995). Efficacy of selected seed mixes oftransgenic Btand nontransgenic cotton againstbollworms and tobacco budworms in South Carolina. p. 769–771. InProc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., SanAntonio, TX. 4–7 Jan. 1995. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am.,Memphis, TN

  • Fand, B. B., Nagrare, V. S., Gawande, S. P., Nagrale, D. P., Naikwadi, B. V., Vrushali, D., Gokte, N. N., & Waghmare, V. N. (2019). Widespread infestation of pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechidae) on Bt cotton in Central India: a new threat and concerns for cotton production. Phytoparasitica, 47, 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-019-00738.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, A. J., Petzold-Maxwell, J. L., Keweshan, R. S., & Dunbar, M. W. (2011). Field-evolved resistance to Bt maize by western corn rootworm. PLoS One, 6, 22,629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022629.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, F. (1998). Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: integrating pest genetics and ecology. Annual Review of Entomology, 43, 701–726. PMID: 15012402. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardee, D. D., Van Duyn, J. W., Layton, M. B., & Bagwell, R. D. (2001). Management of the Tobacco Budworm-Bollworm Complex. United States Department of Agriculture; Agricultural Research Service, ARS–154

  • Hawkins, N. J., Chris, B., Andrea, D., & Paul, N. (2019). The evolutionary origin of pesticides resistance. Biological Reviews, 94, 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, G., Jackson, R. E., Adamczyk, J., Bradley, J. R., Van Duyn, J., & Gore, J. (2010). Spatial and temporal variability in host use by Helicoverpa zea as measured by analyses of stable carbon isotope ratios and gossypol residues. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01796.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranthi, K. R., & Kranthi, N. R. (2004). Modelling adaptability of cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) to Bt-cotton in India. Current Science, 87, 1096–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranthi, K. R., & Stone, G. D. (2020). Long-term impacts of Bt cotton in India. Nature Plants, 6, 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0615-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kranthi, K. R., Jadhav, D. R., Kranthi, S., Wanjari, R. R., Ali, S., & Russell, D. (2002). Insecticide resistance in five major insect pests of cotton in India. Crop Protection, 21, 449–460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kukanur, V. S., Singh, T. V. K., Kranthi, K. R., & Andow, D. (2018). Cry1Ac resistance allele frequency in field populations of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) collected in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, India. Crop Protection, 107, 3440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.01.008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luong, T. T. A., Downes, S. J., Cribb, B., Perkins, L. E., & Zalucki, M. P. (2016). Oviposition site selection and survival of susceptible and resistant larvae of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Bt and non-Bt cotton. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 106(06), 710717. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007485316000328.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mallet, J., & Porter, P. (1992). Preventing insect adaptation to insect-resistant crops: Are seed mixtures or refugia the best strategy? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 250, 165–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manjunath, T. M. (2012). Bt-cotton: refuge in seed-mix–some clarifications on its need and viability. Current Science, 102, 541–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naik, V. C. B., Kumbhare, S., Kranthi, S., Satija, U., & Kranthi, K. R. (2018). Field-evolved resistance of pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), to transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton expressing crystal 1Ac (Cry1Ac) and Cry2Ab in India. Pest Management Science, 74, 2544–2554. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Onstad, D. W., Mitchell, P. D., Hurley, T. M., Lundgren, J. G., Porter, R. P., & Krupke, C. H. (2011). Seeds of change: corn seed mixtures for resistance management and integrated pest management. Journal of Economic Entomology, 104, 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao, F., Huang, J., Rozelle, S., & Wilen, J. (2010). Natural refuge crops, buildup of resistance and zero-refuge strategy for Bt cotton in China. Sc China Life Science, 53, 1227–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, A. M., Tang, J. D., Roush, R. T., Metz, T. D., & Earle, E. D. (2000). Field tests on managing resistance to Bt-engineered plants. Nature Biotechnology, 18, 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/73804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Storer, N. P., Babcock, J. M., Schlenz, M., Meade, T., Thompson, G. D., & Bing, J. W. (2010). Discovery and characterization of field resistance to Bt maize: Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Puerto Rico. Journal of Economic Entomology, 103, 1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC10040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik, B. E., Gassman, A. J., Crowde, D. W., & Carriere, Y. (2008). Field-evolved resistance to Bt toxins. Nature Biotechnology, 26, 1074–1076. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1208-1383b.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik, B. E., Brévault, T., & Carrière, Y. (2013). Insect resistance to Bt crops: lessons from the first billion acres. Nature Biotechnology, 31, 510–521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van, R. J. (2007). First report of field resistance by the stem borer, Busseola fusca (Fuller) to Bt-transgenic maize. South Africa Journal of Plant Soil, 24, 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Johnson, M. L., & Zalucki, M. P. (2008). Possible effect of genetically modified cotton on foraging habits of early instar Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) larvae. Australian Journal of Entomology, 47, 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D., Zalucki, M. P., Guo, R., Fang, Z., Shen, W., Zhang, L., & Liu, B. (2016). Oviposition and feeding avoidance in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) against transgenic Bt cotton. Journal of Applied Entomology, 140(9), 715–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi through Public Private Partnership project with Mahyco Monsanto Biotech Ltd. The authors are also highly thankful to the Director, ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research and Head, ICAR-CICR, Regional Station, Sirsa for providing the necessary facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rishi Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of Interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, R., Kranthi, S., Rao, G.M.V.P. et al. Assessment of bollworm damage and yield loss in seed blends of Bollgard-II with corresponding Non-Bt hybrid as ‘built in refuge’ in cotton. Phytoparasitica 49, 253–263 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-020-00846-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-020-00846-z

Keywords

Navigation