Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Caterpillars on three and four leaves are sufficient to reconstruct binary normal networks

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While every rooted binary phylogenetic tree is determined by its set of displayed rooted triples, such a result does not hold for an arbitrary rooted binary phylogenetic network. In particular, there exist two non-isomorphic rooted binary temporal normal networks that display the same set of rooted triples. Moreover, without any structural constraint on the rooted phylogenetic networks under consideration, similarly negative results have also been established for binets and trinets which are rooted subnetworks on two and three leaves, respectively. Hence, in general, piecing together a rooted phylogenetic network from such a set of small building blocks appears insurmountable. In contrast to these results, in this paper, we show that a rooted binary normal network is determined by its sets of displayed caterpillars (particular type of subtrees) on three and four leaves. The proof is constructive and realises a polynomial-time algorithm that takes the sets of caterpillars on three and four leaves displayed by a rooted binary normal network and, up to isomorphism, reconstructs this network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aho AV, Sagiv Y, Szymanski TG, Ullman JD (1981) Inferring a tree from lowest common ancestors with an application to the optimization of relational expressions. SIAM J Comput 10:405–421

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bickner DR (2012) On normal networks. Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa

  • Bininda-Emonds ORP (2004) The evolution of supertrees. Trends Ecol Evol 19:315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordewich M, Semple C (2016) Determining phylogenetic networks from inter-taxa distances. J Math Biol 73:283–303

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bordewich M, Huber KT, Moulton V, Semple C (2018) Recovering normal networks from shortest inter-taxa distance information. J Math Biol 77:571–594

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bulteau L, Weller M (2019) Parameterized algorithms in bioinformatics: an overview. Algorithms 12:256

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cardona G, Rosselló F, Valiente G (2009) Comparison of tree-child phylogenetic networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf 6:552–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis A, Moulton V (2018) Identifiability of tree-child phylogenetic networks under a probabilistic recombination-mutation model of evolution. J Theor Biol 446:160–167

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Francis AR, Steel M (2015) Which phylogenetic networks are merely trees with additional arcs? Syst Biol 64:768–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambette P, Huber KT (2012) On encodings of phylogenetic networks of bounded level. J Math Biol 65:157–180

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Habib M, To TH (2012) Constructing a minimum phylogenetic network from a dense triplet set. J Bioinform Comput Biol 10:1250013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber KT, Moulton V (2012) Encoding and constructing 1-nested phylogenetic networks with trinets. Algorithmica 66:714–738

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huber KT, van Iersel L, Moulton V, Wu T (2015) How much information is needed to infer reticulate evolutionary histories? Syst Biol 64:102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber KT, van Iersel L, Moulton V, Scornavacca C, Wu T (2017) Reconstructing phylogenetic level-1 networks from nondense binet and trinet sets. Algorithmica 77:173–200

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • van Iersel L, Kelk S (2011) Constructing the simplest possible phylogenetic network from triplets. Algorithmica 60:207–235

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • van Iersel L, Moulton V (2014) Trinets encode tree-child and level-2 phylogenetic networks. J Math Biol 68:1707–1729

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • van Iersel L, Moulton V, de Swart E, Wu T (2017) Binets: fundamental building blocks for phylogenetic networks. Bull Math Biol 79:1135–1154

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson J, Sung WK (2006) Inferring a level-1 phylogenetic network from a dense set of rooted triplets. Theoret Comput Sci 363:60–68

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson J, Nguyen NB, Sung WK (2006) Algorithms for combining rooted triplets into a galled phylogenetic network. SIAM J Comput 35:1098–1121

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid C, Semple C, Welsh D (2015) Counting phylogenetic networks. Ann Comb 19:205–224

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami Y, van Iersel L, Janssen R, Jones M, Moulton V (2019) Reconstructing tree-child networks from reticulate-edge-deleted subnetworks. Bull Math Biol 81:3823–3863

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pardi F, Scornavacca C (2015) Reconstructible phylogenetic networks: do not distinguish the indistinguishable. PLoS Comput Biol 11:e1004135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semple C, Steel M (2003) Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Willson SJ (2010) Properties of normal phylogenetic networks. Bull Math Biol 72:340–358

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Willson SJ (2011) Regular networks can be uniquely constructed from their trees. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf 8:785–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the two anonymous referees for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Semple.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors were supported by the New Zealand Marsden Fund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Linz, S., Semple, C. Caterpillars on three and four leaves are sufficient to reconstruct binary normal networks. J. Math. Biol. 81, 961–980 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-020-01533-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-020-01533-7

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation