Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling and Dynamic Response of Curved Steel–Concrete–Steel Sandwich Shells Under Blast Loading

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The steel–concrete–steel sandwich structures are usually composed of concrete core and face steel plates. This paper presented the dynamic response of the curved steel–concrete–steel (SCS) sandwich shells subjected to blast loading. The bolts were employed to connect the face steel plates and the concrete. Numerical model was established based on LS-DYNA and the accuracy of the modelling method was verified against existing blast test. The displacement histories, damage of concrete and energy absorption capability of the shell were obtained from the numerical calculations and discussed. Different failure modes of the curved SCS sandwich shell under various loads were obtained from numerical results, i.e., local deformation of the shell for the case of close-in detonations and buckling of steel plates for the case of far-field detonations. It was noted that the concrete debris can be restrained by the face steel plates with good ductility. Numerical results showed that the energy absorption from concrete is higher under close-in detonations on the ground. The effects of charge weight, steel plate thickness, concrete thickness and rise height on the dynamic response of curved SCS sandwich shells were also analyzed and discussed in detail. The curved SCS sandwich shell with thicker back steel plate showed better blast resistant performance. Moreover, the damage of curved shell was more serious if the rise height to span ratio (Rr-s) is beyond the range of 0.16–0.25.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASCE. (2010). Design of blast-resistant buildings in petrochemical facilities. Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASCE. (2011). Blast protection of buildings. ASCE/SEI59-11. Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. M. (1964). Introduction to structural dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, H., & Pryer, J. (1998). Advantages of British steel Bi-steel in immersed tunnel construction. In Proceedings of the IABSE colloquium held Stockholm (p. 78).

  • Chen, W., & Hao, H. (2012). Numerical study of a new multi-arch double-layered blast-resistance door panel. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 43, 16–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Zhang, P., Liu, J., Cheng, Y., & Wang, H. (2019). Experimental and numerical analyses on the dynamic response of aluminum foam core sandwich panels subjected to localized air blast loading. Marine Structures, 65, 343–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiquito, M., López, L. M., Castedo, R., Pérez-Caldentey, A., & Santos, A. P. (2019). Behaviour of retrofitted masonry walls subjected to blast loading: Damage assessment. Engineering Structures, 201, 109805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E., Chae, S. W., Park, H., Nam, T. H., Mohammadzadeh, B., & Wang, J. H. (2018a). Investigating self-centering capacity of superelastic SMA fibers with different anchorage through pullout tests. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 18, 6228–6232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E., Mohammadzadeh, B., & Kim, H. S. (2018b). SMA bending bars as self-centering and damping devices. Smart Materials and Structures, 28, 025029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E., Mohammadzadeh, B., Kim, D., & Joen, J. S. (2018c). A new experimental investigation into the effects of reinforcing mortar beams with superelastic SMA fibers on controlling and closing cracks. Composites Part B Engineering, 137, 140–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E., Mohammadzadeh, B., Wang, J. H., & Kim, W. J. (2018d). Pullout behavior of superelastic SMA fibers with various end-shapes embedded in cement mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 167, 605–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. S., Fisher, J. W., Hammons, M. I., Porter, J. R., & Dinan, R. J. (2005). Failure mechanisms of polymer-reinforced concrete masonry walls subjected to blast. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(8), 1194–1205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. S., Porter, J. R., Dinan, R. J., Hammons, M. I., & Connell, J. D. (2004). Explosive testing of polymer retrofit masonry walls. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 18(2), 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, S. T., Baylot, J. T., & Woodson, S. C. (2002). Response of 1/4 scale concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls to blast. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128(2), 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, C. D., & Shukry, E. D. (1988). Effect of damage on composite cylinders subjected to external pressure. ACI Structural Journal, 85(4), 405–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Z., & Liew, J. Y. R. (2016). Steel–concrete–steel sandwich composite structures subjected to extreme loads. International Journal of Steel Structures, 124, 142–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N. (1988). Structural impact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, K. W. (2012). Blast resistance of steel–concrete composite structures. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

  • Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2015). Blast resistant performance of bolt connections in the earth covered steel magazine. International Journal of Steel Structures, 15(2), 507–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauthammer, T., Assadi-Lamouki, A., & Shanaa, H. M. (1993). Analysis of impulsively loaded reinforced concrete structural elements—I. Theory. Computers & Structures, 48(5), 851–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Kartik, K. V., & Iqbal, M. A. (2020). Experimental and numerical investigation of reinforced concrete slabs under blast loading. Engineering Structures, 206, 110125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyei, C., & Braimah, A. (2017). Effects of transverse reinforcement spacing on the response of reinforced concrete columns subjected to blast loading. Engineering Structures, 142, 148–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, G. S., Karagiozova, D., von Klemperer, C. J., Nurick, G. N., Ozinsky, A., & Pickering, E. G. (2013). The air-blast response of sandwich panels with composite face sheets and polymer foam cores: Experiments and predictions. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 54, 64–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, G. S., & Schleyer, G. K. (2005). Inelastic deformation and failure of profiled stainless steel blast wall panels. Part I: Experimental investigations. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 31(4), 341–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, G. S., & Schleyer, G. K. (2006). Deformation and failure of profiled stainless steel blast wall panels. Part III: Finite element simulations and overall summary. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 32, 988–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liew, J. Y. R., & Sohel, K. M. A. (2009). Lightweight steel–concrete–steel sandwich system with J-hook connectors. Engineering Structures, 31(5), 1166–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liew, J. Y. R., Sohel, K. M. A., & Koh, C. G. (2009). Impact tests on steel–concrete–steel sandwich beams with lightweight concrete core. Engineering Structures, 31(9), 2045–2059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liew, J. Y. R., & Wang, T. Y. (2011). Novel steel–concrete–steel sandwich composite plates subject to impact and blast load. Advances in Structural Engineering, 14(4), 673–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louca, L. A., Boh, J. W., & Choo, Y. S. (2004). Design and analysis of stainless steel profiled blast barriers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60, 1699–1723.

    Google Scholar 

  • LSTC. (2013). LSDYNA keyword user’s manual. Livermore: Livermore Software Technology Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malek, N., Machida, A., Mutsuyoshi, H., & Makabe, T. (1993). steel–concrete sandwich members without shear reinforcement. Transactions of Japan Concrete Institute, 15(2), 1279–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh, B., Bina, M., & Hasounizadeh, H. (2012). Application and comparison of mathematical and physical models on inspecting slab of stilling basin floor under static and dynamic forces. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 147, 283–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh, B., Choi, E., & Kim, W. J. (2018). Comprehensive investigation of buckling behavior of plates considering effects of holes. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 68(2), 261–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh, B., Choi, E., & Kim, D. (2019). Vibration of sandwich plates considering elastic foundation temperature change and FGM faces. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 70(4), 601–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2014a). Investigation into central-difference and Newmark’s beta methods in measuring dynamic responses. Advanced Materials Research, 831, 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2014b). Use of buckling coefficient in predicting buckling load of plates with and without holes. Journal of Korean Society for Advanced Composite Structures, 5(3), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2015). Numerical analysis of dynamic responses of the plate subjected to impulsive loads. International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 9(9), 1194–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2016). Investigation into buckling coefficients of plates with holes considering variation of hole size and plate thickness. Mechanika, 22(3), 167–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2017). Analytical method to investigate nonlinear dynamic responses of sandwich plates with FGM faces resting on elastic foundation considering blast loads. Composite Structures, 174, 142–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2018). An analytical and numerical investigation on the dynamic responses of steel plates considering the blast loads. International Journal of Steel Structures, 19, 603–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Y. (2007). Users manual for LS-DYNA concrete material model 159. Virginia: Federal Highway Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muszynski, L. C., & Purcell, M. R. (2003a). Composite reinforcement to strengthen existing concrete structures against air blast. Journal of Composites for Construction, 7(2), 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muszynski, L. C., & Purcell, M. R. (2003b). Use of composite reinforcement to strengthen concrete and air-entrained concrete masonry walls against air blast. Journal of Composites for Construction, 7(2), 98–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, J. W., Kim, H. J., Kim, S. B., Yi, N. H., & Kim, J. H. (2010). Numerical evaluation of the retrofit effectiveness for GFRP retrofitted concrete slab subjected to blast pressure. Composite Structures, 19(5), 1212–1222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oduyemi, T. O. S., & Wright, H. D. (1989). An experimental investigation into the behavior of double skin sandwich beams. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 14(3), 197–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, A. K., Kumar, R., Paul, D. K., & Trikha, D. N. (2006). Non-linear response of reinforced concrete containment structure under blast loading. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 236, 993–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Y., Xiong, W., Li, Z.-X., & Xu, Q. (2015). Experimental studies on the local damage and fragments of unreinforced masonry walls under close-in explosions. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 90, 122–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, P. F., & Lu, B. (2007). Improving the blast resistance capacity of RC slabs with innovative composite materials. Composites Part B-Engineering, 38, 523–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohel, K. M. A., & Liew, J. Y. R. (2011). Steel–concrete–steel sandwich slabs with lightweight core: Static performance. Engineering Structures, 33(3), 981–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohel, K. M. A., & Liew, J. Y. R. (2014). Behavior of steel–concrete–steel sandwich slabs subject to impact load. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 100(100), 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiagarajan, G., Kadambi, A. V., Robert, S., & Johnson, C. F. (2014). Experimental and finite element analysis of doubly reinforced concrete slabs subjected to blast loads. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 75, 162–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasudevan, A. K. (2013). Finite element analysis and experimental comparison of doubly reinforced concrete slab subjected to blast loads. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City.

  • Wang, Y., Zhai, X., Lee, S. C., & Wang, W. (2016). Responses of curved steel–concrete–steel sandwich shells subjected to blast loading. Thin-Walled Structures, 108, 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, X., & Hao, H. (2009). Numerical derivation of homogenized dynamic masonry material properties with strain rate effects. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 36(3), 522–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, C., Wang, Y., & Zhai, X. (2020a). Low velocity impact performance of curved steel–concrete–steel sandwich shells with bolt connectors. Thin-Walled Structures, 150, 106672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, C., Wang, Y., Zhai, X., & Meng, L. (2020b). Strength assessment of curved steel–concrete–steel sandwich shells with bolt connectors under concentrated load. Engineering Structures, 212, 110465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, C., Wang, Y., Zhai, X., Meng, L., & Zhou, H. (2019). Experimental study on curved steel–concrete–steel sandwich shells under concentrated load by a hemi-spherical head. Thin-Walled Structures, 137, 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, J. B., & Zhang, W. (2017). Numerical analysis on steel–concrete–steel sandwich plates by damage plasticity model: from materials to structures. Construction and Building Materials, 149, 801–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, X., & Wang, Y. (2013). Modelling and dynamic response of steel reticulated shell under blast loading. Shock and Vibration, 20, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, C. F., Chen, J. Y., Wang, Y., & Lu, S. J. (2012). Damage mechanism and response of reinforced concrete containment structure under internal blast loading. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 61, 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this paper is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 51608151) and Heilongjiang Provincial Postdoctoral Science Fund (LBH-TZ1014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ximei Zhai.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, L., Wang, Y. & Zhai, X. Modeling and Dynamic Response of Curved Steel–Concrete–Steel Sandwich Shells Under Blast Loading. Int J Steel Struct 20, 1663–1681 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-020-00403-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-020-00403-8

Keywords

Navigation