Skip to main content
Log in

Day-to-Day Evolution Model Based on Dynamic Reference Point with Heterogeneous Travelers

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the implementation of a dynamic reference point scheme to capture traveler’s mental characteristics, with their day-to-day route choice behavior and heterogeneity. The traveler’s heterogeneity focuses on their different risk attitudes. On each day, travelers choose the routes based on their estimated travel costs, which can be affected by the reference point structure and its update. Most existing studies on the day-to-day traffic assignment models are proposed to capture day-to-day flow fluctuations through a learning model based on traveler’s past experience and information, but did not work on the consideration of gain and loss, which is described by the reference point scheme, comparing with traveler’s previous experience. This study aims to develop a day-to-day dynamic evolution model, in which travelers take on a tendency to refer to their previous travel experience as a reference when coping with different travel scenarios. First, the multi-class dynamic system is proposed to model traveler’s route choice behavior in a transportation network with two traveler classes. Then, the equilibrium state and stability of the evolution model is examined. We further investigate the class-specified update structure of the reference point. Finally, numerical experiments are presented to illustrate the application of our method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arkes HR, Hirshleifer D, Jiang D, Lim SS (2010) A cross-cultural study of reference point adaptation: evidence from China, Korea, and the US[J]. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 112(2):99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avineri E, Prashker J (2003) Sensitivity to uncertainty: need for a paradigm shift[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1854:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmat G, Iriberri N (2010) The importance of relative performance feedback information: Evidence from a natural experiment using high school students. Journal of Public Economics 94(7-8):435–452

  • Bar-Gera H (2005) Continuous and discrete trajectory models for dynamic traffic assignment. Netw Spat Econ 5(1):41–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bie J, Lo HK (2010) Stability and attraction domains of traffic equilibria in a day-to-day dynamical system formulation. Transp Res Part B 44:90–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Public Roads (1964) Traffic assignment manual. Tech Rep. US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC

  • Cantarella GE (1997) Fixed-point stability and bifurcations in dynamic processes for traffic assignment[M]. IOSS Press

  • Cantarella GE, Cascetta E (1995) Dynamic processes and equilibrium in transportation networks: towards a unifying theory. INFORMS:305–329

  • Cantarella G E, Velonà P (2003) Stability analysis of equilibrium patterns in a transportation network[C]. Proceedings of the european transport conference (etc) 2003 held 8–10 october 2003, Strasbourg, France

  • Cantarella GE, Watling DP (2016a) Modelling road traffic assignment as a day-to-day dynamic, deterministic process: a unified approach to discrete- and continuous-time models. EURO J Transp Logist 5:69–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantarella GE, Watling DP (2016b) A general stochastic process for dynamic traffic assignment: formulation, asymptotic behavior and stability analysis. Transp Res Part B 92(A):3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantarella GE, Velonà P, Watling DP (2015) Day-to-day Dynamics & Equilibrium Stability in a two-mode transport system with responsive bus operator strategies. Netw Spat Econ 15(3):485–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-013-9188-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascetta E (1989) A stochastic process approach to the analysis of temporal dynamics in transportation networks. Transp Res B Methodol 23B:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X(M), Chen X, Zheng H, Chen C (2017) Understanding network travel time reliability with on-demand ride service data. Frontiers of Engineering Management 4(4):388. https://doi.org/10.15302/j-fem-2017046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delle Site P, Salucci MV (2013) Transition choice probabilities and welfare analysis in random utility models with imperfect before–after correlation. Transp Res B Methodol 58:215–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2013.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domencich TA, McFadden D (1975) Urban travel demand-a behavioral analysis[R]

  • Friesz TL, Bernstein D, Mehta NJ, Tobin RL, Ganjalizadeh S (1994) Day-to-day dynamic network disequilibria and idealized traveler information systems. Oper Res 42(6):1120–1136. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.42.6.1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesz TL, Kim T, Kwon C, Rigdon MA (2011) Approximate network loading and dual-time-scale dynamic user equilibrium. Transp Res B Methodol 45(1):176–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2010.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao S, Frejinger E, Ben-Akiva M (2010) Adaptive route choices in risky traffic networks: a prospect theory approach[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 18(5):727–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guckenheimer J, Holmes P, Slemrod M (1984) Nonlinear oscillations dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields[J]. J Appl Mech 51:947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Liu HX (2011) A day-to-day dynamic model in discrete/continuum transportation networks. Transp Res Rec 2263(−1):66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo RY, Yang H, Huang HJ et al (2018) Day-to-day departure time choice under bounded rationality in the bottleneck model[J]. Transp Res B Methodol 117(PB):832–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo RY, Huang HJ, Yang H (2019) Tradable credit scheme for control of evolutionary traffic flows to system optimum: model and its convergence. Netw Spat Econ 19(3):833–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-018-9432-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han L, Wang DZW, Lo HK, Zhu C, Cai X (2017) Discrete-time day-to-day dynamic congestion pricing scheme considering multiple equilibria[J]. Transp Res B Methodol 104:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasnine MS, Graovac A, Camargo F, Habib KN (2019) A random utility maximization (RUM) based measure of accessibility to transit: accurate capturing of the first-mile issue in urban transit. J Transp Geogr 74:313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He X, Peeta S (2016) A marginal utility day-to-day traffic evolution model based on one-step strategic thinking. Transp Res B 84:237–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz JL (1984) The stability of stochastic equilibrium in a two-link transportation network. Transp Res B 18(1):13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalouptsidis N, Koutroumbas K, Psaraki V (2007) Classification methods for random utility models with i.i.d. disturbances under the most probable alternative rule. Eur J Oper Res 176(3):1778–1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress D, Pesch E (2016) Competitive location and pricing on networks with random utilities. Netw Spat Econ 16(3):837–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-015-9301-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsov YA (2004) Elements of applied bifurcation theory [J]

  • Li Y, Li J (2017) Multi-class dynamic network traffic flow propagation model with physical queues. Frontiers of Engineering Management 4:399. https://doi.org/10.15302/j-fem-2017041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney A, Zhang D (1997) Projected dynamical systems in the formulation, stability analysis, and computation of fixed-demand traffic network equilibria. Transp Sci 31:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netessine S, Yakubovich V (2012) The Darwinian workplace[J]. Harv Bus Rev 90(5):25–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen S, Dupuis C (1984) An Efficient Method for Computing Traffic Equilibria in Networks with Asymmetric Transportation Costs. Transportation Science 18(2):185–202

  • Peeta S, Zhou C (2002) A hybrid deployable dynamic traffic assignment framework for robust online route guidance. Netw Spat Econ 2:269–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeta S, Ziliaskopoulos AK (2001) Foundations of dynamic traffic assignment: the past, the present and the future. Netw Spat Econ 1(3):233–265. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012827724856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schul Y, Mayo R (2003) Searching for certainty in an uncertain world: the difficulty of giving up the experiential for the rational mode of thinking[J]. J Behav Decis Mak 16(2):93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y., Urban transportation networks: equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Cui X, Yao J, Li D (2015) Dynamic trading with reference point adaptation and loss aversion[J]. Oper Res 63(4):789–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Site PD (2017) On the equivalence between SUE and Fixed-point states of day-to-day assignment processes with serially-correlated route choice. Netw Spat Econ 17(3):935–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-017-9353-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MJ (1984) The stability of a dynamic model of traffic assignment---an application of a method of Lyapunov. INFORMS:245–252

  • Teklu F (2008) A stochastic process approach for frequency-based transit assignment with strict capacity constraints. Netw Spat Econ 8(2–3):225–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain 5:297–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Kaa EJ (2008) Extended prospect theory: findings on choice behaviour from economics and the behavioural sciences and their relevance for travel behaviour[J]

  • Waller ST, Fajardo D, Duell M, Dixit V (2013) Linear programming formulation for strategic dynamic traffic assignment. Netw Spat Econ 13(4):427–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-013-9187-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop JG, Whitehead JI (1952) Correspondence. Some Theoritical Aspects of Road Traffic Research. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 1(5):767–768

  • Wu J, Sun H, Wang DZW, Zhong M, Han L, Gao Z (2013) Bounded-rationality based day-to-day evolution model for travel behavior analysis of urban railway network. Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies 31(2):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Lo HK (2016) Day-to-day departure time modeling under social network influence. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 92:54–72

  • Xu H (2013) Analysis and optimization of urban traffic flow system[M]. Nanjing University Press

  • Xu H, Zhou J, Xu W (2010) Stochastic network user equilibrium and system evolution with dependence on reference point[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory and Practice 30(12):2283–2289

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Lou Y, Yin Y, Zhou J (2011) A prospect-based user equilibrium model with endogenous reference points and its application in congestion pricing[J]. Transportation Research Part B Methodological 45(2):311–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Huang HJ (2005) Mathematical and economic theory of road pricing. Elsevier, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Wan C, Sun H et al (2017) Dynamic rerouting behavior and its impact on dynamic traffic patterns[J]. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst:1–17

  • Zhao X, Wan C, Bi J (2019) Day-to-Day assignment models and traffic dynamics under information provision. Netw Spat Econ 19(2):473–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-018-9386-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71771018, 91846202,71621001) and the Science and Technology Foundation of Beijing Jiaotong University (2016RC012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huijun Sun.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

The process of calculating the eigenvalues of the matrix \( {J}_C^{\prime }{J}_P \) can be described as follows:

$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}{\left.{J}_c\right|}_{z^{\ast }}={\left.\left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial C\left({f}_1\right)}{\partial {f}_1}& \frac{\partial C\left({f}_1\right)}{\partial {f}_2}\\ {}\frac{\partial C\left({f}_2\right)}{\partial {f}_1}& \frac{\partial C\left({f}_2\right)}{\partial {f}_2}\end{array}\right]\right|}_{z^{\ast }}\\ {}={\left.\left[\begin{array}{cc}{c}_{0,1} ab{\left(\frac{f_1^{\ast }}{Q_1}\right)}^{b-1}\frac{1}{Q_1}& 0\\ {}0& {c}_{0,2} ab{\left(\frac{f_2^{\ast }}{Q_2}\right)}^{b-1}\frac{1}{Q_2}\end{array}\right]\right|}_{z^{\ast }}\end{array}} $$
(42)
$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}{\left.{J}_P\right|}_{z^{\ast }}={\left.\left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial {P}_1}{\partial {c}_1}& \frac{\partial {P}_1}{\partial {c}_2}\\ {}\frac{\partial {P}_2}{\partial {c}_1}& \frac{\partial {P}_2}{\partial {c}_2}\end{array}\right]\right|}_{z^{\ast }}\\ {}={\left.\left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\left(-\theta \right)\exp \left(-\theta {c}_1^{\ast}\right)\exp \left(-\theta {c}_2^{\ast}\right)}{{\left[\exp \left(-\theta {c}_1^{\ast}\right)+\exp \left(-\theta {c}_2^{\ast}\right)\right]}^2}& \frac{\theta \exp \left(-\theta {c}_1^{\ast}\right)\exp \left(-\theta {c}_2^{\ast}\right)}{{\left[\exp \left(-\theta {c}_1^{\ast}\right)+\exp \left(-\theta {c}_2^{\ast}\right)\right]}^2}\\ {}\frac{\theta \exp \left(-\theta {c}_1^{\ast}\right)\exp \left(-\theta {c}_2^{\ast}\right)}{{\left[\exp \left(-\theta {c}_1^{\ast}\right)+\exp \left(-\theta {c}_2^{\ast}\right)\right]}^2}& \frac{\left(-\theta \right)\exp \left(-\theta {c}_1^{\ast}\right)\exp \left(-\theta {c}_2^{\ast}\right)}{{\left[\exp \left(-\theta {c}_1^{\ast}\right)+\exp \left(-\theta {c}_2^{\ast}\right)\right]}^2}\end{array}\right]\right|}_{z^{\ast }}\end{array}} $$
(43)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, H., Zhang, S., Han, L. et al. Day-to-Day Evolution Model Based on Dynamic Reference Point with Heterogeneous Travelers. Netw Spat Econ 20, 935–961 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-020-09504-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-020-09504-7

Keywords

Navigation