Skip to main content
Log in

Selection of teak sawdust polypropylene composite’s composition for outdoor applications using TOPSIS analysis

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selection of a material for their end use in engineering applications depends on the properties of materials. In this paper, physical and mechanical properties of teak sawdust-polypropylene composite are evaluated and most suitable composition for outdoor applications have been determined by using TOPSIS technique of optimization. Virgin and recycled polypropylene are mixed with teak sawdust to fabricate the composite with and without maleated polypropylene (MAPP) using compression molding method. TOPSIS technique of optimization involves prioritizing the performance indicators. Important properties such as tensile strength, flexural strength, impact strength, hardness, melt flow index, water absorption and thickness of swell are selected for the study. The composition 50% recycled polypropylene, 45% wood sawdust and 5% MAPP by weight is found to be most suitable for outdoor applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thakur V K and Thakur M K 2014 Processing and characterization of natural cellulose fibers thermoset polymer composites. J. Carbohydr. Polym. 109: 102–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azwa Z N, Yousif B F, Manalo A C and Karunasena W 2013 A review on the degradability of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. J. Mat. Des. 47: 424–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashori A and Nourbakhsh A 2009 Characteristics of wood–fiber plastic composites made of recycled materials. J. Waste Manag. 29: 1291–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nafaji S K, Tajvidi M and Hamidina E 2007 Effect of temperature, plastic type and virginity on the water uptake of sawdust/plastic composites. J. Holz Roh Werkst. 65: 377–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adhikary K B, Pang S and Staiger M P 2008 Dimensional stability and mechanical behaviour of wood–plastic composites based on recycled and virgin high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Composites: Part B. 39: 807–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bledzki A K, Faruk O and Huque M 2002 Physico-mechanical studies of wood fiber reinforced composites. J. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 41(3): 435–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. La Mantia FP and Morreale M 2011 Green composites: A brief review J. Composite Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 42: 579–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adhikary K B, Shusheng P and Staiger M P 2008 Long term moisture absorption and thickness swelling recycled thermoplastics reinforced with pinus radita sawdust recycled and virgin high density polyethylene. J. Chem. Eng. 142: 190–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tamrakar S, Roberto A. Lopez-Anido 2011 Water absorption of wood polypropylene composite sheet piles and its influence on mechanical properties. J. Construction and Building Materials 25: 3977–3988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. [10]Shanian A and Savadogo O 2006 TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell. J. Power Sources. 159: 1095–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rao R V and Patel B K 2010 A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection. J. Mat. and Des. 37(10): 4738–4747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. American Standard test method 2014 D 638-14 standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA

    Google Scholar 

  13. American Standard test method 2003 D790 – 03 standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA

  14. American Standard test method 2003 D 256-10 standard test methods for determining the izod pendulum impact resistance of plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA

  15. American Standard test method 2003 D 2240-15 Standard test method for rubber property durometer hardness. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA

  16. American Standard test method 2003 D 1238-10. Standard test method for melt flow rates of thermoplastics by extrusion plastometer. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA

  17. American Standard test method 1998 D 570-98 Standard test method for water absorption of plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA

  18. Byun H S and Lee K H 2005 A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method’ J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 26: 1338–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Srikrishna S, Reenivasulu R and Vani S 2014 A new car selection in the market using TOPSIS Technique. IJEGS 177–181. ISSN 2091-2730

  20. Fatih Dogan 2014 Morphology and Thermo Mechanical Properties of Wood/Polypropylene Composites. Intech Open access: 415–428

  21. Laly A Pothan 2009 Natural Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites: From Macro to Nanoscale Archives contemporaines ISBN 2914610998, 9782914610995

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Kumar Yadav.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yadav, A.K., Srivastava, R. Selection of teak sawdust polypropylene composite’s composition for outdoor applications using TOPSIS analysis. Sādhanā 45, 231 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01435-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01435-w

Keywords

Navigation