Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of Optimum Process Parameters and Residual Stress in Friction Welding of Thixocast A356 Aluminum Alloy

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quest of automobile industries for weight reduction and enhancement of the mechanical strength of components has been a major incentive for new manufacturing technologies such as thixocasting. It is therefore important that the welded joints of such components exhibit adequate strength and formability. The present investigation is on optimization of process parameters to achieve better weld quality obtained in friction-welded joints of thixocast A356 aluminum alloy. The optimum combination of welding parameters is obtained by using the analysis of the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio based on the Taguchi method. Joint strength higher than the parent material strength is achieved with an optimum set of friction-welding parameters. In addition, residual stress analysis is carried out both experimentally and numerically. Comparisons between the experimental and numerical residual stresses are in good agreement with each other. The residual stress obtained is of low magnitude and compressive in nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. B. Spencer, R .Mehrabian, and M.C. Flemings: Metall. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, pp 1925 – 32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Z. Fan: Int. Mater. Rev., 2002, vol. 47, pp 49 – 85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Lakshmi, M.C.V. Kumar, Raghunath, P. Kumar, V. Ramanarayanan, K.S.S.S. Murthy, and P. Dutta: Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China., 2010, vol. 20, pp. 961–67.

  4. H. H. Kim, and C. G. Kang: Adv. Mater. Res., 2011, vol. 264-265. pp. 36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Stephen: Solid State Phenom, 2014, vol. 217-218, pp. 487– 95.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Hirt and R. Kopp: Thixoforming, Semi-Solid Metal Processing, Wiley, New York, 2009

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. S.K. Singh, K.Chattopadhyay, G.Phanikumar, and P. Dutta: Acta Mater., 2014, vol.73, pp. 177–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. G.Albertini, E. Girardin, and A. Manescu: Innovative Technological Materials, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M Haghshenas, M. A. Gharghouri, V. Bhakhri, R. J. Klassen, and A. P. Gerlich: Int J Adv Manuf Technol., 2017, vol.93, pp.3733– 747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. V. M. Linton and M.I. Ripley: Acta Mater., 2008, vol.56, pp.4319–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. M. Attallah, M. Preuss, and C. Boonchareon, A Steuwer,D. John, D Hughes, C Dungey, A.J. Baxter: Metall and Mat Trans A, 2012, vol. 43, pp.3149– 161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Bühr, B. Ahmad, P. Colegrove, A. McAndrew, H. Guo, X. Zhang: Mater. Des., 2018, vol. 139, pp. 222– 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R J Moat, D Hughes, A Steuwer, N Iqbal, M Preuss, S Bray and M Rawson: Metall and Mat Trans A, 2009, vol.40, pp.2098– 108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Philip and H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia: Mater. Sci. Technol., 2001, vol. 17, pp. 355–65.

  15. Hasan Okuyucu, Adem Kurt, and Erol Arcaklioglu: Mater. Des., 2007, vol. 28 (1), pp.78–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Chen: J. Mater. Sci., 2009, vol. 44, pp. 2573–80.

  17. P. Mondal, and D.Bose; Int Res J Eng Technol., 2015, vol. 2, pp. 483–88.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N .Kiaee, and M. A. Khafri: Mater Des., 2014, vol. 54, pp.25–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. X. Liu, S. Lan, and J. Ni: Mater. Des., 2014, vol. 59, pp. 50 – 62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Liao, Y. Shi, Y. Cui, S. Cui, Z. Jiang and Y.Yi: Metals, 2018, vol. 8(10), pp.756–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Bozkurt: Mater Des., 2012, vol. 35, pp.440–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Pradeep, and S. Muthukumaran: Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2013, vol. 5(3), pp. 25-35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Kannan, S.S. Kumaran, and L. A. Kumaraswamidhas: J Mech Sci Technol, 2016, vol. 30, pp.2225 –235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R.N. Kacker, E.S. Lagergren, and J.J. Filliben: J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol., 1991, vol.96 (5), pp.577–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. B.D. Cullity: Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, Addison Wesley Publishing Co. Inc., 1978.

  26. J. Long, Q. Pan, N.Tao, M. Dao, S. Suresh, and L. Lu: Acta Mater., 2019, vol.166, pp.56–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. G.J. Johnson and W.H. Cook: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ballistics, The Hague, 1983, pp. 541–48.

  28. I.S. Kim, J.S. Son, I.G. Kim, J.Y. Kim, and O.S. Kim: J.Mater.Process.Technol., 2003, vol. 136, pp. 139–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. M.Koilraj, V. Sundareswaran, S. Vijayan, and S. R.K. Rao: Mater Des., 2012, vol. 42, pp. 1–7.

  30. K. Elangovan, V. Balasubramanian, and S. Babu: J. Mater.Eng. Perform., 2008, vol. 17, pp. 820–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. R.A. Fisher: Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Oliver & Boyd, London, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Winiczenko: Int J Adv Manuf Technol., 2016, vol. 84, pp.941–955.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Fraley, M. Oom, B. Terrien, and J.Z. Date: The Michigan Chemical Process Dynamic and Controls Open Text Book, 2006.

  34. D.Wackerly, W.Mendenhall, and R.L.Scheaffer: Mathematical Statistics with Applications. 6th ed., Pacific Grove, CA, Druxbury Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. Karthikeyan, and V.Balasubramanian: Int. J Adv. Manuf. Tech., 2010, vol.51, pp. 173–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. T.Saravanan, H. Das, K. Arunmuthu, J. Philip, B.P.C. Rao, T. Jayakumar, and T.K. Pal, Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining, 2014, vol.19, pp 125–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. R. I. Stephens, A. Fatemi, R. Stephens, and H. O. Fuchs: Metal Fatigue in Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  38. S.R.Sharma, Z.Y. Ma, and R.S. Mishra: Scr. Mater., 2004, vol.51, pp. 237–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. M. Bouazara, A. Bouaicha, and K.A. Ragab: J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2015, vol. 24, pp. 3084–092.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradip Dutta.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Manuscript submitted March 24, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, S.K., Chattopadhyay, K. & Dutta, P. Determination of Optimum Process Parameters and Residual Stress in Friction Welding of Thixocast A356 Aluminum Alloy. Metall Mater Trans B 51, 3079–3088 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-020-01948-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-020-01948-z

Navigation