Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative assessment of seismic collapse risk for non-ductile and ductile bridges: a case study in China

  • S.I. : Recent Advances in Seismic Fragility and Vulnerability
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Risk assessment plays an important role in quantifying earthquake loss and has been widely used in the field of seismic engineering. However, current studies of the risk assessment rarely consider the different failure modes of piers (i.e., flexure failure, flexure-shear failure and shear failure), which will lead to an excessive estimation for the seismic performance and collapse safety of the reinforced concrete girder bridges. This paper focuses on studying the seismic behavior of bridges considering different failure modes and comparing the seismic collapse risk of the bridges with and without ductile detailing. The numerical analysis is performed in an open source finite element (FE) software framework, Open Sees. Nonlinear shear springs are introduced into the FE models of reinforced concrete (RC) columns to accommodate the shear and flexural-shear effect of the bridges. The accuracy of the FE models is validated by using the existing results of static cyclic-loading experiments. Case studies are conducted for two categories of the girder bridges, which are designed based on new and old seismic design criteria in China, respectively. The collapse fragility curves are developed by using the incremental dynamic analysis method, which considers the uncertainties of the ground-motion characteristics and the structural material parameters. Based on the seismic hazard curve of a designated region, a comparative assessment of the seismic collapse risk is performed regarding mean annual collapse rate for the non-ductile and ductile bridges. The main results of the paper are: (1) The FE model with the nonlinear shear spring provides an acceptably accurate solution for simulating the initial stiffness, shear failure point, strength degradation slope and residual shear strength of the RC columns; (2) The structural collapse safety is shown to be related not only to the collapse probability of the bridges but also to the occurring probability of the ground motion intensity exceeding a given threshold; (3) The mean annual collapse rate of the ductile girder bridges is significantly smaller than that of the non-ductile girder bridges. The results can be used as a reference to implement specific policies for appraising and mitigating the seismic risk of existing RC bridges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig.1
Fig.2
Fig. 3
Fig.4
Fig.5
Fig.6
Fig.7
Fig.8
Fig.9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ang BG (1981) Ductility of reinforced concrete bridge piers under seismic loading. Dissertation, University of Canterbury

  • Arakawa T, He M-X, Arai Y, Mizoguchi M (1988) Shear resisting behavior of reinforced concrete columns with spiral hoops. Trans Jpn Concr Inst 10:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (2014) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE reston, VA

  • Aviram A, Mackie KR, Stojadinović B (2008) Guidelines for nonlinear analysis of bridge structures in California. Pacific earthquake engineering research center, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker JW (2015) Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthq Spectra 31:579–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Baradaran Shoraka M, Yang T, Elwood K (2013) Seismic loss estimation of non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42:297–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Bae S, Bayrak O (2008) Plastic hinge length of reinforced concrete columns. ACI Struct J 106(2):290–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry MP, Eberhard MO (2005) Practical performance model for bar buckling. J Struct Eng 131:1060–1070

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracci JM, Kunnath SK (1998) Analytical modeling of beam-column joints of composite SRC frame systems. Spec Publ 174:197–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Camata G, Spacone E, Al-Mahaidi R, Saouma V (2004) Analysis of test specimens for cohesive near-bond failure of fiber-reinforced polymer-plated concrete. J Compos Constr 8:528–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardone D (2014) Displacement limits and performance displacement profiles in support of direct displacement-based seismic assessment of bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43:1239–1263

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen LB (2012) Seismic fragility analysis for highway bridges in Wenchuan region. Dissertation, Southwest Jiaotong university (in Chinese)

  • Choi E (2002) Seismic analysis and retrofit of mid-America bridges Dissertation, Georgia institute of technology

  • Cordova PP, Deierlein G, Mehanny SSF, Cornell CA (2000) Development of a two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure. In: Proceedings of the 2nd U.S.–Japan workshop on performance-based seismic design methodology for reinforced concrete building structures, PEER Report 2000/10, pacific earthquake engineering research center, university of California, Berkeley

  • Davey BE (1975) Reinforced concrete bridge piers under seismic loading. Master of engineering report, civil engineering department, university of Canterbury, Christchurch

  • Eads L, Miranda E, Krawinkler H, Lignos DG (2013) An efficient method for estimating the collapse risk of structures in seismic regions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42:25–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood KJ (2004) Modelling failures in existing reinforced concrete columns. Can J Civ Eng 31:846–859

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood KJ, Eberhard MO (2009) Effective stiffness of reinforced concrete columns. ACI Struct J 106:476–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood KJ, Moehle JP (2005) Drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns with light transverse reinforcement. Earthq Spectra 21:71–89

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2009) Recommended methodology for quantification of building system performance and response parameters (FEMA P695A). Prepared by the applied technology council, Redwood City

  • Gentile R, Porco F, Raffaele D, Uva G (2018) Simplified moment-curvature relationship in analytical form for RC circular sections. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 51:145–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard OR, Ricardo M (2019) On the efficient risk assessment of bridge structures. In: 7th international conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, Crete, Greece, 24–26

  • Ghee AB, Priestley MN, Paulay T (1989) Seismic shear strength of circular reinforced concrete columns. Struct J 86:45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh J, Padgett JE (2011) Probabilistic seismic loss assessment of aging bridges using a component-level cost estimation approach. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 40:1743–1761

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra LF, Medina RA, Krawinkler H (2005) Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34:1489–1511

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai H, Yamamoto Y (1986) A study on causes of earthquake damage of Izumi high school due to Miyagi-Ken-Oki earthquake in 1978. Trans Jpn Concr Inst 8:405–418

    Google Scholar 

  • JT/T663-2006 (2006) Series of elastomeric pad bearings for highway bridges. China communications press, Beijing (in Chinese)

  • JTG/TB02-01-2008 (2008) Guideline for seismic design for highway bridges. China communications press, Beijing (in Chinese)

  • Kameshwar S, Padgett JE (2014) Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards. Eng Struct 78:154–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S (1981) On the method of discrete probability distributions in risk and reliability calculations–application to seismic risk assessment. Risk Anal 1:189–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy RC, Short SA (1994) Basis for seismic provisions of DOE-STD-1020. Rep. No. UCRL-CR-111478, lawrence livermore national laboratory, livermore, Calif., and Rep. No. BNL-52418, Brookhaven national laboratory, Upton

  • Maekawa K, An X (2000) Shear failure and ductility of RC columns after yielding of main reinforcement. Eng Fract Mech 65:335–368

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBorgne M R (2012) Modeling the post shear failure behavior of reinforced concrete columns. In: Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, Austin

  • LeBorgne M, Ghannoum W (2013) Analytical element for simulating lateral-strength degradation in reinforced concrete columns and other frame members. J Struct Eng 140:04014038

    Google Scholar 

  • Yh LI (2008) A practical handbook for highway bridge support. China communications press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Ellingwood BR (2009) Framework for multihazard risk assessment and mitigation for wood-frame residential construction. J Struct Eng 135(2):159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Liel A, Haselton C, Deierlein G, Baker J (2007) Assessing the seismic collapse risk of reinforced concrete frame structures, including the effects of modeling uncertainties. In: special workshop on risk acceptance and risk communication, stanford university, pp 26–27

  • Liu KY, Witarto W, Chang KC (2015) Composed analytical models for seismic assessment of reinforced concrete bridge columns. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44:265–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn AC, Moehle JP, Mahin SA, Holmes WT (1996) Seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete building columns. Earthq Spectra 12:715–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangalathu S, Soleimani F, Jeon JS (2017) Bridge classes for regional seismic risk assessment: improving HAZUS models. Eng Struct 148:755–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini A, Spacone E (2006) Analysis of reinforced concrete elements including shear effects. ACI Struct J 103:645

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroney B (1995) Large scale bridge abutment tests to determine stiffness and ultimate strength under seismic loading. Dissertation, university of California

  • Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL (2006) OpenSees command language manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, Berkeley, p 264

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Communications of the People's Republic of China (1977) The criterion for seismic design of highway engineering: trial. China communications press, Beijing (in Chinese)

  • Monteiro R, Araújo M, Delgado R, Marques M (2018) Modeling considerations in seismic assessment of RC bridges using state-of-practice structural analysis software tools. Front Struct Civ Eng 12(1):109–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Monti G, Filippou FC, Spacone E (1997) Analysis of hysteretic behavior of anchored reinforcing bars. Struct J 94:248–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro IRM, Park R, Priestley MJN (1976) Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete bridge piers. Report 76-9, department of civil engineering, university of canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp-106

  • Muntasir Billah AHM, Shahria AM (2015) Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges: a state-of-the-art review. Struct Infrastruct Eng 11(6):804–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagasaka T (1982) Effectiveness of steel fiber as web reinforcement in reinforced concrete columns. Trans Jpn Concr Inst 4:493–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuenhofer A, Filippou FC (1997) Evaluation of nonlinear frame finite-element models. J Struct Eng 123:958–966

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielson BG, Desroches R (2007) Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(6):823–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikfar F, Konstantinidis D (2013). Sliding response analysis of operational and functional components (OFC) in seismically isolated buildings. In: Proceedings 3rd specialty conference on disaster prevention and mitigation, Canadian society of civil engineering (CSCE), Montreal, QC

  • Padgett JE, Dennemann K, Ghosh J (2010) Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost-benefit (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retrofit assessment. Struct Saf 32:165–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett JE, Nielson BG, DesRoches R (2008) Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:711–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiao MY (2013) Research on bridge seismic responses under the excitation of near-fault ground motions. Dissertation, Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong university (in Chinese)

  • Ramanathan K, DesRoches R, Padgett JE (2012) A comparison of pre and post-seismic design considerations in moderate seismic zones through the fragility assessment of multispan bridge classes. Eng Struct 45:559–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan K, Padgett JE, DesRoches R (2015) Temporal evolution of seismic fragility curves for concrete box-girder bridges in California. Eng Struct 97:29–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Sezen H, Moehle JP (2004) Shear strength model for lightly reinforced concrete columns. J Struct Eng 130:1692–1703

    Google Scholar 

  • Sezen H, Moehle JP (2006) Seismic tests of concrete columns with light transverse reinforcement. ACI Struct J 103:842

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen JM (2015) Seismic engineering. China building industry press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov V, Zahran HM (2018) Seismic hazard analysis for development of risk-targeted ground-motion maps in the western Saudi Arabia. In: Proceedings 16-th European conference on earthquake engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp 18–21

  • Tavares DH, Padgett JE, Paultre P (2012) Fragility curves of typical as-built highway bridges in eastern Canada. Eng Struct 40:107–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight JK, Sozen MA (1973) Shear strength decay in reinforced concrete columns subjected to large deflection reversals. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakeri B, Padgett JE, Amiri GG (2013) Fragility analysis of skewed single-frame concrete box-girder bridges. J Perform Constr Facil 28:571–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L, Elwood K, Haukaas T (2007) Classification and seismic safety evaluation of existing reinforced concrete columns. J Struct Eng 133:1316–1330

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China

    Caigui Huang, Libo Chen, Leqia He & Weidong Zhuo

Authors
  1. Caigui Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Libo Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leqia He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Weidong Zhuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Libo Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 7 and 8.

Table 7 The parameters of the far-field ground motions
Full size table
Table 8 The parameters of the near-fault ground motions
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, C., Chen, L., He, L. et al. Comparative assessment of seismic collapse risk for non-ductile and ductile bridges: a case study in China. Bull Earthquake Eng 19, 6641–6667 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00946-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00946-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation