Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 7, 2020

Understory use by terrestrial small mammals in an unflooded forest patch in the Pantanal floodplain

  • Nayara Yoshie Sano ORCID logo , Heitor Miraglia Herrera , Grasiela Edith de Oliveira Porfirio and Filipe Martins Santos ORCID logo EMAIL logo
From the journal Mammalia

Abstract

To date, there have been no studies that have evaluated small mammal utilization of the understory of forests. In this study, we described the use of vertical strata by small mammals in patches of unflooded forests, known as “cordilheiras”, in the Nhecolândia sub-region of the Pantanal, Brazil. We collected all species using the ground and understory, including the terrestrial didelphid Monodelphis domestica. We suppose that local habitat features (e.g., Acuri palms), rather than intrinsic species characteristics, may be more conducive to the use of understory vegetation by small mammals in the Nhecolândia region.


Corresponding author: Filipe Martins Santos, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais e Sustentabilidade Agropecuária, Universidade Católica Dom Bosco, Av. Tamandaré, 6000-Jardim seminário, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 501100005672

Award Identifier / Grant number: 501100002322

Award Identifier / Grant number: 501100003593

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This study was funded by “Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul” (FUNDECT; grant PRONEX 006/2015), “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior” — CAPES (Finance Code 001), and “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico” — CNPq (406547/2018-1). It was financed in part by the Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul – UFMS/MEC. We gratefully acknowledge the receipt of the following grants: FMS 88887.162877/2018-00, NYS 88887.194498/2018-00, and HMH 308768/2017-5 CNPq PQ.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Andreazzi, C.S., Rademaker, V., Gentile, R., Herrera, H.M., Jansen, A.M., and D’Andrea, P.S. (2011). Population ecology of small rodents and marsupials in a semi-deciduous tropical forest of the southeast Pantanal, Brazil. Zoologia (Curitiba) 28: 762–770, https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-46702011000600009.Search in Google Scholar

Antunes, P.C. (2009). Uso de habitat e partição do espaço entre três espécies de pequenos mamíferos simpátricos no Pantanal Sul-Mato-Grossense, Master Dissertation. Brasil, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul.Search in Google Scholar

Antunes, P.C., Oliveira-Santos, L.G.R., Tomas, W.M., Forester, J.D., and Fernandez, F.A.Z. (2016). Disentangling the effects of habitat, food, and intraspecific competition on resource selection by the spiny rat. Thrichomys fosteri J. Mammal. 97: 1738–1744, https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyw140.Search in Google Scholar

Aragona, M. and Marinho-Filho, J. (2009). História natural e biologia reprodutiva de marsupiais no Pantanal, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Zoologia 26: 220–230, https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-46702009000200004.Search in Google Scholar

Cáceres, N.C., Nápoli, R.P., and Hannibal, W. (2010). Differential trapping success for small mammals using pitfall and standard cage traps in a woodland savannah region of southwestern Brazil. Mammalia 75: 45–52, https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.2010.069.Search in Google Scholar

Camargo, N.F., Sano, N.Y., and Vieira, E.M. (2018). Forest vertical complexity affects alpha and beta diversity of small mammals. J. Mammal. 99: 1444–1454, https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyy136.Search in Google Scholar

de Lima, J.S., Rocha, F.L., Alves, F.M., Lorosa, E.S., Jansen, A.M., and Mourão, G.M. (2015). Infestation of arboreal nests of coatis by triatomine species, vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi, in a large Neotropical wetland. J. Vector Ecol. 40: 379–385, https://doi.org/10.1111/jvec.12177.Search in Google Scholar

Fahrig, L. (2020). Why do several small patches hold more species than few large patches? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 29: 615–628, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13059.Search in Google Scholar

Graipel, M.E., Cherem, J.J., Miller, P.R.M., and Glock, L. (2003). Trapping small mammals in the forest understory: a comparison of three methods. Mammalia 67: 551–558, https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm-2003-0409.Search in Google Scholar

Hannibal, W. and Caceres, N.C. (2010). Use of vertical space by small mammals in gallery forest and woodland savannah in south-western Brazil. Mammalia 74: 247–255, https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.2010.007.Search in Google Scholar

Hannibal, W., Arguelho, W.C., Moreira, J.C., and Aoki, C. (2019). Use of understory for frugivory by Thrichomys fosteri (Rodentia, Echimydae). Oecol. Austr. 23: 1100–1113, https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2019.2304.30.Search in Google Scholar

Lambert, T.D., Malcolm, J.R., and Zimmerman, B.L. (2005). Variation in small mammal species richness by trap height and trap type in Southeastern Amazonia. J. Mammal. 86: 982–990, https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2005)86[982:vismsr]2.0.co;2.10.1644/1545-1542(2005)86[982:VISMSR]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Lammers, A.R. (2004). The biodynamics of arboreal locomotion: the effects of substrate diameter on locomotor kinetics in the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica). J. Exp. Biol. 207: 4325–4336, https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01231.Search in Google Scholar

Malcolm, J.R. (1991). Comparative abundances of neotropical small mammals by trap height. J. Mammal. 72: 188–192, https://doi.org/10.2307/1381995.Search in Google Scholar

Menezes, J.F.S., Mourão, G., and Kotler, B.P. (2017). Understory cover increases patch use in rodent Thrichomys fosteri. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 30: 140–154, https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2017.1354921.Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, A.P., Tomas, W.M., and Ragusa-Netto, J. (2008). Estrutura do sub-bosque em manchas florestais no Pantanal da Nhecolândia: efeitos da presença de gado. Comunicado Técnico 74. Embrapa Pantanal, Corumbá, 4. Mato Grosso do Sul.Search in Google Scholar

Paglia, A.P., Fonseca, G.A.B., Rylands, A.B., Herrmann, G., Aguiar, L.M.S., Chiarello, A.G., Leite, Y.L.R., Costa, L.P., Siciliano, S., Kierulff, M.C.M., et al. (2012). Lista Anotada dos Mamíferos do Brasil. 2. In: Occasional paper in conservation biology, Vol. 6, pp. 1–76.Search in Google Scholar

Rodela, L.G. (2006). Unidades de vegetação e pastagens nativas do pantanal da Nhecolândia, Mato Grosso do Sul, Doctoral thesis. São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo.Search in Google Scholar

Silva, J.S.V. and Abdon, M.M. (1989). Delimitation of the Brazilian Pantanal and its subregions. Pesqui. Agropecuária Bras. 33: 1703–1711.Search in Google Scholar

Vieira, E.M. and Monteiro-Filho, E.L.A. (2003). Vertical stratification of small mammals in the Atlantic rain forest of Southeastern Brazil. J. Trop. Ecol. 19: 501–507, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467403003559.Search in Google Scholar

Wall, S.B.V., Kuhn, K.M., and Beck, M.J. (2005). Seed removal, seed predation, and secondary dispersal. Ecology 86: 801–806, https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0847.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-02-14
Accepted: 2020-08-12
Published Online: 2020-09-07
Published in Print: 2021-03-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mammalia-2020-0016/html
Scroll to top button