Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter September 3, 2020

Functionalized layered double hydroxide applied to heavy metal ions absorption: A review

  • Zhen Tang , Zedong Qiu , Shuang Lu EMAIL logo and Xianming Shi EMAIL logo
From the journal Nanotechnology Reviews

Abstract

The use of functional material can help mitigate the pollution by heavy metals, which presents an array of risks to human production and life. This work provides a comprehensive review of the current knowledge on functionalized layered double hydroxide (LDH) as a heavy metal absorption material, by synthesizing the information from a total of 141 relevant publications published since 2005. LDH provides a potentially highly efficient method to adsorb heavy metal ions, which is simple to prepare and of low cost. The lack of functional groups and structural components of pristine LDH, however, limits the absorption capacity and widespread applications of LDH. Through intercalation, surface modification, or loading on substrates, functional groups or structural components are introduced into the pristine LDH to prepare functionalized LDH. In this process, the hydroxyl group and the valence state of [Mg(OH)6] octahedrons play a crucial role. Functionalized LDH can be endowed with selective absorption capacity and enhanced stability and recyclability. After adsorbing heavy metal ions, functionalized LDH can be readily separated from the liquid phase. These aspects are discussed, along with the structure and composition, shape and size, and synthesis methods and research tools of LDH. This work concludes with the discussion of preparation and utilization and a look to the future in terms of identified research needs regarding the preparation, use, and recycling (or upcycling) of economical and environmental-friendly LDH.

1 Introduction

The pollution of natural environment by heavy metal ions is a ubiquitous issue with dire consequences. Heavy metals with a density greater than 4.5 g/cm3, such as Hg, Cr, Ni, Fe, Cu, Zn, and Mn, are closely related to human production and life. Heavy metals are widely used in electronic components, antibacterial materials, batteries, photosensitive materials, etc. If the heavy metals are not properly disposed, they may cause many environmental or health risks [1]. For example, in soil contaminated by heavy metal ions, the growth of crops is slow and the yield is reduced, while heavy metal ions are enriched in the plants [2]. Similarly, heavy metals not only affect the growth of organisms and plants in water but also become enriched in aquatic organisms and plants [3]. Even at low concentrations, heavy metal ions accumulate in the human body through the food chain and drinking water, thereby threatening human health [4].

Heavy metal ion pollution can be mitigated through precipitation, electrolysis, membrane separation, ion exchange, and absorption, among which absorption is the method widely used because of its simple operation, low cost, and high efficiency [5,6]. The precipitation method is mainly achieved by adding hydroxide, sulfide, ferrite, etc., in water, causing the heavy metal ions to react with them to generate precipitate. However, its effluent concentration does not meet the requirements and needs further treatment. The electrolysis method uses direct current to remove heavy metal ions in water through the process of redox reaction, but its electric energy consumption is high, and the method is only suitable for wastewater with high heavy metal ion concentration. The ion exchange method uses the exchange groups of the ion exchanger to exchange heavy metal ions in water. However, the operating and raw material costs are high. The membrane separation method involves choosing a suitable membrane that will hinder the passage of heavy metal ions but the strength of the membrane is poor and easily blocked. Absorption is a common phenomenon that exists at the solid–liquid interface. Loose porous and large specific surface area absorbents have been leveraged to adsorb heavy metal ions in water.

Absorbents fall into three main categories: inorganic absorbents, organic absorbents, and biological absorbents. Inorganic absorbents (layered double hydroxide [LDH], graphene, activated carbon, zeolite, mesoporous silica, etc.) have large specific surface areas and controllable pore structure [7]. Organic absorbents are mainly coordinated by unpaired electrons and heavy metal ions in nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, and other atoms of the contained functional groups. The advantages of bioabsorbents are their renewable nature and highly selective absorption ability. Table 1 provides some absorption properties of various materials for heavy metal ions.

Table 1

Absorption capacity (mg/g) of different absorption materials for heavy metal ions

Hg2+ Ag+ Pb2+ Cd2+ Ref.
Kaolin 30.10 34.5 [8,9]
Cellulose 48 52 68 [10]
Mesoporous silica 102.7 [11]
Potato starch phosphate 51.38 106.25 91.84 [12]
Coal gangue 179.2 332.8 110.4 [13]
Graphene 400 114.9 270.3 70.10 [14,15,16]
Zeolite 117 446.7 303 34.85 [17,18,19,20]
LDH 582 565 359.7 368.1 [21,22]

Among the common absorbents, LDH has been widely studied because of their low cost, high efficiency, and easy preparation [23,24,25]. However, due to the lack of functional groups and structural components of pristine LDH, the absorption capacity and further applications of LDH is limited [26]. Compared with that of pristine LDH, functionalized LDH has better absorption capacity.

Cumulative studies have been conducted over the last 15 years or so and have resulted in a wealth of information related to preparation and utilization of functionalized LDH as well as the structure and composition, shape, and size of LDH. Currently, there is an urgent need to synthesize the renewed knowledge and individual case studies on these subjects and help identify common trends and knowledge gaps. In this context, the main purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of the current knowledge on functionalized LDH as heavy metal ion absorption material. To this end, this study followed the following four steps: (1) selecting review topics relevant to the specific application of LDH for heavy metal removal, as follows: LDH, heavy metal, intercalation, modification, LDH composite, selective absorbability, particle size, and nanostructure; (2) a total of 141 publications published since 2005 were included in this study by using the following criteria: relevance to the topics, representation and credibility, absorption property, and modification method; (3) through reading and analysis, these articles are classified and summarized based on the modification methods, absorption properties, composition, and structure; and (4) identifying future research needs to reduce environmental impact and economic costs to facilitate LDH synthesis and use. The findings and rationale of this study will promote the preparation and utilization of functionalized LDH as heavy metal ion absorption material.

This review article is organized in four main sections. Following this introduction is a brief discussion of the structure and composition, shape and size, and synthesis methods and research tools. In Section 3 the preparation methods of functionalized LDH are classified, including intercalation, surface modification, loaded on substrates. In Section 4 the practical properties of functionalized LDH are discussed, with a focus on selective absorbability, liquid–solid separation, stability, and recyclability. Section 5 provides conclusions regarding the preparation methods and practical properties and a look to the future in terms of identified research needs regarding the preparation, use, and recycling (or upcycling) of economical and environmental-friendly LDH.

2 LDH

The structure, composition, shape, and size of LDH are closely related to the absorption properties, which is also the basis of the preparation of functionalized LDH. For different functional groups or structural components, different preparation methods have been explored to introduce them into LDH. To shed light on the structure, properties, and absorption mechanism of functionalized LDH, scientific research tools are necessary. These subjects are discussed in the following subsections.

2.1 Structure and composition

The structural formula of LDH is [M2+ 1−x M3+ x (OH)2] x+ (A n) x/n ·mH2O, where M2+ and M3+ are divalent and trivalent metal cations, respectively, and A n is an interlayer anion. The crystal structure of MgAl–CO3–LDH is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 
                  Crystal structure diagram of MgAl–CO3–LDH.
Figure 1

Crystal structure diagram of MgAl–CO3–LDH.

The crystal structure shown in Figure 1 belongs to the Rm (166) space group, with unit cell parameters a = 3.054 Å, c = 22.81 Å, and c/a = 7.4689. [Mg(OH)6] octahedrons with common edges making up the unit layer. Part of the Mg2+ is replaced by Al3+ resulting in a positively charged layer. The presence of CO3 2− between layers makes the overall structure electrically neutral. The bonding force between the cationic layer and the anion is poor, and the anion is easily replaced by other anions or molecules. When adsorbing heavy metal ions, the type and quantity of interlayer anions can be adjusted according to the demand [27,28]. Because different kinds of ions have different valence states and ionic radii, their kinds and quantities are closely related to the crystal structure and layer charge density. Therefore, the absorption performance of LDH with different ion types and ratios was studied [29,30,31]. The anions between pristine layers are usually CO3 2−, SO4 2−, Cl, or NO3 [32]. The combination of divalent and trivalent cations in LDH used to adsorb heavy metal ions is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Combination of divalent and trivalent cations in LDH

Ca2+ Mg2+ Cu2+ Zn2+ Ni2+ Fe2+ Co2+ Mn2+
Al3+
Fe3+
Cr3+

Among them, MgAl–LDH absorption of heavy metal ions is the topic of most existing studies. In addition to LDH consisting of divalent and trivalent metal cations, the absorption capacity of other LDH consisting of cations of other valences has been studied [33,34]. For example, LiAl–LDH intercalated with triethylenetetramine was used to absorb Nd3+ and Sr2+. Due to the poor stability of Li metal chelate, the Li–Al LDH has free triethylenetetramine ions in the interlayer, which can effectively improve its heavy-metal-ion-absorption capacity [35].

2.2 Shape and size

In addition to the type and quantity of ions, the size and shape of LDH are closely related to its absorption performance. The size of the particles is affected by the type and amount of the agent, preparation method, temperature, time, and other factors [36]. For instance, Yuki Arai and Makoto Ogawa prepared CoAl–LDH with particles the diameter of 1–38 µm by adjusting the glycerol/water ratio, heating temperature, and time [37]. The milling technology can also reduce the particle size of MgAl–LDH without significantly altering its shape and crystallinity [38]. Particle size is closely related to absorption performance. Yang et al. studied the effect of MgAl–LDH particle size on the absorption performance of As5+, and the results show the absorption rate of MgAl–LDH increases while the particle size decreases, but the absorption capacity does not change significantly [39]. Ricardo Rojas believes that the removal capacity of MgAl–LDH increases with the decreasing particle size. Although the affinity of MgAl–LDH for Cu2+ is independent of particle size, the volume of the layer available for Cu2+ incorporation increased [40]. The existing conclusions are not uniform and limited. The effect of LDH particle size on the absorption capacity of heavy metal ions merits further investigation.

A variety of preparation methods can be employed to synthesize LDH of different dimensional nanostructures. The quaternary microemulsion (CTAB, water, n-hexane, n-hexanol) was selected to prepare NiAl–LDH nanotube (1D) [41]. To prepare MgAl–LDH monolayer nanosheets (2D), nitrate-intercalated MgAl–LDH was delaminated by sonication [42]. Polystyrene beads were chosen as a template to prepare MgAl–LDH hollow nanoshells (3D) [43]. The structure reconstruction method was also selected to synthesize ZnAl–LDH hierarchical sphere [44]. The nanostructure mentioned earlier is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2 
                  The SEM micrograph of different LDH micro-structure: (a) nanotube [41]; (b) nanosheets [42]; (c) nanoshells [43]; and (d) hierarchical sphere [44].
Figure 2

The SEM micrograph of different LDH micro-structure: (a) nanotube [41]; (b) nanosheets [42]; (c) nanoshells [43]; and (d) hierarchical sphere [44].

Among them, hierarchical sphere LDH has attracted much attention due to its porous structure and structural stability, which are beneficial to the absorption of heavy metal ions [45]. LDH hierarchical sphere composed of cross-linked nanosheets is synthesized by the hydrothermal method, which is a low-cost and simple technology method [46,47]. The structure of calcined layered double hydroxide (CLDH) prepared by calcining hierarchical sphere LDH was not changed, showing 99% removal of As6+ and Cr6+ in 5 min. The wastewater after 20 min of absorption meets the WTO standards for drinking water. The maximum absorption capacities of hierarchical sphere CLDH for As6+ and Cr6+ ions are 178.6 and 148.7 mg/g, respectively [48]. Due to its unique hierarchical sphere structure, hierarchical sphere LDH is a promising heavy metal ion absorbent featuring better absorption capacity and absorption efficiency than powdery LDH.

2.3 Synthesis methods

The synthesis methods of LDH mainly include the coprecipitation method, sol–gel method, hydrothermal synthesis method, ion exchange method, structure reconstruction method, mechanochemical method, etc. The metal salt solution and alkali solution are mixed to cause coprecipitation, and LDH crystals are generated by crystallizing the precipitated product under certain conditions (coprecipitation method). LDH is synthesized using organometallic salts through the sol–gel transformation process (sol–gel method). The metal salt solution and the alkali solution are quickly mixed, and the mixed solution is immediately transferred to an autoclave. After crystallization at a certain temperature, it is filtered, washed, and dried to obtain LDH (hydrothermal synthesis method). The original anion is replaced by other anions to prepare the required LDH (ion exchange method). The CLDH is added to a liquid medium containing an anion, and its structure can be partially restored to an ordered layered structure (structure reconstruction method). Under the action of high-energy mechanical force, the physical and chemical properties and structure of the reactants are induced to change (mechanochemical method). Table 3 provides a summary to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the aforementioned methods.

Table 3

Comparison of different preparation methods

Method Advantage Disadvantage
Coprecipitation Simple process Uneven particles and time-consuming
Sol–gel Good uniformity Low output and high cost
Hydrothermal synthesis Good crystallinity and controllable size Low output
Ion exchange Insert large anionic groups Complex composition
Structure reconstruction Higher purity anion Impure crystal phase and bad crystal form
Mechanochemical Low pollution and high reactivity Impure crystal phase

In addition to the aforementioned preparation methods, in situ synthesis method in waste liquid or from solid waste has been explored to prepare LDH, which brings additional environmental and economic benefits [49,50,51]. For instance, Francisco et al. added magnesium ions and hydroxide to waste liquid (including SO4 2−, H+, Pb2+, Al3+, Cu2+, Zn2+) to prepare MgAl–CO3 LDH. In the absence of Mg2+, (Zn–Cu–Mg) Al LDH was formed [52]. Waste serpentine tailings (including 34 wt% MgO and 4.27 wt% Fe2O3) were used to prepare MgFe–LDH, and Mg2+ and Fe3+ were dissolved by adding nitric acid. To increase the conversion rate and yield, the preparation process needs further exploration [53].

2.4 Research tools

As an absorption material, the main evaluation parameter of LDH resides with its absorption properties. According to the absorption properties, the types and proportions of raw materials and preparation methods can be optimized. To achieve a fundamental understanding of the absorption mechanism, the experimental data are fitted to the most appropriate absorption model and advanced tools (XRD, zeta, BET, TEM, SEM, FT-IR, XPS, XRF, etc.) are used to characterize LDH before and after absorption. Figure 3 presents a schematic overview on the absorption properties, model, and characterization of LDH.

Figure 3 
                  Schematic overview of LDH research tools.
Figure 3

Schematic overview of LDH research tools.

The absorption properties of LDH include absorption capacity, selective absorbability, recyclability, and stability. The absorption capacity usually refers to the maximum absorption capacity of heavy metal ions in one cycle, and little attention has been paid to the total absorption capacity of the entire life cycle. Considering the environment and cost implications, however, the recyclability of LDH is one critical property. The temperature, type and quantity of ions, and pH value of wastewater value are all variable, so selective absorbability and stability are also important. The difference between the absorption properties of functionalized and pristine LDH will be discussed later.

In evaluating LDH, its absorption results can be used to fit a model. When the absorption reaches equilibrium at a constant temperature, the concentration of adsorbate on the surface of the absorbent and in the solution is distributed according to a certain rule. There is a certain functional relationship, known as the absorption isotherm, with the common used models being Langmuir and Freundlich absorption isotherms. Dubinin–Radushkevich, Temkin, and Flory–Huggins absorption isotherms are also used sometimes. Furthermore, kinetic simulation of the absorption process is used to characterize the change of absorption with time under certain temperature conditions. Commonly used absorption kinetic models are pseudo-first-order kinetics, pseudo-second-order kinetics, Elovich and intraparticle diffusion. Absorption thermodynamic parameters include ΔG (Gibbs free energy), ΔH (enthalpy), ΔS (entropy), and E a (activation energy). These parameters can be calculated according to certain formulas and experimental data. The combination of experimental and theoretical analysis can better carry out research on materials [54].

The mechanisms of LDH removing heavy metal ions mainly include isomorphic substitution, complexation, and electrostatic interaction [55,56]. The process of electrons interacting with donors and electron acceptors to form complexes is complexation, which is the most important absorption mechanism for functionalized LDH. When the radius or valence of the heavy metal ions is similar to those in the crystal structure, isomorphic substitution may also occur. Isomorphic substitution refers to the replacement of cations on the LDH lattice sites by heavy metal ions. Heavy metal ions can also be adsorbed on the surface of LDH by electrostatic interaction. To further explore the absorption mechanism, it is necessary to characterize the LDH before and after absorption. The easiest way to characterize crystal structure is XRD. Due to the change of anion and cation type, quantity and valence state, the crystal structure also changes, which will be directly reflect to the intensity and position of the XRD characteristic peak. Hence, the XRD patterns before and after absorption can be used to analyze the change of crystal structure and the formation of new phases. In addition to XRD, TEM can be used to characterize the crystal structure. The type of chemical bonding can be judged based on the electron binding energy obtained by XPS or absorption frequency obtained by FT-IR. The focus of XPS and FT-IR are the analysis of the valence state of metal elements and the functional groups composed of C, O, and H. Morphology is mainly characterized by SEM and TEM. For example, as shown in Figure 4 (previous research study of our team) [55], when CaAl–LDH adsorbs Co2+, Co2+ replaces Ca2+ in the crystal lattice. Due to the difference in ionic radius Co2+ and Ca2+, the crystal structure (Figure 4a, f, and g), chemical bond (Figure 4b and c), and morphology (Figure 4e, d, and h) have changed. Furthermore, the specific surface area and pore size tester characterize the pore structure parameters (specific surface area, pore volume, pore size) of LDH. The zeta potentiometer tests the electromotive force, which is an important indicator for characterizing the stability of the colloidal dispersion system. LDH can absorb charged ions with opposite surface charges and repel ions with the same charge. The element analyzer and XRF can determine elemental composition of LDH. Such tools enable a more mechanistic understanding and help unravel the absorption mechanism of LDH.

Figure 4 
                  The characterization of LDH before and after absorption Co2+ [55]: (a) XRD; (b) FT-IR; (c) XPS; (d) CaAl–LDH SEM; (e) and (f) CaAl–LDH TEM; (g) Co2+–LDH TEM; and (h) Co2+–LDH SEM.
Figure 4

The characterization of LDH before and after absorption Co2+ [55]: (a) XRD; (b) FT-IR; (c) XPS; (d) CaAl–LDH SEM; (e) and (f) CaAl–LDH TEM; (g) Co2+–LDH TEM; and (h) Co2+–LDH SEM.

3 Synthesis methods of functionalized LDH

Due to the lack of functional groups and structural components of pristine LDH, the absorption capacity and further applications of LDH are limited. To solve this issue, functionalized LDH has been prepared by introducing functional groups or structural components. In this process, due to the presence of hydroxyl groups on the surface and the positively charged [Mg(OH)6] octahedrons, LDH can interact electrostatically and chemically with functional groups or structural components. The preparation methods of functionalized LDH are divided into three categories: Intercalation method is used for small organic or inorganic molecules, whereas surface modification method is used for larger organic molecules. In addition, for the substrates that can provide attachment sites, LDH is loaded on the substrates. These are detailed in the following subsections.

3.1 Intercalation

To increase absorption capacity for heavy metal ions, LDH is intercalated with molecules, which can cause complexation with the heavy metal ions. LDH that is intercalated with sulfide has good absorption capacity for heavy metal ions, and its selective absorption has attracted wide attention, which will be described later [57,58]. In addition, LDH is mainly intercalated with organic molecules, which can significantly improve absorption capacity for heavy metal ions [59,60,61,62]. For example, compared with the maximum absorption capacity of LDH, the maximum absorption capacity of LDH intercalated with SDBS and citrate for Cu2+ increased by 72.7 mg/g [63]. These organic-containing functional groups such as –SH, –COOH, and –NH2 contain many coordination atoms which can provide electron pairs. Therefore, organic compounds and heavy metal ions can undergo complex reactions to form complexes.

Organic molecules are mainly combined with LDH through electrostatic interaction and chemical bonding. Usually when LDH was intercalated with molecules, the crystal parameters a and b of LDH were not changed, but the c was obviously changed. XRD is used to determine the powder crystal structure, which is the most intuitive and concise characterization method for intercalation. The arrangement of intercalated molecules between layers can also be analyzed by unit cell parameters (usually d 003). The basal spacing of LDH intercalated with molecules and arrangement of molecules between layers are shown in Table 4. Arrangement including horizontal, vertical, and inclination is shown in Figure 5.

Table 4

The basal spacing (Å) of LDH and arrangement of molecules

Origin anion d 003 Intercalated molecules d003 Arrangement Ref.
NO3 7.6 Glutamate 8.1 [64]
CO3 2− 7.9 Malate 8.1 [65]
CO3 2− 7.9 Tartrate 8.3
NO3 7.5 l-Cysteine 8.0 Horizontal Monolayer [66]
Cl 7.8 Humate hybrid 7.9 [60]
Cl 7.8 DTPA 14.2 Inclination Monolayer [67]
NO3 8.8 DMSA 10.5 [68]
CO3 2− 7.6 Tartrate 12.2 [69]
NO3 8.58 Tripolyphosphate 10.35 [70]
CO3 2− 6.5 l-Phenylalanine 11.84 Inclination Monolayer [71]
CO3 2− 7.8 EDTA 7.9 [72]
NO3 8.8 EDTA 13.9 Vertical Monolayer [73]
CO3 2− 8.8 CMCD 19.0 [74]
CO3 2− 7.65 D2EHPA 26.28 Inclination Bilayer [75]
NO3 9 Rhamnolipid 33.9 Inclination Bilayer [76]
Figure 5 
                  Arrangement of molecules: (a) horizontal; (b) vertical; and (c) inclination.
Figure 5

Arrangement of molecules: (a) horizontal; (b) vertical; and (c) inclination.

As shown in Table 4, basal spacing is related to the type and arrangement of the molecules between the layers, which is closely related to absorption capacity for heavy metal ions. The arrangement is affected by many factors, such as concentration, temperature, intercalation method, etc. [77]. For example, the coprecipitation method is used to synthesis LDH intercalated with EDTA. When the pH value is 8.0, 9.0, and 10.0, the basal spacing between the layers is 15.2, 15.1, and 14.7 Å, respectively [78]. This basal spacing is also different from 7.9 to 13.9 Å, as shown in Table 4. The layer thickness is 4.8 Å, and interlayer spacing calculated are 10.4, 3.1, and 8.1 Å. Therefore, there are some differences in the arrangement of EDTA and the degree of binding between EDTA and LDH.

The interlayer composition and structure of LDH were adjusted by inserting molecules, which is also closely related to the intercalating process. The main synthesis methods of LDH intercalated organic molecules are coprecipitation, ion exchange, and structure reconstruction methods. The delamination/reassembling method (nanosheets prepared by ultrasound can reassemble in solution) is also feasible. Appropriate methods should be selected according to the physical and chemical properties of organic molecules.

3.2 Surface modification

Due to hydrodynamic radius, charge density, and other reasons, some molecules are difficult to enter the interlayer, so the surface modification method is selected to prepare LDH-based composites. Surface modification can improve the absorption performance of LDH-based composites for heavy metal ions and remove the limitations of other absorption materials in the process of adsorbing heavy metal ions. For example, biodegradable bioabsorption materials are environmental friendly, but their absorption performance is easily affected by the solution environment. Combining bioabsorbent materials and LDH with good stability can produce absorbent with excellent absorption capacity for heavy metal ions such as MgAl–LDH-based composites prepared using MgAl–LDH and proteins extracted from bael or bilva oil meal with an maximum absorption capacity of Pb2+ (625 mg/g) [79].

Direct cross-linking, indirect cross-linking, and in situ growth were mainly selected to modify the surface of LDH. The hydroxyl group on the surface of LDH plays an important role in surface modification. After surface modification, the structure diagrams of the LDH-based composites are shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6 
                  The structure diagrams of the LDH-based composite material: (a) direct cross-linking [80]; (b) indirect cross-linking [81]; and (c) in situ growth method [82].
Figure 6

The structure diagrams of the LDH-based composite material: (a) direct cross-linking [80]; (b) indirect cross-linking [81]; and (c) in situ growth method [82].

Direct cross-linking refers to the direct bonding between molecules and LDHs. As shown in Figure 6a [80], the amino groups and hydroxyl groups contained in chitosan (CS) can directly dehydrate with the hydroxyl groups on the surface of MgAl–LDH, which leads to the direct cross-linking of CS with MgAl–LDH. When pH is above 3, CS–LDH exhibits excellent absorption capacity and stability. The absorption capacity of CS–LDH for Pb2+ and Cd2+ is better than that of CS and MgAl–LDH. The main absorption mechanism includes isomorphic substitution, chemical precipitation, and surface complexation. The hydrodynamic radii of the humic substance is 20–71 Å, making it difficult for the humus material to enter the interlayer [83,84]. Due to the hybridization of ZnAl–LDH surface and fulvic acid, ZnAl–LDH-based absorbents were prepared. Fulvic acid is rich in functional groups such as hydroxyl and carboxyl groups, which play an important role in the absorption of heavy metal ions [85].

When organic molecules cannot be directly cross-linked with LDH, other organic molecules are needed as a bridge to link organic molecules and LDH, which is called indirect cross-linking. For example, as shown in Figure 6b, since polyaniline cannot be directly cross-linked with CaFe–LDH surface, the 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane was selected to modify the CaFe–LDH surface first. The presence of the Si–O–M vibration peak in the FT-IR spectrum proves the dehydration reaction of the silicon hydroxyl group of 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane and the hydroxyl group of CaFe–LDH [81]. Polydopamine containing amino, hydroxy, and benzene rings connected MgAl–LDH and poly(methyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic anhydride) by mussel-inspired chemistry and a ring-opening reaction. The absorption capacity of this ternary absorbent is twice that of the pristine MgAl–LDH [86]. Polydopamine also can connect α-amino phosphonate chains and MgAl–LDH by a combinatorial procedure of mussel-inspired chemistry and Kabachnik–Fields [87]. The ternary absorbent containing MgAl–LDH, polyethylene polyamine, and tannic acid was prepared by combining catechol chemistry and Michael addition and/or Schiffbase reaction. Compared with pristine MgAl–LDH, the absorption capacity of ternary absorbent was also significantly improved. Electrostatic absorption and surface complexation are the main absorption mechanism [88].

Other absorbents can be covered on the surface of LDH by the in situ growth method. For example, as shown in Figure 6c, zero valent iron is fixed on the surface of CaMgAl–LDH by the in situ growth method. Because it contains abundant functional groups such as Fe–O, Al–O, and –OH, CaMgAl–LDH-based absorbent had high efficiency and excellent absorption capacities. The maximum absorption capacity of U6+ is 216.1 mg/g. The main absorption mechanism entails the reduction and absorption of zero valent iron and the absorption of CaMgAl–LDH [82]. Zeolitic imidazolate framework (MOF materials) with high porosity and good stability is a potential absorbent. Due to the small size of MOF; however, it is difficult to separate and recover after adsorbing heavy metal ions in the solution. CoAl–LDH-covered zeolitic imidazolate framework was successfully synthesized by the in situ growth method. The composites show excellent absorption capacity and recycle stability. The maximum absorption capacity of Cr6+ is 378 mg/g [89].

The surface modification method combines the advantages of LDH and other absorption materials. While increasing its cation-absorption capacity, the anion-absorption capacity of LDH remained. Therefore, surface modified LDH can simultaneously adsorb heavy metals in the form of different ions, which can be widely used in heavy metal ion absorption and even wastewater treatment. To the best of our knowledge, there are few related studies. Surface modification of LDH and its ability to simultaneously adsorb heavy metal cations and anions warrant further study.

3.3 Loading LDH on substrates

In addition to intercalation and surface modification, the LDH is loaded on the substrate by in situ growth, which can also effectively improve the absorption capacity of heavy metal ions. The substrate can provide stable attachment sites for LDH particles, and the aggregation of LDH particles is hindered to some extent. Absorption sites have also increased. Silica aerogel, N-doped carbon nanosheet, graphene, biochar, and other materials that can provide many absorption sites and stable attachment sites can be used as substrates [90,91,92,93,94,95]. Because carbon-based materials contain more functional groups and larger specific surface areas, they have been extensively studied [96,97,98]. For example, TiO2/graphitic carbon nanocomposites were used for water treatment [99]. Carbon-based materials of different dimensions are studied as substrates and their microstructure is shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7 
                  Microstructure of substrate and LDH loaded on substrate: (a) carbon nanofiber; (d) LDH loaded on carbon nanofiber [100]; (b) graphene; (e) LDH loaded on graphene [107]; (c) biochar; and (f) LDH loaded on biochar [108].
Figure 7

Microstructure of substrate and LDH loaded on substrate: (a) carbon nanofiber; (d) LDH loaded on carbon nanofiber [100]; (b) graphene; (e) LDH loaded on graphene [107]; (c) biochar; and (f) LDH loaded on biochar [108].

As shown in Figure 7a and d, due to its mechanical stability, good hydrophilicity, and high specific surface area, carbon nanofiber (1D) has been used as a substrate to grow NiAl–LDH in situ. Since the carbon nanofiber/NiAl–LDH composite material has porous and open nanostructures, the aggregation of carbon nanofiber and NiAl–LDH is hindered. The combination of the high exchange capacity of LDH and the higher number of active sites of carbon nanofibers, so the composites, can efficiently remove heavy metal ions mainly through surface complex and electrostatic interaction [100]. The surface negative charge of graphene (2D) containing many functional groups and positively charged LDH can self-assemble through electrostatic interaction. Both graphene and LDH have a unique layered structure, so the combination of graphene and LDH is the strongest. LDH/graphene composites contain a porous structure, which is conducive to heat and mass transfer and can expose more active sites at the same time [101]. Electron and stress transport networks are also easily formed between LDH and graphene [102,103]. Therefore, compared with other LDH/carbon-based composite materials, the LDH/graphene composite material is the more stable and effective [104,105,106]. The microstructures of graphene oxide and MgAl–LDH/graphene composites are shown in Figure 7b and e, respectively. The alkaline environment used for the in situ growth of LDH results in the reduction of part of the graphene oxide to reduced graphene oxide. Because the LDH nanoplates are vertically interwoven with reduced graphene oxide surface, the LDH/graphene composites have an open porous structure and a high surface area, which results in the composites being able to efficiently adsorb heavy metal ions [107]. Biochar (3D) prepared from solid wastes such as rice husk, straw, and fallen leaves have a high specific surface area, porous structure, and many functional groups. MgFe–LDH is loaded on the surface of biochar by the in situ growth method. Negative charged biochar can also be connected to LDH through electrostatic interaction. The microstructures of biochar and LDH/biochar composites are shown in Figure 7c and f, respectively. Biochar is a potential absorbent, but its functional groups are easily pyrolyzed. LDH has stable absorption performance but is easy to aggregate. Combining MgFe–LDH and biochar, the composite material has excellent absorption capacity and cyclic utilization. The maximum absorption capacity of Pb2+ is 476 mg/g [108].

Some materials such as zeolite, Fe3O4, and gravel provide little or no absorption sites, but can provide attachment sites that can also be used as a substrate [109,110]. The composites prepared by in situ growth of LDH on this type of substrate are usually a core–shell structure with the main purpose to facilitate solid–liquid separation. For example, Fe3O4/MgAl–LDH–RL (Rhamnolipid, RL) composite material with a core-shell structure is prepared as shown in Figure 8. MgAl–LDH grows in situ on the Fe3O4 surface by the coprecipitation method, then RL is inserted between the MgAl–LDH layers by the delamination/reassembling method. The magnetic absorbent is easily separated by an external magnetic field within 20 s [111].

Figure 8 
                  Schematic illustration of preparation Fe3O4/MgAl–LDH–RL [111].
Figure 8

Schematic illustration of preparation Fe3O4/MgAl–LDH–RL [111].

4 Properties of functionalized LDH

Considering the varied temperature, type and quantity of ions, and pH value of wastewater as well as environment and economic cost, selective absorbability, liquid–solid separation, stability, and recyclability are important. Due to the introduction of functional groups and structural components, selective absorbability, liquid–solid separation, stability, and recyclability of functionalized LDH are much better than that of pristine LDH. The following subsections discuss the difference between these absorption properties of functionalized and pristine LDH.

4.1 Selective absorbability

In the actual absorption process, heavy metal ions and other ions are present in the solution. These ions can occupy the absorption sites of LDH, so that its ability to adsorb heavy metal ions is reduced. Therefore, it is very important to prepare LDH with selective absorbability, which is beneficial for the detection and absorption of heavy metal ions [112,113,114]. In addition, LDH is expected to have different absorption capacities for different heavy metal ions, which is beneficial to the separation between heavy metal ions.

On the one hand, the binding capacity of different cations and anions and the solubility of the combined products in solutions are different, which influences the removal of heavy metal ions. For example, MgAl–LDH removes Cu2+ and Ni2+ by forming hydroxides, and Pb2+ by forming carbonates [115]. On the other hand, the cations of LDH can be replaced by other cations with similar radii through isomorphic substitution, which can be applied to the preparation of LDH of different components and the selective absorption of heavy metal ions. Two aspects cause LDH to have a certain selective absorption. For example, because the stability of Cu2+ hydroxide is higher than that of Pb2+, the presence of Cu2+ affects significantly the absorption capacity of FeMnMg–LDH for Pb2+, whereas the presence of Mg2+ and Ca2+ does not significantly affect the absorption capacity of FeMnMg–LDH for Pb2+ [116].

Functionalized LDH prepared by intercalation, surface modification, and loaded on substrates also has selective absorption performance. For example, based on the analysis of element results, the different coordination number leads to different absorption capacity of MgAl–LDH intercalated with phytate. Based on molecular simulation, the bonding energy between MgAl–LDH-phytate and metal ion is different, which results in MgAl–LDH-phytate having selective absorption [117]. The surface of MgAl–LDH coated by Molybdenum disulfide can effectively remove Cr6+, which is not affected by the presence of coexisting anions (K+, Na+, Ca+, Mg2+, Zn2+, and Al3+) or cations [118]. The K sp (solubility product constant) follows the order of K sp(Cu(OH)2) < K sp(Zn(OH)2) < K sp(Pb(OH)2) < K sp(Ni(OH)2) < K sp(Cd(OH)2), and absorption of Cu2+ and Pb2+ by functional groups and isomorphic substitution between Cu2+ or Pb2+ and Mg2+ are easier. Hence, the selectivity absorption order of MgFe–LDH loaded with magnetic (Fe3O4) carbon spheres is as follows: Cu2+ > Pb2+ > Zn2+ > Ni2+ > Cd2+ [119].

As described earlier, many functionalized LDHs have selective absorption properties. Among them, the selective absorption performance of LDH composites with groups of sulfurated species has been widely studied [120,121]. The K d (distribution coefficient) is an important index in evaluating the selective absorption performance. K d = V(C 0C f)/m, where V is solution volume, m is absorbent quality, and C 0 and C f are the initial and final heavy metal ion concentrations, respectively. The K d value of heavy metal ion absorption by LDH composite absorbent with groups of sulfurated species is shown in Table 5.

Table 5

The K d value of functionalized LDH

Functional molecules K d (mL/g) Ref.
Ag+ Pb2+ Cu+ Cd2+ Zn2+ Hg2+ Co2+ Ni2+
Sulfonated calix [4] arene 9.43 × 102 1.36 × 104 1.03 × 106 [122]
Sodium citrate and l-cysteine 9.99 × 106 2.12 × 104 3.32 × 105 8.79 × 102 1.67 × 103 2.49 × 106 [123]
(NH4)2MoS4 1.0 × 107 9.9 × 106 1.6 × 105 5.42 × 102 9.9 × 106 1.99 × 102 2.45 × 102 [124]
(NH4)2MoS4 2.3 × 104 5.6 × 103 3.52 × 102 9.80 × 102 [45]
K2S4 8.8 × 106 3.0 × 103 2.4 × 103 3.96 × 102 3.05 × 102 8.4 × 106 80 47 [125]
K2S2 3.0 × 106 4.14 × 102 4.66 × 102 83 4.48 × 102 8.43 × 102 2.32 × 102 3.57 × 102
K2S5 1.1 × 107 1.1 × 104 9.55 × 102 2.0 × 103 27 1.0 × 107 72 73 [22]
(NH4)2MoS4 1.1 × 107 1.0 × 107 1.7 × 105 2.9 × 105 6.21 × 102 1.0 × 107 2.82 × 104 3.69 × 102
CO3 2− 8.5 × 103 4.7 80 77 3.41 × 102 96.59 80 1.48 × 102
NO3 4.3 × 103 1.09 × 102 1.33 × 102 1.0 × 102 3.67 × 102 95.34 11 2.4 × 102

Table 5 reveals that the introduction of polysulfides, sulfides, and thiols can increase the K d value, which reflects the absorption capacity of heavy metal ions. Therefore, the introduction of these functional groups increases the absorption capacity of LDH to heavy metal ions. Based on the hard–soft–acid–base theory, the sulfur-containing functional group is a soft base, the heavy metal ions are mostly soft acids, and the two form a strong bond. However, Ca2+, Mg2+, etc., are hard acids, and the combination of hard acids and soft bases is weak, so Ca2+, Mg2+, etc., do not occupy LDH absorption sites. For example, in the presence of high concentration levels of competitive ions (such as Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+), LDH intercalated with 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate has superior selectivity and higher absorption capacity for U6+. The K d(Ca2+), K d(Mg2+), K d(K+), K d(Na+), and K d(U6+) are 96.5, 1.2 × 102, 3.0, 1.0, and 1.25 × 106, respectively [126]. To better reveal the materials’ selective absorption performance, the separation factor SF A/B = K d A / K d B is used to evaluate their ability to separate certain ions from mixture. Usually when the value of SFA/B is greater than 100, it indicates that this material can separate A from B [127]. It can be seen in Table 5 that the K d ratio of the two heavy metal ions may also be greater than 100, indicating that LDH can be used not only to selectively adsorb heavy metal ions but also to separate heavy metal ions.

In the actual absorption process during implementation by industry, many ions in the solution may cause competitive absorption. Because many studies employed spectroscopy to test ion concentration, the presence of multiple ions can cause interference. Therefore, the selective absorption of LDH cannot be easily clarified and this is an important issue needing further investigation.

4.2 Liquid–solid separation

Due to the good hydrophilicity of LDH nanoparticles, solid–liquid separation needs to be performed by high-speed centrifugation or filtration (usually 0.45 µm membrane) after heavy metal ions are adsorbed in the research stage [128,129,130]. Yet, when absorbing heavy metal ions on a large scale, solid–liquid separation is costly and difficult to implement, which hinders the application of LDH. To facilitate solid–liquid separation, LDH is loaded on substrates [131,132].

When the substrate is a magnetic substance, solid–liquid separation can be performed under the action of a magnetic field. Maghemite, NiFe2O4, Fe3O4, etc., can be used as a magnetic substrate [133,134,135]. Taking Fe3O4/ZnCr–LDH material as an example, its magnetization characteristic curve and the absorption efficiency in recycle runs are shown in Figure 9 [136].

Figure 9 
                  Magnetization characteristic curve (a) and the absorption efficiency in recycle runs (b) [136].
Figure 9

Magnetization characteristic curve (a) and the absorption efficiency in recycle runs (b) [136].

As illustrated in Figure 9, Fe3O4/ZnCr–LDH was easily separated from the solution by a magnetic field. Even after four cycles, the absorption capacity of Fe3O4/ZnCr–LDH significantly decreased but was still easily separated. In addition, magnetic LDH composites can also be used in soil remediation. For example, humic acid-modified magnetic Fe3O4/MgAl–LDH is used to immobilize heavy metal ions in the soil through absorption. After adsorbing heavy metal ions, the magnetic LDH absorbent can be easily recovered, which is beneficial for recycling [137].

Loading LDH to zeolite, sand, etc., due to the large difference in particle size and density, solid–liquid separation can also be performed easily [138]. Such LDH composite materials can be applied in constructed rapid infiltration systems (CRIS). A schematic diagram of the preparation of Maifanite/Mg–LDHs and its application in CRIS is shown in Figure 10 [139]. Specifically, Maifanite/Mg–LDHs were placed into the device, the water was injected from above, and the filtered water flowed out from below. Since LDH was loaded on a maifanite stone, LDH was not dissolved into the water.

Figure 10 
                  Schematic diagram of the preparation of Maifanite/Mg-LDHs and its application in CRIS [139].
Figure 10

Schematic diagram of the preparation of Maifanite/Mg-LDHs and its application in CRIS [139].

LDH can also be loaded on the surface of the biomaterial, which can also facilitate solid–liquid separation [140]. For example, MgAl–LDH is loaded on CS by in situ growth. MgAl–LDH/CS beads were prepared, and their size shown in Figure 11. Besides MgAl–LDH, CS also can adsorb heavy metal ions by surface complex [141]. This provides new design ideas for the preparation of high-performance and sustainable LDH composites.

Figure 11 
                  CS beads and MgAl–LDH/CS beads [141].
Figure 11

CS beads and MgAl–LDH/CS beads [141].

4.3 Stability and recyclability

Pristine LDH has poor stability and recyclability. The introduction of functional groups and structural components can increase its stability and cyclability to a certain extent. As shown in Figure 12a, LDH relies on the complexation of the surface hydroxyl groups and electrostatic action to adsorb heavy metal ions, so acidity (or alkalinity) of the solution has a greater impact on the absorption capacity of pristine LDH. However, functionalized LDH mainly depends on the complexation of functional groups, so functionalized LDH has good and stabilized absorption capacity for heavy metal ions whether in acid or alkaline solutions [76].

Figure 12 
                  The stability (a) [76] and recyclability (b) [86] of functionalized LDH and pristine LDH.
Figure 12

The stability (a) [76] and recyclability (b) [86] of functionalized LDH and pristine LDH.

After adsorbing heavy metal ions, LDH has a poor ability to recycle and reuse, especially by isomorphous substitution to adsorb heavy metal ions. As shown in Figure 12b, after four cycles, the absorption efficiency of pristine LDH is less than 10%, while the absorption efficiency of functionalized LDH is more than 80% [86]. The current research focuses on the absorption capacity after each cycle and rarely discusses the reason for the decline in absorption capacity during the cycle.

5 Conclusions and outlook

This review has collected the published literature on LDH over the last 15 years, sorted out the main methods of preparing functionalized LDH, and discussed some practical properties of functionalized LDH. Intercalation, surface modification, and loaded on substrates can be used to prepare functionalized LDH. In this process, the hydroxyl group and the valence state of [Mg(OH)6] octahedrons play an important role. Functionalized LDH has better selective absorption capacity as well as stability and recyclability. Loading LDH to zeolite, sand, a magnetic substance, etc., may allow it to be more easily separated from the liquid. These properties are closely related to functional groups and structural components.

Relative to pristine LDH, functionalized LDH can more efficiently adsorb heavy metal ions in the solution to facilitate enrichment, recycling, and reuse, which solves the water pollution problem caused by heavy metal ions to a certain extent. However, its economic cost and environmental impact must be considered through life cycle, thus there are some aspects worthy of further study.

  1. To reduce production costs and environmental footprint induced during the preparation of LDH, how to minimize the use of chemical reagents? The preparation of pristine LDH requires cations such as calcium, magnesium, and aluminum, which are abundant in waste liquids and solid wastes. This seems a logical direction to pursue. A large amount of waste liquid is generated in the LDH production process, how to reduce the waste liquid? One viable method is synthesis in situ in the waste liquid. Another viable method is to choose the mechanochemical method to synthesize LDH, but the resulting LDH is not as pure and additional research is needed to improve the LDH purity. So far, LDH used for adsorbing heavy metal ions has been synthesized mainly by coprecipitation and hydrothermal methods. For these two methods, innovations should focus on how to minimize the amount of water used during the LDH synthesis.

  2. In the process of heavy metal ions adsorbed by LDH, some ions, functional groups, or structural components will leach into the solution, causing secondary environmental pollution. Existing studies have focused on improving the absorption properties of heavy metal ions, yet little attention or research has been devoted to how to minimize the amount of organic reagents used in the preparation of functionalized LDH. In addition, some LDHs remove heavy metal ions in water through isomorphic substitution, which will inevitably lead to partial ions leaching. The effect of these ions on the aqueous solution should also be evaluated, especially since LDH itself contains heavy metal cations. Therefore, the risk of secondary pollution should be regarded as an important indicator for evaluating LDH. Choosing environmental-friendly raw materials is the simplest solution. It is also desirable to develop a suitable preparation method for more stable LDH.

  3. When treating wastewater on a large scale, a large amount of LDH will be used and this can help reduce the cost of LDH through economy of scale. How does one recycle and reuse the LDH that has reached the end of its service life? When LDH reaches its service life, if its structure has collapsed, one can add it as a filler to polymer materials or cement-based materials. If the structure has not changed significantly and only the introduced functional group or structural components fails, the LDH can be reused after being processed. The easiest way to handle this is calcination, since the calcined product can be transformed into LDH after structural reconstruction in solution.

In summary, the preparation, use, and recycling (or upcycling) of economical and environmental-friendly LDHs need further study. Based on the performance and structure of LDH, we propose the following hypothetical application scenario. In the first step, pristine LDH is used to absorb organic anions in waste liquid, such as dyes. In the second step, because organic anions contain many functional groups, they can complex with heavy metal ions, so LDH-organic anions are used to adsorb heavy metal ions. The third step is to choose a suitable method to remove the heavy metal ions adsorbed by LDH. Repeat the second and third steps until the functional group fails. Finally, the LDH is calcined, and the calcined product undergoes structural reconstruction while adsorbing organic anions in the waste liquid containing organic anions. When LDH-organic anions are then used to adsorb heavy metal ions, a cycle is formed. This is an intriguing hypothesis to be further tested, although some of the studies have been proven viable. More investigations should be conducted to clarify various dimensions of this crosscutting issue and collect data to enable a reliable life cycle assessment of LDH for various decontamination applications.


tel: +86-13-21-460-0050
tel: +01-509-335-7088

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by “National Natural Science Foundation of China” No. 51872273. This research was also supported by “State Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Reuse for Building Materials” SWR-2020-005.

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Cong X, Lu S, Gao Y, Yao Y, Elchalakani M, Shi X. Effects of microwave, thermomechanical and chemical treatments of sewage sludge ash on its early-age behavior as supplementary cementitious material. J Clean Prod. 2020;258. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120647.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Chibuike GU, Obiora SC. Heavy metal polluted soils: effect on plants and bioremediation methods. Appl Environ Soil Sci. 2014;2014:1–12.10.1155/2014/752708Search in Google Scholar

[3] Vitali D, Dragojevic IV, Sebecic B, Validzic K. Assesment of toxic and potentially toxic elements in potato and cabbage grown in different locations in Croatia. Dtsch Lebensmittel-Rundschau. 2007;103(9):424–30.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Pantic S, Skodric SR, Loncar Z, Pantic I. Neurotoxocity, nephrotoxicity, and hepatotoxicity of copper-based nanoparticles: potential implications in molecular medicine and neurosciences. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2019;58(1):201–5.10.1515/rams-2019-0032Search in Google Scholar

[5] Lu Y, Jiang B, Fang L, Ling F, Gao J, Wu F, et al. High performance NiFe layered double hydroxide for methyl orange dye and Cr(vi) adsorption. Chemosphere. 2016;152:415–22.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Zhu D, Cheng Y, Xue B, Jiang Y, Wei C. Coal gasification fine slag as a low-cost adsorbent for adsorption and desorption of humic acid. Silicon. 2019;12(7):1547–56.10.1007/s12633-019-00250-1Search in Google Scholar

[7] Yi Z, Tang Q, Jiang T, Cheng Y. Adsorption performance of hydrophobic/hydrophilic silica aerogel for low concentration organic pollutant in aqueous solution. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8(1):266–74.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0025Search in Google Scholar

[8] Drweesh SA, Fathy NA, Wahba MA, Hanna AA, Akarish AIM, Elzahany EAM, et al. Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies of Pb(ii) adsorption from aqueous solutions on HCl-treated Egyptian kaolin. J Environ Chem Eng. 2016;4(2):1674–84.10.1016/j.jece.2016.02.005Search in Google Scholar

[9] Yilmaz S, Sahan T, Karabakan A. Response surface approach for optimization of Hg(ii) adsorption by 3-mercaptopropyl trimethoxysilane-modified kaolin minerals from aqueous solution. Korean J Chem Eng. 2017;34(8):2225–35.10.1007/s11814-017-0116-zSearch in Google Scholar

[10] Kenawy IM, Hafez MAH, Ismail MA, Hashem MA. Adsorption of Cu(ii), Cd(ii), Hg(ii), Pb(ii) and Zn(ii) from aqueous single metal solutions by guanyl-modified cellulose. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 2018;107:1538–49.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Lin Y, Xu J, Sudhakar BS, Gu J, Hong R. Preparation of spherical aminopropyl-functionalized MCM-41 and its application in removal of Pb(ii) ion from aqueous solution. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8(1):275–84.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0026Search in Google Scholar

[12] Bashir A, Manzoor T, Malik LA, Qureashi A, Pandith AH. Enhanced and selective adsorption of Zn(ii), Pb(ii), Cd(ii), and Hg(ii) ions by a dumbbell- and flower-shaped potato starch phosphate polymer: a combined experimental and DFT calculation study. ACS Omega. 2020;5(10):4853–67.10.1021/acsomega.9b03607Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Shang Z, Zhang L, Zhao X, Liu S, Li D. Removal of Pb(ii), Cd(ii) and Hg(ii) from aqueous solution by mercapto-modified coal gangue. J Environ Manag. 2019;231:391–6.10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.072Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Ma Y-X, Xing D, Ruan Y-X, Du X-Y, La P-Q. Fabrication of amino-functionalized magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposites for adsorption of Ag(i) from aqueous solution. Environ Eng Sci. 2018;35(3):219–30.10.1089/ees.2016.0483Search in Google Scholar

[15] Fu W, Wang X, Huang Z. Remarkable reusability of magnetic Fe3O4-encapsulated C3N3S3 polymer/reduced graphene oxide composite: a highly effective adsorbent for Pb and Hg ions. Sci Total Environ. 2019;659:895–904.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.303Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Alimohammady M, Jahangiri M, Kiani F, Tahermansouri H. Highly efficient simultaneous adsorption of Cd(ii), Hg(ii) and As(iii) ions from aqueous solutions by modification of graphene oxide with 3-aminopyrazole: central composite design optimization (2017;41:8905). N J Chem. 2019;43(48):19437.10.1039/C9NJ90158BSearch in Google Scholar

[17] Salam MA, Abukhadra MR, Mostafa M. Effective decontamination of As(v), Hg(ii), and U(vi) toxic ions from water using novel muscovite/zeolite aluminosilicate composite: adsorption behavior and mechanism. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020. 10.1007/s11356-020-07945-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Hu C, Kang S, Xiong B, Zhou S, Tang K. Selective recovery of Ag(i) from industrial wastewater using zeolite imidazolate framework-8: performance and mechanisms. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26(14):14214–25.10.1007/s11356-019-04674-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Shafiee M, Abedi MA, Abbasizadeh S, Sheshdeh RK, Mousavi SE, Shohani S. Effect of zeolite hydroxyl active site distribution on adsorption of Pb(ii) and Ni(ii) pollutants from water system by polymeric nanofibers. Sep Sci Technol. 2019;11(55):1994–2011.10.1080/01496395.2019.1624572Search in Google Scholar

[20] Gribanov EN, Oskotskaya ER, Saunina IV. Sorption purification of natural and waste water from Hg(ii), Cd(ii) and Pb(ii) by natural zeolite of Hotynetskoe deposits. Sorpt Chromatogr Process. 2018;18(3):316–23.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Hou T, Yan L, Li J, Yang Y, Shan L, Meng X, et al. Adsorption performance and mechanistic study of heavy metals by facile synthesized magnetic layered double oxide/carbon composite from spent adsorbent. Chem Eng J. 2020;384. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123331.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Jawad A, Peng L, Liao Z, Zhou Z, Shahzad A, Ifthikar J, et al. Selective removal of heavy metals by hydrotalcites as adsorbents in diverse wastewater: different intercalated anions with different mechanisms. J Clean Prod. 2019;211:1112–26.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.234Search in Google Scholar

[23] Zhao D, Sheng G, Hu J, Chen C, Wang X. The adsorption of Pb(ii) on Mg2Al layered double hydroxide. Chem Eng J. 2011;171(1):167–74.10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.082Search in Google Scholar

[24] Park M, Choi CL, Seo YJ, Yeo SK, Choi J, Komarneni S, et al. Reactions of Cu2+ and Pb2+ with Mg/Al layered double hydroxide. Appl Clay Sci. 2007;37(1–2):143–8.10.1016/j.clay.2006.12.006Search in Google Scholar

[25] He X, Qiu X, Chen J. Preparation of Fe(ii)–Al layered double hydroxides: application to the adsorption/reduction of chromium. Colloids Surf A. 2017;516:362–74.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.12.053Search in Google Scholar

[26] Tao X, Liu D, Song J, Ye Q, Xu D. Plasma modification of ZnMgAl–LDHs for adsorption property improvement. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2017;74:281–8.10.1016/j.jtice.2017.02.009Search in Google Scholar

[27] Zhang Z-Q, Zeng H-Y, Liu X-J, Xu S, Chen C-R, Du J-Z. Modification of MgAl hydrotalcite by ammonium sulfate for enhancement of lead adsorption. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2016;60:361–8.10.1016/j.jtice.2015.10.034Search in Google Scholar

[28] Kameda T, Takeuchi H, Yoshioka T. Hybrid inorganic/organic composites of Mg–Al layered double hydroxides intercalated with citrate, malate, and tartrate prepared by co-precipitation. Mater Res Bull. 2009;44(4):840–5.10.1016/j.materresbull.2008.09.003Search in Google Scholar

[29] Puzyrnaya LN, Pshinko GN, Zub VY, Zuy OV. Removal of Cu(ii), Co(ii) and Cd(ii) from water solutions by layered-double hydroxides with different [Mg(ii)]/[Fe(iii)] molar ratios. Bull Mater Sci. 2019;43(1):3.10.1007/s12034-019-1969-zSearch in Google Scholar

[30] de Oliveira HB, Wypych F. Evaluation of layered zinc hydroxide nitrate and zinc/nickel double hydroxide salts in the removal of chromate ions from solutions. J Solid State Chem. 2016;243:136–45.10.1016/j.jssc.2016.08.019Search in Google Scholar

[31] Ogata F, Ueta E, Kawasaki N. Characteristics of a novel adsorbent Fe–Mg-type hydrotalcite and its adsorption capability of As(iii) and Cr(vi) from aqueous solution. J Ind Eng Chem. 2018;59:56–63.10.1016/j.jiec.2017.10.005Search in Google Scholar

[32] Sommella A, Caporale AG, Denecke MA, Mangold S, Pigna M, Santoro A, et al. Nature and reactivity of layered double hydroxides formed by coprecipitating Mg, Al and As(v): effect of arsenic concentration, pH, and aging. J Hazard Mater. 2015;300:504–12.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.046Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Chen M, Wu P, Huang Z, Liu J, Li Y, Zhu N, et al. Environmental application of MgMn-layered double oxide for simultaneous efficient removal of tetracycline and Cd pollution: performance and mechanism. J Environ Manag. 2019;246:164–73.10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Zhou H, Jiang Z, Wei S, Liang J. Adsorption of Cd(ii) from aqueous solutions by a novel layered double hydroxide FeMnMg–LDH. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2018;229(3):78.10.1007/s11270-017-3597-9Search in Google Scholar

[35] Kameda T, Shinmyou T, Yoshioka T. Uptake of Nd3+ and Sr2+ by Li–Al layered double hydroxide intercalated with triethylenetetramine-hexaacetic acid: kinetic and equilibrium studies. RSC Adv. 2015;5(97):79447–55.10.1039/C5RA12807BSearch in Google Scholar

[36] Jose NA, Zeng HC, Lapkin AA. Hydrodynamic assembly of two-dimensional layered double hydroxide nanostructures. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4913.10.1038/s41467-018-07395-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[37] Arai Y, Ogawa M. Preparation of Co–Al layered double hydroxides by the hydrothermal urea method for controlled particle size. Appl Clay Sci. 2009;42(3–4):601–4.10.1016/j.clay.2008.04.011Search in Google Scholar

[38] Pagano C, Marmottini F, Nocchetti M, Ramella D, Perioli L. Effects of different milling techniques on the layered double hydroxides final properties. Appl Clay Sci. 2018;151:124–33.10.1016/j.clay.2017.10.030Search in Google Scholar

[39] Yang L, Dadwhal M, Shahrivari Z, Ostwal M, Liu PKT, Sahimi M, et al. Adsorption of arsenic on layered double hydroxides: effect of the particle size. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2006;45(13):4742–51.10.1021/ie051457qSearch in Google Scholar

[40] Rojas R. Effect of particle size on copper removal by layered double hydroxides. Chem Eng J. 2016;303:331–7.10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.007Search in Google Scholar

[41] Zhao Y, Xiao F, Jiao Q. Controlling of morphology of Ni/Al-LDHs using microemulsion-mediated hydrothermal synthesis. Bull Mater Sci. 2008;31(6):831–4.10.1007/s12034-008-0132-zSearch in Google Scholar

[42] Rahman MT, Kameda T, Kumagai S, Yoshioka T. A novel method to delaminate nitrate-intercalated Mg Al layered double hydroxides in water and application in heavy metals removal from waste water. Chemosphere. 2018;203:281–90.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.166Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[43] Li L, Ma R, Iyi N, Ebina Y, Takada K, Sasaki T. Hollow nanoshell of layered double hydroxide. Chem Commun. 2006;29:3125–27.10.1039/b605889bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[44] Li Z, Yang B, Zhang S, Wang B, Xue B. A novel approach to hierarchical sphere-like ZnAl-layered double hydroxides and their enhanced adsorption capability. J Mater Chem A. 2014;2(26):10202–10.10.1039/c4ta01028kSearch in Google Scholar

[45] Wang J, Zhang L, Zhang T, Du T, Li T, Yue T, et al. Selective removal of heavy metal ions in aqueous solutions by sulfide-selector intercalated layered double hydroxide adsorbent. J Mater Sci Technol. 2019;35(9):1809–16.10.1016/j.jmst.2019.04.016Search in Google Scholar

[46] Zhao L-X, Liang J-L, Li N, Xiao H, Chen L-Z, Zhao R-S. Kinetic, thermodynamic and isotherm investigations of Cu2+ and Zn2+ adsorption on Li–Al hydrotalcite-like compound. Sci Total Environ. 2020;716. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137120.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Mubarak M, Jeon H, Islam MS, Yoon C, Bae J-S, Hwang S-J, et al. One-pot synthesis of layered double hydroxide hollow nanospheres with ultrafast removal efficiency for heavy metal ions and organic contaminants. Chemosphere. 2018;201:676–86.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.046Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] Lei C, Zhu X, Zhu B, Jiang C, Le Y, Yu J. Superb adsorption capacity of hierarchical calcined Ni/Mg/Al layered double hydroxides for Congo red and Cr(vi) ions. J Hazard Mater. 2017;321:801–11.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.070Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Douglas GB. Contaminant removal from acidic mine pit water via in situ hydrotalcite formation. Appl Geochem. 2014;51:15–22.10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.09.005Search in Google Scholar

[50] Xu Y, Zhang J, Zhou J, Chen C, Liu Q, Qian G, et al. CN and heavy metal removal through formation of layered double hydroxides from mixed CN-containing electroplating wastewaters and pickle acid liquor. Chem Eng J. 2013;215–216:411–7.10.1016/j.cej.2012.10.074Search in Google Scholar

[51] Ali J, Wang H, Ifthikar J, Khan A, Wang T, Zhan K, et al. Efficient, stable and selective adsorption of heavy metals by thio-functionalized layered double hydroxide in diverse types of water. Chem Eng J. 2018;332:387–97.10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.080Search in Google Scholar

[52] Peligro FR, Pavlovic I, Rojas R, Barriga C. Removal of heavy metals from simulated wastewater by in situ formation of layered double hydroxides. Chem Eng J. 2016;306:1035–40.10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.054Search in Google Scholar

[53] Zhu P, Li ZL, Hao Y, Qian GR, Zhou J. Novel approach to synthetic Mg(ii)Fe(iii) layered double hydroxide using waste serpentine tailings. J Hazard Toxic Radioactive Waste. 2017;21(3):UNSP06016002.10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000340Search in Google Scholar

[54] Zhao H, Jiang K, Yang R, Tang Y, Liu J. Experimental and theoretical analysis on coupled effect of hydration, temperature and humidity in early-age cement-based materials. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2020;146:118784.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118784Search in Google Scholar

[55] Chi L, Wang Z, Sun Y, Lu S, Yao Y. Crystalline/amorphous blend identification from cobalt adsorption by layered double hydroxides. Mater (Basel). 2018;11(9):1706.10.3390/ma11091706Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[56] Chi L, Wang Z, Sun Y, Lu S, Yao Y. Removal of cobalt ions from waste water by Friedel’s salt. Mater Res Express. 2018;6(1):015508.10.1088/2053-1591/aae613Search in Google Scholar

[57] Chen L, Xu H, Xie J, Liu X, Yuan Y, Liu P, et al. [SnS4](4–) clusters modified MgAl–LDH composites for mercury ions removal from acid wastewater. Environ Pollut. 2019;247:146–54.10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[58] Ma L, Wang Q, Islam SM, Liu Y, Ma S, Kanatzidis MG. Highly selective and efficient removal of heavy metals by layered double yydroxide intercalated with the MoS4(2−) ion. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138(8):2858–66.10.1021/jacs.6b00110Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[59] Bessaies H, Iftekhar S, Doshi B, Kheriji J, Ncibi MC, Srivastava V, et al. Synthesis of novel adsorbent by intercalation of biopolymer in LDH for the removal of arsenic from synthetic and natural water. J Environ Sci. 2020;91:246–61.10.1016/j.jes.2020.01.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[60] Gonzalez MA, Pavlovic I, Rojas-Delgado R, Barriga C. Removal of Cu2+, Pb2+ and Cd2+ by layered double hydroxide-humate hybrid. Sorbate and sorbent comparative studies. Chem Eng J. 2014;254:605–11.10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.132Search in Google Scholar

[61] Kameda T, Takeuchi H, Yoshioka T. Kinetics of uptake of Cu2+ and Cd2+ by Mg–Al layered double hydroxides intercalated with citrate, malate, and tartrate. Colloids Surf A. 2010;355(1–3):172–7.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.12.005Search in Google Scholar

[62] Huang D, Liu C, Zhang C, Deng R, Wang R, Xue W, et al. Cr(vi) removal from aqueous solution using biochar modified with Mg/Al-layered double hydroxide intercalated with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Bioresour Technol. 2019;276:127–32.10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.114Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[63] Li Y, Bi H-Y, Shi X-Q. Simultaneous adsorption of heavy metal and organic pollutant onto citrate-modified layered double hydroxides with dodecylbenzenesulfonate. Environ Eng Sci. 2015;32(8):666–75.10.1089/ees.2014.0489Search in Google Scholar

[64] Yanming S, Dongbin L, Shifeng L, Lihui F, Shuai C, Haque MA. Removal of lead from aqueous solution on glutamate intercalated layered double hydroxide. Arab J Chem. 2017;10:S2295–301.10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.08.005Search in Google Scholar

[65] Kameda T, Takeuchi H, Yoshioka T. Uptake of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution using Mg–Al layered double hydroxides intercalated with citrate, malate, and tartrate. Sep Purif Technol. 2008;62(2):330–6.10.1016/j.seppur.2008.02.001Search in Google Scholar

[66] Zhang X, Yan L, Li J, Yu H. Adsorption of heavy metals by l-cysteine intercalated layered double hydroxide: kinetic, isothermal and mechanistic studies. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;562:149–58.10.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[67] Liang X, Hou W, Xu Y, Sun G, Wang L, Sun Y, et al. Sorption of lead ion by layered double hydroxide intercalated with diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. Colloids Surf A. 2010;366(1–3):50–7.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.05.012Search in Google Scholar

[68] Pavlovic I, Perez M, Barriga C, Ulibarri M. Adsorption of Cu2+, Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions by layered double hydroxides intercalated with the chelating agents diethylenetriaminepentaacetate and meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinate. Appl Clay Sci. 2009;43(1):125–9.10.1016/j.clay.2008.07.020Search in Google Scholar

[69] Shen Y, Zhao X, Zhang X, Li S, Liu D, Fan L. Removal of Pb2+ from the aqueous solution by tartrate intercalated layered double hydroxides. Korean J Chem Eng. 2015;33(1):159–69.10.1007/s11814-015-0110-2Search in Google Scholar

[70] Zhang H, Dai Z, Sui Y, Wang N, Fu H, Ding D, et al. Scavenging of U(vi) from impregnated water at uranium tailings repository by tripolyphosphate intercalated layered double yydroxides. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2018;57(50):17318–27.10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04636Search in Google Scholar

[71] Mallakpour S, Hatami M. Biosafe organic diacid intercalated LDH/PVC nanocomposites versus pure LDH and organic diacid intercalated LDH: synthesis, characterization and removal behaviour of Cd2+ from aqueous test solution. Appl Clay Sci. 2017;149:28–40.10.1016/j.clay.2017.09.006Search in Google Scholar

[72] Kameda T, Saito S, Umetsu Y. Mg–Al layered double hydroxide intercalated with ethylene-diaminetetraacetate anion: synthesis and application to the uptake of heavy metal ions from an aqueous solution. Sep Purif Technol. 2005;47(1–2):20–6.10.1016/j.seppur.2005.06.001Search in Google Scholar

[73] Perez MR, Pavlovic I, Barriga C, Cornejo J, Hermosin MC, Ulibari MA. Uptake of Cu2+, Cd2+ and Pb2+ on Zn–Al layered double hydroxide intercalated with edta. Appl Clay Sci. 2006;32(3–4):245–51.10.1016/j.clay.2006.01.008Search in Google Scholar

[74] Kameda T, Takaizumi M, Kumagai S, Saito Y, Yoshioka T. Uptake of Ni2+ and Cu2+ by Zn–Al layered double hydroxide intercalated with carboxymethyl-modified cyclodextrin: equilibrium and kinetic studies. Mater Chem Phys. 2019;233:288–95.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.05.076Search in Google Scholar

[75] Rouahna N, Barkat D, Ouakouak A, Srasra E. Synthesis and characterization of Mg–Al layered double hydroxide intercalated with D2EHPA: application for copper ions removal from aqueous solution. J Environ Chem Eng. 2018;6(1):1226–32.10.1016/j.jece.2018.01.036Search in Google Scholar

[76] Li Y, Bi H-Y, Jin Y-S. Facile preparation of rhamnolipid-layered double hydroxide nanocomposite for simultaneous adsorption of p-cresol and copper ions from water. Chem Eng J. 2017;308:78–88.10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.030Search in Google Scholar

[77] Huang G, Wang D, Ma S, Chen J, Jiang L, Wang P. A new, low-cost adsorbent: preparation, characterization, and adsorption behavior of Pb(ii) and Cu(ii). J Colloid Interface Sci. 2015;445:294–302.10.1016/j.jcis.2014.12.099Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[78] Kameda T, Hoshi K, Yoshioka T. Preparation of Cu–Al layered double hydroxide intercalated with ethylenediaminetetraacetate by coprecipitation and its uptake of rare earth ions from aqueous solution. Solid State Sci. 2013;17:28–34.10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2012.12.010Search in Google Scholar

[79] Olivera S, Hu C, Nagananda GS, Reddy N, Venkatesh K, Muralidhara HB. Multipurpose composite for heavy metal sorption, antimicrobial, and antioxidant applications. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2018;16(4):2017–30.10.1007/s13762-018-1774-zSearch in Google Scholar

[80] Lyu F, Yu H, Hou T, Yan L, Zhang X, Du B. Efficient and fast removal of Pb(2+) and Cd(2+) from an aqueous solution using a chitosan/Mg–Al-layered double hydroxide nanocomposite. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;539:184–93.10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.049Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[81] Dinari M, Neamati S. Surface modified layered double hydroxide/polyaniline nanocomposites: synthesis, characterization and Pb2+ removal. Colloids Surf A. 2020;589. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124438.Search in Google Scholar

[82] Pang H, Wu Y, Huang S, Ding C, Li S, Wang X, et al. Macroscopic and microscopic investigation of uranium elimination by Ca–Mg–Al-layered double hydroxide supported nanoscale zero valent iron. Inorg Chem Front. 2018;5(10):2657–65.10.1039/C8QI00779ASearch in Google Scholar

[83] Vreysen S, Maes A. Adsorption mechanism of humic and fulvic acid onto Mg/Al layered double hydroxides. Appl Clay Sci. 2008;38(3–4):237–49.10.1016/j.clay.2007.02.010Search in Google Scholar

[84] Kawahigashi M, Sumida H, Yamamoto K. Size and shape of soil humic acids estimated by viscosity and molecular weight. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2005;284(2):463–9.10.1016/j.jcis.2004.10.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[85] Li L, Qi G, Wang B, Yue D, Wang Y, Sato T. Fulvic acid anchored layered double hydroxides: a multifunctional composite adsorbent for the removal of anionic dye and toxic metal. J Hazard Mater. 2018;343:19–28.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[86] Dou J, Huang Q, Huang H, Gan D, Chen J, Deng F, et al. Mussel-inspired preparation of layered double hydroxides based polymer composites for removal of copper ions. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;533:416–27.10.1016/j.jcis.2018.08.064Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[87] Dou J, Chen J, Huang Q, Huang H, Mao L, Deng F, et al. Preparation of polymer functionalized layered double hydroxide through mussel-inspired chemistry and Kabachnik–Fields reaction for highly efficient adsorption. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020;8(1). 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103634.Search in Google Scholar

[88] Huang Q, Zhao J, Liu M, Chen J, Zhu X, Wu T, et al. Preparation of polyethylene polyamine@tannic acid encapsulated MgAl-layered double hydroxide for the efficient removal of copper (ii) ions from aqueous solution. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2018;82:92–101.10.1016/j.jtice.2017.10.019Search in Google Scholar

[89] Wang F, Guo Z. Insitu growth of ZIF-8 on Co Al layered double hydroxide/carbon fiber composites for highly efficient absorptive removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions. Appl Clay Sci. 2019;175:115–23.10.1016/j.clay.2019.04.013Search in Google Scholar

[90] Wang L, Wang X, Li J, Feng X, Wang Y. Silica aerogel-supported hydrozincite and carbonate-intercalated hydrotalcite for high-efficiency removal of Pb(ii) ions by precipitation transformation reactions. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2017;12(1):549.10.1186/s11671-017-2323-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[91] Zhu J, Liu Q, Liu J, Chen R, Zhang H, Li R, et al. Ni–Mn LDH-decorated 3D Fe-inserted and N-doped carbon framework composites for efficient uranium(vi) removal. Environ Sci Nano. 2018;5(2):467–75.10.1039/C7EN01018DSearch in Google Scholar

[92] Wang T, Li C, Wang C, Wang H. Biochar/MnAl–LDH composites for Cu(ii) removal from aqueous solution. Colloids Surf A. 2018;538:443–50.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.11.034Search in Google Scholar

[93] Yuan X, Wang Y, Wang J, Zhou C, Tang Q, Rao X. Calcined graphene/MgAl-layered double hydroxides for enhanced Cr(vi) removal. Chem Eng J. 2013;221:204–13.10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.090Search in Google Scholar

[94] He S, Zhao Y, Wei M, Evans DG, Duan X. Fabrication of hierarchical layered double hydroxide framework on aluminum foam as a structured adsorbent for water treatment. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51(1):285–91.10.1021/ie2015894Search in Google Scholar

[95] Yu J, Zhu Z, Zhang H, Qiu Y, Yin D. Mg–Fe layered double hydroxide assembled on biochar derived from rice husk ash: facile synthesis and application in efficient removal of heavy metals. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25(24):24293–304.10.1007/s11356-018-2500-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[96] Ma Y, Wang Y, Xie D, Gu Y, Zhu X, Zhang H, et al. Hierarchical MgFe-layered double hydroxide microsphere/graphene composite for simultaneous electrochemical determination of trace Pb(ii) and Cd(ii). Chem Eng J. 2018;347:953–62.10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.172Search in Google Scholar

[97] Gong J, Liu T, Wang X, Hu X, Zhang L. Efficient removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous systems with the assembly of anisotropic layered double hydroxide nanocrystals@carbon nanosphere. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(14):6181–7.10.1021/es200668qSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[98] Wang H, Wang S, Chen Z, Zhou X, Wang J, Chen Z. Engineered biochar with anisotropic layered double hydroxide nanosheets to simultaneously and efficiently capture Pb2+ and CrO42− from electroplating wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2020;306:123118.10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123118Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[99] Typek J, Guskos N, Zolnierkiewicz G, Pilarska M, Guskos A, Kusiak-Nejman E, et al. Magnetic properties of TiO2/graphitic carbon nanocomposites. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2019;58(1):107–22.10.1515/rams-2019-0009Search in Google Scholar

[100] Yu S, Liu Y, Ai Y, Wang X, Zhang R, Chen Z, et al. Rational design of carbonaceous nanofiber/Ni–Al layered double hydroxide nanocomposites for high-efficiency removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions. Environ Pollut. 2018;242(Pt A):1–11.10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.031Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[101] Ghouri ZK, Motlak M, Afaq S, Barakat NAM, Abdala A. Template-free synthesis of Se-nanorods-rGO nanocomposite for application in supercapacitors. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8(1):661–70.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0057Search in Google Scholar

[102] Zhao M-Q, Zhang Q, Huang J-Q, Wei F. Hierarchical nanocomposites derived from nanocarbons and layered double hydroxides – properties, synthesis, and applications. Adv Funct Mater. 2012;22(4):675–94.10.1002/adfm.201102222Search in Google Scholar

[103] Liao W, Wang H, Li H-q, Yang P. Cd(ii) removal by Fe(ii) surface chemically modified layered double hydroxide–graphene oxide: performance and mechanism. RSC Adv. 2019;9(67):38982–9.10.1039/C9RA07305ASearch in Google Scholar

[104] Peng Y, Yu Z, Li F, Chen Q, Yin D, Min X. A novel reduced graphene oxide-based composite membrane prepared via a facile deposition method for multifunctional applications: oil/water separation and cationic dyes removal. Sep Purif Technol. 2018;200:130–40.10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.059Search in Google Scholar

[105] Wang J, Mei X, Huang L, Zheng Q, Qiao Y, Zang K, et al. Synthesis of layered double hydroxides/graphene oxide nanocomposite as a novel high-temperature CO2 adsorbent. J Energy Chem. 2015;24(2):127–37.10.1016/S2095-4956(15)60293-5Search in Google Scholar

[106] Wu X-L, Wang L, Chen C-L, Xu A-W, Wang X-K. Water-dispersible magnetite-graphene-LDH composites for efficient arsenate removal. J Mater Chem. 2011;21(43):17353–9.10.1039/c1jm12678dSearch in Google Scholar

[107] Varadwaj GBB, Oyetade OA, Rana S, Martincigh BS, Jonnalagadda SB, Nyamori VO. Facile synthesis of three-dimensional Mg–Al layered double hydroxide/partially reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for the effective removal of Pb(2+) from aqueous solution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(20):17290–305.10.1021/acsami.6b16528Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[108] Jia Y, Zhang Y, Fu J, Yuan L, Li Z, Liu C, et al. A novel magnetic biochar/MgFe-layered double hydroxides composite removing Pb2+ from aqueous solution: isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics. Colloids Surf A. 2019;567:278–87.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.01.064Search in Google Scholar

[109] Gao C, Zhang X, Yuan Y, Lei Y, Gao J, Zhao S, et al. Removal of hexavalent chromium ions by core-shell sand/Mg-layer double hydroxides (LDHs) in constructed rapid infiltration system. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;166:285–93.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.09.083Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[110] Ji Y, Zhang X, Gao J, Zhao S, Dou Y, Xue Y, et al. Efficiency and mechanisms of cadmium removal via core–shell zeolite/Zn-layer double hydroxides. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;188. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109887.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[111] Li Y, Bi H-Y, Mao X-M, Liang Y-Q, Li H. Adsorption behavior and mechanism of core–shell magnetic rhamnolipid–layered double hydroxide nanohybrid for phenolic compounds from heavy metal–phenolic pollutants. Appl Clay Sci. 2018;162:230–8.10.1016/j.clay.2018.06.013Search in Google Scholar

[112] Li SS, Jiang M, Jiang TJ, Liu JH, Guo Z, Huang XJ. Competitive adsorption behavior toward metal ions on nano-Fe/Mg/Ni ternary layered double hydroxide proved by XPS: evidence of selective and sensitive detection of Pb(ii). J Hazard Mater. 2017;338:1–10.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[113] Wang Y, Gu Y, Xie D, Qin W, Zhang H, Wang G, et al. A hierarchical hybrid monolith: MoS42−-intercalated NiFe layered double hydroxide nanosheet arrays assembled on carbon foam for highly efficient heavy metal removal. J Mater Chem A. 2019;7(20):12869–81.10.1039/C9TA03102BSearch in Google Scholar

[114] Sahu S, Kar P, Bishoyi N, Mallik L, Patel RK. Synthesis of polypyrrole-modified layered double hydroxides for efficient removal of Cr(vi). J Chem Eng Data. 2019;64(10):4357–68.10.1021/acs.jced.9b00444Search in Google Scholar

[115] Yang F, Sun S, Chen X, Chang Y, Zha F, Lei Z. Mg–Al layered double hydroxides modified clay adsorbents for efficient removal of Pb2+, Cu2+ and Ni2+ from water. Appl Clay Sci. 2016;123:134–40.10.1016/j.clay.2016.01.026Search in Google Scholar

[116] Zhou H, Jiang Z, Wei S. A new hydrotalcite-like absorbent FeMnMg–LDH and its adsorption capacity for Pb2+ ions in water. Appl Clay Sci. 2018;153:29–37.10.1016/j.clay.2017.11.033Search in Google Scholar

[117] Jin C, Liu H, Kong X, Yan H, Lei X. Enrichment of rare earth metal ions by the highly selective adsorption of phytate intercalated layered double hydroxide. Dalton Trans. 2018;47(9):3093–101.10.1039/C7DT03583GSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[118] Wang J, Wang P, Wang H, Dong J, Chen W, Wang X, et al. Preparation of molybdenum disulfide coated Mg/Al layered double hydroxide composites for efficient removal of Chromium(vi). ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2017;5(8):7165–74.10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01347Search in Google Scholar

[119] Xie Y, Yuan X, Wu Z, Zeng G, Jiang L, Peng X, et al. Adsorption behavior and mechanism of Mg/Fe layered double hydroxide with Fe3O4-carbon spheres on the removal of Pb(ii) and Cu(ii). J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;536:440–55.10.1016/j.jcis.2018.10.066Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[120] Nakayama H, Hirami S, Tsuhako M. Selective adsorption of mercury ion by mercaptocarboxylic acid intercalated Mg–Al layered double hydroxide. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2007;315(1):177–83.10.1016/j.jcis.2007.06.036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[121] Nakayama H, Hirami S, Tsuhako M. Selective adsorption of mercury ion by mercaptocarboxylic acid intercalated Mg–Al layered double hydroxide. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2007;315(1):177–83.10.1016/j.jcis.2007.06.036Search in Google Scholar

[122] Reda AT, Zhang D. Sorption of metal ions from aqueous solution by sulfonated calix[4]arene intercalated with layered double hydroxide. J Environ Chem Eng. 2019;7(2):UNSP 10302.10.1016/j.jece.2019.103021Search in Google Scholar

[123] Asiabi H, Yamini Y, Shamsayei M, Molaei K, Shamsipur M. Functionalized layered double hydroxide with nitrogen and sulfur co-decorated carbondots for highly selective and efficient removal of soft Hg(2+) and Ag(+) ions. J Hazard Mater. 2018;357:217–25.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.05.055Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[124] Jawad A, Liao Z, Zhou Z, Khan A, Wang T, Ifthikar J, et al. Fe-MoS4: an effective and stable LDH-Based adsorbent for selective removal of heavy metals. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(34):28451–63.10.1021/acsami.7b07208Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[125] Ma S, Chen Q, Li H, Wang P, Islam SM, Gu Q, et al. Highly selective and efficient heavy metal capture with polysulfide intercalated layered double hydroxides. J Mater Chem A. 2014;2(26):10280–9.10.1039/C4TA01203HSearch in Google Scholar

[126] Asiabi H, Yamini Y, Shamsayei M. Highly efficient capture and recovery of uranium by reusable layered double hydroxide intercalated with 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate. Chem Eng J. 2018;337:609–15.10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.143Search in Google Scholar

[127] Huang S, Song S, Zhang R, Wen T, Wang X, Yu S, et al. Construction of layered double hydroxides/hollow carbon microsphere composites and its applications for mutual removal of Pb(ii) and humic acid from aqueous solutions. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2017;5(12):11268–79.10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01717Search in Google Scholar

[128] Du L, Wang X, Liu T, Li J, Wang J, Gao M, et al. Magnetic solid-phase extraction of organophosphorus pesticides from fruit juices using NiFe2O4@polydopamine@Mg/Al-layered double hydroxides nanocomposites as an adsorbent. Microchem J. 2019;150:104128.10.1016/j.microc.2019.104128Search in Google Scholar

[129] Yang Y, Li J, Yan T, Zhu R, Yan L, Pei Z. Adsorption and photocatalytic reduction of aqueous Cr(vi) by Fe3O4-ZnAl-layered double hydroxide/TiO2 composites. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;562:493–501.10.1016/j.jcis.2019.11.088Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[130] Anirudhan TS, Suchithra PS. Synthesis and characterization of tannin-immobilized hydrotalcite as a potential adsorbent of heavy metal ions in effluent treatments. Appl Clay Sci. 2008;42(1–2):214–23.10.1016/j.clay.2007.12.002Search in Google Scholar

[131] Zhang F, Song Y, Song S, Zhang R, Hou W. Synthesis of magnetite-graphene oxide-layered double hydroxide composites and applications for the removal of Pb(ii) and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid from aqueous solutions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(13):7251–63.10.1021/acsami.5b00433Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[132] Wang R-X, Wen T, Wu X-L, Xu A-W. Highly efficient removal of humic acid from aqueous solutions by Mg/Al layered double hydroxides-Fe3O4 nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 2014;4(42):21802–9.10.1039/c4ra02212bSearch in Google Scholar

[133] Wang C, Wang H. Pb(ii) sorption from aqueous solution by novel biochar loaded with nano-particles. Chemosphere. 2018;192:1–4.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.125Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[134] Deng L, Shi Z, Wang L, Zhou S. Fabrication of a novel NiFe2O4/Zn–Al layered double hydroxide intercalated with EDTA composite and its adsorption behavior for Cr(vi) from aqueous solution. J Phys Chem Solids. 2017;104:79–90.10.1016/j.jpcs.2016.12.030Search in Google Scholar

[135] Shan, R-R, Yan, L-G, Yang, K, Hao Y-F, Du B. Adsorption of Cd(ii) by Mg-Al-CO3− and magnetic Fe3O4/Mg–Al–CO3-layered double hydroxides: kinetic, isothermal, thermodynamic and mechanistic studies. J Hazard Mater. 2015;299:42–49.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.06.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[136] Chen D, Li Y, Zhang J, Li W, Zhou J, Shao L, et al. Efficient removal of dyes by a novel magnetic Fe3O4/ZnCr-layered double hydroxide adsorbent from heavy metal wastewater. J Hazard Mater. 2012;243:152–60.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.10.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[137] Xiang Y, Kang F, Xiang Y, Jiao Y. Effects of humic acid-modified magnetic Fe3O4/MgAl-layered double hydroxide on the plant growth, soil enzyme activity, and metal availability. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019;182:109424.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109424Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[138] Zhang X, Xue Y, Gao J, He C, Ji Y, Dou Y. Comparison of adsorption mechanisms for cadmium removal by modified zeolites and sands coated with Zn-layered double hydroxides. Chem Eng J. 2020;380. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122578.Search in Google Scholar

[139] Zhang X, Dou Y, Gao C, He C, Gao J, Zhao S, et al. Removal of Cd(ii) by modified maifanite coated with Mg-layered double hydroxides in constructed rapid infiltration systems. Sci Total Environ. 2019;685:951–62.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.228Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[140] Guo X, Zhang F, Peng Q, Xu S, Lei X, Evans DG, et al. Layered double hydroxide/eggshell membrane: an inorganic biocomposite membrane as an efficient adsorbent for Cr(vi) removal. Chem Eng J. 2011;166(1):81–87.10.1016/j.cej.2010.10.010Search in Google Scholar

[141] Li M, Dopilka A, Kraetz AN, Jing H, Chan CK. Layered double hydroxide/chitosan nanocomposite beads as sorbents for selenium oxoanions. Ind & Eng Chem Res. 2018;57(14):4978–87.10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00466Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-07-15
Accepted: 2020-08-03
Published Online: 2020-09-03

© 2020 Zhen Tang et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 12.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2020-0065/html
Scroll to top button