Research status and future development of crashworthiness of civil aircraft fuselage structures: An overview

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100644Get rights and content

Abstract

The crashworthy design, verification, and certification of civil aircraft fuselage structures are extremely important for the aviation safety and the survivability of crew and passengers in a crash event. To improve the crashworthy performance of civil aircraft, a building block approach is recommended with several levels, i.e. coupons - elements - details - sub-components - components - full-scale aircraft. Impact tests and numerical simulations are described according to the different levels of building block approach. Design methods for improving the crashworthiness of fuselage structures are introduced. The status of research to evaluate the sub-components (such as the sub-cargo structure); the components (such as the fuselage section); and, the full-scale aircraft is summarized. Finally, the current crashworthy verification methods and evaluation processes for civil aviation fuselage structures are highlighted. Future development of crashworthy design, verification, and certification of civil aircraft fuselage structures is proposed.

Introduction

Crashworthiness is the ability of civil aircraft structure and internal systems to provide maximum occupant protection in a crash or emergency landing event, and to enable the occupants to successfully evacuate the aircraft [1,2]. The crash impacts of civil aircraft are inevitable, which can seriously threaten the survivability of occupants. About 40% of civil aviation accidents occur in the take-off or landing phase, and most of them belong to the category of survival crash accidents [3]. How to ensure the occupants’ safety during the crash process is an important issue of crashworthy design.

To ensure civil aviation safety, the airworthiness standards of civil aircraft were given in the FAR 25/CCAR 25 [4,5]. There are no specific rules for crashworthiness of the fuselage sections, but the crashworthy requirements of the fuselage sections are included in more than 40 relevant rules [[6], [7], [8]]. For example, Section 25.561 specifies that the fuselage structure must be designed to give each occupant every reasonable chance of escaping serious injury in a minor crash-landing event when seats, belts and all other safety design provisions are properly used. Section 25.562 specifies the requirements of emergency landing dynamic conditions.

In order to meet the airworthiness requirements of civil aircraft, a large number of crashworthy tests have been carried out on the fuselage sections and full-scale aircraft. During a crash event, the impact load is transmitted along the sub-cargo floor support struts, cargo cross beam, fuselage frame, cabin floor support struts and passenger cross beam, and finally transmitted to occupants through the seats, as shown in Fig. 1 [9]. The crashworthy performance can be immensely improved with well-designed energy absorption materials and structures, and the crashworthiness of civil aircraft is dominated by the impact response characteristics of the fuselage section [10]. The impact response of the fuselage section can be evaluated to ensure that the impact energy can be absorbed by the primary structures (frames, stringers, skins, cabin floors and support struts, cargo floors and support struts) with the goals of managing the fuselage deformation and reducing the impact load. It is difficult to evaluate the crashworthiness of civil aircraft by conducting theoretical analysis, because of the high degree of nonlinearity in materials and geometry during a crash event. The crashworthiness of civil aircraft is evaluated early by conducting impact tests of the fuselage sections, but there are still disadvantages in conducting impact tests, such as high costs, long preparation period, etc. Numerical simulation technology can be used to analyze and evaluate the crashworthy behavior, which can greatly compensate for the disadvantages of impact tests. So, the combination of methods (numerical simulation and impact test) can be used to evaluate the crashworthiness of civil aircraft.

In recent years, composite materials have been widely used in civil aircraft fuselage structures, and are gradually applied to the main load bearing structures. The Boeing company has increased composite material usage to 50% for Boeing 787, and the Airbus company has increased composite material usage to 52% for A350-900. Due to the significant difference of failure and energy absorption characteristics between metal structures and composite structures, the massive use of composite materials has brought great challenges to the crashworthy design, verification and certification of civil aircraft. For composite aircraft, no specific rules address the impact response characteristics for a survivable crash condition. Therefore, the crashworthy requirements of composite fuselage structure was put forward in FAA AC 20–107B [11], and the Special Conditions (SC) for Boeing 787-8 (25-362-SC) and A350-900 (25-537-SC) had also been issued to ensure the crash safety level equivalent to that provided by FAR 25/CCAR 25 [12,13]. Boeing 787–8 and A350-900 must meet the following criteria over a range of vertical descent velocities from 0 to 9.14 m/s (30 ft/s): 1. Maintenance of a survivable volume; 2. Maintenance of acceptable acceleration and loads experienced by the occupants; 3. Retention of items of mass; 4. Maintenance of occupant emergency egress paths. The crashworthy design, verification, and certification of composite fuselage structure has been and will continue to be the main concern.

The research on the crashworthiness of civil aircraft structure mainly involves fuselage structure [14,15], seat system [16], landing gear system [17], and overhead stowage bins [18], etc. This paper mainly focuses on the crashworthy design, verification, and certification of civil aircraft fuselage structure, and a building block approach is recommended with several levels, i.e. coupons - elements - details - subcomponents - components - full-scale aircraft. Based on the different levels of building block approach, the impact tests and numerical simulations are described, and the design methods for improving the crashworthiness of an aircraft fuselage section are also introduced. Then the current crashworthy verification and evaluation processes for civil aircraft are highlighted. Finally, the future development of crashworthy design, verification, and certification of civil aircraft fuselage structure is proposed.

Section snippets

Building block approach of crashworthiness

The MoC (Means of Compliance) using the building block approach was put forward in FAA AC 20–107B, and a series of impact tests and numerical simulation could be conducted with several levels, i.e. coupons - elements - details - sub-components - components, as shown in Fig. 2(a). To support the crashworthy verification and certification of Boeing 787 and A350, the building block approach of crashworthiness are recommended with several levels, as shown in Fig. 2(b) and (c) [19,20].

For the civil

Materials

The materials performance is extremely important for the crashworthy design and numerical simulation of civil aircraft fuselage structures, such as tensile/compression/shear performance, in-layer/interlayer performance, and so on [21,22]. The mechanical properties can be obtained to support the crashworthy design by conducting material performance tests under quasi-static and dynamic conditions [23,24], and the macroscopic failure modes and micro failure mechanisms can be analyzed to better

Energy absorption columns

Thin-walled columns are widely used as energy absorption structures, because a large amount of impact energy can be absorbed due to the longer axial crushing distance. The specific energy absorption (Es) is commonly used to evaluate the energy absorption characteristics, which is calculated as follows:Es=EAm=Fdlm=FdlρAlwhere EA is the total energy absorption, m is the mass of the crushed failure part of the structure, F is the crushing force, ρ is the density, A is the effective section

Details

The failure modes, damage sequences, and energy absorption characteristics can be well predicted by conducting the impact tests for the details, such as sub-floor webs, sub-floor energy absorption columns and fuselage panel, which are extremely important for crashworthy verification and evaluation of the civil aviation airframe.

Sub-components: sub-cargo fuselage section

For the civil aircraft fuselage section, the energy absorption structures, such as composite C-channels [19,20], semi-circular channels [94] and composite corrugated plates [127,128], can be arranged under the sub-cargo fuselage section, which is the main energy absorption area. Dynamic impact tests are conducted to evaluate the failure mode, failure mechanism, failure sequence and energy absorption capability.

Drop tests

Many drop tests have been conducted to research the crashworthiness of civil aircraft fuselage section. Since the 1970s, the FAA and NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) begun to study the crash dynamics and crash safety of GA aircraft and helicopters. In the 1980s, NASA and FAA launched the CID (Controlled Impact Demonstration) project, and a crash test of a Boeing 720 full-scale aircraft was conducted to obtain the structural response data, which could be used to validate the

Crashworthy verification and evaluation

The FE simulation analysis, which must be verified by drop test results, has been widely used in the crashworthy verification and evaluation of civil aircraft fuselage structures. The crashworthy compliance of the A340 is demonstrated through the FE simulation, which are validated and verified by the drop test results of the A320 fuselage section. For the A350XWB composite fuselage section, the crashworthy compliance is demonstrated to show a similar crash safety level as the A340 metal

Conclusions

Crashworthiness is an important issue in aircraft design, and it is also a necessary condition for obtaining an airworthiness certificate. Especially for composite aircraft and wide-body aircraft, the similar crash safety levels must be guaranteed as those of certified metal aircraft of the same size, and must meet the following criteria over a range of vertical descent velocities from 0 to 9.14 m/s (30 ft/s): 1. Maintenance of a survivable volume; 2. Maintenance of acceptable acceleration and

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the supports from Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (2017ZD67002), Tianjin Municipal Education Commission Scientific Research Project (2019KJ135), Central Universities Foundation of Civil Aviation University of China (3122019162).

References (168)

  • J. Mucha et al.

    The experimental analysis of the double joint type change effect on the joint destruction process in uniaxial shearing test

    Thin-Walled Struct.

    (2013)
  • Y.L. Tang et al.

    Mechanical property and failure mechanism of 3D Carbon–Carbon braided composites bolted joints under unidirectional tensile loading

    Mater. Des.

    (2015)
  • D. Hull

    A unified approach to progressive crushing of fibre-reinforced composite tubes

    Compos. Sci. Technol.

    (1991)
  • A.F. Johnson et al.

    Design and testing of crashworthy aerospace composite components

    Poly. Compos. Aerosp. Ind.

    (2015)
  • S.S. Teramoto et al.

    Buckling transition of axially impacted open shells

    Int. J. Impact Eng.

    (2004)
  • V.S. Sokolinsky et al.

    Numerical simulation of the crushing process of a corrugated composite plate

    Compos. Part A- Appl. S.

    (2011)
  • S.T. Lau et al.

    On the effect of geometrical designs and failure modes in composite axial crushing: a literature review

    Compos. Struct.

    (2012)
  • L.N. Chiu et al.

    Finite element modelling of composite structures under crushing load

    Compos. Struct.

    (2015)
  • Y.R. Ren et al.

    Evaluation of double- and triple-coupled triggering mechanisms to improve crashworthiness of composite tubes

    Int. J. Mech. Sci.

    (2019)
  • H. Luo et al.

    Progressive failure numerical simulation and experimental verification of carbon-fiber composite corrugated beams under dynamic

    Polym. Test.

    (2017)
  • D. Siromani et al.

    An experimental study on the effect of failure trigger mechanisms on the energy absorption capability of CFRP tubes under axial compression

    Compos. Part A- Appl. S.

    (2014)
  • C. Mcgregor et al.

    Finite element modelling of the progressive crushing of braided composite tubes under axial impact

    Int. J. Impact Eng.

    (2010)
  • R.A. Eshkoor et al.

    Effect of trigger configuration on the crashworthiness characteristics of natural silk epoxy composite tubes

    Compos. B Eng.

    (2013)
  • S. Ramakrishna

    Microstructural design of composite materials for crashworthy structural applications

    Mater. Des.

    (1997)
  • B.P. Bussadori et al.

    Modelling of CFRP crushing structures in explicit crash analysis

    Compos. B Eng.

    (2014)
  • A. Abramowitz et al.

    Vertical drop test of a narrow-body transport fuselage section with overhead stowage bins

  • W. Gil et al.

    Transport Aircraft Crash Dynamics

    (1982)
  • Federal Aviation Administration

    PART 25 Airworthiness Standards

    (2003)
  • Civil Aviation Administration of China

    CCAR-25-R4, China Civil Aviation Regulation: 25-airworthiness Standard of Transport Aircraft

    (2011)
  • Federal Aviation Administration

    Cabin Safety Subject Index

    (2014)
  • Federal Aviation Administration

    Transport Airplane Cabin Interiors Crashworthiness Handbook, AC 25-17A

    (2009)
  • European Aviation Safety Agency

    Study on CS 25 Cabin Safety Requirements

    (2008)
  • M. Waimer et al.

    Crash concepts for CFRP transport aircraft–comparison of the traditional bend frame concept versus the developments in a tension absorbers concept

    Int. J. Crashworthiness

    (2018)
  • X.F. Yang et al.

    Crashworthy design and energy absorption mechanisms for helicopter structures: a systematic literatures review

    Prog. Aero. Sci.

    (2020)
  • Federal Aviation Administration

    Composite Aircraft Structure

    (2009)
  • Federal Aviation Administration

    25-362-SC Special Conditions: Boeing Model 787-8 Airplane; Crashworthiness

    (2007)
  • Federal Aviation Administration

    25-537-SC Special Conditions: Airbus A350-900 Airplane Crashworthiness, Emergency Landing Conditions

    (2014)
  • D.I. Gransden et al.

    Development of a finite element model for comparing metal and composite fuselage section drop testing

    Int. J. Crashworthiness

    (2017)
  • S. Heimbs et al.

    Design, analysis and testing of a composite crash absorber for aeronautic applications, 3rd ECCOMAS Thematic Conference

  • H.M. Lankarani et al.

    Application of Computer-Aided analysis tools for aircraft occupant and seat crashworthiness problems

    Int. J. Crashworthiness

    (1999)
  • K.H. Lyle et al.

    Simulation of aircraft landing gears with a nonlinear dynamic finite element code

    J. Aircraft

    (2002)
  • K.E. Jachson et al.

    Crash Simulation of Vertical Drop Tests of Two Boeing 737 Fuselage

    (2002)
  • R. Mostafa

    Virtual test & simulation

  • D. Hachenberg et al.

    Crashworthiness of fuselage hybrid structure, 8th triennial international aircraft fire and cabin safety research conference (8IARCSFC)

    Atlantic City

    (2016)
  • G. Olivares et al.

    Crashworthiness Evaluation of Composite Aircraft Structures

    (April 2013)
  • Sae International

    Polymer Matrix Composites: Guidelines for Characterization of Structural Materials

    (2012)
  • D 3039/D3039M Astm

    Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials

    (2017)
  • Z.Y. Feng et al.

    Hygrothermal environment effects on mechanical properties of T700/3228 CFRP laminates

    Mater. Test.

    (2019)
  • Z.Y. Feng et al.

    Influence of hygrothermal environment on tensile property of unidirectional composite laminates

    Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng.

    (2018)
  • Z.Y. Feng et al.

    Hygrothermal effects on compression property of CFRP laminates

    Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (36)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text