Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consideration of Uncertainties in Analyzing Nuclear Power Facilities’ Fire Hazard

  • NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

Paying increased attention to the safety of nuclear power facilities is a key element for their further development. An approach to analyzing their fire safety with due regard to the uncertainty factors associated with the parameters of applied models and with the fire breakout and development conditions is presented. The two-zone fire modeling code that takes into account the specific features of transportable (floating) nuclear power plants is used, and its basic characteristics are given. An original approach to a dynamic probabilistic safety assessment is applied, which is based on a global optimum search algorithm. This algorithm is used in this study for taking into account the uncertainties associated with combustion models, possible human actions, and change in the equipment’s operation modes. The proposed method incorporates a genetic algorithm for searching the global optimum, the main purpose of which is to find the most hazardous fire development scenarios in accordance with adaptive variation of parameters within their uncertainty boundaries. Application of the method is demonstrated for two versions of fire breakout in the process rooms of a transportable power unit equipped with a nuclear power installation. The basic parameters of the two-zone fire model and dynamic probabilistic safety assessment are given. The results of computations for the dynamic probabilistic safety assessment demonstrate the complex nature of interaction among different processes. The data from analyzing the influence of the main parameters are given, a comparison with the standard calculation version and with the use of uncertainty analysis is carried out, and the conditional probability of the worst scenario is estimated. Owing to the consideration of uncertainties and the search for the most dangerous scenarios, it became possible to establish the fire development scenarios that can lead to essentially more severe consequences than those determined in using the standard parameters of two-zone fire models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. EPRI/NRC-RES Fire PRA Methodology for Nuclear Power Facilities, EPRI 1011989, NUREG/CR-6850 (U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Reactor Research, Washington, DC, 2005), Vol. 1–2.

  2. Y.-H. Lee, J.-H. Kim, and J.-E. Yang, “Application of the CFAST zone model to the Fire PSA,” Nucl. Eng. Des. 240, 3571–3576 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.04.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fire Dynamics Tools (FDT): Quantitative Fire Hazard Analysis Methods for the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Fire Protection Inspection Program. Final Report, NUREG-1805 (U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Reactor Research, Washington, DC, 2004).

  4. Nuclear Power Plant Fire Modeling Analysis Guidelines (NPP FIRE MAG). Final Report, NUREG-1934, EPRI 1023259 (U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington, DC, 2012).

  5. V. D. Baibakov, Yu. B. Vorobyev, and V. D. Kuznetsov, Codes for Calculating Nuclear Reactors: Study Aid (Mosk. Energ. Inst., Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yu. B. Vorob’ev, V. D. Kuznetsov, and M. Mansuri, “Assessing the influence of uncertain factors in analyzing emergency processes at nuclear power stations equipped with VVER-1000 reactors,” Therm. Eng. 53, 688–693 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. D. Peacock, W. W. Jones, P. A. Reneke, and G. P. Forney, CFAST — Consolidated Model of Fire Growth and Smoke Transport (Version 7). User’s Guide (National Inst. of Standards and Technology, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yu. B. Vorobyev, A. M. Ganzhinov, V. E. Karnaukhov, D. S. Urtenov, and V. S. Ustinov, “Experience gained from using computation codes for modeling fires at nuclear-powered transport facilities,” Vestn. Mosk. Energ. Inst., No. 5, 39–48 (2016).

  9. Verification and Validation of Selected Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications. Main Report, NUREG-1824 (U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington, DC, 2007), Vol. 1–7.

  10. J. B. Hoover and P. A. Tatem, Application of CFAST to Shipboard Fire. Modeling III. Guidelines for Users, NRL/MR/6180–01-8550 (Navy Technology Center for Safety and Survivability. Chemistry Division, 2001).

  11. J. B. Hoover, “Application of the CFAST zone model to ships — Fire specification parameters,” J. Fire Prot. Eng. 18, 199–222 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1042391508091342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Heskestad, “Fire plumes, flame height, air entrainment,” in SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Ed. by M. J. Hurley, 5th ed. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2016), pp. 396–428.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yu. B. Vorobyev, D. S. Urtenov, V. E. Karnaukhov, V. N. Podgornyi, Yu. N. Eikhorn, and M. L. Lukashenko, “About the accuracy of modeling based on the two-zone approach for analyzing the fire safety of nuclear power facilities,” Vestn. Mosk. Energ. Inst., No. 2, 21–28 (2019).

  14. S. N. Bogdan, O. M. Kovalevich, N. A. Kozlova, S. A. Shevchenko, and D. A. Yashnikov, “About the calculation error evaluation in the framework of the nuclear facilities safety analysis,” Yad. Radiats. Bezop. 84 (2), 38–53 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Tunc, “A survey of dynamic methodologies for probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants,” Ann. Nucl. Energy 52, 113–124 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Zio and N. Pedroni, “Estimation of the functional failure probability of a thermal–hydraulic passive system by Subset Simulation,” Nucl. Eng. Des. 239, 580–599 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Zio and N. Pedroni, “How to effectively compute the reliability of a thermal hydraulic nuclear passive system,” Nucl. Eng. Des. 241, 310–327 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.10.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. K. N. Chyong Van and Yu. B. Vorob’ev, “Determining the worst-case accidents at a nuclear power plant and identifying their occurrence during operation,” Vestn. Mosk. Energ. Inst., No. 5, 30–38 (2016).

  19. Yu. B. Vorobyev, P. Kudinov, M. El’tsov, K. Keop, and K. N. Chyong Van, “Application of information technologies (genetic algorithms, neural networks, parallel calculations) in safety analysis of nuclear power plants,” Tr. Inst. Sist. Program. Ross. Akad. Nauk 26 (2), 137–158 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. N. Sivanandam and S. N. Deepa, Introduction to Genetic Algorithms (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. S. E. Yakush, “Uncertainty of tenability times in multiroom building fires,” Combust. Sci. Technol. 184, 1080–1092 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2012.663998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. NP 001-15. General Safety Assurance Provisions for Nuclear Power Plants (Nauchno-Tekh. Tsentr Yad. Radiats. Bezop., Moscow, 2016).

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was carried out using the equipment installed in the Complex for Modeling and Processing the Data of Mega Class Research Installations shared center at the National Research Center Kurchatov Institute (a subsidy the Russian Federation Ministry of Education and Science, the work identifier RFMEFI62117X0016, http://ckp.nrcki.ru/).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, 111250, Moscow, Russia

    Yu. B. Vorobyev & V. N. Podgornyi

  2. National Research Center Kurchatov Institute, 123182, Moscow, Russia

    Yu. B. Vorobyev, D. S. Urtenov, V. E. Karnaukhov & M. L. Lukashenko

Authors
  1. Yu. B. Vorobyev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. S. Urtenov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. E. Karnaukhov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V. N. Podgornyi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. L. Lukashenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. B. Vorobyev.

Additional information

Translated by V. Filatov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vorobyev, Y.B., Urtenov, D.S., Karnaukhov, V.E. et al. Consideration of Uncertainties in Analyzing Nuclear Power Facilities’ Fire Hazard. Therm. Eng. 67, 640–646 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601520090098

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601520090098

Keywords:

Search

Navigation