Elsevier

Physica B: Condensed Matter

Volume 599, 15 December 2020, 412533
Physica B: Condensed Matter

Magnetic spiral order in the square-lattice spin system (CuBr)Sr2Nb3O10

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2020.412533Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Strongly frustrated J1J2J3 Heisenberg model can be used to describe quasi-two-dimensional compounds with helicoidal spin order, when the Dzyaloshinsky-Moria interaction is inconsistent.

  • We demonstrate that the magnetic and thermodynamic properties of the quasi-two-dimensional square-lattice compound (CuBr)Sr2Nb3O10 can be interpreted within quantum J1J2J3 Heisenberg model.

  • This work will help researchers in theoretical describing a rich variety of experimental compounds with helicoidal spin order, where inversion symmetry is preserved.

Abstract

We address quantum spin helical states in the strongly frustrated Heisenberg model. Contrary to conventional Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya approach we show that such states appear without central symmetry breaking. As an example, we demonstrate that the magnetic and thermodynamic properties of the quasi-two-dimensional square-lattice compound (CuBr)Sr2Nb3O10 can be interpreted within 2D S=12 J1J2J3 Heisenberg model. In this compound neutron experiment indicates helical spin order while central symmetry does hold.

Introduction

Helical (spiral) spin states constitute a topical and intriguing field of magnetism being the subject of intense research last years. Most of the investigations consider the helical state caused by the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI) [1], [2].

The DMI is widely used mechanism for theoretical description of neutron scattering experimental data for complex spin structures [3], [4], [5]. The DMI can induce helical or cycloidal magnetic structure with a determined chirality such as skyrmion with exotic thermodynamic properties [6], [7], [8]. In addition, the DMI plays a key role in the ground-state phase diagram of a spin-1 Heisenberg–Ising alternating chains and appearance of the Haldane phase in such systems [9].

It is however noteworthy that DMI approach presumes broken inversion symmetry. Basically, there exists alternative way to get helical states that does not require inversion symmetry breaking. It appears to be strongly frustrated Heisenberg model [10], [11], [12]. In particular, in two dimensions for the square lattice helices emerge when exchange interaction on three nearest coordination spheres are considered.

Hereinafter we address quasi-two-dimensional compound with stacked square lattice magnetic planes (CuBr)Sr2Nb3O10. Neutron scattering experiment [13], [14] indicates helical spin order in this substance, while DMI-based explanation is unacceptable (inversion symmetry is preserved). This dyad brings forth the assumption to describe the magnetic order via J1J2J3 Heisenberg model [13], [14].

In the present communication we verify the mentioned assumption, we show that the experimental properties of the layered compound (CuBr)Sr2Nb3O10 [13], [14], [15] are well reproduced within the limits of quantum S=12J1J2J3 Heisenberg model on the square lattice.

Our consideration is strictly two-dimensional, hence at nonzero temperature long-range order is impossible due to Mermin–Wagner theorem. So we address spin-liquid state, in particular with helicoidal structure of short-range order. This approach leads to adequate description of both neutron scattering experiment and thermodynamic properties. At the very end we propose the possible way of experimental verification of the approach adequacy by the analysis of spin excitation spectrum.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we introduce the model and briefly discuss the adopted method. In Section 3 the theoretical conclusions are presented and discussed with respect to the neutron diffraction, susceptibility and specific heat experimental data for the square-lattice quasi-two-dimensional (CuBr)Sr2Nb3O10. To the end, in Section 4 the results obtained are summarized.

Section snippets

Model and method

The Hamiltonian of the model reads Ĥ=J0ĥĥ=J1i,jŜiŜj+J2[i,j]ŜiŜj+J3{i,j}ŜiŜj here J0 defines the energy scale. Common parametrization via J2J1 and J3J1 in the dimensionless Hamiltonian (2) is not convenient for large areas of the phase diagram (when J10), so we use trigonometric parametrization by the angles φ and ψ : J1=cosψcosφ, J2=cosψsinφ, J3=sinψ with normalization condition J12+J22+J32=1.

In  (2) (Ŝi)2=34, i,j denotes NN (nearest neighbor) bonds, [i,j] denotes NNN

Results and discussion

The aim of the work is to describe the experimental data for the layered square-lattice compound (CuBr)Sr2Nb3O10 [13], [14], [15]. This appears to be particular case of the general picture of J1J2J3 model thermodynamic properties. We first describe it briefly. We set aside layer–layer interaction and consider the problem in the purely 2D case. The phase diagram of the model obtained in SSSA for two different temperatures is presented in Fig. 1. Hereafter J1, J2 and J3 are parameterized by

Conclusion

To summarize we have shown that the magnetic and thermodynamic properties of the quasi-two-dimensional square-lattice compound (CuBr)Sr2Nb3O10, where neutron experiment indicates helical spin order while common explanation by Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction is unacceptable, can be interpreted within the strongly frustrated Heisenberg model.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

A.V. Mikheyenkov: Investigation, Project administration, Writing - original draft. V.E. Valiulin: Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft. A.F. Barabanov: Conceptualization, Supervision, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to N.M. Chtchelkatchev for useful discussions. This work is supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant 19-02-00509. Numerical simulations were supported by Russian Science Foundation (grant RNF 18-12-00438). Part of calculations was performed using the resources of the Federal Collective Usage Center Complex for Simulation and Data Processing for Mega-science Facilities at NRC “Kurchatov Institute”, http://ckp.nrcki.ru/, and the cluster of Joint

References (31)

  • MikheyenkovA.V. et al.

    Thermodynamic properties of the 2D frustrated Heisenberg model for the entire circle

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2016)
  • YangJ. et al.

    A self-consistent approach to the J1J2J3 model

    Phys. Lett. A

    (1997)
  • DzialoshinskiiI.

    Thermodynamical theory of ’weak’ ferromagnetism in antiferromagnetic substances

    Sov. Phys.—JETP

    (1957)
  • MoriyaT.

    Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism

    Phys. Rev.

    (1960)
  • FelcyA.L. et al.

    A nonlinear lattice model for Heisenberg helimagnet and spin wave instabilities

    Physica B

    (2016)
  • View full text