Skip to main content
Log in

Broadcasting Regional Call Dialects Has Little Influence on the Effectiveness of Call-Broadcast Surveys for Marsh Birds

  • Applied Wetland Science
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emergent wetlands have declined in North America and, in response, many wetland-dependent animals have declined in abundance. For example, many species of secretive marsh birds in North America have declined during the last century. However, estimates of population decline and efforts to assess the effects of management actions are hampered because marsh birds are difficult to detect using conventional survey techniques. Call-broadcast surveys can improve detection probability of marsh birds; however, the effectiveness of call-broadcast varies regionally for some marsh birds, which might reflect differential responsiveness to call dialects. Here, we evaluated differential responses by least bitterns (Ixobrychus exilis) and clapper rails (Rallus crepitans) to different call dialects by using 679 paired call-broadcast surveys in Florida and South Carolina. We detected similar numbers of least bitterns and clapper rails responding to the different call dialects, except in Florida, where least bitterns responded more frequently to a more-distant (Louisiana) dialect than a more-local (Florida) dialect. Our results suggest that, at least for clapper rails and least bitterns, it may not be necessary to incorporate regional call dialects into standardized surveys. However, additional research is needed in more regions of North America and with other species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen T, Finkbeiner SL, Johnson DH (2004) Comparison of detection rates of breeding marsh birds in passive and playback surveys at Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge, South Dakota. Waterbirds 27:277–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenowitz EA (1983) The contribution of temporal song cues to species recognition in the red-winged blackbird. Animal Behaviour 31:1116–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (1995) Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway CJ (2009) Standardized North American marsh bird monitoring protocols, version 2009-2. Wildlife research report #2009–02. U.S. Geological Survey, Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Tucson, AZ

  • Conway CJ (2011) Standardized North American marsh bird monitoring protocol. Waterbirds 34:319–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway CJ, Droege S (2006) A unified strategy for monitoring changes in abundance of birds associated with North American tidal marshes. Studies in Avian Biology 32:382–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway CJ, Eddleman WR, Anderson SH (1994) Nesting success and survival of Virginia rails and Soras. Wilson Bulletin 106:466–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway CJ, Gibbs JP (2005) Effectiveness of call-broadcast surveys for monitoring marsh birds. Auk 122:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway CJ, Gibbs JP (2011) Summary of intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting detection probability of marsh birds. Wetlands 31:403–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway CJ, Nadeau CP (2010) Effects of broadcasting conspecific and heterospecific calls on detection of marsh birds in North America. Wetlands 30:358–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway CJ, Sulzman C (2007) Status and habitat use of the California black rail in the southwestern U.S.A. Wetlands 27:987–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway CJ, Sulzman C, Raulston BA (2004) Factors affecting detection probability of California black rails. Journal of Wildlife Management 68:360–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE (2000) Status and trends of wetlands in conterminous United States 1986 to 1997. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. 82 p

  • Dahl TE (2006) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1998 to 2004. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. 112 p

  • Derryberry EP (2011) Male response to historical and geographical variation in bird song. Biology Letters 7:57–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddleman, W. R., and C. J. Conway. 1998. Clapper rail (Rallus longirostris), the birds of North America online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell lab of ornithology; retrieved from the birds of North America online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/340

  • Eddleman WR, Knopf FL, Meanley B, Reid FA, Zembal R (1988) Conservation of north American rallids. Wilson Bulletin 100:458–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin RM, Conway CJ, Hadden SW (2002) Species occurrence of marsh birds at Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts. Northeastern Naturalist 9:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Hill J (2006) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP, Melvin SM (1993) Call-response surveys for monitoring breeding waterbirds. Journal of Wildlife Management 57:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glahn JF (1974) Study of breeding birds with recorded calls in northcentral Colorado. Wilson Bulletin 86:206–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Irish J (1974) Post-breeding territorial behavior of soras and Virginia rails in several Michigan marshes. Jack-Pine Warbler 52:115–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RR, Dinsmore JJ (1986) The use of tape-recorded calls to count Virginia rails and soras. Wilson Bulletin 98:303–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann GW (1983) Displays and vocalizations of the sora and Virginia rail. Wilson Bulletin 95:42–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroodsma DE (1989) Suggested experimental designs for song playbacks. Animal Behaviour 37:600–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legare ML, Eddleman WR, Buckley PA, Kelly C (1999) The effectiveness of tape playback in estimating black rail density. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemon RE (1967) The response of cardinals to songs of different dialects. Animal Behaviour 15:538–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manci KM, Rusch DH (1988) Indices to distribution and abundance of some inconspicuous waterbirds on Horicon marsh. Journal of Field Ornithology 59:67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau CP, Conway CJ, Piest L, Burger B (2013) Multi-species call-broadcast improved detection of endangered Yuma clapper rail compared to single-species call-broadcast. Wetlands 33:699–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau CP, Conway CJ, Smith BS, Lewis TE (2008) Maximizing detection probability of wetland-dependent birds during point-count surveys in northwestern Florida. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120:513–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA, Nowicki S, Hughes M (1997) The response of male and female house sparrows to geographic variation in song. Condor 99:651–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steidl RJ, Conway CJ, Litt A (2013) Power to detect trends in abundance of secretive marsh birds: effects of species traits and sampling effort. Journal of Wildlife Management 77:445–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens BS, Conway CJ (2020) Predictive multi-scale occupancy models at range-wide extents: effects of habitat and human disturbance on distributions of wetland birds. Diversity and Distributions 26:34–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate J (1986) The blue-list for 1986. American Birds 40:227–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner RW Jr (1984) Wetlands of the United States: current status and recent trends. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Washington, DC

  • Tomback DE, Thompson DB, Baker MC (1983) Dialect discrimination by white-crowned sparrows: reactions to near and distant dialects. Auk 100:452–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A. Fournier and two anonymous reviewers provided comments on an earlier version that improved the paper. L. Santisteban and J. Reinman helped with data proofing and field logistics. B. Smith and K. Morris conducted surveys. We performed this study under the auspices of University of Arizona IACUC protocol #07-189. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Courtney J. Conway.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conway, C.J., Nadeau, C.P. & Conway, M. Broadcasting Regional Call Dialects Has Little Influence on the Effectiveness of Call-Broadcast Surveys for Marsh Birds. Wetlands 40, 2055–2059 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-020-01367-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-020-01367-5

Keywords

Navigation