Skip to main content
Log in

Constraints on H± Parameter Space in 2HDM at \(\sqrt {s}=\) 8 TeV and \(\sqrt {s}=\) 13 TeV

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reflects the heavy Higgs scenario where the mass of charged Higgs is equal to or greater than 200 GeV. The CMS observed and expected values of upper limits on the product \(\sigma _{H^{\pm }} \times BR(H^{\pm } \rightarrow tb^{{\pm }})\), assuming \(H^{\pm } \rightarrow tb^{{\pm }}=1\), both at 8 TeV (at integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb− 1) and 13 TeV (at integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb− 1 ) center of mass energies are used. By comparing these expected and observed upper limits with computational values, it is found out the expected and observed exclusion regions of charged Higgs parameter space (\( m_{H}^{\pm }\) - tanβ space) in 2HDM both at \(\sqrt {s}=\) 8 TeV and \(\sqrt {s}=\) 13 TeV. We compare the expected and observed exclusion regions and observe that exclusion regions made by observed upper limits are always greater than the exclusion made by expected upper limits both at 8 TeV and 13 TeV energies. Only in the mass range from 200 GeV to 220 GeV the expected exclusion region is greater than the observed one only at \(\sqrt {s}=\) 13 TeV. We also equate the exclusion regions at these two different center of mass energies and find that the expected exclusion region and observed exclusion region at \(\sqrt {s}=\)13 TeV are always greater than the expected exclusion region and observed exclusion region at \(\sqrt {{s}}=\) 8 TeV respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Branco, G.C., Ferreira, P.M., Lavoura, L., Rebelo, M.N., Sher, M., Silva, J.P.: Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models. Physics reports 516(1-2), 1–102 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Haber, H.E., Kane, G.L.: The search for supersymmetry:, probing physics beyond the standard model. Physics Reports 117(2-4), 75–263 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, J.E.: The strong CP problem in orbifold compactifications and an SU3, SU(2) U(1) in model. Physics Letters B 207(4), 434–440 (1988)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Peccei, R.D., Quinn, H.R.: CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440–1443 (1977). ITP-568-STANFORD

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanyal, P.: Limits on the charged Higgs parameters in the two Higgs doublet model using CMS \(\sqrt s= 13\) TeV results. The European Physical Journal C 79(11), 913 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Krawczyk, M., Sokolowska, D.: The Charged Higgs boson mass in the 2HDM:, Decoupling and CP violation. arXiv preprint arXiv:0711.4900 (2007)

  7. GC, B., Ranco, L.L., Silva, J.P.: CP Violation Oxford University Press Oxford, 1999 (1999)

  8. Lee, T.D.: A theory of spontaneous T violation. Physical Review D 8(4), 1226 (1973)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Branco, G.C.: Spontaneous CP nonconservation and natural flavor conservation: A minimal model. Physical Review D 22(11), 2901 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hashemi, M., Haghighat, G.: Search for neutral Higgs bosons within type I 2HDM at future linear colliders. The European Physical Journal C 79(5), 419 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Glashow, S.L., Weinberg, S.: Natural conservation laws for neutral currents. Physical Review D 15(7), 1958 (1977)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Barroso, A., Branco, G.C.: Constraints on light axions. Physics Letters B 116(4), 247–250 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mrazek, J., Pomarol, A., Rattazzi, R., Redi, M., Serra, J., Wulzer, A.: The other natural two Higgs doublet model. Nuclear Physics B 853 (1), 1–48 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eriksson, D., Rathsman, J., S, O.: 2HDMC, two-higgs-model calculator. Computer Physics Communications 181(1), 189–205 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Khachatryan, V., Sirunyan, A.M., Tumasyan, A., Adam, W., Asilar, E., Bergauer, T., Flechl, M.: Search for a charged Higgs boson in pp collisions at \(\sqrt s= 8\) TeV. Journal of High Energy Physics 2015(11), 18 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sirunyan, A.M., Tumasyan, A., Adam, W., Ambrogi, F., Bergauer, T., Brandstetter, J., Fruehwirth, R.: Search for a charged Higg boon decaying into top and bottom quark in event with electron or muon in proton-proton colliion at \(\sqrt s = 13\) TeVs. Journal of High Energy Physics 2020(1), 96 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Arhrib, A., Benbrik, R., Moretti, S.: Bosonic decays of charged Higgs bosons in a 2HDM type-I. The European Physical Journal C 77(9), 621 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ijaz Ahmed.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, I., Badshah, M. & Kausar, N. Constraints on H± Parameter Space in 2HDM at \(\sqrt {s}=\) 8 TeV and \(\sqrt {s}=\) 13 TeV. Int J Theor Phys 59, 3189–3205 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-020-04572-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-020-04572-4

Keywords

Navigation