Skip to main content
Log in

A Simple Proof of Regularity of Steady-State Distributional Solutions to the Navier–Stokes Equations

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is proved that a distributional solution u to the stationary Navier–Stokes equations in a bounded domain \(\Omega \) of \({\mathbb R}^n\) \((n>2)\) is regular, provided its norm in the weak-\(L^n(\Omega )\) space is small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In indicial notation \(({\mathrm{div}}\,(u\otimes u))_i=\partial _j(u_iu_j)\) so that \({\mathrm{div}}\,(u\otimes (u-\kappa ))\), for every constant vector \(\kappa \).

  2. To a distributional [resp. weak] solution u to (1.1) in \(\Omega \) is associated in a standard way a pressure field \(p\in W^{-1,q}(\Omega )\) [resp. \(p\in L^q(\Omega )\)] in such a way that the pair (up) is a solution to (1.1) in the sense of distributions [3]. If u is regular, then from the equation \(\Delta p+\partial _{ij}(u_iu_j)=0\) it follows that also p is regular and (up) is a classical solution to (1.1) in \(\Omega \).

  3. Here and in sequel, at least for interior regularity, we can require that the hypotheses on u are satisfied locally. The symbol c will be reserved to denote positive constants whose numerical value is not essential to our purposes.

  4. When it will be necessary, we use the symbol \(\mathscr {B}_R(x)\) to mean that the ball or the half-ball is centered at x.

  5. This inequality follows from the fact that the function \(\int _{B_R}|u-t|^2\) of t has the minimum at \(t=u_R\).

References

  1. Campanato, S.: Proprietà di una famiglia di spazi funzionali. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (III) 18, 137–160 (1964)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Campanato, S.: Equazioni ellittiche del II ordine e spazi \(\cal{L}^{2,\lambda }\). Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 69, 321–382 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Galdi, G.P.: An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of the Navier–Stokes Equations. Steady-State Problems. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Giaquinta, M.: Non linear systems of the type of the stationary Navier–Stokes system. J. Reine Angew. Math. 330, 173–214 (1982)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Giusti, E.: Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations. World Scientific, London (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Grafakos, L.: Classical Fourier Analysis. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, H., Kozono, H.: A removable isolated singularity theorem for the stationary Navier–Stokes equations. J. Differ. Equ. 220, 68–84 (2006)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Morrey, C.B.: Multiple Integrals in the Calculus of Variations. Springer, Berlin (1966)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Nečas, J.: Direct Methods in the Theory of Elliptic Equations. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Peetre, J.: Espaces d’interpolation et théorème de Soboleff. Ann. Inst. Fourier 16, 279–317 (1966)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Neil, R.: Convolution operators and \(L^{(p, q)}\) spaces. Duke Math. J. 30, 129–142 (1963)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Russo, R.: On Stokes’ problem. In: Rannacher, R., Sequeira, A. (eds.) Advances in Mathematica Fluid Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tartar, L.: Imbedding theorems of Sobolev spaces into Lorentz spaces. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. Ser. 8 1–B, 479–500 (1998)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work of M.Korobkov is supported by Mathematical Center in Akademgorodok, the agreement with Ministry of Science and High Education of the Russian Federation Number 075-15-2019-1613. The research of K. Pileckas was funded by the Grant No. S-MIP-17-68 from the Research Council of Lithuania. The research of R. Russo has been supported by the funding program VALERE of Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Remigio Russo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by G. P. Galdi.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korobkov, M.V., Pileckas, K. & Russo, R. A Simple Proof of Regularity of Steady-State Distributional Solutions to the Navier–Stokes Equations. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 22, 55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-020-00517-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-020-00517-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation