Abstract
The retrofit of buildings to improve energy efficiency represents a vast opportunity in the construction market with the potential to reduce energy demand, create jobs, and achieve environmental benefits. Multiple challenges need to be overcome to unleash this potential and realize the benefits of investments in building energy retrofit projects. Small-/medium-sized commercial buildings are typically underserved by the energy retrofit industry due to the lack of owners’ ability to manage and finance energy efficiency improvements. In the case of energy-intensive and low-margin types of commercial buildings such as restaurants, the potential for energy savings is high, but the favorable conditions that enable retrofits, such as a pending renovation, propensity of clients to conserve energy, and willingness to take time for a retrofit, are scarce. In this research, the development of small energy efficiency projects is examined by proposing a screening method to find prospective candidates for financed energy efficiency projects in a targeted region. This method enables the co-creators of energy retrofit projects to predict the decision-making behavior of business owners and their willingness to invest in energy retrofit based on their restaurants’ attributes in social media. As part of a current initiative, supported by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, a series of design, development, and delivery of retrofit projects in the context of food services was closely studied. The initial focus was on the Philadelphia region as a model for broader statewide applications. Restaurant owners were surveyed, and information was collected about their buildings’ energy systems, utility bills, and their willingness and/or capacity to invest in energy efficiency upgrades. A “Philadelphia restaurants” dataset was then scraped from the Yelp website. The data includes information about restaurant ratings, number of reviewers, price range, working hours, and ambiance. A methodology was developed to analyze the data and to find patterns and criteria that could possibly influence the owner’s decision for investing in energy performance improvement. To identify patterns, two methods were employed: (1) several focus groups over program period with team members who played roles in project development phase and (2) statistical analysis to identify the factors contributing to successful projects. Using these screening questions from focus groups and the results from statistical analysis, the retrofit likelihood can be estimated for each individual project. This methodology can be applied to larger datasets and would enable the investigators to screen the whole market and prioritize the targets for business recruitment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The community business development corporation (CBDC) is a federal and provincially funded not-for-profit organization. CBDCs assist in the creation of small businesses and in the expansion and modernization of existing small businesses by providing financial and technical services to entrepreneurs (from Wikipedia)
Esri’s tapestry segmentation provides a detailed description of America’s neighborhoods (ZIP Lookup | esri Tapestry Segmentation n.d.)
References
About CBEI | CBEI. (n.d.). http://cbei.psu.edu/about-cbei/ (accessed September 18, 2018).
Billhymer, L. (2016). Title: The corner store retail AER packaged retrofit and utility incentive program final findings. http://cbei.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/The-Corner-Store-Retail-AER-Packaged-Retrofit.pdf (accessed September 18, 2018).
Cattaneo, C. (2019). Internal and external barriers to energy efficiency: which role for policy interventions? Energy Efficiency, 12(5), 1293–1311.
CBECS 2012: Building stock results, U.S. Energy Inf. Adm. (2015). https://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/reports/2012/buildstock/ (accessed September 13, 2018).
CBEI. (2016). Final report and accomplishments. http://cbei.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/CBEI-RetrofitSolutions-0509.pdf (accessed September 13, 2018).
Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), 2012- Table C14. 2016. https://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/data/2012/c&e/pdf/c14.pdf (accessed September 13, 2018).
Dixon-O’Mara, C., & Ryan, L. (2018). Energy efficiency in the food retail sector: barriers, drivers and acceptable policies. Energy Efficiency, 11(2), 445–464.
Energy Efficiency Retrofits For Small And Medium Commercial Buildings. (2016). Navig. Res. https://www.navigantresearch.com/reports/energy-efficiency-retrofits-for-small-and-medium-commercial-buildings (accessed September 13, 2018).
Energy Savings Performance Contracting | Department of Energy. (n.d.). https://www.energy.gov/eere/slsc/energy-savings-performance-contracting (accessed September 13, 2018).
Fleiter, T., Schleich, J., & Ravivanpong, P. (2012). Adoption of energy-efficiency measures in SMEs—an empirical analysis based on energy audit data from Germany. Energy Policy, 51, 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2012.09.041.
Fuller, M., Kunkel, C., Zimring, M., Hoffman, I., Soroye, K. L., & Goldman, C. (2010). Driving demand for home energy improvements.
Hirst, E., White, D., & Goeltz, R. (1985). Indoor temperature changes in retrofit homes. Energy., 10, 861–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(85)90119-7.
Ingle, A., Moezzi, M., Lutzenhiser, L., & Diamond, R. (2012). How well do home energy audits serve the homeowner?. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cus_pubs/154 (accessed September 18, 2018).
Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2014 – Main Text. (2016). http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/usinventoryreport.html (accessed September 13, 2018).
Kostka, G., Moslener, U., & Andreas, J. (2013). Barriers to increasing energy efficiency: evidence from small-and medium-sized enterprises in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.06.025.
Lewis, A., Elmualim, A., & Riley, D. (2010). Linking energy and maintenance management to improve knowledge transfer within building operation and management. University of Reading.
Ma, Z., Cooper, P., Daly, D., & Ledo, L. (2012). Existing building retrofits: methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy and Buildings, 55, 889–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2012.08.018.
McDougall, G. H. G., Claxton, J. D., & Ritchie, J. R. B. (1982). Residential home audits: an empirical analysis of the ENER $ AVE program.
Murphy, L. (2014). The influence of energy audits on the energy efficiency investments of private owner-occupied households in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 65, 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2013.10.016.
Nadel, S. (1992). Utility demand-side management experience and potential- a critical review. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 17, 507–535. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.eg.17.110192.002451.
Palm, J. (2009). Placing barriers to industrial energy efficiency in a social context: a discussion of lifestyle categorisation. Energy Efficiency, 2(3), 263–270.
Palmer, K., Walls, M., Gordon, H., & Gerarden, T. (2013). Assessing the energy-efficiency information gap: results from a survey of home energy auditors. Energy Efficiency, 6, 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-012-9178-2.
Peng, C.-Y. J., Lee, K. L., & Ingersoll, G. M. (2002). An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209598786.
Rohdin, P., & Thollander, P. (2006). Barriers to and driving forces for energy efficiency in the non-energy intensive manufacturing industry in Sweden. Energy., 31, 1836–1844. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2005.10.010.
Ruparathna, R., Hewage, K., & Sadiq, R. (2017). Economic evaluation of building energy retrofits: a fuzzy based approach. Energy and Buildings, 139, 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2017.01.031.
Safari, M. (2019). A regenerative approach to development and construction of building energy retrofit projects.
Schleich, J., & Gruber, E. (2008). Beyond case studies: barriers to energy efficiency in commerce and the services sector. Energy Economics, 30, 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2006.08.004.
Sorrell, S., Schleich, J., Scott, S., O’malley, E., Trace, F., Boede, U., Ostertag, K., & Radgen, P. (2000). Reducing barriers to energy efficiency in public and private organizations.
Stoft, S. E. (1995). The economics of conserved-energy “supply” curves on JSTOR. The Energy Journal, 16, 109–137 https://www.jstor.org/stable/41322619?casa_token=vpInF6YTTI0AAAAA:HZb8W7sI5UUc3H4Hnx149MwAnUvF98Lt00Jyw2Nhor4w1gSOvTYNaHj8w0hHRRBS_MlzhDUwcht2dXMmTO_NS3oi0jNMaiixaLWr2KahkgX7WVcZJ4Oz&seq=10/subjects#metadata_info_tab_contents (accessed September 13, 2018).
Stuart, E., et al. (2016). US energy service company (ESCO) industry: recent market trends.
Trianni, A., & Cagno, E. (2012). Dealing with barriers to energy efficiency and SMEs: some empirical evidences. Energy., 37, 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2011.11.005.
Weber, L. (1997). Some reflections on barriers to the efficient use of energy. Energy Policy, 25, 833–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00084-0.
ZIP Lookup | esri Tapestry Segmentation. (n.d.). https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/tapestry-segmentation/zip-lookup (accessed September 19, 2018).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the PA Department of Environmental Protection, the staff at Penn State at The Navy Yard, Private Energy Partners, and the Philadelphia Energy Authority for their support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Safari, M., Asadi, S. A screening method for lowering customer acquisition cost in small commercial building energy efficiency projects. Energy Efficiency 13, 1665–1676 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-020-09899-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-020-09899-9