Abstract
This work proposes a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) as a useful tool for supporting interventions to overcome problems faced by water utilities due to inadequate network hydraulic capacity. Urban population growth and ageing infrastructure have brought new challenges at a time of mounting preoccupations with high consumer expectations of water services. The proposed MCDA approach uses four criteria to assess the performance of a set of alternative designs for the reinforcement of existing water networks. The traditional formulations that only consider a single-phase fixed plan are replaced with a flexible and robust design approach able to deal with uncertainty related to future demand changes. For this purpose, a phased planning horizon scheme is proposed that considers various possible future demands that the network might have to cope with during its lifespan. After implementing the solution for the first phase, the reinforcements foreseen for the next phases can be reassessed if new information becomes available. The procedure can be repeated up to the last phase. This means that the infrastructure is prepared from the outset to deal with circumstances to change as time unfolds. The results for a specific case study show that the value of MCDA lies in the insightful information that it provides for decision makers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Zahrani M, Abo-Monasar A, Sadiq R (2016) Risk-based prioritization of water main failure using fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique. J of Water Supply: Res and T - AQUA 65(2):145–161. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2015.051
Banihabib ME, Hashemi-Madani F-S, Forghani A (2017) Comparison of compensatory and non-compensatory multi criteria decision making models in water resources strategic management. Water Resour Manag 31(12):3745–3759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1702-x
Basupi I, Kapelan Z (2015) Evaluating flexibility in water distribution system design under future demand uncertainty. J Infrastruct Syst 21(2):04014034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000199
Brans, J. P., & Mareschal, B. (2005). Promethee methods. In Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer-Verlag, 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23081-5_5, Promethee Methods
Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the Promethee method. Eur J Oper Res 24(2):228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5
Choi T, Han J, Koo J (2015) Decision method for rehabilitation priority of water distribution system using ELECTRE method. Desalin Water Treat 53(9):2369–2377. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.927122
Cimorelli L, Morlando F, Cozzolino L, D’Aniello A, Pianese D (2018) Comparison among resilience and entropy index in the optimal rehabilitation of water distribution networks under limited-budgets. Water Resour Manag 32(12):3997–4011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2032-3
Creaco E, Franchini M, Walski TM (2014) Accounting for phasing of construction within the design of water distribution networks. J Water Res Plan Man 140(5):598–606. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000358
Creaco E, Franchini M, Walski TM (2015) Taking account of uncertainty in demand growth when phasing the construction of a water distribution network. J Water Res Plan Man t 141(2):04014049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000441
Creaco E, Franchini M, Walski TM (2016) Comparison of various phased approaches for the constrained minimum-cost design of water distribution networks. Urban Water J 13(3):270–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2014.991330
Cunha M, Marques J, Creaco E, Savi D (2019) A dynamic adaptive approach for water distribution network design. J Water Res Plan Man 145(7):04019026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001085
De Neufville R, Scholtes S (2011) Flexibility in engineering design. MIT Press, Engineering Systems, 293p
DWSD, DW (2004) Summary report - comprehensive water master plan. CH2M HILL 113p
Fontana ME, Morais DC (2013) Using Promethee V to select alternatives so as to rehabilitate water supply network with detected leaks. Water Resour Manag 27(11):4021–4037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0393-1
Gheisi A, Shabani S, Naser G (2015) Flexibility ranking of water distribution system designs under future mechanical and hydraulic uncertainty. In Procedia Engineering, Elsevier 119:1202–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.975
Gupta RS (2017) Hydrology and hydraulic systems, 4e. Waveland Press, Inc., Long Grove, IL, 889p
Huang D, Vairavamoorthy K, Tsegaye S (2010). flexible design of urban water distribution networks. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010, ASCE, 4225–4236. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers https://doi.org/10.1061/41114(371)430
Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671
MacCrimmon K (1968) Decisionmaking Among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach RAND Corporation:72
Maier HR, Kapelan Z, Kasprzyk J, Kollat J, Matott LS, Cunha MC, Dandy GC, Gibbs MS, Keedwell E, Marchi A, Ostfeld A, Savic D, Solomatine DP, Vrugt JA, Zecchin AC, Minsker BS, Barbour EJ, Kuczera G, Pasha F, Castelletti A, Giuliani M, Reed PM (2014) Evolutionary algorithms and other metaheuristics in water resources: current status, research challenges and future directions. Environ Model Softw 62:271–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.013
Maier HR, Guillaume JHA, van Delden H, Riddell GA, Haasnoot M, Kwakkel JH (2016) An uncertain future, deep uncertainty, scenarios, robustness and adaptation: how do they fit together? Environ Model Softw 81:154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.014
Mareschal B (1988) Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid. Eur J Oper Res 33(1):54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90254-8
Mareschal B, De Smet Y (2009) Visual PROMETHEE: developments of the PROMETHEE & GAIA multicriteria decision aid methods. In: In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp 1646–1649. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2009.5373124
Marques J, Cunha M, Savić D (2015) A multicriteria approach for a phased design of water distribution networks. Procedia Engineering, Elsevier 119:1231–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.983
Marques J, Cunha M, Savić D (2017) Ranking alternatives for the flexible phased Design of Water Distribution Networks. Procedia Engineering, Elsevier 186:567–575
Marques J, Cunha M, Savić D (2018) Many-objective optimization model for the flexible design of water distribution networks. J Environ Manag 226:308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2018.08.054
Marzouk M, Hamid SA, El-Said M (2015) A methodology for prioritizing water mains rehabilitation in Egypt. HBRC Journal 11(1):114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.03.002
Monte MBS, de Almeida-Filho AT (2016) A multicriteria approach using MAUT to assist the maintenance of a water supply system located in a low-income community. Water Resour Manag 30(9):3093–3106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1333-7
Morley MS, Tricarico C (2008) Pressure driven demand extension for EPANET (EPANETpdd). Technical Report CWS 10
Mutikanga H, Sharma S, Vairavamoorthy K (2011) Multi-criteria decision analysis: a strategic planning tool for water loss management. Water Resour Manag 25(14):3947–3969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9896-9
Okoli C, Pawlowski SD (2004) The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information and Manag 42(1):15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
Pollard SJT, Strutt JE, MacGillivray BH, Hamilton PD, Hrudey SE (2004) Risk analysis and management in the water utility sector. Process Saf Environ Prot 82(6):453–462. https://doi.org/10.1205/psep.82.6.453.53207
Roach T, Kapelan Z, Ledbetter R (2018) A resilience-based methodology for improved water resources adaptation planning under deep uncertainty with real world application. Water Resour Manag 32(6):2013–2031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1914-8
Rossman LA (2000) Working with Brain Scans. In: EPANET 2: users manual. US Environmental Protection Agency National Risk Management Research Laboratory, US EPA, 200p. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312708089715
Salehi S, Jalili Ghazizadeh M, Tabesh M (2017) A comprehensive criteria-based multi-attribute decision-making model for rehabilitation of water distribution systems. Struct Infrastruct E, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1359633
Schaake JC, Lai D (1969). Linear programming and dynamic applications to water distribution network design. MIT, 222p
Scholten L, Schuwirth N, Reichert P, Lienert J (2014) Tackling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis – an application to water supply infrastructure planning. Eur J Oper Res 242(1):243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.09.044
Tanyimboh TT, Templeman AB (2000) Quantified assessment of the relationship between the reliability and entropy of water distribution systems. Eng Optim 33(2):179–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150008940916
Tscheikner-Gratl F, Egger P, Rauch W, Kleidorfer M (2017) Comparison of multi-criteria decision support methods for integrated rehabilitation prioritization. Water 9(2):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020068
Walski, T.M., 2013. Long-term water distribution design. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2013, ASCE, Reston, VA, 830–844. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412947.080
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology under project grant UIDB/00308/2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cunha, M., Marques, J. & Savić, D. A Flexible Approach for the Reinforcement of Water Networks Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Water Resour Manage 34, 4469–4490 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02655-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02655-9