Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Task Assignment for UAV Swarm Operations in Hostile Environments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes the engagement model and optimal task assignment algorithm for small-UAV swarm operations in hostile maritime environments. To alleviate the complexity of a real engagement environment, several assumptions are made: in the proposed engagement model, a vessel can attack the UAV within a certain range with a constant kill probability rate; and the ability of a vessel to attack UAVs is reduced if the multiple UAVs are involved. The objective function for optimal task assignment is constructed from the engagement model which estimates the total damage to vessels as the engagement outcome. Considering computational time and non-convex nature of the optimization problem, a heuristic approach, SL-PSO (social-learning particle swarm optimization), is adopted to maximize the objective function. In particular, a modified SL-PSO approach is introduced to deal with the optimization problem in a discrete domain. Numerical simulation results for two scenarios are presented to analyze the characteristics of the proposed engagement model and the performance of the optimal task assignment algorithm in the given environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Otto RP (2016) Small unmanned aircraft systems (SUAS) flight plan: 2016–2036 bridging the gap between tactical and strategic: technical report. Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  2. Edwards SJ (2005) Swarming and the future of warfare, technical report. Rand Corp, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  3. UVision (2019). https://uvisionuav.com/. Accessed May 2019

  4. Switchblade (2019). https://www.avinc.com/uas/adc/switchblade. Accessed May 2019

  5. ALPAGU (2019). https://www.stm.com.tr/en/news/announcement/stm-leaves-its-mark-on-idef-2017. Accessed May 2019

  6. Perdix Project (2019) https://dod.defense.gov/News/News-Releases/News-Release-View/Article/1044811/department-of-defense-announces-successful-micro-drone-demonstration/. Accessed May 2019

  7. McLemore C, Gaver D, Jacobs P (2016) A model for geographically distributed combat interactions of swarming naval and air forces. Naval Res Logist 63(7):562–576

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Barkdoll TC, Gaver DP, Glazebrook KD, Jacobs PA, Posadas S (2002) Suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) as an information duel. Naval Res Logist NRL 49(8):723–742

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Fan DD, Theodorou E, Reeder J (2017) Evolving cost functions for model predictive control of multi-agent UAV combat swarms. In: Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference companion, ACM, pp 55–56

  10. Faied M, Assanein I, Girard A (2009) UAVs dynamic mission management in adversarial environments. Int J Aerosp Eng 2009:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hou Y, Liang X, He L, Zhang J (2019) Time-coordinated control for unmanned aerial vehicle swarm cooperative attack on ground-moving target. IEEE Access 7:106931–106940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoo D-W, Lee C-H, Tahk M-J, Choi H-L (2014) Optimal resource management algorithm for unmanned aerial vehicle missions in hostile territories. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 228(12):2157–2167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jia Z, Yu J, Ai X, Xu X, Yang D (2018) Cooperative multiple task assignment problem with stochastic velocities and time windows for heterogeneous unmanned aerial vehicles using a genetic algorithm. Aerosp Sci Technol 76:112–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhen Z, Xing D, Gao C (2018) Cooperative search-attack mission planning for multi-UAV based on intelligent self-organized algorithm. Aerosp Sci Technol 76:402–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao C, Zhen Z, Gong H (2016) A self-organized search and attack algorithm for multiple unmanned aerial vehicles. Aerosp Sci Technol 54:229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li P, Duan H (2017) A potential game approach to multiple UAV cooperative search and surveillance. Aerosp Sci Technol 68:403–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Manyam SG, Casbeer DW, Manickam S (2017) Optimizing multiple UAV cooperative ground attack missions. In: 2017 International conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), IEEE, pp 1572–1578

  18. Bellman R (2013) Dynamic programming. Courier Corporation, Chelmsford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng R, Jin Y (2015) A social learning particle swarm optimization algorithm for scalable optimization. Inf Sci 291:43–60

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. Micro Machine and Human Science, 1995. In: MHS’95. Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on, IEEE, pp 39–43

  21. Kennedy J (2003) Bare bones particle swarms. In: Swarm intelligence symposium. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE, IEEE, pp 80–87

  22. Kennedy J, Mendes R (2002) Population structure and particle swarm performance. Evolutionary computation. In: Proceedings of the 2002 congress on vol 2, IEEE, pp 1671–1676

  23. Hsieh S-T, Sun T-Y, Liu C-C, Tsai S-J (2009) Efficient population utilization strategy for particle swarm optimizer. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B (Cybern) 39(2):444–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gong Y-J, Li J-J, Zhou Y, Li Y, Chung HS-H, Shi Y-H, Zhang J (2016) Genetic learning particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Cybern 46(10):2277–2290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pham LV, Dickerson B, Sanders J, Casserly M, Maldonado V, Balbuena D, Graves S, Pandya B (2012) UAV swarm attack: protection system alternatives for destroyers. Ph.D. thesis, Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School

  26. Metz S (2000) Armed conflict in the 21st century: the information revolution and post-modern warfare. Strategic Studies Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jadoun VK, Gupta N, Niazi K, Swarnkar A (2014) Nonconvex economic dispatch using particle swarm optimization with time varying operators. Adv Electr Eng 2014:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by the Defense Challengeable Future Technology Program of Agency for Defense Development, Republic of Korea, Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2020R1A6A1A03040570), and a grant to Bio-Mimetic Robot Research Center Funded by Defense Acquisition Program Administration and Agency for Defense Development, Republic of Korea (UD190018ID).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyondong Oh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J., Oh, H., Yu, B. et al. Optimal Task Assignment for UAV Swarm Operations in Hostile Environments. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 22, 456–467 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-020-00317-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-020-00317-z

Navigation