Skip to main content
Log in

Looseness Detection and Assessment of Flange Type Joints Using Vibroacoustic Modulation Method

  • ACOUSTIC METHODS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flanged joints’ looseness is among the common causes for the failure of industrial structures with flanged joints such as wind turbine or transmission line pipes the timely detection of which can prevent the imposition of heavy, financial losses and in some cases property damage. Conventional methods for detecting this fault, such as torque control methods, have high error of measurement, or impedance-based measurement methods, have high expenses, or vibration or ultrasonic methods which lack accuracy due to the use of linear phenomena in fault detection. Vibroacoustic modulation method is one of the nonlinear fault detection methods that detect and evaluate looseness of flanged connection with high precision through the measurement of the intensity of the vibrational and ultrasonic signals modulation applied to the structure. Although the published papers in recent years have often identified the cracking, delamination, or corrosion and decay of parts using this method, in this paper the efficiency of the vibroacoustic modulation method in the detection and evaluation of flanged joints of simulated wind turbine towers has been numerically investigated by defining an index for modulation intensity and bond relaxation. Then, the effect of parameters such as ultrasonic and vibrational frequency, amplitude of ultrasonic and vibrational stimulation, sensors and actuators position, as well as preload force, on the method performance have been studied. Finally, in order to reduce the simulation time in ABAQUS software, the modeling of the neural network was performed using MATLAB software and the obtained results were compared with numerical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 16.
Fig. 17.
Fig. 18.
Fig. 19.
Fig. 20.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Nikravesh, S.M.Y. and Goudarzi, M., A review paper on looseness detection methods in bolted structures, Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct., 2017, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 2153–2176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zaitsev, V. Y., Sutin, A., Belyaeva, I.Y., and Nazarov, V., Nonlinear interaction of acoustical waves due to cracks and its possible usage for cracks detection, Modal Anal., 1995, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 335–344.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zaitsev, V. Y., Sas, P., and Wevers, M., Nonlinear modulation methods of structural damage de-tection based on dissipative nonlinear effects, in Proc. Int. Semin. Modal Anal., KU Leuven, 2001, pp. 233–242.

  4. Kazakov, V., A modulation crack-detection technique: I. Instrumental method of implementation, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2006, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 709–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaitsev, V. Y., Nazarov, V., Gusev, V., and Castagnede, B., Novel nonlinear-modulation acoustic technique for crack detection, NDT & E Int., 2006, vol. 39, no.3, pp. 184–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Den Abeele, K. A., Johnson, P.A., and Sutin, A., Nonlinear elastic wave spectroscopy (NEWS) techniques to discern material damage, part I: nonlinear wave modulation spectroscopy (NWMS), J. Res. Nondestr. Eval., 2000, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Donskoy, D., Sutin, A., and Ekimov, A., Nonlinear acoustic interaction on contact interfaces and its use for nondestructive testing, NDT & E Int., 2001, vol. 34, no.4, pp. 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Donskoy, D.M., and Sutin, A.M., Vibro-acoustic modulation nondestructive evaluation technique, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 1998, vol.9, no. 9, pp. 765–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meo, M., Polimeno, U., and Zumpano, G., Detecting damage in composite material using nonlin-ear elastic wave spectroscopy methods, Appl. Compos. Mater., 2008, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 115–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zaitsev, V. Y. and Sas, P., Nonlinear response of a weakly damaged metal sample: a dissipative modulation mechanism of vibro-acoustic interaction, J. Vib. Control, 2000, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 803–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Amerini, F. and Meo, M., Structural health monitoring of bolted joints using linear and nonlin-ear acoustic/ultrasound methods, Struct. Health Monit., 2011, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 659–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaques, J. and Adams, D., Using Impact Modulation to Identify Loose Bolts on a Satellite, Purdue Univ. Lafayette, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, F. and Song, G., Bolt early looseness monitoring using modified vibro-acoustic modula-tion by time-reversal, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2019, vol. 130., no. 1, pp. 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, F., Ho, S.C.M., and Song, G., Modeling and analysis of an impact-acoustic method for bolt looseness identification, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2019, vol. 133, no. 1, p. 106 249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meyer, J.J. and Adams, D.E., Using impact modulation to quantify nonlinearities associated with bolt loosening with applications to satellite structures, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2019, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 787–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nikravesh, S.M.Y. and Goudarzi, M., Looseness detection and assessment of flange type joints using vibro-acoustic modulation method, in: 8th Int. Conf. Acoust. Vib., Iran (Tehran), 2018.

  17. Amerini, F., Barbieri, E., Meo, M., and Polimeno, U., Detecting loosening/tightening of clamped structures using nonlinear vibration techniques, Smart Mater. Struct., 2010, vol. 19, no. 8, p. 085 013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ooijevaar, T.H., Vibration Based Structural Health Monitoring of Composite Skin-Stiffener Structures, 2014.

  19. Meo, M. and Zumpano, G., Nonlinear elastic wave spectroscopy identification of impact dam-age on a sandwich plate, Compos. Struct., 2005, vol. 71, nos. 3–4, pp. 469–474.

  20. Broda, D., Staszewski, W., Martowicz, A., Uhl, T., and Silberschmidt, V., Modelling of nonlinear crack–wave interactions for damage detection based on ultrasound—A review, J. Sound Vib., 2014, vol. 333, no. 4, pp. 1097–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shigley, J.E., Mischke, C.R., and Budynas, R.G., Mechanical Engineering Design, Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Goudarzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seyed Majid Yadavar Nikravesh, Masoud Goudarzi Looseness Detection and Assessment of Flange Type Joints Using Vibroacoustic Modulation Method. Russ J Nondestruct Test 56, 490–505 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830920060066

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830920060066

Keywords:

Navigation