Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Alternative multiscale material and structures modeling by the finite-element method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we present an alternative finite element to multiscale analysis. In this strategy, strain energy comes only from semi-discrete or lattice elements immersed in a continuum without stiffness, enabling mechanical analysis from molecular scales to macroscopic scales. Some characteristics of the proposed element are: (1) geometrically non-linear exact description that allows the presence of large displacements and large strain, (2) general mapping that allows curved and distorted elements generation with automatic immersions, (3) total compatibility with standard finite elements, and (4) huge degrees of freedom reduction with a small loss of continuum mobility. Throughout the text, the proposed strategy is presented in detail and applied in the determination of suitable meshes for any scale of analysis, which is an important information for future applications. To be direct, a Lennard–Jones-like (LJL) potential is chosen to build different crystalline-like structures that, when immersed in finite elements without stiffness, results in the desired continuous behavior. In this sense, some space of the paper is used to determine the energy constant of the LJL potential for these different "crystalline" structures at any scale. Taking advantage of the total compatibility of the proposed element with continuum elements, the multiscale strategy is straightforward applied. Selected examples are used to demonstrate the good behavior of the proposed element and its applicability. Future developments to enhance applications are commented at the conclusion section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang Q, Biyikli E, To AC (2013) Multiresolution molecular mechanics: statics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 258:26–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Park HS, Liu WK (2004) An introduction and tutorial on multiple-scale analysis in solids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:1733–1772

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Fish J, Chen W (2004) Discrete-to-continuum bridging based on multigrid principles. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:1693–1711

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Clayton JD, Chung PW (2006) An atomistic-to-continuum framework for nonlinear crystal mechanics based on asymptotic homogenization. J Mech Phys Solids 54:1604–1639

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Abraham FF, Walkup R, Gao H, Duchaineau M, Diaz De La Rubia T, Seager M (2002) Simulating materials failure by using up to one billion atoms and the world's fastest computer: Work-hardening. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:5783–5787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abraham FF, Walkup R, Gao H, Duchaineau M, Diaz De La Rubia T, Seager M (2002) Simulating materials failure by using up to one billion atoms and the world's fastest computer: brittle fracture. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:5777–5782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buehler MJ, Hartmaier A, Gao H, Duchaineau M, Abraham FF (2004) Atomic plasticity: description and analysis of a one-billion atom simulation of ductile materials failure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:5257–5282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chougrani L, Pernot J, Véron P, Abed S (2019) Parts internal structure definition using non-uniform patterned lattice optimization for mass reduction in additive manufacturing. Eng Comput 35:277–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0598-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hao S, Liu WK, Moran B, Vernerey F, Olson GB (2004) Multiscale constitutive model and computational framework for the design of ultra-high strength, high toughness steels. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:1865–1908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen H, Zang M, Zhang YX (2016) A ghost particle-based coupling approach for the combined finite-discrete element method. Finite Elem Anal Des 114:68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tu F, Ling D, Bu L, Yang Q (2014) Generalized bridging domain method for coupling finite elements with discrete elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 276:509–533

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Munjiza A (2004) The combined finite-discrete element method. Wiley, West Sussex

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Alemi Parvin S, Ahmed NA, Fattahi AM (2020) Numerical prediction of elastic properties for carbon nanotubes reinforced composites using a multi-scale method. Eng Comput (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00925-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Paluszny A, Tang XH, Zimmerman RW (2013) Fracture and impulse based finite-discrete element modeling of fragmentation. Comput Mech 52(5):1071–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vervuurt A, Schlangen E, van Mier JGM (1996) Tensile cracking in concrete and sandstone: part 1—basic instruments. Mat Struct 29:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02486002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chanthasopeephan T, Desai JP, Lau ACW (2007) Modeling soft-tissue deformation prior to cutting for surgical simulation: finite element analysis and study of cutting parameters. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Valdastri P, Tognarelli S, Menciassi A, Dario P (2009) A scalable platform for biomechanical studies of tissue cutting forces. Meas Sci Technol 20:045801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu L, Guan TM, Lei L (2013) Discrete element model for performance analysis of cutter head excavation system of EPB machine. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol 37:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. van Mier JGM, Schlangen E, Vervuurt A (1996) Tensile cracking in concrete and sandstone: part 2—effect of boundary rotations. Mat Struct 29:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02486198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo X-J, Stylianopoulos T, Barocas VH, Shephard MS (2009) Multiscale computation for bioartificial soft tissues with complex geometries. Eng Comput 25(1):87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Daw MS, Foiles SM, Baskes MI (1993) The embedded-atom method: a review of theory and applications. Mater Sci Rep 9:251–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jacucci G (1984) Defect Calculations beyond the Harmonic Model. In: Murch GE, Nowick AS (eds) Diffusion in crystalline solids. Academic Press, New York

  23. Nieminen RM, Puska MJ, Manninen M (eds) Many-atom interactions in solids. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 48. Springer, Berlin

  24. Vanalli V, Paccola RR, Coda HB (2008) A simple way to introduce fibers into FEM models. Commun Numer Methods Eng 24:585–603

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Sampaio MSM, Paccola RR, Coda HB (2013) Fully adherent fiber-matrix FEM formulation for geometrically nonlinear 2D solid analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 66:12–25

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Coda HB, Paccola RR (2017) An alternative positional FEM formulation for geometrically nonlinear analysis of shells: curved triangular isoparametric elements. Comput Mech 40(1):185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanches RAK, Coda HB (2013) Unconstrained vector nonlinear dynamic shell formulation applied to fluid structure interaction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 259:177–196

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Bonet J, Wood RD, Mahaney J, Heywood P (2000) Finite element analysis of air supported membrane structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(5–7):579–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang Q, To AC (2015) Multiresolution molecular mechanics: a unified and consistent framework for general finite element shape functions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 283:384–481

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin ZJ, He LF, Wang JY, Li MS, Bao YW, Zhou YC (2008) Atomic-scale microstructure and elastic properties of quaternary Zr–Al–Si–C ceramics. Acta Mater 56:2022–2031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khoei AR, DorMohammadi H, Aramoon A (2014) A temperature-related boundary Cauchy–Born method for multiscale modeling of silicon nano-structures. Phys Lett A 378:551–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ciarlet PG (1998) Mathematical elasticity, vol I: three-dimensional elasticity, series “Studies in mathematics and its applications”. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988

  33. Ogden RW (1984) Nonlinear elastic deformation. Ellis Horwood, England

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Aguiar AR (2006) Local and global injective solution of the rotationally symmetric sphere problem. J Elast 84:99–129

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Slater JC (1964) Atomic radii in crystals. J Chem Phys 41(10):3199–3205

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Grant no. 001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. R. Paccola.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coda, H.B., Sanches, R.A.K. & Paccola, R.R. Alternative multiscale material and structures modeling by the finite-element method. Engineering with Computers 38 (Suppl 1), 311–329 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01148-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01148-y

Keywords

Navigation