Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of microfluidic devices for glioblastoma study: current status and future directions

  • Published:
Biomedical Microdevices Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most malignant primary brain tumors. This neoplasm is the hardest to treat and has a bad prognosis. Because of the characteristics of genetic heterogeneity and frequent recurrence, a successful cure for the disease is unlikely. Increasing evidence has revealed that the GBM stem cell-like cells (GSCs) and microenvironment are key elements in GBM recurrence and treatment failure. To better understand the mechanisms underlying this disease and to develop more effective therapeutic strategies for treatment, suitable approaches, techniques, and model systems closely mimicking real GBM conditions are required. Microfluidic devices, a model system mimicking the in vivo brain microenvironment, provide a very useful tool to analyze GBM cell behavior, their correlation with tumor malignancy, and the efficacy of multiple drug treatment. This paper reviews the applications of microfluidic devices in GBM research and summarizes progress and perspectives in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • E. Akbari, G.B. Spychalski, J.W. Song, Microfluidic approaches to the study of angiogenesis and the microcirculation. Microcirculation 24(5), (2017)

  • E. Alegre et al., Circulating melanoma exosomes as diagnostic and prognosis biomarkers. Clin. Chim. Acta 454, 28–32 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. S. Arbab, et al., Major Challenges and Potential Microenvironment-Targeted Therapies in Glioblastoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18(12), (2017)

  • L. Armbrecht, P.S. Dittrich, Recent advances in the analysis of single cells. Anal. Chem. 89(1), 2–21 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • N.G. Avci et al., Investigating the influence of HUVECs in the formation of Glioblastoma spheroids in high-throughput three-dimensional microwells. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 14(7), 790–796 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Ayuso et al., Glioblastoma on a microfluidic chip: Generating pseudopalisades and enhancing aggressiveness through blood vessel obstruction events. Neuro-Oncology 19(4), 503–513 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • P.L. Bedard et al., Tumour heterogeneity in the clinic. Nature 501(7467), 355–364 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Blaha et al., A microfluidic platform for modeling metastatic cancer cell matrix invasion. Biofabrication 9(4), 045001 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • E.L. Brackett, C.A. Swofford, N.S. Forbes, Microfluidic device to quantify the behavior of therapeutic Bacteria in three-dimensional tumor tissue. Methods Mol. Biol. 1409, 35–48 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • D.J. Brat, B. Kaur, E.G. Van Meir, Genetic modulation of hypoxia induced gene expression and angiogenesis: Relevance to brain tumors. Front. Biosci. 8, d100–d116 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Bui et al., Role of key genetic mutations on increasing migration of brain cancer cells through confinement. Biomed. Microdevices 19(3), 56 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.A. Burrell et al., The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution. Nature 501(7467), 338–345 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Caballero et al., Organ-on-chip models of cancer metastasis for future personalized medicine: From chip to the patient. Biomaterials 149, 98–115 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • X. Cai, M.E. Sughrue, Glioblastoma: New therapeutic strategies to address cellular and genomic complexity. Oncotarget 9(10), 9540–9554 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Cassereau et al., A 3D tension bioreactor platform to study the interplay between ECM stiffness and tumor phenotype. J. Biotechnol. 193, 66–69 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Chen et al., 3D-printed microfluidic devices: Fabrication, advantages and limitations-a mini review. Anal. Methods 8(31), 6005–6012 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Chen et al., Microfluidic assay of circulating endothelial cells in coronary artery disease patients with angina pectoris. PLoS One 12(7), e0181249 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. De Vleeschouwer, G. Bergers, in Glioblastoma, ed. by S. De Vleeschouwer. Glioblastoma: To Target the Tumor Cell or the Microenvironment? (Brisbane (AU), 2017)

  • D.C. Duffy et al., Rapid prototyping of microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal. Chem. 70(23), 4974–4984 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Fan et al., Engineering a brain Cancer Chip for high-throughput drug screening. Sci. Rep. 6, 25062 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Fang et al., Clinical application of a microfluidic chip for immunocapture and quantification of circulating exosomes to assist breast cancer diagnosis and molecular classification. PLoS One 12(4), e0175050 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • B.L. Fernandez-Carballo et al., Continuous-flow, microfluidic, qRT-PCR system for RNA virus detection. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 410(1), 33–43 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Gale et al., A review of current methods in microfluidic device fabrication and future commercialization prospects. Inventions 3, 60 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Gao et al., Engineering of microscale three-dimensional pancreatic islet models in vitro and their biomedical applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 36(4), 619–629 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Gheibi et al., Microchamber cultures of bladder Cancer: A platform for characterizing drug responsiveness and resistance in PDX and primary Cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 12277 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • S.W. Han, W.G. Koh, Hydrogel-framed Nanofiber matrix integrated with a microfluidic device for fluorescence detection of matrix Metalloproteinases-9. Anal. Chem. 88(12), 6247–6253 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Han et al., Rapid emergence and mechanisms of resistance by U87 glioblastoma cells to doxorubicin in an in vitro tumor microfluidic ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113(50), 14283–14288 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • A.B. Holton et al., Microfluidic biopsy trapping device for the real-time monitoring of tumor microenvironment. PLoS One 12(1), e0169797 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Hong, Q. Pan, L.P. Lee, Single-cell level co-culture platform for intercellular communication. Integr Biol (Camb) 4(4), 374–380 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.V. Joseph et al., Hypoxia enhances migration and invasion in glioblastoma by promoting a mesenchymal shift mediated by the HIF1alpha-ZEB1 axis. Cancer Lett. 359(1), 107–116 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • S.J. King et al., Lamellipodia are crucial for haptotactic sensing and response. J. Cell Sci. 129(12), 2329–2342 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Li et al., Cell migration microfluidics for electrotaxis-based heterogeneity study of lung cancer cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 89(Pt 2), 837–845 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Lin et al., Exosomes: Novel biomarkers for clinical diagnosis. Sci. World J. 2015, 657086 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Ma et al., Increased protein sorption in poly(acrylic acid)-containing films through incorporation of comb-like polymers and film adsorption at low pH and high ionic strength. Langmuir 29(9), 2946–2954 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Masrie, B.Y. Majlis, J. Yunas, Fabrication of multilayer-PDMS based microfluidic device for bio-particles concentration detection. Biomed Mater Eng 24(6), 1951–1958 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. McDonald, G.M. Whitesides, Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a material for fabricating microfluidic devices. Acc. Chem. Res. 35(7), 491–499 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Mottet et al., A three dimensional thermoplastic microfluidic chip for robust cell capture and high resolution imaging. Biomicrofluidics 8(2), 024109 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • X. Mu et al., Microfluidics for manipulating cells. Small 9(1), 9–21 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • P.N. Nge, C.I. Rogers, A.T. Woolley, Advances in microfluidic materials, functions, integration, and applications. Chem. Rev. 113(4), 2550–2583 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • N.T. Nguyen et al., Design, fabrication and characterization of drug delivery systems based on lab-on-a-chip technology. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65(11–12), 1403–1419 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Occhetta et al., Design of a microfluidic strategy for trapping and screening single cells. Med. Eng. Phys. 38(1), 33–40 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Pham et al., Fluorescence analysis of single mitochondria with nanofluidic channels. Methods Mol. Biol. 1264, 35–46 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • T.J. Plegue et al., Stability of polyethylene glycol and Zwitterionic surface modifications in PDMS microfluidic flow chambers. Langmuir 34(1), 492–502 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • S.T. Sanjay et al., Recent advances of controlled drug delivery using microfluidic platforms. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 128, 3–28 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Schneider, J. Kreutz, D.T. Chiu, The potential impact of droplet microfluidics in biology. Anal. Chem. 85(7), 3476–3482 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Shao et al., Chip-based analysis of exosomal mRNA mediating drug resistance in glioblastoma. Nat. Commun. 6, 6999 (2015a)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Shao, J. Chung, D. Issadore, Diagnostic technologies for circulating tumour cells and exosomes. Biosci. Rep. 36(1), e00292 (2015b)

    Google Scholar 

  • C.W.t. Shields, C.D. Reyes, G.P. Lopez, Microfluidic cell sorting: a review of the advances in the separation of cells from debulking to rare cell isolation. Lab Chip 15(5), 1230–1249 (2015)

  • D.J. Sikorski et al., Clonal analysis of individual human embryonic stem cell differentiation patterns in microfluidic cultures. Biotechnol. J. 10(10), 1546–1554 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • I.V. Smolina, N.E. Broude, Ultrasensitive detection of DNA and protein markers in cancer cells. Cancer Biol Med 12(3), 143–149 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Sonker, V. Sahore, A.T. Woolley, Recent advances in microfluidic sample preparation and separation techniques for molecular biomarker analysis: A critical review. Anal. Chim. Acta 986, 1–11 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sottoriva et al., Intratumor heterogeneity in human glioblastoma reflects cancer evolutionary dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110(10), 4009–4014 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Spuul et al., Microfluidic devices for the study of actin cytoskeleton in constricted environments: Evidence for podosome formation in endothelial cells exposed to a confined slit. Methods 94, 65–74 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Stupp et al., Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10(5), 459–466 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • T.B. Terrell-Hall et al., Trastuzumab distribution in an in-vivo and in-vitro model of brain metastases of breast cancer. Oncotarget 8(48), 83734–83744 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • T.B. Tran et al., Electrical dual-sensing method for real-time quantitative monitoring of cell-secreted MMP-9 and cellular morphology during migration process. Biosens. Bioelectron. 77, 631–637 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wang et al., Variation over time and interdependence between disease progression and death among patients with glioblastoma on RTOG 0525. Neuro-Oncology 17(7), 999–1006 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Wang et al., Clonal evolution of glioblastoma under therapy. Nat. Genet. 48(7), 768–776 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • X. Wu et al., A versatile microfluidic platform for the study of cellular interactions between endothelial cells and neutrophils. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1861(5 Pt A), 1122–1130 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • H.D. Xi et al., Active droplet sorting in microfluidics: A review. Lab Chip 17(5), 751–771 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. Xu et al., Design and construction of a multi-organ microfluidic Chip mimicking the in vivo microenvironment of lung Cancer metastasis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(39), 25840–25847 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Xu et al., Probing the response of lung tumor cells to inflammatory microvascular endothelial cells on fluidic microdevice. Electrophoresis 38(2), 311–319 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • K.M. Yamada, E. Cukierman, Modeling tissue morphogenesis and cancer in 3D. Cell 130(4), 601–610 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Yang, R. Nelson, A. Ros, Toward analysis of proteins in single cells: A quantitative approach employing isobaric tags with MALDI mass spectrometry realized with a microfluidic platform. Anal. Chem. 88(13), 6672–6679 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael E. Sughrue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

Dr. Michael Sughrue is the Chief Medical Officer of Omniscient Neurotechnologies. No products directly related to this were discussed in this paper. No other authors report any conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, X., Briggs, R.G., Homburg, H.B. et al. Application of microfluidic devices for glioblastoma study: current status and future directions. Biomed Microdevices 22, 60 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-020-00516-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-020-00516-1

Keywords

Navigation