Abstract
The concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs radionuclides in soil samples collected from 323 different regions of Nevşehir province were determined by using a gamma spectrometer with an HPGe detector. The mean gamma activity concentrations (ranges) of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs for districts were determined as 49.45 (7.40–193.90), 54.08 (<2.8–122.50), 698.43 (37.67–1370.20) and 8.26 (0.10–52.60) Bq kg−1, respectively. The mean activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K were higher than the world mean value. According to Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, distributions of 226Ra, 232Th and 137Cs show log-normal distributions. Whereas, 40K shows normal distribution. The mean radium equivalent activity was 181.68 Bq kg−1 which is lower than the recommended maximum value of 370 Bq kg−1. The mean external terrestrial gamma dose rate was found to be 85.12 nGy h−1. The calculated external hazard value was 0.49 and within the acceptable limit which is less than unity (Hex ≤ 1). Thermo Scientific RadEye NBR detector was used to determine environmental gamma dose rates. The gamma dose rates were measured at 445 points at a height of 1 m from land surface. The mean outdoor gamma dose rate (range) was found as 150.13 (50–480) nGy h−1. This mean value was found higher than world mean value. The fact that most of the Nevşehir province is based on volcanic rocks explains why the gamma dose rates are high.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank to Çekmece Nuclear Researches and Training Centre (ÇNEAM) for its contributions. We would like to thank the reviewers and the editor Professor Syed M. Qaim for valuable contributions.
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
1. Bouzarjomehri, F., Ehrampoush, M. H. Gamma background radiation in Yazd province; A preliminary report. Iran J. Radiat. Res. 2005, 3, 17. http://ijrr.com/article-1-118-en.html.Search in Google Scholar
2. Al-Jundi, J. Population doses from terrestrial gamma exposure in areas near to old phosphate mine, Russaifa, Jordan. Radiat. Meas. 2002, 35, 23; https://doi.org/10.1016/s1350-4487(01)00261-x.Search in Google Scholar
3. Faheem, M., Mujahid, S. A, Matiullah. Assessment of radiological hazards due to the natural radioactivity in soil and building material samples collected from six districts of the Punjab province-Pakistan. Radiat. Meas. 2008, 43, 1443; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.02.014.Search in Google Scholar
4. Tzortzis, M., Svoukis, E., Tsertos, H. A comprehensive study of natural gamma radioactivity levels and associated dose rates from surface soils in Cyprus. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2004, 109, 217. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nch300.Search in Google Scholar
5. Ramachandran, T. V. Background radiation, people and the environment. Iran. J. Radiat. Res. 2011, 9, 63. http://ijrr.com/article-1-738-en.html.Search in Google Scholar
6. Jibiri, N. N., Farai, I. P. Application of in-situ gamma-ray spectrometry in the determination of activity concentrations of 40K, 238U and 232Th and mean annual effective dose rate levels in southeastern cities in Nigeria. Radioprotection 2005, 40, 489. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro:2005027.10.1051/radiopro:2005027Search in Google Scholar
7. Marouf, B. A., Mohamed, A. S., Taha, J. S. Assessment of exposure rate and collective effective dose equivalent in the city of Baghdad due to natural gamma radiation. Sci. Total Environ. 1993, 133, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(93)90117-o.Search in Google Scholar
8. Anne-Sophie, E., Denis, H., Solenne, B., Dominique, L., Eric, J., Margot, T., Jacqueline, C. Childhood leukemia incidence and exposure to indoor radon, terrestrial and cosmic gamma radiation. Health Phys. 2006, 90, 569. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HP.0000198787.93305.35.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. UNSCEAR. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Sales No. E. 94. IX.2; United Nations Publication: New York, 1993.10.18356/0300f937-enSearch in Google Scholar
10. UNSCEAR. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Annex B. Sales No. E. 00. IX.3, ISBN 92-1-142238-8; United Nations publication: New York, 2000b.Search in Google Scholar
11. Akhtar, N., Tufail, M., Ashraf, M. Natural environmental radioactivity and estimation of radiation exposure from saline soils. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 1, 279; https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03325843.Search in Google Scholar
12. UNSCEAR. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation: Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Annex A. Sales No. E. 00. IX.3, ISBN 92-1-142238-8; United Nations publication: New York, 2000a.Search in Google Scholar
13. Bozkurt, A., Yorulmaz, N., Kam, E., Karahan, G., Osmanlıoğlu, A. E. Assessment of environmental radioactivity for Şanlıurfa region of southeastern Turkey. Radiat. Meas. 2007, 42, 1387; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.05.052.Search in Google Scholar
14. UNSCEAR. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Annex C. Sales No. E. 00. IX.3; United Nations publication: New York, 2000c.Search in Google Scholar
15. UNSCEAR. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. sales No. E. 88. IX.7; United Nations publication: New York, 1988.Search in Google Scholar
16. Turhan, Ş., Köse, A., Varinlioğlu, A., Şahin, N. K., Arıkan, I., Oğuz, F., Yücel, B., Özdemir, T. Distribution of terrestrial and anthropogenic radionuclides in Turkish surface soil samples. Geoderma 2012, 187–188, 117; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.04.017.Search in Google Scholar
17. Kobya, Y., Taşkın, H., Yeşilkanat, C. M., Varinlioğlu, A, Korcak, S. Natural and artificial radioactivity assessment of dam lakes sediments in Çoruh River, Turkey. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2015, 303, 287; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3420-7.Search in Google Scholar
18. Karahan, G. Risk assessment of baseline outdoor gamma dose rate levels study of natural radiation sources in Bursa, Turkey. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2010, 142, 324; https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq217.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
19. TUIK. Turkish Statistical institute official. Web Site https://www.turkstat.gov.tr.Search in Google Scholar
20. Altın, T. B. Observed changes in annual and seasonal temperatures in Nevşehir (central Anatolia, Turkey) for period 1960–2016. Eurasian J. Agric. Res. 2017, 1, 4. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ejar/issue/37295/430697.Search in Google Scholar
21. Göz, E., Kadir, S., Gürel, A., Eren, M. Geology, mineralogy, geochemistry and depositional environment of a Late Miocene/Pliocene fluviolacustrine succession, Cappadocia Volcanic Province, central Anatolia, Turkey. Turk. J. Earth Sci. 2014, 23, 386; https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-1307-17.Search in Google Scholar
22. Ulusay, R., Aydan, Ö. Cultural, Historical and Geo Engineerıng Aspects of the Cappadocia Region. From the Past to the Future. 29–31 August 2016; ISRM International Symposium Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering: Cappadocia, Turkey, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
23. Ümran, D. A. Zeolite mineralogy and Cappadocia erionite. Indoor Built Environ. 2003, 12, 337 https://doi.org/10.1177/142032603036408.Search in Google Scholar
24. Temel, A., Gündoğdu, M. N. Zeolite occurrences and the erionite-mesothelioma relationship in Cappadocia, central Anatolia, Turkey. Miner. Depos. 1996, 31, 539; https://doi.org/10.1007/s001260050060.Search in Google Scholar
25. Kıyak, A., Karavul, C., Gülen, L., Pekşen, E., Kılıç, A. R. Assessment of geothermal energy potential by geophysical methods: Nevşehir Region, Central Anatolia. J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 2015, 295, 55 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2015.03.002.Search in Google Scholar
26. Pasvanoğlu, S., Güner, A., Gültekin, F. Environmental problems at the Nevşehir (Kozaklı) geothermal field, central Turkey. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 66, 549https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1264-9.Search in Google Scholar
27. Mollah, S., Rahman, M. M., Koddus, M. A., Husain, S. R., Malek, M. A. Measurement of high natural background radiation levels by TLD at Cox’s and Bazar coastal areas in Bangladesh. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 1987, 18, 39 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a079882.Search in Google Scholar
28. Beretka, J., Matthew, P. J. Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and by products. J. Health Phys. 1985, 48, 87; https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-198501000-00007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
29. ICRP. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann. ICRP 1990, 21, 1.Search in Google Scholar
30. Siebel, W., Schmitt, A. K., Kiemele, E., Danısık, M., Aydin, F. Acıgöl rhyolite field, central Anatolia (part II): geochemical and isotopic (Sr–Nd–Pb, δ18O) constraints on volcanism involving two high-silica rhyolite suites. Contrib. Mineral. Petr. 2011, 162, 1233; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-011-0651-20.Search in Google Scholar
31. Bingöldağ, N., Otansev, P. Determination of natural radiation levels and lifetime cancer risk in Kırıkkale, Turkey. Radiochim. Acta 2018, 106, 401 https://doi.org/10.1515/ract-2017-2781.Search in Google Scholar
32. Değerlier, M., Karahan, G., Özger, G. Radioactivity concentrations and dose assessment for soil samples around Adana, Turkey. J. Environ. Radioact. 2008, 99, 1018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.12.015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
33. Kam, E., Bozkurt, A. Environmental radioactivity measurements in Kastamonu region of northern Turkey. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2007, 65, 440; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.11.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
34. Yarar, Y., Kam, E. Environmental radioactivity concentrations of Tekirdağ. Int. Congr. Ser. 2005, 1276, 387; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2004.11.047.Search in Google Scholar
35. Çelik, N., Çevik, N., Çelik, A., Küçükömeroğlu, B. Determination of indoor radon and soil radioactivity levels in Giresun, Turkey. J. Environ. Radioact. 2008, 99, 1349; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.04.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
36. Taşkın, H., Karavus, M., Ay, P., Topuzoğlu, A., Hıdıroğlu, S., Karahan, G. Radionuclide concentrations in soil and lifetime cancer risk due to gamma radioactivity in Kırklareli, Turkey. J. Environ. Radioact. 2009, 100, 49; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.10.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
37. Erees, F. S., Aközcan, S., Parlak, Y., Çam, S. Assessment of dose rates around Manisa (Turkey). Radiat. Meas. 2006, 41, 598 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.11.004.Search in Google Scholar
38. Karadeniz, Ö., Karakurt, H., Akal, C. Natural radionuclide activities in forest soil horizons of Mount IDA/Kazdagi. Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 1; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4554-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
39. Kam, E., Bozkurt, A., Ilgar, R. A study of background radioactivity level for Çanakkale Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess 2010, 168, 685; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1143-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
40. Otansev, P., Karahan, G., Kam, E., Barut, İ., Taşkın, H. Assessment of natural radioactivity concentrations and gamma dose rate levels in Kayseri. Turkey. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2012, 148, 227. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncr023.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
