Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Review Approach for Sound Propagation Prediction of Plate Constructions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this contribution, a review study is established in order to gather, classify and organize all of the previous researches on the sound insulation characteristics of plate structures with span a period from 1967 to nowadays. Accordingly, more than 200 articles in the area of acoustic performance of these structures are rolled up and reviewed. To achieve this end, in the first step, all of the existence papers are categorized and classified based on the thematic correspondent. Herewith, not only some appropriate descriptions about the importance of the issue are given but also a series of basic equations and generalities in this field are developed. The paper is then conducted to focus on the various theories in order to present the reliable results according to thickness of structures. In this regard, different theories including classical, shear deformation and three-dimensional are highlighted. To extend the review, a comprehensive explanation is provided with emphasis on the type of materials such as composite, isotropic and functionally graded. It is useful to note that sandwich plate structures with their subdivisions are also set in this group. Consequently, the structures are organized according to their boundary conditions. Besides, the importance of type of incident field is inspected, too. Subsequently, in order to remark the methods employed by the researchers, the works are reviewed based on their solution techniques. Before concluding remarks, the remained papers are classified on the basis of various procedures such as optimization and control of sound transmission through plate structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Darvish Gohari H, Zarastvand M, Talebitooti R (2019) Acoustic performance prediction of a multilayered finite cylinder equipped with porous foam media. J Vib Control. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546319890025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Talebitooti R, Choudari Khameneh A, Zarastvand M, Kornokar M (2018) Investigation of three-dimensional theory on sound transmission through compressed poroelastic sandwich cylindrical shell in various boundary configurations. J Sandwich Struct Mater. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636217751562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Talebitooti R, Zarastvand M (2018) Vibroacoustic behavior of orthotropic aerospace composite structure in the subsonic flow considering the third order shear deformation theory. Aerosp Sci Technol 75:227–236

    Google Scholar 

  4. Talebitooti R, Zarastvand M (2018) The effect of nature of porous material on diffuse field acoustic transmission of the sandwich aerospace composite doubly curved shell. Aerosp Sci Technol 78:157–170

    Google Scholar 

  5. Talebitooti R, Zarastvand M, Gohari H (2017) Investigation of power transmission across laminated composite doubly curved shell in the presence of external flow considering shear deformation shallow shell theory. J Vib Control. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546317727655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Talebitooti R, Zarastvand M, Gohari H (2018) The influence of boundaries on sound insulation of the multilayered aerospace poroelastic composite structure. Aerosp Sci Technol 80:452–471

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zarastvand M, Ghassabi M, Talebitooti R (2019) Acoustic insulation characteristics of shell structures: a review. Arch Comput Methods Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09387-z

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Talebitooti R, Johari V, Zarastvand M (2018) Wave transmission across laminated composite plate in the subsonic flow investigating two-variable refined plate theory. Latin Am J Solids Struct 15:e39

    Google Scholar 

  9. Talebitooti R, Zarastvand M, Rouhani A (2019) Investigating hyperbolic shear deformation theory on vibroacoustic behavior of the infinite functionally graded thick plate. Latin Am J Solids Struct 16:e139

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou J, Bhaskar A, Zhang X (2013) Sound transmission through a double-panel construction lined with poroelastic material in the presence of mean flow. J Sound Vib 332:3724–3734

    Google Scholar 

  11. Talebitooti R, Zarastvand M, Gheibi M (2016) Acoustic transmission through laminated composite cylindrical shell employing third order shear deformation theory in the presence of subsonic flow. Compos Struct 157:95–110

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ghassabi M, Talebitooti R, Zarastvand M (2019) State vector computational technique for three-dimensional acoustic sound propagation through doubly curved thick structure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 352:324–344

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghassabi M, Zarastvand M, Talebitooti R (2019) Investigation of state vector computational solution on modeling of wave propagation through functionally graded nanocomposite doubly curved thick structures. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00773-6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Darvishgohari H, Zarastvand M, Talebitooti R, Shahbazi R (2019) Hybrid control technique for vibroacoustic performance analysis of a smart doubly curved sandwich structure considering sensor and actuator layers. J Sandwich Struct Mater. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636219896251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Talebitooti R, Darvish Gohari H, Zarastvand M, Loghmani A (2019) A robust optimum controller for suppressing radiated sound from an intelligent cylinder based on sliding mode method considering piezoelectric uncertainties. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 30:3066–3079

    Google Scholar 

  16. Talebitooti R, Gohari H, Zarastvand M (2017) Multi objective optimization of sound transmission across laminated composite cylindrical shell lined with porous core investigating Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm. Aerosp Sci Technol 69:269–280

    Google Scholar 

  17. Talebitooti R, Zarastvand M, Darvishgohari H (2019) Multi-objective optimization approach on diffuse sound transmission through poroelastic composite sandwich structure. J Sandwich Struct Mater. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636219854748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang T, Huang Q, Li S (2016) Three-dimensional elasticity solutions for sound radiation of functionally graded materials plates considering state space method. Shock Vib. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1403856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Remillieux MC, Pasareanu SM, Svensson UP (2013) Numerical modeling of the exterior-to-interior transmission of impulsive sound through three-dimensional, thin-walled elastic structures. J Sound Vib 332:6725–6742

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bhattacharya M, Guy R, Crocker M (1971) Coincidence effect with sound waves in a finite plate. J Sound Vib 18:157–169

    Google Scholar 

  21. Craven P, Gibbs B (1981) Sound transmission and mode coupling at junctions of thin plates, part I: representation of the problem. J Sound Vib 77:417–427

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Gibbs B, Craven P (1981) Sound transmission and mode coupling at junctions of thin plates, part II: parametric survey. J Sound Vib 77:429–435

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Clark RL, Frampton KD (1996) Sound transmission through an aeroelastic plate into an acoustic cavity. J Acoust Soc Am 99:2586–2603

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lee J-H, Ih J-G (2004) Significance of resonant sound transmission in finite single partitions. J Sound Vib 277:881–893

    Google Scholar 

  25. Putra A, Ismail A (2014) Normal incidence of sound transmission loss from perforated plates with micro and macro size holes. Adv Acoust Vib 2014:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wójcik J, Gambin B (2017) Theoretical and numerical aspects of nonlinear reflection–transmission phenomena in acoustics. Appl Math Model 46:771–784

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Xin F, Gong J, Ren S, Huang L, Lu T (2017) Thermoacoustic response of a simply supported isotropic rectangular plate in graded thermal environments. Appl Math Model 44:456–469

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Mana AA, Sonti VR (2018) Sound transmission through a finite perforated panel set in a rigid baffle: a fully coupled analysis. J Sound Vib 414:126–156

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang X, Guo X, Chen T, Yao G (2018) Plate-type metamaterials for extremely broadband low-frequency sound insulation. Int J Mod Phys B 32:1850019

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yoon K, Kim S, Kim W, Yoon K, Kim S, Kim W (1997) Active control of sound fields in plate–cavity system by anisotropic piezoelectric polymers. In: 38th Structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. pp 1313

  31. Renji K (2005) Sound transmission loss of unbounded panels in bending vibration considering transverse shear deformation. J Sound Vib 283:478–486

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jin Y-Q, Pang F-Z, Yang F, Li G-M (2014) A general model for analysis of sound radiation from orthogonally stiffened laminated composite plates. China Ocean Eng 28:457–470

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xin F (2015) An exact elasticity model for rib-stiffened plates covered by decoupling acoustic coating layers. Compos Struct 119:559–567

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chronopoulos D, Ichchou M, Troclet B, Bareille O (2014) Computing the broadband vibroacoustic response of arbitrarily thick layered panels by a wave finite element approach. Appl Acoust 77:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  35. Thomas D, Nelson P, Pinnington R, Elliott S (1995) An analytical investigation of the active control of the transmission of sound through plates. J Sound Vib 181:515–539

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pierre RS Jr, Koopmann G, Chen W (1998) Volume velocity control of sound transmission through composite panels. J Sound Vib 210:441–460

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kim SJ, Song KY (1999) Active control of sound fields from plates in flow by piezoelectric sensor/actuator. AIAA J 37:1180–1186

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kandaswamy S, Ramachandraiah A (2003) experimental investigations of sound transmission in cavity ferrocement panels with ties. Archit Sci Rev 46:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ni Q-Q, Lu E, Kurahashi N, Kurashiki K, Kimura T (2008) Development of insulation sheet materials and their sound characterization. Adv Compos Mater 17:25–40

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kim I, Kim Y-S (2009) Active vibration control of trim panel using a hybrid controller to regulate sound transmission. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 10:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lee B, Kim S (2014) Effect of structure on sound absorption and sound transmission loss of composite sheet. Adv Compos Mater 23:319–325

    Google Scholar 

  42. Park HS, Oh BK, Kim Y, Cho T (2015) Low-frequency impact sound transmission of floating floor: case study of mortar bed on concrete slab with continuous interlayer. Build Environ 94:793–801

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang H, Fan L, Qu J, Zhang S (2016) Sound transmission properties assisted by the phase resonances of composite acoustic gratings. J Appl Phys 119:084902

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kaijun Y, Lin L, Ichchou M, Collet M (2017) Sound insulation performance of plates with interconnected distributed piezoelectric patches. Chin J Aeronaut 30:99–108

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bhingare NH, Prakash S, Jatti VS (2019) A review on natural and waste material composite as acoustic material. Polym Test 80:106142

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bosmans I, Mees P, Vermeir G (1996) Structure-borne sound transmission between thin orthotropic plates: analytical solutions. J Sound Vib 191:75–90

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tolokonnikov L (1998) The transmission of sound through an inhomogeneous anisotropic layer adjoining viscous liquids. J Appl Math Mech 62:953–958

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee J-H, Kim J (2002) Analysis of sound transmission through periodically stiffened panels by space-harmonic expansion method. J Sound Vib 251:349–366

    Google Scholar 

  49. Christen J, Ichchou M, Troclet B, Ouisse M (2014) Global sensitivity analysis of acoustic transmission models through infinite plates. In: Proceedings of ISMA. pp 4177–4188

  50. Wareing RR, Davy JL, Pearse JR (2016) The sound insulation of single leaf finite size rectangular plywood panels with orthotropic frequency dependent bending stiffness. J Acoust Soc Am 139:520–528

    Google Scholar 

  51. Reynders E, Van Hoorickx C, Dijckmans A (2016) Sound transmission through finite rib-stiffened and orthotropic plates. Acta Acust United Acust 102:999–1010

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang H, Shi D, Zha S, Wang Q (2018) Sound-vibration behaviors of the thin orthotropic rectangular fluid–structure coupled system resting on varying elastic Winkler and Pasternak foundations. Results Phys 11:188–200

    Google Scholar 

  53. Chandra N, Raja S, Gopal KN (2014) Vibro-acoustic response and sound transmission loss analysis of functionally graded plates. J Sound Vib 333:5786–5802

    Google Scholar 

  54. Chandra N, Raja S, Gopal K (2015) A comprehensive vibro-acoustic parametric analysis and ranking of functionally graded materials. Int J Appl Mech 7:1550072

    Google Scholar 

  55. George N, Pitchaimani J, Murigendrappa S, Lenin Babu M (2018) Vibro-acoustic behavior of functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced polymer nanocomposite plates. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 232:566–581

    Google Scholar 

  56. Elmallawany A (1985) Calculation of sound insulation of ribbed panels using statistical energy analysis. Appl Acoust 18:271–281

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sun Z, Sun J, Wang C, Dai Y (1996) Dynamic vibration absorbers used for increasing the noise transmission loss of aircraft panels. Appl Acoust 48:311–321

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ng C, Zheng H (1998) Sound transmission through double-leaf corrugated panel constructions. Appl Acoust 53:15–34

    Google Scholar 

  59. Yuan M, Ji H, Qiu J, Ma T (2012) Active control of sound transmission through a stiffened panel using a hybrid control strategy. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 23:791–803

    Google Scholar 

  60. Xin F, Lu T (2012) Sound radiation of parallelly stiffened plates under convected harmonic pressure excitation. Sci China Technol Sci 55:496–500

    Google Scholar 

  61. Zheng H, Wei Z (2013) Vibroacoustic analysis of stiffened plates with nonuniform boundary conditions. Int J Appl Mech 5:1350046

    Google Scholar 

  62. Jin YQ, Pang FZ, Tang D, Xie XZ (2013) Sound transmission through lightweight metallic plate by Fourier transform method. Adv Mater Res 676:325–329

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ou D, Mak C, Deng S (2013) Prediction of the sound transmission loss of a stiffened window. Build Serv Eng Res Technol 34:359–368

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zhou H-A, Wang X-M, Mei Y-L (2014) Theoretical analysis of the sound absorption characteristics of periodically stiffened micro-perforated plates. Acta Mech Sin 30:714–726

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Chen Z, Fan L, Zhang S-Y, Zhang H, Li X-J, Ding J (2015) An open-structure sound insulator against low-frequency and wide-band acoustic waves. Appl Phys Express 8:107301

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ou D (2015) Low frequency sound insulation analysis and evaluation of stiffened building structures. Build Environ 94:802–809

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ford R, Lord P, Williams P (1967) The influence of absorbent linings on the transmission loss of double-leaf partitions. J Sound Vib 5:22–28

    Google Scholar 

  68. Cummings A (1979) The effects of external lagging on low frequency sound transmission through the walls of rectangular ducts. J Sound Vib 67:187–201

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hovem JM (1981) Transmission of sound through a porous disk. Appl Phys Lett 39:590–591

    Google Scholar 

  70. Hasheminejad SM, Avazmohammadi R (2006) Acoustic diffraction by a pair of poroelastic cylinders. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech Z Angew Math Mech Appl Math Mech 86:589–605

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. Dupont T, Leclaire P, Sicot O, Gong XL, Panneton R (2011) Acoustic properties of air-saturated porous materials containing dead-end porosity. J Appl Phys 110:094903

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hung T-C, Huang J-S, Wang Y-W, Lin K-Y (2014) Inorganic polymeric foam as a sound absorbing and insulating material. Constr Build Mater 50:328–334

    Google Scholar 

  73. Huq MM, Chen P-Q, Hsieh C-T, Yang H-C, Tasi T-P (2016) Sound transmission loss from polyvinyl acetate polymer mixed with different porous carbons. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 232:184–188

    Google Scholar 

  74. Fang Y, Zhang X, Zhou J (2017) Sound transmission through an acoustic porous metasurface with periodic structures. Appl Phys Lett 110:171904

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wang L, Zhang F-S (2017) Characterization of a novel sound absorption material derived from waste agricultural film. Constr Build Mater 157:237–243

    Google Scholar 

  76. Fang Y, Zhang X, Zhou J (2018) Experiments on reflection and transmission of acoustic porous metasurface with composite structure. Compos Struct 185:508–514

    Google Scholar 

  77. Teagle-Hernandez A, Ohtmer O, Nguyen D (2019) Mathematical modeling of porous medium for sound absorption simulations II: wave propagation and interface conditions. J Appl Math Phys 7:2780–2795

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ma F, Wu JH, Huang M (2015) Resonant modal group theory of membrane-type acoustical metamaterials for low-frequency sound attenuation. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 71:30504

    Google Scholar 

  79. Li J, Zhou X, Huang G, Hu G (2016) Acoustic metamaterials capable of both sound insulation and energy harvesting. Smart Mater Struct 25:045013

    Google Scholar 

  80. Guild MD, García-Chocano VM, Sánchez-Dehesa J, Martin TP, Calvo DC, Orris GJ (2016) Aerogel as a soft acoustic metamaterial for airborne sound. Phys Rev Appl 5:034012

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ma F, Huang M, Wu JH (2017) Ultrathin lightweight plate-type acoustic metamaterials with positive lumped coupling resonant. J Appl Phys 121:015102

    Google Scholar 

  82. Jung JW, Kim JE, Lee JW (2018) Acoustic metamaterial panel for both fluid passage and broadband soundproofing in the audible frequency range. Appl Phys Lett 112:041903

    Google Scholar 

  83. Zhang X, Zhang H, Chen Z, Wang G (2018) Simultaneous realization of large sound insulation and efficient energy harvesting with acoustic metamaterial. Smart Mater Struct 27:105018

    Google Scholar 

  84. Liao Y, Chen Y, Huang G, Zhou X (2018) Broadband low-frequency sound isolation by lightweight adaptive metamaterials. J Appl Phys 123:091705

    Google Scholar 

  85. Chen S, Fan Y, Fu Q, Wu H, Jin Y, Zheng J, Zhang F (2018) A review of tunable acoustic metamaterials. Appl Sci 8:1480

    Google Scholar 

  86. Van Belle L, Claeys C, Deckers E, Desmet W (2019) The impact of damping on the sound transmission loss of locally resonant metamaterial plates. J Sound Vib 461:114909

    Google Scholar 

  87. Edwards WT, Chang CM, McKnight G, Sorensen A, Nutt SR (2020) Transmission loss and dynamic response of hierarchical membrane-type acoustic metamaterials. J Vib Acoust. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4045789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Akishita S, Mitani Y-I, Miyaguchi H (1994) Sound transmission control through rectangular plate by using piezoelectric ceramics as actuators and sensors. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 5:371–378

    Google Scholar 

  89. Tan C, Hird C (1997) Active control of the sound field of a constrained panel by an electromagnetic actuator—an experimental study. Appl Acoust 52:31–51

    Google Scholar 

  90. Green K, Leo DJ (2000) Piezoelectric-actuated vibroacoustic absorbers for interior noise control. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 11:910–920

    Google Scholar 

  91. Chen K-T, Chiang K-T, Huang S-M, Tsai B-C (2002) Active vibration control for the improvement of sound transmission loss through a square plate. Build Acoust 9:289–301

    Google Scholar 

  92. Nguyen C, Pietrzko S (2007) Vibroacoustic FE analysis of an adaptive plate with PZT actuator/sensor pairs connected to a multiple-mode, electric shunt system. Finite Elem Anal Des 43:1120–1134

    Google Scholar 

  93. Yu X, Zhu H, Rajamani R, Stelson KA (2007) Acoustic transmission control using active panels: an experimental study of its limitations and possibilities. Smart Mater Struct 16:2006

    Google Scholar 

  94. Larbi W, Deü J-F, Ohayon R, Sampaio R (2014) Coupled FEM/BEM for control of noise radiation and sound transmission using piezoelectric shunt damping. Appl Acoust 86:146–153

    Google Scholar 

  95. Sanada A, Higashiyama K, Tanaka N (2015) Active control of sound transmission through a rectangular panel using point-force actuators and piezoelectric film sensors. J Acoust Soc Am 137:458–469

    Google Scholar 

  96. Kaizuka T, Tanaka N, Nakano K (2016) Active control of sound transmission using structural modal filters. J Sound Vib 381:14–29

    Google Scholar 

  97. Zhang H, Xiao Y, Wen J, Yu D, Wen X (2016) Ultra-thin smart acoustic metasurface for low-frequency sound insulation. Appl Phys Lett 108:141902

    Google Scholar 

  98. Langfeldt F, Gleine W (2019) Membrane-and plate-type acoustic metamaterials with elastic unit cell edges. J Sound Vib 453:65–86

    Google Scholar 

  99. Guyader J, Boisson C, Lesueur C, Millot P (1986) Sound transmission by coupled structures: application to flanking transmission in buildings. J Sound Vib 106:289–310

    Google Scholar 

  100. Craik R, Steel J, Evans D (1991) Statistical energy analysis of structure-borne sound transmission at low frequencies. J Sound Vib 144:95–107

    Google Scholar 

  101. Frampton K, Clark R (1996) Transmission of stochastic pressures through an aeroelastic plate into a cavity. In: 37th Structure, structural dynamics and materials conference. pp 1445

  102. Sakuma T, Oshima T (2001) Numerical vibro-acoustic analysis of sound insulation performance of wall members based on a 3-D transmission model with a membrane/plate. Acoust Sci Technol 22:367–369

    Google Scholar 

  103. Chen J, Kao D (2016) Sound attenuation of membranes loaded with square frame-shaped masses. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1740236

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  104. Chen K, Chen Y, Lin K, Weng C (1998) The improvement on the transmission loss of a duct by adding Helmholtz resonators. Appl Acoust 54:71–82

    Google Scholar 

  105. Hosseini-Toudeshky H, Mofakhami M, Yarmohammadi R (2009) Sound transmission between partitioned contiguous enclosures. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 223:1091–1101

    Google Scholar 

  106. Lee Y, Li Q, Leung A, Su R (2012) The jump phenomenon effect on the sound absorption of a nonlinear panel absorber and sound transmission loss of a nonlinear panel backed by a cavity. Nonlinear Dyn 69:99–116

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  107. Koju V, Rowe E, Robertson WM (2014) Extraordinary acoustic transmission mediated by Helmholtz resonators. AIP Adv 4:077132

    Google Scholar 

  108. Chen Y, Huang G, Zhou X, Hu G, Sun C-T (2014) Analytical coupled vibroacoustic modeling of membrane-type acoustic metamaterials: plate model. J Acoust Soc Am 136:2926–2934

    Google Scholar 

  109. Langfeldt F, Riecken J, Gleine W, Von Estorff O (2016) A membrane-type acoustic metamaterial with adjustable acoustic properties. J Sound Vib 373:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  110. Ma F, Huang M, Wu JH (2017) Acoustic metamaterials with synergetic coupling. J Appl Phys 122:215102

    Google Scholar 

  111. Chen Y, Jin G, Feng Z, Liu Z (2017) Modeling and vibro-acoustic analysis of elastically restrained panel backed by irregular sound space. J Sound Vib 409:201–216

    Google Scholar 

  112. Liu Y, Du J (2018) Structural-acoustic interaction of a three-dimensional panel–cavity–duct system with non-uniform boundary restraints. J Fluids Struct 79:94–114

    Google Scholar 

  113. Chin CS, Ji X (2019) Analytical modelling of structure-borne sound transmission through I-junction using Chebyshev–Ritz method on cascaded rectangular plate–cavity system. Appl Acoust 143:171–182

    Google Scholar 

  114. Wöhle W, Beckmann T, Schreckenbach H (1981) Coupling loss factors for statistical energy analysis of sound transmission at rectangular structural slab joints, part I. J Sound Vib 77:323–334

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  115. Wöhle W, Beckmann T, Schreckenbach H (1981) Coupling loss factors for statistical energy analysis of sound transmission at rectangular structural slab joints, part II. J Sound Vib 77:335–344

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  116. Chen K, Jan S (2001) Sound transmission loss of thick perforated panels. Build Acoust 8:41–56

    Google Scholar 

  117. Villot M, Guigou C, Gagliardini L (2001) Predicting the acoustical radiation of finite size multi-layered structures by applying spatial windowing on infinite structures. J Sound Vib 245:433–455

    Google Scholar 

  118. Xiao Y, Wen J, Wen X (2012) Sound transmission loss of metamaterial-based thin plates with multiple subwavelength arrays of attached resonators. J Sound Vib 331:5408–5423

    Google Scholar 

  119. Oudich M, Zhou X, Badreddine Assouar M (2014) General analytical approach for sound transmission loss analysis through a thick metamaterial plate. J Appl Phys 116:193509

    Google Scholar 

  120. Oudich M, Li Y (2017) Tunable sub-wavelength acoustic energy harvesting with a metamaterial plate. J Phys D Appl Phys 50:315104

    Google Scholar 

  121. Robin O, Berry A (2018) Estimating the sound transmission loss of a single partition using vibration measurements. Appl Acoust 141:301–306

    Google Scholar 

  122. Bechert DW, Michel U, Pfizenmaier E (1978) Experiments on the transmission of sound through jets. AIAA J 16:873–874

    Google Scholar 

  123. Dimitriadis EK, Fuller C (1991) Active control of sound transmission through elastic plates using piezoelectric actuators. AIAA J 29:1771–1777

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  124. Wu SF, Maestrello L (1995) Responses of finite baffled plate to turbulent flow excitations. AIAA J 33:13–19

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  125. Dockumaci E (1998) An exact transfer matrix formulation of plane sound wave transmission in inhomogeneous ducts. J Sound Vib 217:869–882

    Google Scholar 

  126. Dokumaci E (1998) On transmission of sound in circular and rectangular narrow pipes with superimposed mean flow. J Sound Vib 210:375–389

    Google Scholar 

  127. Xin F, Lu T (2010) Analytical modeling of sound transmission across finite aeroelastic panels in convected fluids. J Acoust Soc Am 128:1097–1107

    Google Scholar 

  128. Naify CJ, Chang C-M, McKnight G, Nutt S (2011) Transmission loss of membrane-type acoustic metamaterials with coaxial ring masses. J Appl Phys 110:124903

    Google Scholar 

  129. Wang C (2015) Modal sound transmission loss of a single leaf panel: effects of inter-modal coupling. J Acoust Soc Am 137:3514–3522

    Google Scholar 

  130. Wang T, Sheng M, Qin Q (2017) Sound transmission loss through metamaterial plate with lateral local resonators in the presence of external mean flow. J Acoust Soc Am 141:1161–1169

    Google Scholar 

  131. Yamamoto T (2018) Acoustic metamaterial plate embedded with Helmholtz resonators for extraordinary sound transmission loss. J Appl Phys 123:215110

    Google Scholar 

  132. Bravo T, Maury C, Pinhède C (2012) Sound absorption and transmission through flexible micro-perforated panels backed by an air layer and a thin plate. J Acoust Soc Am 131:3853–3863

    Google Scholar 

  133. Low HK (1974) Prediction and measurements of airborne sound transmission through concrete structures. Archit Sci Rev 17:5–9

    Google Scholar 

  134. Osipov A, Vermeir G (1996) Sound transmission in buildings with elastic layers at joints. Appl Acoust 49:141–162

    Google Scholar 

  135. Hopkins C (1997) Sound transmission across a separating and flanking cavity wall construction. Appl Acoust 52:259–272

    Google Scholar 

  136. Ou D, Mak CM (2011) Experimental validation of the sound transmission of rectangular baffled plates with general elastic boundary conditions. J Acoust Soc Am 129:EL274–EL279

    Google Scholar 

  137. Reynders E, Langley RS, Dijckmans A, Vermeir G (2014) A hybrid finite element–statistical energy analysis approach to robust sound transmission modeling. J Sound Vib 333:4621–4636

    Google Scholar 

  138. Wu F, He Z, Liu G, Li G, Cheng A (2016) A novel hybrid ES-FE-SEA for mid-frequency prediction of transmission losses in complex acoustic systems. Appl Acoust 111:198–204

    Google Scholar 

  139. Xie X, Zheng H, Qu Y (2016) A variational formulation for vibro-acoustic analysis of a panel backed by an irregularly-bounded cavity. J Sound Vib 373:147–163

    Google Scholar 

  140. Dammak K, Koubaa S, El Hami A, Walha L, Haddar M (2019) Numerical modelling of vibro-acoustic problem in presence of uncertainty: application to a vehicle cabin. Appl Acoust 144:113–123

    Google Scholar 

  141. Hoshi K, Hanyu T, Okuzono T, Sakagami K, Yairi M, Harada S, Takahashi S, Ueda Y (2020) Implementation experiment of a honeycomb-backed MPP sound absorber in a meeting room. Appl Acoust 157:107000

    Google Scholar 

  142. Parrott TL, Zorumski WE (1992) Sound transmission through a high-temperature acoustic probe tube. AIAA J 30:318–323

    Google Scholar 

  143. Yu G, Li D, Cheng L (2008) Effect of internal resistance of a Helmholtz resonator on acoustic energy reduction in enclosures. J Acoust Soc Am 124:3534–3543

    Google Scholar 

  144. Rocha TL, Dias M (2015) Improved sound transmission loss in an automotive component using piezoceramic patches and dissipative shunt circuits. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 26:476–786

    Google Scholar 

  145. Geng Q, Li Y (2016) Solutions of dynamic and acoustic responses of a clamped rectangular plate in thermal environments. J Vib Control 22:1593–1603

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  146. Craik RJ (1990) Sound transmission paths through a statistical energy analysis model. Appl Acoust 30:45–55

    Google Scholar 

  147. Wu T, Dandapani A (1994) A boundary element solution for sound transmission through thin panels. J Sound Vib 171:145–157

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  148. Bretagne A, Tourin A, Leroy V (2011) Enhanced and reduced transmission of acoustic waves with bubble meta-screens. Appl Phys Lett 99:221906

    Google Scholar 

  149. Zhang Y, Wen J, Zhao H, Yu D, Cai L, Wen X (2013) Sound insulation property of membrane-type acoustic metamaterials carrying different masses at adjacent cells. J Appl Phys 114:063515

    Google Scholar 

  150. Song A-L, Chen T-N, Wang X-P, Wan L-L (2016) Waveform-preserved unidirectional acoustic transmission based on impedance-matched acoustic metasurface and phononic crystal. J Appl Phys 120:085106

    Google Scholar 

  151. Wang F, Chen T, Wang X, Bao K, Wan L (2017) A membrane-type acoustic metamaterial muffler. Int J Mod Phys B 31:1750049

    Google Scholar 

  152. Gao N, Hou H (2017) Low frequency acoustic properties of a honeycomb-silicone rubber acoustic metamaterial. Mod Phys Lett B 31:1750118

    Google Scholar 

  153. Li S, Mao D, Huang S, Wang X (2018) Enhanced transmission loss in acoustic materials with micro-membranes. Appl Acoust 130:92–98

    Google Scholar 

  154. Liu Y, Du J (2019) Vibroacoustic characteristics and sound attenuation analyses of a duct–membrane system coupled with strip masses. J Vib Control. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546319873459

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  155. Boulvert J, Cavalieri T, Costa-Baptista J, Schwan L, Romero-García V, Gabard G, Fotsing ER, Ross A, Mardjono J, Groby J-P (2019) Optimally graded porous material for broadband perfect absorption of sound. J Appl Phys 126:175101

    Google Scholar 

  156. Gerretsen E (1979) Calculation of the sound transmission between dwellings by partitions and flanking structures. Appl Acoust 12:413–433

    Google Scholar 

  157. Vaicaitis R, Grosveld F, Mixson J (1985) Noise transmission through aircraft panels. J Aircr 22:303–310

    Google Scholar 

  158. Steel J (1994) Sound transmission between plates in framed structures. J Sound Vib 178:379–394

    Google Scholar 

  159. Osipov A, Mees P, Vermeir G (1997) Low-frequency airborne sound transmission through single partitions in buildings. Appl Acoust 52:273–288

    Google Scholar 

  160. Chiello O, Sgard F, Atalla N (2003) On the use of a component mode synthesis technique to investigate the effects of elastic boundary conditions on the transmission loss of baffled plates. Comput Struct 81:2645–2658

    Google Scholar 

  161. Trevathan JW, Pearse JR (2005) The significance of the incident sound field on the sound transmission loss of a finite panel. Build Acoust 12:225–235

    Google Scholar 

  162. Vinokur R (2006) Mechanism and calculation of the niche effect in airborne sound transmission. J Acoust Soc Am 119:2211–2219

    Google Scholar 

  163. Crocker MJ, Battacharya M, Price A (1971) Sound and vibration transmission through panels and tie beams using statistical energy analysis. J Eng Ind 93:775–781

    Google Scholar 

  164. Dijckmans A (2016) Wave based modeling of airborne flanking transmission across suspended ceilings. Dimensions 1:1

    Google Scholar 

  165. Ang LYL, Koh YK, Lee HP (2019) Plate-type acoustic metamaterials: evaluation of a large-scale design adopting modularity for customizable acoustical performance. Appl Acoust 149:156–170

    Google Scholar 

  166. Sanada A, Tanaka N (2012) Theoretical and experimental study on active sound transmission control based on single structural mode actuation using point force actuators. J Acoust Soc Am 132:767–778

    Google Scholar 

  167. Poblet-Puig J, Rodríguez-Ferran A (2013) Modal-based prediction of sound transmission through slits and openings between rooms. J Sound Vib 332:1265–1287

    Google Scholar 

  168. Yu X, Cheng L, Guyader J-L (2014) On the modeling of sound transmission through a mixed separation of flexible structure with an aperture. J Acoust Soc Am 135:2785–2796

    Google Scholar 

  169. Yairi M, Koga T, Takebayashi K, Sakagami K (2014) Transmission of a spherical sound wave through a single-leaf wall: mass law for spherical wave incidence. Appl Acoust 75:67–71

    Google Scholar 

  170. Djojodihardjo H (2015) Vibro-acoustic analysis of the acoustic–structure interaction of flexible structure due to acoustic excitation. Acta Astronaut 108:129–145

    Google Scholar 

  171. Yuan M, Qiu J, Ji H, Zhou W, Ohayon R (2015) Active control of sound transmission using a hybrid/blind decentralized control approach. J Vib Control 21:2661–2684

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  172. Liu B, Jiang Y, Chang D (2017) Sound transmission of a spherical sound wave through a finite plate. J Sound Vib 410:209–216

    Google Scholar 

  173. Shi S, Su Z, Jin G, Liu Z (2018) Vibro-acoustic modeling and analysis of a coupled acoustic system comprising a partially opened cavity coupled with a flexible plate. Mech Syst Signal Process 98:324–343

    Google Scholar 

  174. Wang K, Tao J, Qiu X (2018) Boundary control of sound transmission into a cavity through its opening. J Sound Vib. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. Toyoda M, Ishikawa S (2019) Frequency-dependent absorption and transmission boundary for the finite-difference time-domain method. Appl Acoust 145:159–166

    Google Scholar 

  176. Meidinger N, Legrain I (1997) Comparison of computational and experimental results in vibroacoustic active control using piezoelectric film technology. Aerosp Sci Technol 1:573–580

    Google Scholar 

  177. Gardonio P, Bianchi E, Elliott S (2004) Smart panel with multiple decentralized units for the control of sound transmission. Part I: theoretical predictions. J Sound Vib 274:163–192

    Google Scholar 

  178. Gardonio P, Bianchi E, Elliott S (2004) Smart panel with multiple decentralized units for the control of sound transmission. Part II: design of the decentralized control units. J Sound Vib 274:193–213

    Google Scholar 

  179. Bianchi E, Gardonio P, Elliott S (2004) Smart panel with multiple decentralized units for the control of sound transmission. Part III: control system implementation. J Sound Vib 274:215–232

    Google Scholar 

  180. Wang X (2010) Theory of resonant sound transmission through small apertures on periodically perforated slabs. J Appl Phys 108:064903

    Google Scholar 

  181. Jin G, Feng N, Yang T (2011) Control strategies and mechanisms for active control of sound transmission into a vibro-acoustic enclosure. J Mar Sci Appl 10:206–214

    Google Scholar 

  182. Chen Y, Huang G, Zhou X, Hu G, Sun C-T (2014) Analytical coupled vibroacoustic modeling of membrane-type acoustic metamaterials: membrane model. J Acoust Soc Am 136:969–979

    Google Scholar 

  183. Sharma GS, Skvortsov A, MacGillivray I, Kessissoglou N (2017) Sound transmission through a periodically voided soft elastic medium submerged in water. Wave Motion 70:101–112

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  184. Tian H, Tong D, Tao Y (2018) Analytical approach of membrane-type acoustic metamaterial with ring masses. Multidiscip Model Mater Struct 14:828–836

    Google Scholar 

  185. Langfeldt F, Gleine W, von Estorff O (2018) An efficient analytical model for baffled, multi-celled membrane-type acoustic metamaterial panels. J Sound Vib 417:359–375

    Google Scholar 

  186. Lee CH, Han MJ, Park TW, Kim YS, Shin KD (2020) A comparative study on the transmission loss of helmholtz resonator and quarter, half, conical half-wave resonator using acoustic analysis model. Int J Mech Eng Robot Res 9:153–157

    Google Scholar 

  187. Crocker M, Price A (1969) Sound transmission using statistical energy analysis. J Sound Vib 9:469–486

    Google Scholar 

  188. Minten M, Cops A, Wijnants F (1987) The sound transmission loss of a single panel measured with the two-microphone and the conventional method-comparison with the statistical energy analysis model. Appl Acoust 22:281–295

    Google Scholar 

  189. Howard CQ (2008) Transmission loss of a panel with an array of tuned vibration absorbers. Acoust Aust 36:98–103

    Google Scholar 

  190. Estrada H, Candelas P, Uris A, Belmar F, Meseguer F, de Abajo FJG (2011) Sound transmission through perforated plates with subwavelength hole arrays: a rigid-solid model. Wave Motion 48:235–242

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  191. Yang M, Li Y, Meng C, Fu C, Mei J, Yang Z, Sheng P (2015) Sound absorption by subwavelength membrane structures: a geometric perspective. C R Méc 343:635–644

    Google Scholar 

  192. Wareing RR, Davy JL, Pearse JR (2015) Variations in measured sound transmission loss due to sample size and construction parameters. Appl Acoust 89:166–177

    Google Scholar 

  193. Shen C, Xie Y, Li J, Cummer SA, Jing Y (2016) Asymmetric acoustic transmission through near-zero-index and gradient-index metasurfaces. Appl Phys Lett 108:223502

    Google Scholar 

  194. Zhang C, Qin M, Zou H, Qiu X (2019) Secondary source and error sensing strategies for the active control of sound transmission through a small opening. J Sound Vib 464:114973

    Google Scholar 

  195. Li H, Ma J, Zhu J, Chen B (2019) Numerical and experimental studies on inclined incidence parametric sound propagation. Shock Vib. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2984191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  196. Du L, Lau S-K, Lee SE (2019) Experimental study on sound transmission loss of plenum windows. J Acoust Soc Am 146:EL489–EL495

    Google Scholar 

  197. Wrona S, Mazur K, Rzepecki J, Chrapońska A, Pawełczyk M (2019) Sound transmission through a thin plate with shaped frequency response. Arch Acoust 44:731–738

    Google Scholar 

  198. Szechenyi E (1971) Sound transmission through cylinder walls using statistical considerations. J Sound Vib 19:83–94

    Google Scholar 

  199. Elmallawany A (1982) Improvement of the method of statistical energy analysis for the calculation of sound insulation at low frequencies. Appl Acoust 15:341–345

    Google Scholar 

  200. Santos P, Tadeu A (2002) Acoustic insulation provided by a single wall separating two contiguous tunnels via BEM. J Sound Vib 257:945–965

    Google Scholar 

  201. Desmet W, Pluymers B, Sas P (2003) Vibro-acoustic analysis procedures for the evaluation of the sound insulation characteristics of agricultural machinery cabins. J Sound Vib 266:407–441

    Google Scholar 

  202. Langley RS, Cordioli JA (2009) Hybrid deterministic-statistical analysis of vibro-acoustic systems with domain couplings on statistical components. J Sound Vib 321:893–912

    Google Scholar 

  203. Wu C, Wang X, Tang H (2007) Transmission loss prediction on SIDO and DISO expansion-chamber mufflers with rectangular section by using the collocation approach. Int J Mech Sci 49:872–877

    Google Scholar 

  204. Ruber K, Kanapathipillai S, Randall R (2015) Sound transmission loss of a panel backed by a small enclosure. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control 34:549–567

    Google Scholar 

  205. Wang C (2015) Modal sound transmission loss of a single leaf panel: asymptotic solutions. J Acoust Soc Am 138:3964–3975

    Google Scholar 

  206. Huang T-Y, Shen C, Jing Y (2016) Membrane-and plate-type acoustic metamaterials. J Acoust Soc Am 139:3240–3250

    Google Scholar 

  207. Hartmann T, Morita S, Tanner G, Chappell DJ (2018) High-frequency structure-and air-borne sound transmission for a tractor model using dynamical energy analysis. Wave Motion 87:132–150

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  208. Takahashi K, Yairi M, Okuzono T, Sakagami K, Toyoda M (2019) Basic study on relationship between airborne sound transmission and structure-borne sound radiation of a finite elastic plate. Acoust Sci Technol 40:52–55

    Google Scholar 

  209. Gai X-L, Xing T, Kang Z-X, Li X-H, Zhang B, Cai Z-N, Wang F, Guan X-W (2020) Study on sound insulation performance of the periodic arrangement expansion chambers structure with built-in micro-perforated panel. Appl Acoust 161:107187

    Google Scholar 

  210. Fuller CR (1990) Active control of sound transmission/radiation from elastic plates by vibration inputs: i. Analysis. J Sound Vib 136:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  211. Metcalf V, Fuller CR, Silcox R, Brown D (1992) Active control of sound transmission/radiation from elastic plates by vibration inputs, II: experiments. J Sound Vib 153:387–402

    Google Scholar 

  212. Zhang H, Wen J, Xiao Y, Wang G, Wen X (2015) Sound transmission loss of metamaterial thin plates with periodic subwavelength arrays of shunted piezoelectric patches. J Sound Vib 343:104–120

    Google Scholar 

  213. Gu Y, Cheng Y, Wang J, Liu X (2015) Controlling sound transmission with density-near-zero acoustic membrane network. J Appl Phys 118:024505

    Google Scholar 

  214. Xiao S, Ma G, Li Y, Yang Z, Sheng P (2015) Active control of membrane-type acoustic metamaterial by electric field. Appl Phys Lett 106:091904

    Google Scholar 

  215. Kaizuka T, Nakano K (2018) Active control of sound transmission into an enclosure using structural modal filters. J Sound Vib 431:328–345

    Google Scholar 

  216. Zhang H, Xu G-L, Yin W, Wang H-B, Ge P (2018) Numerical investigation on the transmission loss of skin panels based on the intelligent PSO-CGA algorithm. IEEE Access, DOI

    Google Scholar 

  217. Roca D, Yago D, Cante J, Lloberas-Valls O, Oliver J (2018) Computational design of locally resonant acoustic metamaterials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 345:161–182

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  218. Wang F, Chen Z, Wu C, Yang Y (2019) Prediction on sound insulation properties of ultrafine glass wool mats with artificial neural networks. Appl Acoust 146:164–171

    Google Scholar 

  219. Dammak K, El Hami A (2019) Multi-objective reliability based design optimization of coupled acoustic-structural system. Eng Struct 197:109389

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Noise and Vibration Control Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

    M. R. Zarastvand, M. Ghassabi & R. Talebitooti

Authors
  1. M. R. Zarastvand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Ghassabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Talebitooti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Talebitooti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zarastvand, M.R., Ghassabi, M. & Talebitooti, R. A Review Approach for Sound Propagation Prediction of Plate Constructions. Arch Computat Methods Eng 28, 2817–2843 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09482-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09482-6

Search

Navigation