Skip to main content
Applied Biological Chemistry
Download PDF

Effect of sodium silicate on early growth stages of wheat under drought stress

Applied Biological Chemistry volume 63, Article number: 48 (2020) Cite this article

This article has been updated

Abstract

Wheat yield is decreasing due to climate change, and a method to prevent decreasing yield during drought stress is desirable. In this study, wheat cultivars (Koso and Jokyung) were treated with 15% polyethylene glycol-6000 (PEG) and PEG + Si solution (6.5, 8.7, 13.1 and 26.1 mM). The effect of Si treatment on the alleviation of drought stress was measured using the germination test, shoot relative water content (RWC), seedling stage observation, and quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The results of root/shoot length ratio and shoot length ratio showed that Si treatment induced the alleviation of drought stress in Jokyung cultivar. The result of qRT-PCR showed the alleviation of drought stress in Koso cultivar. In addition, the results with shoot RWC and seedling stage observation showed that the alleviation effects of Si treatment was observed with both Koso and Jokyung cultivar at the high concentration of Si (26.1 mM). All these results suggest that Si treatment at a high concentration could be employed to alleviate drought stress in wheat.

Introduction

The extent of damage caused by climate change increases every year, and drought is one of the most serious causes of damage. In the current century, the average temperature of the earth’s surface is predicted to increase by 4.0 °C. As the average temperature rises by 1 °C, crop yields were reported to be reduced by 3–4% globally [1, 2]. Thus, climate change is expected to induce many detrimental effects globally, especially on agricultural industries [3]. Wheat is one of the most important staple foods, with approximately half of the world's population depending on it [4]. Among cultivated wheat varieties, consumption of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) has increased because of its dominance as a staple food [5]. While wheat consumption has increased every year, wheat production is now decreasing. One factor causing the decrease in wheat yield is drought.

Silicon (Si) is the second most abundant element in the soil [6]. It has been widely reported that Si can stimulate plant growth and alleviate various biotic and abiotic stresses [7]. For example, Si can benefit plants exposed to abiotic stresses such as heavy metals, droughts, and heat. In addition, it is known that Si increases the robustness of cell walls in plants and accumulates in the gaps between cells and outer layers while increasing leaf size, thickness, and dry weight [8]. Thus, Si is an important nutrient for plants. Especially, many previous studies have reported the beneficial effects of Si in sorghum, rice, and potato regarding growth under drought stress [9,10,11]. However, only 0.03% of Si is present in the biosphere [12]. The solubility of Si is very low because Si is almost always present in the soil in combination with other elements [13]. The concentration of Si that plants can absorb is very limited; only 0.1–0.6 mM Si is absorbed from water. Therefore, a fertilizer containing soluble silicate is helpful for plant growth [14].

Plant growth in abiotic stress (i.e., salt and drought stress) has known to induce many changes of the expression of numerous genes or proteins. One example of such change is observed with MYB protein which forms the largest transcription factor families [15]. The MYB transcription factors were involved in abiotic stress tolerance and hormone signal transduction [16]. Although these transcription factor families have numerous genes, a few studies were performed regarding plant responses [17]. For example, one MYB gene (TaMYBsdul) was identified under drought and salt stress such that it suggested as a potential marker about drought and salt stress [18].

Previous studies have found that Si helps to alleviate drought stress in wheat during early growth [19]. However, few studies have examined what kind of effect Si has on the expression of genes related to drought stress. In the present study, we examined the effect of Si on drought stress during the initial growth of wheat at the molecular level and the physiological level. The two wheat cultivars used in this study were selected by difference in their protein content. Koso and Jokyung wheat cultivars contain approximately 7.2% (i.e., soft flour) and 13.3% (i.e., hard flour), respectively [20]. Changes in the expression of related genes and physiological characteristics such as germination rate, root and shoot length ratio, and relative water content (RWC) of two wheat cultivars were studied.

Materials and methods

Germination test

A germination test was performed according to methods described in a previous study [21]. The two wheat cultivars (Koso and Jokyung) used in this experiment were provided by the National Institute of Crop Science (Wanju-gun, Korea). Briefly, seeds of Koso and Jokyung were sterilized with 5% NaClO in a 50 mL conical tube and washed with sterilized distilled water three times. After being stored at 23 °C for 1 day, germination tests were performed using a paper towel (GeneAll, Seoul, Korea). A solution of sodium silicate (28%, Odus, Eumseong-gun, Korea) was used for Si treatments with the appropriate dilution. For the drought stress test, seeds of Koso and Jokyung wheat were treated with sterilized distilled water, 15% polyethylene glycol-6000 (PEG), and PEG + Si solution (6.5, 8.7, 13.1, 26.1 mM). For each treatment, five seeds were randomly selected. After 7 days, the germination test was concluded, and the number of germinated wheat seeds was counted, along with measurements of the length of roots and shoots.

Drought stress in the seedling stage

The degree of drought stress was measured according to a published procedure [22] with modifications. Each treatment consisted of 30 sterilized wheat seeds contained in a plastic pot (Φ75 mm × 66 mm) with 25 g of soil (Sunshine® Mix #4, Sun Gro Horticulture, Agawam, MA, USA). Phenotypes were compared between pots. Thirty milliliters of water were sprayed on the surface of each pot every 2 days for 8 days. From day 10, treatment solutions of 50 mL of water, PEG, and PEG + Si solution were administered every 2 days until day 20. Pictures of seedling plants were taken 1, 4, 7, and 10 days after the treatment. After the treatment of drought stress to the seedlings, some leaves were immediately sampled and frozen in a deep freezer (VT-78, My-Bio, Seoul, Korea) at − 75 °C to measure the degree of gene expression. Other leaves were used to measure the shoot RWC as described below.

Relative water content

Shoot relative water content (RWC) was measured for each treatment that received water, PEG, or PEG + Si solution (26.1 mM). Shoot fresh weight (FW) was recorded using excised shoots from test pots taken 10 days after the first drought stress. The excised shoot was put into a 50 mL conical tube containing 5 mL of tap water. The conical tubes were stored in a refrigerator for 24 h at 4 °C to measure turgid weight (TW). After drying for 72 h at 60 °C (BI-600 M, Jeio Tech, Seoul, Korea), dry weight (DW) was recorded. RWC was calculated according to the following formula [23]:

$${\text{RWC }}\left( \% \right) \, = \, \left[ {\left( {{\text{FW}} - {\text{DW}}} \right) \, / \, \left( {{\text{TW}} - {\text{DW}}} \right)} \right] \, \times \, 100$$

Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNAs were isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) from the shoots of seedlings that received water, PEG, or PEG + Si solution (26.1 mM) for 10 days. cDNA was synthesized with the first stand synthesis kit (GeneAll, Seoul, Korea). The cDNA value was quantitatively measured using a nanodrop spectrophotometer (Colibri LB 915, JC Bio, Seoul, Korea) and used in qRT-PCR. Amplifications were performed in 50 cycles using the CFX connect Real-Time PCR (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with BrightGreen 2 × qPCR MasterMix (ABM, Vancouver, Canada). The genes examined were the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genes TC225859(TC1), TC277220(TC2), TC326615(TC3), TC282418(TC4), and BT008981(BT6) whose expression has previously been shown to be altered under drought stress [18]. The primer sequences used for qRT-PCR are listed in Table 1. Actin was used as a housekeeping gene [24]. Gene expression was calculated using the \(2^{{ - \Delta \Delta {\text{Ct}} }}\) method [25].

Table 1 Primers used in PCR and RT-PCR analyses
Full size table

Data analysis

Data were statistically treated by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the least significant difference test at a probability level of 0.05. An ANOVA F-test was used to separate means in the case of a significant effect.

Results

Root length, shoot length, and germination rate of the Koso and Jokyung cultivars were measured for comparing physical difference under drought stress [21] (Table 2). For the Koso cultivar, root lengths of the control and PEG treatment groups were very similar, while shoot length decreased in the PEG treatment group, meaning that shoot length was affected by drought stress due to the PEG treatment. When treated with increasing concentrations of Si, root length only decreased gradually. In contrast, with PEG treatment, the shoot length of the Koso cultivar decreased suddenly from about 7.3 cm to approximately 3.2 cm, while shoot length was maintained up to the treatment of 13.1 mM Si and decreased to about 2.0 cm with the treatment of 26.1 mM Si. For the Koso cultivar, the germination rate was about 82% for the control and PEG treatment. The germination rates increased to about 89% for the 6.5 mM Si treatment and then decreased with further increases in Si concentration. For the Jokyung cultivar, the effects on root length, shoot length, and germination rate were quite different from those of Koso cultivar for the same treatment. That is, root length in the PEG treatment group was greater than that in the control group. Then, root length decreased gradually with further increases in Si concentration. Shoot length decreased from about 9.2 cm for the control group to 6.0–7.0 cm with the PEG treatment and Si treatment (6.5, 8.7, 13.1 mM) groups. However, the shoot length for the 26.1 mM Si treatment group increased to 8.3 cm, suggesting that a higher concentration of Si might be helpful for alleviating drought stress. The germination rate of the Jokyung cultivar was not affected by PEG treatment and Si treatment, suggesting that the Jokyung cultivar is resistant to drought stress or that Si treatment helps alleviate drought stress.

Table 2 Root length, shoot length, and germination rate of wheat seedlings after Si treatment
Full size table

The root/shoot length ratio (RSLR) of the Koso and Jokyung cultivars was calculated from the values obtained in Table 2 (Fig. 1). The RSLR is an important information which indirectly shows the extent of drought stress alleviation [26]. The RSLRs of the Koso cultivar for the control group were close to 1.0 but increased to about 2.0 with PEG treatment and the four increasing concentrations of Si. However, the RSLR values for the treatments were not statistically different (Fig. 1A). The RSLRs of the Jokyung cultivar increased to about 1.7 for the PEG treatment group and decreased gradually with increasing concentration of Si. The RSLR of the Jokyung decreased to about 1.2 with the treatment of 26.1 mM Si (Fig. 1B). These results suggest that the Si treatment is helpful for alleviating drought stress for the Jokyung cultivar but not for the Koso cultivar. For the Koso cultivar, the shoot length ratio of the PEG treatment was about 48.8% of the control. The shoot length ratios of the 6.5, 8.7, 13.1 mM Si treatment groups were not statistically different from the shoot length ratio of the PEG treatment group. However, the shoot length ratio of the 26.1 mL Si treatment was 30.0% of the control (Fig. 2A). These results suggest that Si treatment could not help alleviate the degree of drought stress in the Koso cultivar. For the Jokyung cultivar, the shoot length ratio of the PEG treatment was 76.3% of the control. As the concentrations of Si increased from 6.5 to 13.1 mM, the shoot length ratio slightly decreased to about 67.0%. However, the shoot length ratio of the 26.1 mM Si increased to 90.54% of the control. These results suggest that a high concentration of Si treatment could help alleviate the degree of drought stress in the Jokyung cultivar.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The effect of Si treatment on root/shoot length ratio under drought stress. The wheat cultivars Koso (A) and Jokyung (B) were compared. Each group was treated with sterilized distilled water (control), 15% polyethylene glycol-6000 (PEG), and PEG + Si of 6.5, 8.7, 13.1 and 26.1 mM. Values followed by the same small letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

The effect of Si treatment on shoot length ratio (%) under drought stress. The wheat cultivars Koso (A) and Jokyung (B) were compared. Each group was treated with sterilized distilled water (control), 15% polyethylene glycol-6000 (PEG), and PEG + Si of 6.5, 8.7, 13.1 and 26.1 mM. Values followed by the same small letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05)

Full size image

Based on the observation displayed in Figs. 1 and 2, the Si concentration of 26.1 mM was selected for investigating the effect of Si on the shoot RWC of the two wheat cultivars (Fig. 3). If drought stress of wheat is alleviated, wheat would contain more water in their leaves. Thus, comparison of shoot RWC indicates the comparative water content of wheat leaves under drought stress [27]. The RWC values of the Koso cultivar were 96.0%, 84.4%, and 91.4% for control, PEG treatment, and 26.1 mM Si treatment, respectively. The RWC values of the Jokyung cultivar were 93.3%, 75.1%, and 87.0% for the control, negative control (PEG treatment), and 26.1 mM Si treatment, respectively. Thus, the RWC values decreased with PEG treatment and increased with Si treatment. These results suggest that the extent of drought stress was lowered by the Si treatment in the two wheat cultivars.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The effect of Si treatment on relative water content (RWC) under drought stress. The wheat cultivars Koso (A) and Jokyung (B) were compared. Each group was treated with sterilized distilled water (control), 15% polyethylene glycol-6000 (PEG), and PEG + Si of 26.1 mM. Values followed by the same small letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05)

Full size image

One of methods to confirm the alleviation of drought stress is the direct observation of their phenotypic changes [22]. The time-dependent phenotypic changes of two wheat seedlings, which were under 15% PEG-stimulated drought stress, were observed with a pot test over 10 days. As shown in Fig. 4, the appearance of wheat shoots did not differ on day 1 among the control, PEG treatment, and Si treatment (26.1 mM). However, a noticeable change was observed on days 4, 7, and 10. Overall, the wheat shoots of the PEG treatment seemed to have more significant phenotypes, such as withered leaves, curled leaves, and shorter plant height. Wheat seedling status on day 10 seemed to be better in the order of control > Si treatment > the PEG treatment for the two cultivars. The extent of recovery from the PEG treatment was similar for both cultivars. These results suggest again that the Si treatment helped to protect the wheat seedlings from drought stress due to the PEG treatment. As observed in the germination test results (Table 2, Figs. 1 and 2), the Si treatment was effective at alleviating drought stress due to the PEG treatment for the Jokyung cultivar but not the Koso cultivar. However, the results of the RWC (Fig. 3) and phenotypic change (Fig. 4) show that Si treatment can effectively alleviate drought stress in both cultivars.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The effect of Si treatment on phenotypic changes of wheat under drought stress. The wheat cultivars of Koso (A) and Jokyung (B) were compared. Each group was treated with sterilized distilled water (control or CON), 15% polyethylene glycol-6000 (PEG), and PEG + Si of 26.1 mM

Full size image

qRT-PCR analysis was conducted to examine the variation in the expression for five selected genes after treatment (Fig. 5). The five genes (TC1, TC2, TC3, TC4, and BT6) are known to be related to drought stress. The five genes used in the present study were confirmed as a marker for drought stress response [18]. For the Koso cultivar, the relative RNA expression levels of the five genes were much higher with the PEG treatment than in the control. However, with the Si treatment of 26.1 mM, the relative RNA levels decreased to about the same level as the control for genes TC2, TC3, TC4, and BT6, or were much lower than the control for TC1. In contrast, Si treatment for the Jokyung cultivar had no specific effect on the relative RNA expression levels of the five genes (Fig. 6).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The effect of Si treatment on the expression of genes for the Koso cultivar under drought stress. The treatments were sterilized distilled water (control), 15% polyethylene glycol-6000 (PEG), and PEG + Si of 26.1 mM. Values followed by the same small letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05)

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

The effect of Si treatment on the expression of genes for the Jokyung cultivar under drought stress. The treatments were sterilized distilled water (control), 15% polyethylene glycol-6000 (PEG), and PEG + Si of 26.1 mM. Values followed by the same small letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05)

Full size image

Discussion

A paper towel test was performed to determine the effect of Si treatment on the RSLR and germination rate of two wheat cultivars. Drought stress was induced by the application of 15% PEG. It was evident that Si treatment had a more positive effect on the Jokyung cultivar than the Koso cultivar (Table 2 and Figs. 1 and 2). The RSLR of wheats which were growth in normal conditions has approximately close to 1 [26]. Unlike in the Koso cultivar, the RSLR for the Jokyung cultivar increased by the PEG treatment and gradually decreased with an increasing concentration of Si. The RSLR was not statistically different between control and the 26.1 mM Si treatment, suggesting that drought stress was relieved with Si treatment for the Jokyung cultivar. The RSLR of the Koso cultivar was not statistically different between the PEG treatment and the Si treatment (Fig. 1).

The shoot lengths in drought condition are decreased compared to those in normal condition due to the lack of nutrients for growth [27, 28]. For the Koso cultivar, the shoot length ratio decreased to about 50% of control with the PEG treatment and was not affected by the Si treatment (Fig. 2A). For the Jokyung cultivar, the shoot length ratio of the Si treatments (6.5, 8.7, 13.1 mM) was 70–80% of the control (Fig. 2B). However, the shoot length ratio noticeably recovered with the Si treatment of 26.1 mM. This result indicates that for the Jokyung cultivar, the relatively higher concentration of Si (26.1 mM) might be needed to have a positive effect on the shoot length ratio.

The shoot RWC might be more important than the other indicators for mitigating drought stress [29]. This is because most plants try to conserve turgor pressure to maintain their metabolic activity by the continuous absorption of moisture [30]. For the two wheat cultivars tested, RWC decreased with PEG treatment and increased with the Si treatment of 26.1 mM (Fig. 3). That is, the Si treatment had a positive effect on the RWC for both cultivars. This result contrasts with the results in Figs. 1 and 2 because the Si treatment did not increase the RSLR and shoot length ratio, the experiments of which were performed on a paper towel. The test of RWC was performed with a pot test containing soil. Although various paper towel tests are convenient, they might not be enough to mimic the actual growth of a plant in soil. Thus, caution needs to be used when interpreting the results from paper towel tests. The shoot RWC is known to be correlated with the water holding capacity of a plant [31]. Because the Si treatment of 26.1 mM increased the RWC, it is expected that by enhancing the water holding capacity of wheat, the Si treatment could contribute to an increase in wheat yield under drought stress.

The results in Fig. 3 were supported by the effect of Si treatment on the phenotypic changes of wheat seedlings, as shown in Fig. 4. It is difficult to quantify the outer appearance in the photograph, but it is obvious that Si treatment helped seedlings recover from wheat shoot damage by drought stress due to the PEG treatment, which can be observed more clearly on day 7 and day 10. This phenotypic change might be correlated with the expression of genes related to drought stress [18]. In previous studies with Triticum aestivum L., it was shown that the gene expression of TC1, TC3, and BT6 increased but that of TC2 and TC4 decreased during drought. However, the results of this study have shown that the relative mRNA expression of TC2 and TC4, as well as TC1, TC3, and BT6, increased under drought stress for the Koso cultivar. Upon treatment with Si, the relative mRNA expression decreased back to almost the same level as in the control (Fig. 5). It is speculated that the mRNA expression of the two additional genes (TC2 and TC4) might be different from that in the previous study due to differences in the wheat cultivar tested. The expression of various genes related to drought for the Jokyung cultivar was also examined but no specific trend was observed, suggesting that there could be differences in the expression of the five genes among different wheat cultivars (Fig. 6).

In the present study, the relief of drought stress by Si treatment was tested for the two wheat cultivars. The paper towel test and the pot test were used to measure the RSLR, the shoot length ratio, and the shoot RWC. The results obtained for the pot test showed that Si treatment caused the phenotypic changes of wheats that contained low proteins or high proteins. This result is important because any changes due to drought stress have not much meaning if there are no visible changes. Thus, the phenotypic changes become important information about the benefits of Si treatment under drought stress. Additionally, the increase in the shoot RWC also indicated the alleviation of drought stress. These results are matched with those of phenotypic changes. However, the gene expression related to drought stress only matched the phenotypic changes observed in the Koso cultivar whose flour is used to make snack. This means that other combination of genes might be necessary to be matched with the phenotypic changes for Jokyung wheat cultivar. The measurement of RSLR and the shoot length ratio in control by the paper towel test was convenient and less time-consuming but, in some cases, this might not reflect the results of the pot test and gene expression study. However, for the purpose of comparison, both the paper towel test and the pot test might be necessary to observe the usefulness of Si treatment for other wheat cultivars. That is, we have found that every measurement was differentially affected by wheat cultivars. Thus, more factors (for example, spring/fall wheat and protein content) need to be examined to explain the reason of Si treatment effect on various other wheat cultivars in the future study. All the results obtained in the present study indicated that Si treatment might be effective in mitigating drought stress during wheat growth.

Change history

  • 18 June 2023

    Missing funding information has been added.

References

  1. Alley R, Berntsen T, Bindoff NL, Chen Z, Chidthaisong A, Friedlingstein P, Gregory J, Hegerl G, Heimann M, Hewitson B, Hoskins B, Joos F, Jouzel J, Kattsov V, Lohmann U, Manning M, Matsuno T, Molina M, Nicholls N, Overpeck J, Qin D, Raga G, Ramaswamy V, Ren J, Rusticucci M, Solomon S, Somerville R, Stocker TF, Stott P, Stouffer RJ, Whetton P, Wood RA, Wratt D (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis: summary for policymakers. IPCC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tashiro T, Wardlaw IF (1989) A comparison of the effect of high temperature on grain development in wheat and rice. Ann Bot 64:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shim K-M, Roh K-A, So K-H, Kim G-Y, Jeong H-C, Lee D (2010) Assessing impacts of global warming on rice growth and production in Korea. Curr Clim Change Rep 1:121–131

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hussain A, Rizwan M, Ali Q, Ali S (2019) Seed priming with silicon nanoparticles improved the biomass and yield while reduced the oxidative stress and cadmium concentration in wheat grains. Environ Sci Pollut R 26:7579–7588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee A, Trinh CS, Lee WJ, Kim M, Lee H, Pathiraja D, Choi I-G, Chung N, Choi C, Lee BC (2020) Characterization of two leaf rust-resistant Aegilops tauschii accessions for the synthetic wheat development. Appl Biol Chem 63:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Raven JA (1983) The transport and function of silicon in plants. Biol Rev 58:179–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Adrees M, Ali S, Rizwan M, Zia-ur-Rehman M, Ibrahim M, Abbas F, Farid M, Qayyum MF, Irshad MK (2015) Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of heavy metal toxicity in plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 119:186–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Son M-S, Oh H-J, Song J-Y, Lim M-Y, Sivanesan I, Jeong B-R (2012) Effect of silicon source and application method on growth of kalanchoe 'Peperu'. Hortic Sci Technol 30:250–255

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Farooq M, Wahid A, Lee D-J, Ito O, Siddique KH (2009) Advances in drought resistance of rice. Crit Rev Plant Sci 28:199–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crusciol CA, Pulz AL, Lemos LB, Soratto RP, Lima GP (2009) Effects of silicon and drought stress on tuber yield and leaf biochemical characteristics in potato. Crop Sci 49:949–954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmed M, Qadeer U, Aslam MA (2011) Silicon application and drought tolerance mechanism of sorghum. Afr J Agric Res 6:594–607

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fauteux F, Rémus-Borel W, Menzies JG, Bélanger RR (2005) Silicon and plant disease resistance against pathogenic fungi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 249:1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Williams LA, Parks GA, Crerar DA (1985) Silica diagenesis; I, solubility controls. J Sediment Res 55:301–311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Son MS, Song JY, Lim MY, Sivanesan I, Kim GS, Jeong BR (2013) Silicon uptake level of six potted plants from a potassium silicate-supplemented hydroponic solution. Hortic Sci Technol 31:153–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Riechmann JL, Heard J, Martin G, Reuber L, Jiang C-Z, Keddie J, Adam L, Pineda O, Ratcliffe O, Samaha R (2000) Arabidopsis transcription factors: genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Sci 290:2105–2110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang T, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Liu Z, Gao C (2018) Comprehensive analysis of MYB gene family and their expressions under abiotic stresses and hormone treatments in Tamarix hispida. Front Plant Sci 9:1303

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bartels D, Sunkar R (2005) Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:23–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rahaie M, Xue G-P, Naghavi MR, Alizadeh H, Schenk PM (2010) A MYB gene from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is up-regulated during salt and drought stresses and differentially regulated between salt-tolerant and sensitive genotypes. Plant Cell Rep 29:835–844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hameed A, Sheikh MA, Jamil A, Basra SMA (2013) Seed priming with sodium silicate enhances seed germination and seedling growth in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under water deficit stress induced by polyethylene glycol. Pak J Life Soc Sci 11:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim YJ, Kim HS, Kang CS, Kim KH, Hyun JN, Kim KJ, Park KH (2013) Effect of additional nitrogen fertilizer application on decreasing of preharvest sprouting in winter wheat. Korean J Environ Agric 58:169–176

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lee SG, Lee H, Lee J, Lee BC, Lee H, Choi C, Chung N (2019) Effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on early growth of wheat cultivars. J Appl Biol Chem 62:247–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liting W, Lina W, Yang Y, Pengfei W, Tiancai G, Guozhang K (2015) Abscisic acid enhances tolerance of wheat seedlings to drought and regulates transcript levels of genes encoding ascorbate-glutathione biosynthesis. Front Plant Sci 6:458

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barrs H, Weatherley P (1962) A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci 15:413–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Benderradji L, Brini F, Amar SB, Kellou K, Azaza J, Masmoudi K, Bouzerzour H, Hanin M (2011) Sodium transport in the seedlings of two bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes showing contrasting salt stress tolerance. Aust J Crop Sci 5:233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheong MS, Yoon Y-E, Kim JW, Hong YK, Kim SC, Lee YB (2020) Chlortetracycline inhibits seed germination and seedling growth in Brassica campestris by disrupting H2O2 signaling. Appl Biol Chem 63:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Khatun M, Hafiz M, Hasan M, Hakim M, Siddiqui M (2013) Responses of wheat genotypes to salt stress in relation to germination and seedling growth. Int J Bio-resour Environ Agric Sci 4:635–640

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hamdy A, Khalifa S, Shawer S, Mancy A (2016) Effect of water stress on the growth, nutritional and biochemical status of two varieties of pomegranate seedlings. Int J Plant Prod 7:1321–1329

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mansori M, Farouk IA, Hsissou M, Kaoua EI (2019) Seaweed extract treatment enhances vegetative growth and antioxidant parameters in water stressed Salvia officinalis L. J Mater Environ Sci 8:756–766

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dhanda S, Sethi G (1998) Inheritance of excised-leaf water loss and relative water content in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). Euphytica 104:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Arjenaki FG, Jabbari R, Morshedi A (2012) Evaluation of drought stress on relative water content, chlorophyll content and mineral elements of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties. Intl J Agri Crop Sci 4:726–729

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar A, Sharma S (2007) Genetics of excised-leaf water loss and relative water content in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cereal Res Commun 35:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant (PJ0124962020) from the Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant (PJ0124962020) from the Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea

    Sang Gyu Lee, Hyeri Lee, Byung Cheon Lee, Hojoung Lee & Namhyun Chung

  2. Odus Co., Eumseong, Chungbuk, 27657, Republic of Korea

    Jun Cheol Moon

  3. National Institute of Crop Science, RDA, Wanju-Gun, Jeollabuk-do, 55365, Republic of Korea

    Changhyun Choi

Authors
  1. Sang Gyu Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hyeri Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Byung Cheon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hojoung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jun Cheol Moon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Changhyun Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Namhyun Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SG performed experiments and wrote the paper. Hyeri and JC helped the preparation of experiments. BC and HJ revised the manuscript. NC and CH edited, revised the manuscript and supervised the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Changhyun Choi or Namhyun Chung.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, S.G., Lee, H., Lee, B.C. et al. Effect of sodium silicate on early growth stages of wheat under drought stress. Appl Biol Chem 63, 48 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-020-00532-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-020-00532-y

Keywords