Skip to main content
Log in

Endovascular reconstruction of iatrogenic internal carotid artery injury following endonasal surgery: a systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to provide an update on endovascular treatments for iatrogenic internal carotid artery (ICA) injuries following endonasal surgery. A systematic review of the literature was performed by using Medline, Cochrane library, and Scopus from 1999 to 2019. We used a combination of the MeSH terms “internal carotid artery,” “iatrogenic disease,” and “endovascular procedure.” Twenty-six articles including 46 patients were identified for in this systematic review. The mean age of the patients was 49 years (CI: ± 4.2). The most common site of ICA injury was in cavernous segment (18 patients; 39%). The most common type of iatrogenic ICA injury was a traumatic pseudoaneurysm documented in 28 patients (60%). Endoluminal reconstruction was performed using covered stents in 28 patients, the Pipeline embolization device (PED) in 13 patients, the Surpass flow diverter device in three, the SILK flow diverter in one, and one case was treated using a combined approach of a covered stent and a PED. Flow diversion and covered stents resulted in a good clinical outcome in 94% and 89% of patients, respectively. This difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 1.0). Even though this systematic review was limited due to articles of small sample sizes and considerable heterogeneity, the results indicate that flow diverting devices and covered stents are good therapeutic options for endoluminal reconstruction of iatrogenic ICA injuries following endonasal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ciric I, Ragin A, Baumgartner C, Pierce D (1997) Complications of trans-sphenoidal surgery: results of a national survey, review of the literature and personal experience. Neurosurgery 40:225–237. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199702000-00001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma A, Kumar S, Deverajan SLJ, Agarwal H (2017) Rarepost-tonsillectomy internal carotid artery pseudo aneurysm: management by parent artery occlusion using detachable balloons. Vasc Endovasc Surg 51(7):506–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538574417723154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aydin E, Gok M, Esenkaya A, Cinar C, Oran I (2018) Endovascular management of iatrogenic vascular injury in the craniocervical region. Turk Neurosurg 28:72–78. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.18189-16.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghorbani M, Shojaei H, Bavnd K, Azar M (2018) Surpass streamline flow-diverter embolization device for treatment of iatrogenic and traumatic internal carotid artery injuries. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39(6):1107–1111. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaloupka JC, Putman CM, Citardi MJ, Ross DA, Sasaki CT (1996) Endovascular therapy for the carotid blow out syndrome in head and neck surgical patients: diagnostic and managerial considerations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17(5):843–852

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Niariai Y, Kawamura Y, Takigawa T, Hyodo A, Suzuki K (2020) Pipeline embolization for an iatrogenic intracranial internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm after transsphenoidal pituitary tumor surgery: case report and review of the literature. Interv Neuroradiol 26(1):74–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199874943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang Y, Tian Z, Li C, Liu J, Zhang Y, Yang X, Zhang Y (2019) A modified endovascular treatment protocol for iatrogenic internal carotid artery injuries following endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Neurosurg 132:343–350. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.8.JNS181048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giorgianni A, Pozzi F, Pellegrino C, Pellegrino C, Padovan S, Karligkiotis A et al (2019) Emergency placement of a flow diverter stent for an iatrogenic internal carotid injury during endoscopic pituitary surgery: case report. World Neurosurg 122:376–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Griauzde J, Ravindra VM, Chaudhary N, Gemmete JJ, Mazur MD, Roark CD, Couldwell WT, Park MS, Taussky P, Pandey AS (2017) Use of the pipeline embolization device in the treatment of iatrogenic intracranial vascular injuries: a bi-institutional experience. Neurosurg Focus 42(6):E9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Karadag A, Kinali B, Ugur O, Oran I, Middlebrooks EH, Senoglu M (2017) A case of pseudo aneurysm of the internal carotid artery following endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery: endovascular treatment with flow diversion stent implantation. Act Med 60(2):89–92. https://doi.org/10.14712/1805964.2017.100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tamura T, Rex DE, Puri AS, Wakhloo AK (2017) Surgical iatrogenic internal carotid injury treated with pipeline embolization device: case report and review of the literature. J Neuroendovasc Therap 11:640–606. https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.cr.2017-0058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sylvester PT, Moran CJ, Derdeyn CP, Cross DT, Dacey RG, Zipfel GJ et al (2016) Endovascular management of internal carotid artery injuries secondary to endonasal surgery: case series and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 125(5):1256–1276. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.6.JNS142483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zanaty M, Chalouhi N, Jabbour P, Stake RM, Hasan D (2015) The unusual angiographic course of intracranial pseudoaneurysms. Asian J Neurosurg 10(4):327–330. https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.162721

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lancu D, Lum C, Ahmed ME, Glikstein R, dos Santos MP, Lesiuk H et al (2015) Flow diversion in the treatment of carotid injury and carotid-cavernous fistula after transsphenoidal surgery. Interv Neuroradiol 21(3):346–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019915582367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nerva JD, Morton RP, Levitt MR, Osbun JW, Ferreira MJ, Ghodke BV, Kim LJ (2015) Pipeline embolization device as primary treatment for blister aneurysms and iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms of the internal carotid artery. J Neurointerv Surg 7(3):210–216. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurointervsurg-2013-011047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Griauzde J, Gemmete JJ, Pandey AS, Mckean EL, Sullivan SE, Chaudhary N (2015) Emergency reconstructive endovascular management of intraoperative complications involving the internal carotid artery from trans-sphenoidal surgery. J Neurointerv Surg 7:67–71. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurointsurg-2013-010878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim BM, Jeon P, Kim DJ, Kim DI, Suh SH, Park KY (2015) Jostent covered stent placement for emergency reconstruction of a ruptured internal carotid artery during or after trans-sphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 122:1223–1228. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.JNS14328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sakhir HJ, Gason AD, Sorkin GC, Mokin M, Eller JL, Dumont TM et al (2014) Combined use of covered stent and flow diversion to seal iatrogenic carotid injury with vessel preservation during transsphenoidal endoscopic resection of clival tumor. Surg Neurol Int 5:e81. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.133638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cinar C, Bozkaya H, Parildar M, Oran I (2013) Endovascular management of vascular injury during transsphenoidal surgery. Interv Neuroradiol 19:102–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalinin PK, Sharipov OI, Shkarubo AN, Fomichev DV, Kutin MA, Alekseev SN, Kadashev BA, Iakovlev SB, Dorokhov PS, Bukharin EIu, Kurnosov AB, Popugaev KA (2013) Damage to the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery upon transsphenoidal endoscopic removal of pituitary adenomas (report of four case). Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko 77(6):28–37

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Amenta PS, Starke RS, Jabbour PM, Tjoumkaris SI, Gonzalea LF, Rosenwasser RH et al (2012) Successful treatment of a traumatic carotid pseudoaneurysm with the pipeline stent: case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int 3:e160. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.105099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Golinelli G, Toso A, Taranto F, Aluffi P, Pia F (2012) Delayed carotid pseudo-aneurysm: a life threatening complication after endoscopic sinus surgery. J Craniofac Surg 23(6):1822–1824. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b01e318271052f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dong X, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Yu J (2012) Endovascular stent-graft placement for an iatrogenic internal carotid artery pseudo-aneurysm following transsphenoidal surgery. Neurol India 60(6):670–672. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.105220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghatge SB, Modi DB (2010) Treatment of ruptured ICA during transsphenoidal surgery. Interv Neuroradiol 16(1):31–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/159101991001600104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lippert BM, Ringel K, Stoeter P, Hey O, Mann WJ (2007) Stent graft implantation for treatment of internal carotid artery injury during endonasal sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 21(4):520–524. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leung GK, Auyeung KM, Lui WM, Fan YW (2006) Emergency placement of a self-expandable covered stent for carotid artery injury during trans-sphenoidal surgery. Br J Neurosurg 20(1):55–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ciceri EF, Renga-Gladin C, Erbetta A, Chiapparini L, Nappini S, Savoiardo M et al (2006) Iatrogenic intracranial pseudoaneurysms: neuroradiological and therapeutical considerations, including endovascular options. Neurol Sci 27:317–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-006-0703-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. De Souza JM, Domingues FS, Espinosa G, Gadelha M (2003) Cavernous carotid artery pseudo-aneurysm treated by stenting in acromegalic patient. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 61(2B):459–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vannien RL, Manninen HI, Rinne J (2003) Intrasellar iatrogenic carotid pseudoaneurysm: endovascular treatment with a polytetrafluoroethylene covered stent. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26(3):298–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kocer N, Kizilkilic O, Albayram S, Adaleti I, Kantarci F, Isak C (2002) Treatment of iatrogenic internal carotid artery laceration and carotid cavernous fistula with endovascular stent-graft placement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23(3):442–446

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Laws ER Jr (1999) Vascular complications of transsphenoidal surgery. Pituitary 2(2):163–170. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009951917649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghorbani M, Azar M, Shojaei H (2018) A helical shape anatomical variation of carotid siphon: a case report. J Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2018.10.008

  33. Valentine R, Wormald PJ (2011) Carotid artery injury after endonasal surgery. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 21(2):109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2011.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mencken GS, Wholey MH, Eles GR (1998) Use of coronary artery stents in the treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis at the skull. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 45(4):434–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Li MH, Li YD, Gao BL, Fang C, Luo QI, Cheng YS et al (2007) A new covered stent designed for intracranial vasculature: application in the management of pseudoaneurysm of the cranial internal carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28(8):1579–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Maras D, Lioupis C, Magoufis G, Tsamopoulos N, Moulakakis K, AndrikOpoulos V (2006) Covered stent graft treatment of traumatic internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms: a review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29:958–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ghorbani M, Griessenauer CJ, Wipplinger C, Azar M, Shojaei H, Bavand K, Khosravi D (2019) Flow diverter embolization device for endovascular treatment of rupture blister and wide neck aneurysms. Heliyon 5:e02241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02241

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen SH, McCarthy DJ, Sheinberg D, Hanel R, Sur S, Jabbour P et al (2019) Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of intracranial pseudoaneurysms. World Neurosurg 127:e86–e93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rajah G, Naayanan S, Rangel-Castilla L (2017) Update on flow diverters for the endovascular management of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus 42:E2. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS16427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wakhloo AK, Lylyk P, de Vires J, Taschner C, Lundquist J, Biondi A et al (2015) Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:98–107. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4078

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Shankar JJ, Tampieri D, Lancu D, Cortes M, Agid R, Krings T et al (2016) SILK flow diverter for complex intracranial aneurysms: a Canadian registery. J Neurointerv Surg 8:273–278. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamidreza Shojaei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghorbani, M., Griessenauer, C.J., Shojaei, H. et al. Endovascular reconstruction of iatrogenic internal carotid artery injury following endonasal surgery: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev 44, 1797–1804 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01379-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01379-z

Keywords

Navigation