Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility Study of Beam Angle Optimization for Proton Treatment Planning Using a Genetic Algorithm

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study describes a method that uses a genetic algorithm to select optimal beam angles in proton therapy and evaluates the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in actual patients. In the use of the genetic algorithm to select the optimal angle, a gene represents the angle of each field and a chromosome represents the combination of beam angles. The fitness of the genetic algorithm, which represents the suitability of the chromosome to the solution, was quantified by using the dose distribution. The weighting factors of the organs used for fitness were obtained from clinical data through logistic regression, reflecting the dose characteristics of actual patients. Genetic operations, such as selection, crossover, mutation, and replacement, were used to modify the population and were repeated until an evaluation based on fitness reached the termination criterion. The proposed genetic algorithm was tested by assessing its ability to select optimal beam angles in three patients with liver cancer. The optimal results for fitness, planning target volume (PTV), normal liver, and skin in the population were compared with the clinical treatment plans, a process that took an average of 36.8 minutes. The dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and the fitness of the genetic algorithm plans did not differ significantly from the actual treatment plans. These findings indicate that the proposed genetic algorithm can automatically generate proton treatment plans with the same quality as actual clinical treatment plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. X. Zhang et al., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 67, 620 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. C. Weber et al., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 63, 401 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Noel et al., Strahlenther. Onkol. 178, 480 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Nihei, T. Ogino, S. Ishikura and H. Nishimura, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 65, 107 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. X. Wang et al., Med. Dosim. 33, 259 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Chiba et al., Clin. Cancer Res. 11, 3799 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Mizumoto et al., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 82, e529 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. J. Gandhi et al., Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 5, 209 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Grégoire et al., ICRU report no. 83, J ICRU 10, NP (2010).

  10. S. L. Berry et al., Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 6, 442 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. K. L. Moore et al., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 92, 228 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. X. Wang et al., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 60, 1325 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Djajaputra, Q. Wu, Y. Wu and R. Mohan, Phys. Med. Biol. 48, 3191 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Li, J. Yao and D. Yao, Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 1915 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Lahanas, D. Baltas and N. Zamboglou, Phys. Med. Biol. 48, 399 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Nicolae et al., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 97, 822 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Zhang, D. Dean, A. Metzger and C. Sibata, Med. Phys. 28, 1746 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Alfonso, M. Herrero and L. Nunez, Radiat. Oncol. 10, 263 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Söderström and A. Brahme, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 33, 151 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Stein et al., Med.Phys. 24, 149 (1997).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2018R1D1A1B07047770), and by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) of the Korea government (NRF-2019R1F1A1063910).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Myonggeun Yoon or Kwangzoo Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seo, J., Jo, Y., Moon, S. et al. Feasibility Study of Beam Angle Optimization for Proton Treatment Planning Using a Genetic Algorithm. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 77, 312–316 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.77.312

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.77.312

Keywords

Navigation