Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimation of sediment load for Himalayan Rivers: Case study of Kaligandaki in Nepal

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Himalayan regions have increasing sediment yield due to undulating topography, slope and improper watershed management. However, due to limited observation data, and site accessibility issues, less studies have quantified sedimentation loads in the Himalayas, especially Nepal. This has hindered the investments on run-of-river hydropower projects as high and unpredicted sedimentation has increased losses in hydropower production. Therefore, there is a need to understand key physical processes driving sedimentation in these regions, with the available data. This study used the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to estimate the sedimentation yields in the Kaligandaki basin of Nepal, which is an important tributary that drains into the Ganges. Multi-source data from field observations, remote sensing platforms, surveys and government records were used to set up and run the SWAT model for the Kaligandaki basin from 2000 to 2009. Results for the 10-year model run indicate that 73% of the total sediment load is estimated to come from the upstream regions (also known as High Himalayan region), while only 27% is contributed from the Middle and High Mountain regions (where land management-based interventions were deemed most feasible for future scenarios). The average sediment concentration was 1986 mg/kg (ppm), with values of 8432 and 12 mg/kg (ppm) for maximum and minimum, respectively. Such high sedimentation rates can impact river ecosystems (due to siltation), ecosystem services and hydropower generation. In addition, model results indicate the need for better high frequency observation data. Results from this study can aid in better watershed management, which is aimed at reducing sedimentation load and protecting Himalayan rivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbaspour C K 2009 SWAT-CUP2 User Manual; http://www.eawag.ch/organisation/abteilungen/siam/software/swat/index_EN.

  • Annandale G W, Morris G L and Karki P 2016 Extending the Life of Reservoirs; Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold J G and Fohrer N 2000 SWAT2000: Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling; Hydrol. Process. 19 563–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basnet P, Balla M K and Pradhan B M 2012 Landslide hazard zonation, mapping and investigation of triggering factors in Phewa lake watershed, Nepal; Banko Janakari: J. For. Inf. Nepal 22(1) 43–52, https://doi.org/10.3126/banko.v22i2.9198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhetri A, Kayastha R B and Shrestha A 2016 Assessment of sediment load of Langtang River in Rasuwa District, Nepal; J. Water Resour. Prot. 8(1) 84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinnasamy P 2017a Depleting groundwater – an opportunity for flood storage? A case study from part of the Ganges River basin, India; Hydrol. Res. 48(2) 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinnasamy P 2017b Inference of basin flood potential using nonlinear hysteresis effect of basin water storage: Case study of the Koshi basin; Hydrol. Res. 48(6) 1554–1565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinnasamy P and Shrestha S R 2019 Melamchi water supply project: Potential to replenish Kathmandu’s groundwater status for dry season access; Water Policy 21(S1) 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinnasamy P, Bharati L, Bhattarai U, Khadka A, Dahal V and Wahid S 2015 Impact of planned water resource development on current and future water demand in the Koshi River basin, Nepal; Water Int. 40(7) 1004–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colchen M, Le Fort P and Pêcher A 1986 Geological researches in the Nepal’s Himalaya (Annapurna-Manaslu-Ganesh Himal); Notice of the geological map on 1(200).

  • Devkota K C, Regmi A D and Pourghasemi H R et al. 2013 Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling–Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya; Nat. Hazards 65 135, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0347-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkshoorn J A and Huting J R M 2009 Soil and terrain database for Nepal; Report 2009/01 (http://www.isric.org), ISRIC – World Soil Information, Wageningen.

  • Department of Irrigation (DoI) 2009 Agricultural Database for Nepal; Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas-Mankin K R, Srinivasan R and Arnold J G 2010 Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model: current developments and applications; Trans. ASABE 53(5) 1423–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte A F and Gioda A 2014 Inorganic composition of suspended sediments in the Acre River, Amazon Basin, Brazil; Lat. Am. J. Sedim. Basin Anal. 21(1) 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger J, Bajrachaya S, Egger U, Heinrich R, Reuder J, Shayka P, Wendt H and Wirth V 2000 Diurnal winds in the Himalayan Kali Gandaki valley. Part I: observations; Mon. Weather Rev. 128(4) 1106–1122.

  • Fort M 2000 Glaciers and mass wasting processes: Their influence on the shaping of the Kali Gandaki valley (higher Himalaya of Nepal); Quat. Int. 65 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautam S, Dahal V and Bhattarai R 2019 Impacts of Dem source, resolution and area threshold values on SWAT generated stream network and streamflow in two distinct Nepalese catchments; Environ. Process. 6(3) 597–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghimere M 2011 Landslide occurrence and its relation with terrain factors in the Siwalik Hills, Nepal: Case study of susceptibility assessment in three basins; Nat. Hazards 56 299–320, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9569-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen M C, Potapov P V, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova S A, Tyukavina A, Thau D, Stehman S V, Goetz S J, Loveland T R, Kommareddy A, Egorov A, Chini L, Justice C O and Townshend J R 2013 High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change; Science 342 850–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICIMOD 1996 Climatic and Hydrographical Atlas of Nepal; International Centre for Mountain Development, 261p.

  • Jain S K, Jain S K, Jain N and Xu C Y 2017 Hydrologic modelling of a Himalayan mountain basin by using the SWAT model; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-100.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koirala R, Thapa B, Neopane H P, Zhu B and Chhetry B 2016 Sediment erosion in guide vanes of Francis turbine: A case study of Kaligandaki Hydropower Plant, Nepal; Wear 362 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupker M, France-Lanord C, Galy V, Lavé J, Gaillardet J, Gajurel A P, Guilmette C, Rahman M, Singh S K and Sinha R 2012 Predominant floodplain over mountain weathering of Himalayan sediments (Ganga basin); Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 84 410–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriasi D N, Arnold J G, Van Liew M W, Bingner R L, Harmel R D and Veith T L 2007 Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations; Trans. ASABE 50(3) 885–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris G L 2014 Sediment management and sustainable use of reservoirs; In: Modern Water Resources Engineering, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp. 279–337.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Muthuwatta L, Amarasinghe U A, Sood A and Lagudu S 2015 Reviving the ‘Ganges Water Machine’: Where and how much?. HESSD 12(9) 9741–9763.

    Google Scholar 

  • NASA 2001 ASTER DEM Product. NASA LP DAAC, https://doi.org/10.5067/ASTER/AST14DEM.003.

  • Nash J E and Sutcliffe J V 1970 River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I: A discussion of principles; J. Hydrol. 10 282–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch S L, Arnold J G, Kiniry J R, Williams J R and King K W 2002 Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation, Version 2000, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX and Blackland Research Center, Temple, TX.

  • Pantha B R, Yatabe R and Bhandary N P 2008 GIS-based landslide susceptibility zonation for roadside slope repair and maintenance in the Himalayan region; Episodes J. Int. Geosci. 31(4), http://www.episodes.org/index.php/epi/article/view/64311/50268.

  • Sangroula D P 2009 Hydropower development and its sustainability with respect to sedimentation in Nepal; J. Inst. Eng. 7(1) 56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha D P 2000 Aspects of Erosion and Sedimentation in the Nepalese Himalaya: Highland-Lowland Relations; ICIMOD Publications, Kathmandu, Nepal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha S, Shrestha M and Shrestha P K 2017 Evaluation of the SWAT model performance for simulating river discharge in the Himalayan and tropical basins of Asia; Hydrol. Res. 49(3) 846–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh V, Sharma A and Goyal M K 2019 Projection of hydro-climatological changes over eastern Himalayan catchment by the evaluation of RegCM4 RCM and CMIP5 GCM models; Hydrol. Res. 50(1) 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struck M, Andermann C, Hovius N, Korup O, Turowski J M, Bista R, Pandit H P and Dahal R K 2015 Monsoonal hill slope processes determine grain size-specific suspended sediment fluxes in a trans-Himalayan river; Geophys. Res. Lett. 42(7) 2302–2308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa B S, Thapa B and Dahlhaug O G 2012 Empirical modelling of sediment erosion in Francis turbines; Energy 41(1) 386–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thenkabail P S, Biradar C M, Turral H, Noojipady P, Li Y J, Dheeravath V, Cai X L, Velpuri M, Vithanage J, Schull M and Dutta R 2009 A global irrigated area map (GIAM) using time-series satellite sensor, secondary, Google Earth, and Groundtruth data; Int. J. Remote Sens. 30(14) 3679–3733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J, Joseph S, Thrivikramji K P and Arunkumar K S 2014 Sensitivity of digital elevation models: The scenario from two tropical mountain river basins of the Western Ghats, India; Geosci. Front. 5(6) 893–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank 2017 Nepal–Kali Gandaki: A Hydropower Plant Rehabilitation Project (English); World Bank Group, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank World Bank for the funds to this project, and the World Bank team led by Urvashi Narain. We would like to extend special thanks to the experts and stakeholders who provided assistance with data and knowledge of local conditions and who attended stakeholder consultation meetings in March and September 2016. These include staff from the Nepal Electricity Authority, Department of Roads, Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management, Syanja District Soil Conservation Office, Ministry of Agriculture, World Wildlife Fund – Nepal, World Bank – Nepal, and Institute of Engineering, Pulchowk Campus. Special thanks to the project team, Zhiyun Jiang, Annu Rajbhandari, Adrian Vogl and Stacy Wolny. Gratitude is also extended to Lal Muthuwatta and Vladimir Smakhtin for their valuable feedback and sharing modelling expertise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pennan Chinnasamy.

Additional information

Communicated by C Gnanaseelan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chinnasamy, P., Sood, A. Estimation of sediment load for Himalayan Rivers: Case study of Kaligandaki in Nepal. J Earth Syst Sci 129, 181 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-01437-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-01437-6

Keywords

Navigation