Skip to main content
Log in

A Brief Review on the Application of Sound in Pavement Monitoring and Comparison of Tire/Road Noise Processing Methods for Pavement Macrotexture Assessment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data acquisition and data processing are at the core of pavement management systems. Nowadays, traditional methods of data collection are rarely used in developed countries due to the considerable disadvantages of the traditional methods compared to the automated ones, such as the slow pace of data collection, endangering the safety of the human operators collecting the data, considerable cost, collecting data from only a limited section of road networks, and inconsistency among the data collected by different operators. In contrast, automated methods alleviate the majority of these problems. However, the main drawback of the automated methods is the high cost of purchase, implementation, and maintenance of the equipment, which has deterred their use in developing countries with limited financial resources. To address this problem, developing a new automated method that reduces the production costs while keeping the required accuracy and performance seems imperative. The goal of this research is to investigate the use of microphones, as inexpensive equipment with acceptable accuracy, for collecting pavement macrotexture data, which is an input to the pavement management system. The proposed method is based on the tire/road interaction noise. To this end, a review of the previous researches on audio-based monitoring of various pavement features is presented. By considering the results of the related researches and the goals of this work, a new setup for data collection and an accompanying signal processing method is proposed. To develop and evaluate the proposed method, data from six standard road sections of a test field are collected. To process the collected data, PCA, Cepstrum, LPC, LSF, PSD, and Wavelet methods are employed. The SVM and KNN classification methods are used to evaluate the results of the signal processing step, which is performed in various frequency bands. The best results are obtained by using the Cepstrum signal processing method along with the SVM classifier in the 3000–5000 Hz frequency band resulting in an accuracy of 95% on the test data and the precision error of 1%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. PIARC (2015) State of the art in monitoring road condition, 1–70. https://www.piarc.org/en/order-library/25113-en-State of the art in monitoring road condition and road/vehicle interaction.htm (accessed February 1, 2017)

  2. PIARC (2004) Road Safety manual, https://roadsafety.piarc.org/en (accessed July 8, 2017)

  3. Flintsch G, de León E, McGhee K, AI-Qadi I (2003) Pavement surface macrotexture measurement and applications. Transp Res Rec 1860:168–177. https://doi.org/10.3141/1860-19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith HA (1977) Pavement contributions to wet-weather skidding accident reduction, Transportation Research Record. pp 51–59. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1976/622/622-004.pdf (accessed March 1, 2016)

  5. Saykin VV, Zhang Y, Cao Y, Wang ML, McDaniel JG (2012) Pavement macrotexture monitoring through sound generated by tire-pavement interaction. J Eng Mech 139:264–271. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Y, Mcdaniel JG, Wang ML (2013) Estimation of pavement macrotexture by principal component analysis of acoustic measurements. J Transp Eng 140:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Masino J, Foitzik M-J, Frey M, Gauterin F (2017) Pavement type and wear condition classification from tire cavity acoustic measurements with artificial neural networks. J Acoust Soc Am 141:4220–4229. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4983757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Masino J, Pinay J, Reischl M, Gauterin F (2017) Road surface prediction from acoustical measurements in the tire cavity using support vector machine. Appl Acoust 125:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mendes R, Trichês G, Vergara EF, Gerges SNY (2019) Characterization of tire-road noise from Brazilian roads using the CPX trailer method. Appl Acoust 151:206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ganji MR, Golroo A, Sheikhzadeh H, Ghelmani A (2019) Dense-graded asphalt pavement macrotexture measurement using tire/road noise monitoring. Autom Constr 106:102887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reza M, Ghelmani A, Golroo A, Sheikhzadeh H (2020) Mean texture depth measurement with an acoustical-based apparatus using cepstral signal processing and support vector machine. Appl Acoust 161:107168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Y, McDaniel JG, Wang ML (2015) Pavement macrotexture measurement using tire/road noise. J Civil Struct Health Monit 5:253–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-015-0100-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao Y, Wu HF, McDaniel JG, Wang ML, Evaluating road surface conditions using tire generated noise. In: Proceeding SPIE 8694, nondestructive characterization for composite materials, aerospace engineering, civil infrastructure, and homeland security, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2012269

  14. Ramos-romero C, León-ríos P, Al-hadithi BM, Sigcha L, De Arcas G, Asensio C (2019) Identification and mapping of asphalt surface deterioration by tyre-pavement interaction noise measurement. Measurement 146:718–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.06.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mednis A, Strazdins G, Liepins M, Gordjusins A, Selavo L, RoadMic (2010) Road Surface Monitoring Using Vehicular Sensor Networks with Microphones. In: International conference on networked digital technologies, Springer, Heidelberg: pp 417–429

  16. Masino J, Wohnhas B, Frey M, Gauterin F (2017) Identification and prediction of road features and their contribution on tire road noise. WSEAS Trans Syst Control 12:201–212

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fedele R, Pratico FG, Carotenuto R, Giuseppe Della Corte F (2017) Instrumented infrastructures for damage detection and management, in: 5th IEEE international conference on models and technologies for intelligent transportation systems (MT-ITS), IEEE, pp 526–531. https://doi.org/10.1109/mtits.2017.8005729

  18. Paje SE, Bueno M, Terán F, Viñuela U (2007) Monitoring road surfaces by close proximity noise of the tire/road interaction. J Acoust Soc Am 122:2636–2641. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2766777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paulo JP, Coelho JLB, Figueiredo MAT (2010) Statistical classification of road pavements using near field vehicle rolling noise measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 128(2010):1747–1754. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3466870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kongrattanaprasert W, Nomura H, Kamakura T, Ueda K (2010) Detection of road surface states from tire noise using neural network analysis. IEEJ Trans Ind Appl 130:920–925. https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejias.130.920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yunha K, Oh S, Hori Y (2010) Road condition estimation using acoustic method for electric vehicles. In: 10th FISITA Student Congress

  22. Alonso J, López JM, Pavón I, Recuero M, Asensio C, Arcas G, Bravo A (2014) On-board wet road surface identification using tyre/road noise and Support Vector Machines. Appl Acoust 76:407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ishihama M, Matsumoto K, Miyoshi K, Yoshii K, Kanda M (2016) Tire cavity sound measurement for identifying characters of road surfaces and tire structures. In: INTER-NOISE 2016—45th international congress and exposition on noise control engineering: towards a quieter future, pp 7017–7027

  24. Doğan D (2017) Road-Types classification using audio signal processing and SVM method. In: 25th signal processing and communications applications conference (SIU), IEEE, 2017: pp 3–6

  25. David J, Van Hauwermeiren L, Wout Dekoninck, De Pessemier Toon W, Joseph, Filipan K, De Coensel D, Bert Botteldooren, Martens L (2019) Rolling-noise-relevant classification of pavement based on opportunistic sound and vibration monitoring in cars, In: INTER-NOISE 2019, Spain, Madrid

  26. Dogan D, Boyraz P (2019) Smart traction control systems for electric vehicles using acoustic road-type estimation. IEEE Trans Intell Veh 4(3):486–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Atibi M, Atouf I, Boussaa M, Bennis A (2016) Comparison between the MFCC and DWT applied to the roadway classification. In: 7th international conference on computer science and information technology (CSIT), IEEE, 2016, pp 1–6

  28. Hayashi K, Shin S (2008) Road type estimation by wavelet analysis of running tire sound. In: Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on wavelet analysis and pattern recognition, pp 30–31 https://doi.org/10.1109/icwapr.2008.4635859

  29. Akama S, Tabaru T, Shin S (2004) Bayes estimation of road surface using road noise, In: 30th annual conference of the IEEE industrial electronics society, https://doi.org/10.1109/iecon.2004.1432274

  30. Zofka A, Maliszewski M, Zofka E, Mechowski T (2017) Pavement assessment using on-board sound intensity system. In: 10th International Conference, Environmental Engineering, pp. 27–28

  31. Johnsson R, Odelius J (2012) Methods for road texture estimation using vehicle measurements. In: International conference on noise and vibration engineering, pp 1573–1582

  32. Boyraz P (2014) Acoustic road-type estimation for intelligent vehicle safety applications. Int J Veh Saf 7:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhao R, Gregory J, Ming L, Estimation IRI, Probabilistic U (2016) IRI estimation using probabilistic analysis of acoustic measurements. Mater Perform Charact 2:339–359. https://doi.org/10.1520/MPC20130018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ambrosini L, Gabrielli L, Vesperini F, Squartini S, Cattani L (2018) Deep neural networks for road surface roughness classification from acoustic signals In: Audio Engineering Society Convention, Milan, Italy

  35. Lu Y, Zhang Y, Cao Y, Mcdaniel JG, Wang ML (2013) A mobile acoustic subsurface sensing (MASS) system for rapid roadway assessment. Sensors 13:5881–5896. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130505881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ibarra D, Ramírez-Mendoza R, Ibarra S (2016) Characterization of the road surfaces in real time. Appl Acoust 105:93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.10.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Groschup R, Grosse CU (2016) Development of an efficient air-coupled impact—echo scanner for concrete pavements. In: World conference on non-destructive testing, Munich, Germany

  38. Moghadas Nejad F, Karimi S, Zakeri H (2019) A brief review on acoustic analysis in quality evaluation and a new method for determining bulk density of aggregate. Arch Comput Methods Eng 26(5):1577–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ryden N, Lowe MJS, Cawley P (2009) Non-contact surface wave testing of pavements using a rolling microphone array. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, Nantes, France

  40. Bjurström H, Ryden N, Bjurström H (2017) Non-contact rolling surface wave measurements on asphalt concrete. Road Mater Pavement Des 20:334–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1390491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mioduszewski P, Gardziejczyk W (2016) Inhomogeneity of low-noise wearing courses evaluated by tire/road noise measurements using the close-proximity method. Appl Acoust 111:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sandberg U, Bühlmann E, Conter M, Mioduszewski P (2016) Improving the CPX method by specifying reference tyres and including corrections for rubber hardness and temperature. In: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON congress and conference proceedings., Institute of noise control engineering, Hamburg, pp 4913–4923 http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1049612&dswid=9956 (accessed June 1, 2017)

  43. ISO 11819-2 (2017) Acoustics: measurement of the influence of road surfaces on traffic noise: part 2: the close-proximity method https://www.iso.org/standard/39675.html (accessed June 2, 2017)

  44. AASHTO TP 76 (2015) Standard method of test for measurement of tire/pavement noise using the on-board sound intensity (OBSI) Method https://standards.globalspec.com/std/9945275/AASHTO TP 76 (accessed July 12, 2017)

  45. Masino J, Daubner B, Frey M, Gauterin F (2016) Development of a tire cavity sound measurement system for the application of field operational tests. In: 10th Annual International Systems Conference, SysCon 2016—Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1109/syscon.2016.7490624

  46. Sandberg U, Ejsmont JA (2002) Tyre/road noise reference book, 2002. isbn: 91-631-2610-9

  47. Kuijpers A, van Blokland G (2001) Tyre/road noise models in the last two decades: a critical evaluation. In: Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2001, The Hague, Holland. 2494

  48. Dare TP (2013) Generation mechanisms of tire-pavement noise, https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dissertations/AAI3544123/ (accessed April 3, 2018)

  49. ASTM E965-15 (2015) Standard test method for measuring pavement macrotexture depth using a volumetric technique, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org

  50. IS013473-1 (1997) Characterization of pavement texture by use of surface profiles - Part 1: Determination of Mean Profile Depth. https://www.iso.org/standard/25637.html (accessed April 10, 2017)

  51. Casella G, Fienberg S, Olkin I (2013) An introduction to statistical learning, vol 1. springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peva.2007.06.006

    Book  Google Scholar 

  52. Truchetet F, Laligant O (2008) Review of industrial applications of wavelet and multiresolution-based signal and image processing. J Electr Imag doi 10(1117/1):2957606

    Google Scholar 

  53. John J, Deller R, Hansen JHL, Proakis JG (1993) Discrete-Time processing of speech signals, Prentice Hall PTR. isbn: 978-0780353862

  54. Welch PD (1967) The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust 15:70–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lawrence B-HJ (1993) Fundamental of Speech Recognition. Prentice-hall International, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Mohammad Arbabpour and Mr. Mohammad Ali Ghasemiyeh for their help in developing the measurement platform.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Golroo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ganji, M.R., Ghelmani, A., Golroo, A. et al. A Brief Review on the Application of Sound in Pavement Monitoring and Comparison of Tire/Road Noise Processing Methods for Pavement Macrotexture Assessment. Arch Computat Methods Eng 28, 2977–3000 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09484-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09484-4

Navigation