Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding what we cannot see: a genetic approach to the mating system of the Southern Lanternshark, Etmopterus granulosus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Southern Lanternshark, Etmopterus granulosus, is a deep-sea shark commonly found throughout the oceans of the southern hemisphere and frequently caught as bycatch in deep-sea fisheries. Despite its common occurrence, little is known about this species’ life history and reproductive biology. Here, we develop species-specific microsatellite markers to better understand the mating system of E. granulosus. Eighteen litters were opportunistically collected as bycatch along the Madagascar Ridge, Walter’s Shoal, and Southern Indian Ocean Ridge. Novel microsatellite loci were used to test for the presence and frequency of multiple paternity and morphological data were obtained from mothers to examine whether litter size or polyandry correlated with female size. Multiple paternity was found in 33% of litters, but no significant relationship between either litter size or the occurrence of polyandry and female size was found, although some adult individuals were found to have high internal relatedness. The frequency of multiple paternity in conjunction with these other factors could be indicators of mating between relatives or a reduction in population size due to fishing pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Photo credit M. Nehmens

Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Photos credit M. Nehmens

Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in GenBank repository. GenBank accession numbers included in Table 1.

References

  • Amos W, Worthington Wilmer J, Fullard K, Burg TM, Croxall JP, Bloch D, Coulson T (2001) The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2021–2027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baremore IE, Passerotti MS (2013) Reproduction of the blacktip shark in the Gulf of Mexico. Mar Coast Fish 5:127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1995) Extra-pair copulation and extra-pair paternity in birds. Anim Behav 49:843–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80217-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Pizzari T (2002) Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nat Rev Genet 3:262–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne RJ, Avise JC (2011) Genetic mating system of the brown smoothhound shark (Mustelus henlei), including a literature review of multiple paternity in other elasmobranch species. Mar Biol 159(4):749–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1851-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle A, King A, Cailliet GM, Brennan JS (2007) Long-term trends in catch composition from elasmobranch derbies in Elkhorn Slough, California. Mar Fish Rev 69:25–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DD, Prodohl PA, Gelsleichter J, Manire CA, Shivji MS (2004) Predominance of genetic monogamy by females in a hammerhead shark, Sphyrna tiburo: implications for shark conservation. Mol Ecol 13:1965–1974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clerkin PJ (2017) Life history aspects and taxonomy of deep-sea Chondrichthyans in the southwestern Indian Ocean. San Jose State University, San Jose

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho R, Fernandez-Carvalho J, Lino PG, Santos MN (2012) An overview of the hooking mortality of elasmobranchs caught in a swordfish pelagic longline fishery in the Atlantic Ocean. Aquat Living Resour 25:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daley R, Stevens J, Graham K (2002) Catch analysis and productivity of the deepwater dogfish resource in southern Australia. Report by CSIRO Marine Research and NSW Fisheries to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. FRDC Project 1998/108

  • Daly-Engel TS, Grubbs RD, Feldheim KA, Bowen BW, Toonen RJ (2010) Is multiple mating beneficial or unavoidable? Low multiple paternity and genetic diversity in the shortspine spurdog Squalus mitsukurii. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 403:255–267. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DiBattista JD, Feldheim KA, Gruber SH, Hendry AP (2008) Are indirect genetic benefits associated with polyandry? Testing predictions in a natural population of lemon sharks. Mol Ecol 17:783–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon A, Ross D, O’Malley SLC, Burke T (1994) Paternal investment inversely related to degree of extra-pair paternity in the reed bunting. Nature 371:698–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchatelet L, Oury N, Mallefet J, Magalon H (2020) In the intimacy of the darkness: genetic polyandry in deep-sea luminescent lanternsharks Etmopterus spinax and Etmopterus molleri (Squaliformes, Etmopteridae). J Fish Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon CL, Blower DC, Broderick D, Giles JL, Holmes BJ, Kashiwagi T, Krück NC, Morgan JAT, Tillett BJ, Ovenden JR (2012) A review of the application of molecular genetics for fisheries management and conservation of sharks and rays. J Fish Biol 80:1789–1843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03265.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duran N, Dunbar S, Escobar R, Standish T (2015) High frequency of multiple paternity in a solitary population of olive ridley sea turtles in Honduras. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 463:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2014.10.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert DA (2015) Deep–sea cartilaginous fishes of the southeastern Atlantic Ocean. FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes No. 9, Rome, FAO, pp 251

  • Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) (2020) ArcGIS Pro Desktop v 2.5.2. Oceans [basemap]. Esri, Garmin, GEBCO, NOAA NGDC, and other contributors, Redlands, CA

  • Feldheim KA, Gruber SH, Ashley MV (2001) Population genetic structure of the lemon shark (Negaprion brevirostris) in the western Atlantic: DNA microsatellite variation. Mol Ecol 10:295–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feldheim KA, Gruber SH, Ashley MV (2004) Reconstruction of parental microsatellite genotypes reveals female polyandry and philopatry in the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris. Evolution 58:2332–2342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finucci B, Lamilla J (2018) Etmopterus granulosus. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2018: e.T116856245A3120311. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T116856245A3120311.en. Downloaded on 02 February 2019

  • Finucci B, Dunn MR, Jones EG (2018) Aggregations and associations in deep-sea chondrichthyans. ICES Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frasier TR (2008) STORM: software for testing hypotheses of relatedness and mating patterns. Mol Ecol Resour 8:1263–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garza JC, Williamson EG (2001) Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol 10:305–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn TC, Schable NA (2005) Isolating microsatellite DNA loci. Methods Enzymol 395:202–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez S, Duffy C, Francis MP, Ritche PA (2014) Evidence for multiple paternity in the school shark Galeorhinus galeus found in New Zealand waters. J Fish Biol 85:1739–1745. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jirik KE, Lowe CG (2012) An elasmobranch maternity ward: female round stingrays Urobatis halleri use warm, restored estuarine habitat during gestation. J Fish Biol 80:1227–1245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AG (2001) GERUD1.0: a computer program for the reconstruction of parental genotypes from progeny arrays using multilocus DNA data. Mol Ecol Notes 1:215–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones OR, Wang J (2010) COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data. Mol Ecol Resour 10:551–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AG, Small CM, Paczolt KA, Ratterman NL (2010) A practical guide to methods of parentage analysis. Mol Ecol Resour 10:6–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptation for breeding in birds. Methuen Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lage CR, Petersen CW, Forest D, Barnes D, Kornfield I, Wray C (2008) Evidence of multiple paternity in spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) broods based on microsatellite analysis. J Fish Biol 73:2068–2074. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02065.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons K, Chabot C, Mull C, Paterson Holder CN, Lowe CG (2017) Who’s My Daddy? Considerations for the influence of sexual selection on multiple paternity in elasmobranch mating systems. Ecol Evol 7:5603–5612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox DJ, Feldheim KA (2014) A cost-effective size standard for fragment analysis that maximizes throughput on five dye set platforms. Conserv Genet Resour 6:5–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maduna SN, Van Wyk JH, Da Silva C, Gennari E, Bester-Van Der Merwe AE (2018) Evidence for sperm storage in common smoothhound shark Mustelus mustelus and paternity assessment in a single litter from South Africa. J Fish Biol 92:1183–1191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mourier J, Buray N, Schultz JK, Clua E, Planes S (2013) Genetic network and breeding patterns of a sicklefin lemon shark (Negaprion acutidens) population in the Society Islands, French Polynesia. PLoS One 8:e73899. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pankhurst NW, McMillan J, Tracey DM (1987) Seasonal reproductive cycles in three commercially exploited fishes from the slope waters off New Zealand. J Fish Biol 30:193–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearse DE, Janzen FJ, Avise JC (2001) Genetic markers substantiate long-term storage and utilization of sperm by female painted turtles. Heredity 86:378–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pirog A, Jaquemet S, Soria M, Magalon H (2015) First evidence of multiple paternity in the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas). Mar Freshw Res 68:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf15255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TJ, Morato T, Hart PJB, Clark MR, Haggan N, Santos RS (2007) Sea-mounts: ecology, fisheries, and conservation, vol 12. Black-well, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Portnoy DS, Piercy AN, Musick JA, Burgess GH, Graves JE (2007) Genetic polyandry and sexual conflict in the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, in the western North Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico. Mol Ecol 16:187–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt HL Jr (1993) The storage of spermatozoa in the oviducal glands of Western North Atlantic sharks. Environ Biol Fishes 38:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) Genepop (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Heredity 86:248–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw C, Wintner SP, Bester-Van Der Merwe AE (2016) Assessing multiple paternity in three commercially exploited shark species: Mustelus mustelus, Carcharhinus obscurus and Sphyrna lewini. J Fish Biol 89:1125–1141. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments: a poor man’s approach to genotyping for research and high-throughput diagnostics. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sefc KM, Koblmüller S (2009) Assessing parent numbers from offspring genotypes: the importance of marker polymorphism. Heredity 100:197–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esn095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Straube N, Kriwet J, Schliewen UK (2011) Cryptic diversity and species assignment of large lantern sharks of the Etmopterus spinax clade from the Southern Hemisphere (Squaliformes, Etmopteridae). Zool Scr 40:61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veríssimo A, Grubbs RD, McDowell J, Musick J, Portnoy D (2011) Frequency of Multiple Paternity in the Spiny Dogfish Squalus acanthias in the Western North Atlantic. Heredity 102:88–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esq084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2004) Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics 166:1963–1979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Sherman PW, Morton ML (1990) The ecology and evolution of extra-pair copulations in birds. Curr Ornithol 7:331–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue GH, Chang A (2010) Molecular evidence for high frequency of multiple paternity in a freshwater shrimp species Caridina ensifera. PLoS One 5:e12721. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zeh JA, Zeh DW (2001) Reproductive mode and genetic benefits of polyandry. Anim Behav 61:1051–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Microsatellite data collection was carried out in the Field Museum’s Pritzker Laboratory for Molecular Systematics and Evolution operated with support from the Prtizker Foundation. The Dr. Earl H. Myers and Ethel M. Myers Oceanographic and Marine Biology Trust, and Moss Landing Marine Laboratories provided financial support for this study. This study was also supported by the National Science Foundation’s Jaws and Backbone: Chondrichthyan Phylogeny and a Spine for the Vertebrate Tree of Life, grant: DEB 01132229 to Gavin Naylor, University of Florida. We thank Paul Clerkin for on-vessel specimen processing and PSRC lab members. We thank the reviewers of the manuscript for their contributions, both for taking the time to review our manuscript and others, as well as their suggestions and edits that improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MCN and DAE collected samples. MCN and KAF collected genetic data. All authors contributed to data analysis and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa C. Nehmens.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

The organisms in this study collected during 2012 were collected under IACUC permit #801 issued by San Jose State University. The organisms collected in 2014 were collected under IACUC permit #801 and IACUC permit #2014-D. The shift in permitting was due to a renewal under a different collection type for the laboratory as all specimens were collected post-mortem as incidental bycatch in both years. Adherence to all national and international guidelines for animal care was followed, including proper permitting for international shipment of biological specimens.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: O. Puebla.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Reviewed by undisclosed experts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nehmens, M.C., Feldheim, K.A. & Ebert, D.A. Understanding what we cannot see: a genetic approach to the mating system of the Southern Lanternshark, Etmopterus granulosus. Mar Biol 167, 139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-020-03751-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-020-03751-5

Navigation