Skip to main content
Log in

Split Common Fixed Point Problem for Quasi-Pseudo-Contractive Mapping in Hilbert Spaces

  • Published:
Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the split common fixed point problem for quasi-pseudo-contractive mappings is studied in Hilbert spaces. By using the hybrid projection method, a new algorithm and some strong convergence theorems are established under suitable assumptions. Our results not only improve and generalize some recent results but also give an affirmative answer to an open question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

References

  1. Byrne, C.: A unified treatment of some iterative algorithms in signal processing and image reconstruction. Inverse Probl. 20, 103–120 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ceng, L.C., Ansari, Q.H., Yao, J.C.: An extragradient method for split feasibility and fixed point problems. Comput. Math. Appl. 64, 633–642 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, F., Xu, H.K.: Cyclic algorithms for split feasibility problems in Hilbert spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 74, 4105–4111 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu, H.K.: Iterative methods for the split feasibility problem in infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Inverse Probl. 26, 105018 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, S.S., Wang, L., Qin, L.J.: Split equality fixed point problem for quasi-pseudo-contractive mappings with applications. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2015, 208 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Yao, Y.H., Yao, J.C., Liou, Y.C., Postolache, M.: Iterative algorithms for split common fixed points of demicontractive operators without priori knowledge of operator norms. Carpathian J. Math. 34(3), 451–458 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Moudafi, A.: A note on the split common fixed-point problem for quasi-nonexpansive operators. Nonlinear Anal. 74, 4083–4087 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Moudafi, A.: The split common fixed-point problem for demicontractive mappings. Inverse Probl. 26, 055007 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Censor, Y., Segal, A.: The split common fixed point problem for directed operators. J. Convex Anal. 16, 587–600 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ansari, Q.H., Rehan, A., Wen, C.F.: Implicit and explicit algorithms for split common fixed point problems. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 17, 1381–1397 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Boikanyo, O.A.: A strongly convergent algorithm for the split common fixed point problem. Appl. Math. Comput. 265, 844–853 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Cegielski, A.: General method for solving the split common fixed point problem. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 165, 385–404 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kraikaew, P., Saejung, S.: On split common fixed point problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 415, 513–524 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Takahashi, W.: The split common fixed point problem and strong convegence theorems by hybrid methods in two Banach spaces. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 17, 1051–1067 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Takahashi, S., Takahashi, W.: The split common null point problem and the shrinking projection method in two Banach spaces. Linear Nonlinear Anal. 1, 297–304 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, F.: A new method for split common fixed-point problem without priori knowledge of operator norms. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-017-0434-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, F.: A new iterative method for the split common fixed point problem in Hilbert spaces. Optimization 66(3), 407–415 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Reich, S., Tuyen, T.M.: A new algorithm for solving the split common null point problem in Hilbert spaces. Numer. Algorithms (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-019-00703-z

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Goebel, K., Reich, S.: Uniform Convexity, Hyperbolic Geometry, and Nonexpansive Mappings. Marcel Dekker, New York (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Agarwal, R.P., ORegan, D., Sahu, D.R.: Fixed Point Theory for Lipschitzian-type Mappings with Applications. Springer, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tan, K.K., Xu, H.K.: Approximating fixed points of nonexpansive mappings by the Ishikawa iteration process. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 178, 301–308 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China Medical University, Taiwan. This study was also supported by the National Natural Science of China (No. 11361070).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors contributed equally to the writing of the present article. And they also read and approved the final paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shih-sen Chang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Rosihan M. Ali.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, Ss., Wang, L., Zhao, Y.H. et al. Split Common Fixed Point Problem for Quasi-Pseudo-Contractive Mapping in Hilbert Spaces. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 44, 1155–1166 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-020-01000-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-020-01000-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation