Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Research and development challenges in scaling innovation: a case study of the LEAP-Agri RAMSES II project

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A widely held assumption is that intensifying agroforestry will lead to sustainable increases in production, societal resilience and food security, urgently needed in the current context of changes in markets, climate and demography. Current thinking assumes that to achieve sustainable innovation a participatory approach with public, civil and private stakeholders is necessary, combined with a systemic, trans-disciplinary approach, rather than a technical approach. This study presents a case of applying the Theory of Change (ToC) concept to test this assumption. The ToC was designed to articulate the process of scaling of action-research findings, and to adapt the research to the context of complex agroforestry systems at plot, household, farm, village and landscape levels. This allowed to develop an intervention logic that unpacks what sustainability means for farmers and other local stakeholders in four West African agroforestry systems. The conceptual approach created an awareness of potential impacts of scaling initiatives based on a ToC with pathways to impact combined with monitoring the effects of the research & development project on a variety of ecological, agronomic and economic performance indicators. A number of constraints and paradoxes that are linked to current research and development short term funding are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albergel J, Alpha A, Diaby N, Francis J-A, Lançon J, Sers JM, Viljoen J (2018) Bi-regional scientific cooperation on food and nutrition security and sustainable agriculture. In: Cherry A, Haselip J, Ralphs G, Wagner EI (eds) Africa-Europe research and innovation cooperation global challenges, bi-regional responses. Palgrave-Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer HWJ, Hemmati M, Verhoosel K, Van Vugt S (2016) The MSP guide. How to design and facilitate multi-stakeholder partnerships. Wageningen Centre for Development Innovation, Practical Action Publishing http://www.mspguide.org

  • Callon M (1986) Eléments pour une sociologie de la traduction. L’Année sociologique (1940/1948), Troisième série, vol 36. PUF ed., pp 169–208

  • Chapuis-Lardy L, Badiane ndour NY, Assigbetse K., Diédhiou I, BaLaya R, Cournac L, Founoune-Mboup H, Mc SPadden Gardener B, Ghezzehei T, Jourdan C, Bright MB, Bogie N, Debenport S, DeLay C, DiaKhaté S, Sambou DM, Dick RP (2019) Les cultures vivrières associées aux arbustes natifs: un modèle adapté au climat sahélien. In Seghieri J, Harmand JM (coord) Agroforesterie et services écosystémiques en zone tropicale: recherche de compromis entre services d’approvisionnement et autres services écosystémiques, Versailles: Quae, 2019, pp 191–203. (Update Sciences et Technologies), free e-book https://www.quae.com/produit/1580/9782759230600/agroforesterie-et-services-ecosystemiques-en-zone-tropicale

  • Cherry A, Haselip J, Ralphs G, Wagner EI (eds) (2018) Africa-Europe Research and innovation cooperation Global Challenges, Bi-regional Responses. Palgrave-Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaunay V, Desclaux A, Sokhna C (2018) Niakhar mémoires et perspectives. Recherches pluridisciplinaires sur le changement en Afrique. Coed. IRD, Harmattan

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Félix GF, Scholberg JMS, Clermont-Dauphin C, Cournac L, Groot JCJ, Tittonell P (2018) Enhancing agroecosystem productivity with woody perennials in semi-arid West Africa. A meta-analysis. Agron Sustain Dev 38:57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0533-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gerland P, Raftery AE, Ševčíková H, Li N, Gu D, Spoorenberg T, Alkema L, Fosdick BK, Chunn J, Lalic N, Bay G, Buettner T, Heilig GK, Wilmoth J (2014) World population stabilization unlikely this century. Science 346:234–237. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Novotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans F, Sartas M, Van Schagen B, van Asten P, Schut M (2017) Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling. PLoS ONE 12(2):e0169634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme D (2000) Impact assessment methodologies for microfinance: theory, experience and better practice. World Dev 28(1):79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesteman J (2004) L’Un, le Multiple et le Complexe. L’Université et la transdisciplinarité. A contrario 2(1):89–108. https://doi.org/10.3917/aco.021.108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl R.,Foy C., Gwynne Zodrow G. (2017): Synthesis report, review of successful scaling of agricultural technologies. USAID E3 Analytics and Evaluation Project

  • Kuyah Shem, Oborn Ingrid, Jonsson Mattias, Dahlin Sigrun, Barrios Edmundo, Muthuri Catherine, Malmer Anders, Nyaga John, Magaju Christine, Namirembe Sara, Nyberg Ylva, Sinclair Fergus (2016) Trees in agricultural landscapes enhance provision of ecosystem services in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2016.1214178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayne J (2001) Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: using performance measures sensibly. Can J Program Eval 16(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbow Cheikh, Smith Pete, Skole David, Duguma Lalisa, Bustamante Mercedes (2014) Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MDG Africa Steering Group (2008) Achieving the Millennium development goals in Africa. Recommendations of the MDG Africa Steering Group. United Nations Department of Public Information. New York, June 2008

  • Niang I, Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (64 authors) (2014) Chapter 22: Africa. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. Publisher: Cambridge University Press, pp 1199–1265

  • FAOStat http://www.fao.org/faostat/fr/#home, visited 18 May 2019

  • Pélissier P (1980) L’Arbre dans les paysages agraires de l’Afrique Noire. In: L’arbre en Afrique Tropicale: La fonction et le signe. Cahiers ORSTOM.Série Sciences Humaines, 17 (3–4), 131–136. ISSN 0008-0403

  • Raison J-P (1988) Les parcs en Afrique: état des connaissances, perspectives de recherches. Document de travail. Paris, Centres d’Etudes Africaines, EHESS, p 117

  • Rigourd C, Dugué P (2019) Relancer le conseil et la vulgarisation agricoles en Afrique subsaharienne. Pour de nouvelles politiques en cohérence avec les réalités de terrain. Notes techniques:Technical reports. Juillet 2019, N° 55. Publications AFD@afd.fr https://www.afd.fr/fr/-accueil

  • Sanogo K, Binam J, Bayala J, Villamor GB, Kalinganire A, Dodiomon S (2017) Farmers’ perceptions of climate change impacts on ecosystem services delivery of parklands in southern Mali. Agrofor Syst 91(2):345–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidibé A, Vellema S, Dembélé F, Témé B, Yossi H, Traoré M, Kuyper TW (2014) Women, shea, and finance: how institutional practices in a Malian cooperative create development impact. Int J Agric Sustain 12(3):263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simelton E, Dam BV, Catacutan D (2015) Trees and agroforestry for coping with extreme weather events: experiences from northern and central Viet Nam. Agrofor Syst 89(6):1065–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinare H, Gordon L (2015) Ecosystem services from woody vegetation on agricultural lands in Sudano-Sahelian West Africa. Agr Ecosyst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornon PK, Schuetz T, Förch W, Cramer L, Abreu D, Vermeulen S, Campbell BM (2017) Responding to global change: a theory of change approach to making agricultural research for development outcome-based. Agric Syst 152:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ton G, Vellema S, Ge L (2014) The triviality of measuring ultimate outcomes: acknowledging the span of direct influence. IDS Bull 45(6):37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2011) Scaling up integrated local development innovations. United Nations Development Programme. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/ScalingUp 20report_web2011n.pdf

  • Vogel I (2012) ESPA guide to working with Theory of Change for research projects. LTS/ITAD, ESPA report, p 38

  • Weiss C (1995) Nothing as practical as good theory: exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. New approaches to evaluating community initiatives volume 1 concepts, methods, and contexts. Washington DC: The Aspen Institute

  • WHO (2017) Nutrition in the WHO African Region. World Health Organization, Brazzaville

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigboldus, S, Brouwers J (2016) Using a Theory of Scaling (ToS) to guide decision making. Towards a structured approach to support responsible scaling of innovations in the context of agrifood systems. CDI-16, 2016 https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/using-a-theory-of-scaling-to-guide-decision-making-towards-a-stru

  • Wigboldus S (2018) To scale, or not to scale—that is not the only question. PhD thesis Wageningen University https://edepot.wur.nl/449586

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all partners, stakeholders and communities in the project for their involvement. The RAMSES II project is funded via the LEAP-Agri ERA-Net Cofund Call 2017, a joint Europe Africa Research and Innovation initiative related to Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agriculture with a financial support of the European Commission, Agence Française de Développement, France (AFD); Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR), France; Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) via the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, The Netherlands; Fond d’Impulsion de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique (FIRST), Senegal; and the Fonds National de la Recherche et de l’Innovation pour le Développement (FONRID), Burkina Faso.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Seghieri.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

LEAP-Agri is a joint Europe Africa Research and Innovation (R&I) initiative related to Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agriculture (FNSSA) <https://www.leap-agri.com>.

RAMSES II: Roles of Agroforestry in sustainable intensification of small farMs and food SEcurity for SocIetIes in West Africa <https://josianeseghieri.wixsite.com/ramsesii> one of the 27 projects funded by the Europe Africa LEAP-Agri initiative.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seghieri, J., Brouwers, J., Bidou, JE. et al. Research and development challenges in scaling innovation: a case study of the LEAP-Agri RAMSES II project. Agroforest Syst 95, 1371–1382 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00532-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00532-3

Keywords

Navigation