Abstract
A widely held assumption is that intensifying agroforestry will lead to sustainable increases in production, societal resilience and food security, urgently needed in the current context of changes in markets, climate and demography. Current thinking assumes that to achieve sustainable innovation a participatory approach with public, civil and private stakeholders is necessary, combined with a systemic, trans-disciplinary approach, rather than a technical approach. This study presents a case of applying the Theory of Change (ToC) concept to test this assumption. The ToC was designed to articulate the process of scaling of action-research findings, and to adapt the research to the context of complex agroforestry systems at plot, household, farm, village and landscape levels. This allowed to develop an intervention logic that unpacks what sustainability means for farmers and other local stakeholders in four West African agroforestry systems. The conceptual approach created an awareness of potential impacts of scaling initiatives based on a ToC with pathways to impact combined with monitoring the effects of the research & development project on a variety of ecological, agronomic and economic performance indicators. A number of constraints and paradoxes that are linked to current research and development short term funding are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albergel J, Alpha A, Diaby N, Francis J-A, Lançon J, Sers JM, Viljoen J (2018) Bi-regional scientific cooperation on food and nutrition security and sustainable agriculture. In: Cherry A, Haselip J, Ralphs G, Wagner EI (eds) Africa-Europe research and innovation cooperation global challenges, bi-regional responses. Palgrave-Macmillan, London
Brouwer HWJ, Hemmati M, Verhoosel K, Van Vugt S (2016) The MSP guide. How to design and facilitate multi-stakeholder partnerships. Wageningen Centre for Development Innovation, Practical Action Publishing http://www.mspguide.org
Callon M (1986) Eléments pour une sociologie de la traduction. L’Année sociologique (1940/1948), Troisième série, vol 36. PUF ed., pp 169–208
Chapuis-Lardy L, Badiane ndour NY, Assigbetse K., Diédhiou I, BaLaya R, Cournac L, Founoune-Mboup H, Mc SPadden Gardener B, Ghezzehei T, Jourdan C, Bright MB, Bogie N, Debenport S, DeLay C, DiaKhaté S, Sambou DM, Dick RP (2019) Les cultures vivrières associées aux arbustes natifs: un modèle adapté au climat sahélien. In Seghieri J, Harmand JM (coord) Agroforesterie et services écosystémiques en zone tropicale: recherche de compromis entre services d’approvisionnement et autres services écosystémiques, Versailles: Quae, 2019, pp 191–203. (Update Sciences et Technologies), free e-book https://www.quae.com/produit/1580/9782759230600/agroforesterie-et-services-ecosystemiques-en-zone-tropicale
Cherry A, Haselip J, Ralphs G, Wagner EI (eds) (2018) Africa-Europe Research and innovation cooperation Global Challenges, Bi-regional Responses. Palgrave-Macmillan, London
Delaunay V, Desclaux A, Sokhna C (2018) Niakhar mémoires et perspectives. Recherches pluridisciplinaires sur le changement en Afrique. Coed. IRD, Harmattan
Félix GF, Scholberg JMS, Clermont-Dauphin C, Cournac L, Groot JCJ, Tittonell P (2018) Enhancing agroecosystem productivity with woody perennials in semi-arid West Africa. A meta-analysis. Agron Sustain Dev 38:57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0533-3
Gerland P, Raftery AE, Ševčíková H, Li N, Gu D, Spoorenberg T, Alkema L, Fosdick BK, Chunn J, Lalic N, Bay G, Buettner T, Heilig GK, Wilmoth J (2014) World population stabilization unlikely this century. Science 346:234–237. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257469
Gibbons M, Limoges C, Novotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London
Hermans F, Sartas M, Van Schagen B, van Asten P, Schut M (2017) Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling. PLoS ONE 12(2):e0169634
Hulme D (2000) Impact assessment methodologies for microfinance: theory, experience and better practice. World Dev 28(1):79–98
Kesteman J (2004) L’Un, le Multiple et le Complexe. L’Université et la transdisciplinarité. A contrario 2(1):89–108. https://doi.org/10.3917/aco.021.108
Kohl R.,Foy C., Gwynne Zodrow G. (2017): Synthesis report, review of successful scaling of agricultural technologies. USAID E3 Analytics and Evaluation Project
Kuyah Shem, Oborn Ingrid, Jonsson Mattias, Dahlin Sigrun, Barrios Edmundo, Muthuri Catherine, Malmer Anders, Nyaga John, Magaju Christine, Namirembe Sara, Nyberg Ylva, Sinclair Fergus (2016) Trees in agricultural landscapes enhance provision of ecosystem services in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2016.1214178
Mayne J (2001) Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: using performance measures sensibly. Can J Program Eval 16(1):1–24
Mbow Cheikh, Smith Pete, Skole David, Duguma Lalisa, Bustamante Mercedes (2014) Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.09.002
MDG Africa Steering Group (2008) Achieving the Millennium development goals in Africa. Recommendations of the MDG Africa Steering Group. United Nations Department of Public Information. New York, June 2008
Niang I, Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (64 authors) (2014) Chapter 22: Africa. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. Publisher: Cambridge University Press, pp 1199–1265
FAOStat http://www.fao.org/faostat/fr/#home, visited 18 May 2019
Pélissier P (1980) L’Arbre dans les paysages agraires de l’Afrique Noire. In: L’arbre en Afrique Tropicale: La fonction et le signe. Cahiers ORSTOM.Série Sciences Humaines, 17 (3–4), 131–136. ISSN 0008-0403
Raison J-P (1988) Les parcs en Afrique: état des connaissances, perspectives de recherches. Document de travail. Paris, Centres d’Etudes Africaines, EHESS, p 117
Rigourd C, Dugué P (2019) Relancer le conseil et la vulgarisation agricoles en Afrique subsaharienne. Pour de nouvelles politiques en cohérence avec les réalités de terrain. Notes techniques:Technical reports. Juillet 2019, N° 55. Publications AFD@afd.fr https://www.afd.fr/fr/-accueil
Sanogo K, Binam J, Bayala J, Villamor GB, Kalinganire A, Dodiomon S (2017) Farmers’ perceptions of climate change impacts on ecosystem services delivery of parklands in southern Mali. Agrofor Syst 91(2):345–361
Sidibé A, Vellema S, Dembélé F, Témé B, Yossi H, Traoré M, Kuyper TW (2014) Women, shea, and finance: how institutional practices in a Malian cooperative create development impact. Int J Agric Sustain 12(3):263–275
Simelton E, Dam BV, Catacutan D (2015) Trees and agroforestry for coping with extreme weather events: experiences from northern and central Viet Nam. Agrofor Syst 89(6):1065–1108
Sinare H, Gordon L (2015) Ecosystem services from woody vegetation on agricultural lands in Sudano-Sahelian West Africa. Agr Ecosyst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.11.009
Thornon PK, Schuetz T, Förch W, Cramer L, Abreu D, Vermeulen S, Campbell BM (2017) Responding to global change: a theory of change approach to making agricultural research for development outcome-based. Agric Syst 152:145–153
Ton G, Vellema S, Ge L (2014) The triviality of measuring ultimate outcomes: acknowledging the span of direct influence. IDS Bull 45(6):37–48
UNDP (2011) Scaling up integrated local development innovations. United Nations Development Programme. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/ScalingUp 20report_web2011n.pdf
Vogel I (2012) ESPA guide to working with Theory of Change for research projects. LTS/ITAD, ESPA report, p 38
Weiss C (1995) Nothing as practical as good theory: exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. New approaches to evaluating community initiatives volume 1 concepts, methods, and contexts. Washington DC: The Aspen Institute
WHO (2017) Nutrition in the WHO African Region. World Health Organization, Brazzaville
Wigboldus, S, Brouwers J (2016) Using a Theory of Scaling (ToS) to guide decision making. Towards a structured approach to support responsible scaling of innovations in the context of agrifood systems. CDI-16, 2016 https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/using-a-theory-of-scaling-to-guide-decision-making-towards-a-stru
Wigboldus S (2018) To scale, or not to scale—that is not the only question. PhD thesis Wageningen University https://edepot.wur.nl/449586
Acknowledgements
We thank all partners, stakeholders and communities in the project for their involvement. The RAMSES II project is funded via the LEAP-Agri ERA-Net Cofund Call 2017, a joint Europe Africa Research and Innovation initiative related to Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agriculture with a financial support of the European Commission, Agence Française de Développement, France (AFD); Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR), France; Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) via the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, The Netherlands; Fond d’Impulsion de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique (FIRST), Senegal; and the Fonds National de la Recherche et de l’Innovation pour le Développement (FONRID), Burkina Faso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
LEAP-Agri is a joint Europe Africa Research and Innovation (R&I) initiative related to Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agriculture (FNSSA) <https://www.leap-agri.com>.
RAMSES II: Roles of Agroforestry in sustainable intensification of small farMs and food SEcurity for SocIetIes in West Africa <https://josianeseghieri.wixsite.com/ramsesii> one of the 27 projects funded by the Europe Africa LEAP-Agri initiative.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seghieri, J., Brouwers, J., Bidou, JE. et al. Research and development challenges in scaling innovation: a case study of the LEAP-Agri RAMSES II project. Agroforest Syst 95, 1371–1382 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00532-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00532-3