Skip to main content
Log in

Pull-in and freestanding instability of actuated functionally graded nanobeams including surface and stiffening effects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because of fasttechnological development, electrostatic nanoactuator devices like nanosensors, nanoswitches, and nanoresonators are highly considered by scientific community. Thus, this article presents a new solution technique in solving highly nonlinear integro-differential equation governing electrically actuated nanobeams made of functionally graded material. The modified couple stress theory and Gurtin–Murdoch surface elasticity theory are coupled together to capture the size effects of the nanoscale thin beam in the context of Euler–Bernoulli beam theory. For accurate modelling, all the material properties of the bulk and surface continuums of the FG nanoactuator are varied continuously in thickness direction according to power law. The nonlinearity arising from the electrostatic actuation, fringing field, mid-plane stretching effect, axial residual stress, Casimir dispersion, and van der Waals forces are considered in mathematical formulation. The nonlinear nonclassical equilibrium equation of FG nanobeam-based actuators and associated boundary conditions are exactly derived using Hamilton principle. The new solution methodology is combined from three phases. The first phase applies Galerkin method to get an integro-algebraic equation. The second one employs particle swarm optimization method to approximate the integral terms (i.e. electrostatic force, fringing field, and intermolecular forces) to non-integral cubic algebraic equation. Then, solved the system easily in last phase. The resulting algebraic model provides means for obtaining critical deflection, pull-in voltage, detachment length, minimum gap, and freestanding effects. A reasonable agreement is found between the results obtained from the present method and those in the available literature. A parametric study is performed to investigate the effects of the gradient index, material length scale parameter, surface energy, intermolecular forces, initial gap, and beam length on the pull-in response and freestanding phenomena of fully clamped and cantilever FG nanoactuators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdi J, Koochi A, Kazemi AS, Abadyan M (2011) Modeling the effects of size dependence and dispersion forces on the pull-in instability of electrostatic cantilever NEMS using modified couple stress theory. Smart Mater Struct 20(5):055011

    Google Scholar 

  2. Attia MA (2017) Investigation of size-dependent quasistatic response of electrically actuated nonlinear viscoelastic microcantilevers and microbridges. Meccanica 52(10):2391–2420

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Attia MA (2017) On the mechanics of functionally graded nanobeams with the account of surface elasticity. Int J Eng Sci 115:73–101

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Attia MA, Emam SA (2018) Electrostatic nonlinear bending, buckling and free vibrations of viscoelastic microbeams based on the modified couple stress theory. Acta Mech 229(8):3235–3255

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Attia MA, Mahmoud FF (2016) Modeling and analysis of nanobeams based on nonlocal-couple stress elasticity and surface energy theories. Int J Mech Sci 105:126–134

    Google Scholar 

  6. Attia MA, Mohamed SA (2017) Nonlinear modeling and analysis of electrically actuated viscoelastic microbeams based on the modified couple stress theory. Appl Math Model 41:195–222

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Attia MA, Mohamed SA (2018) Pull-in instability of functionally graded cantilever nanoactuators incorporating effects of microstructure, surface energy and intermolecular forces. Int J Appl Mech 10(08):1850091

    Google Scholar 

  8. Attia MA, Mohamed SA (2020) Nonlinear thermal buckling and postbuckling analysis of bidirectional functionally graded tapered microbeams based on Reddy beam theory. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01080-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Attia MA, Rahman AAA (2018) On vibrations of functionally graded viscoelastic nanobeams with surface effects. Int J Eng Sci 127:1–32

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Attia MA, Shanab RA, Mohamed SA, Mohamed NA (2019) Surface energy effects on the nonlinear free vibration of functionally graded Timoshenko nanobeams based on modified couple stress theory. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 19(11):1950127

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Baghani M (2012) Analytical study on size-dependent static pull-in voltage of microcantilevers using the modified couple stress theory. Int J Eng Sci 54:99–105

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ballestra A, Brusa E, Munteanu MG, Somà A (2008) Experimental characterization of electrostatically actuated in-plane bending of microcantilevers. Microsyst Technol 14(7):909–918

    Google Scholar 

  13. Batra RC, Porfiri M, Spinello D (2008) Effects of van der Waals force and thermal stresses on pull-in instability of clamped rectangular microplates. Sensors 8(2):1048–1069

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bhojawala VM, Vakharia DP (2017) Closed-form relation to predict static pull-in voltage of an electrostatically actuated clamped–clamped microbeam under the effect of Casimir force. Acta Mech 228(7):2583–2602

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Bochobza-Degani O, Nemirovsky Y (2002) Modeling the pull-in parameters of electrostatic actuators with a novel lumped two degrees of freedom pull-in model. Sens Actuators A 97:569–578

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chowdhury S, Ahmadi M, Miller WC (2005) A closed-form model for the pull-in voltage of electrostatically actuated cantilever beams. J Micromech Microeng 15(4):756

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dehghan M, Ebrahimi F, Vinyas M (2019) Wave dispersion characteristics of fluid-conveying magneto-electro-elastic nanotubes. Eng Comput:1–17

  18. Duan J, Li Z, Liu J (2016) Pull-in instability analyses for NEMS actuators with quartic shape approximation. Appl Math Mech 37(3):303–314

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Eberhart RC, Shi Y, Kennedy J (2001) Swarm intelligence. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ebrahimi F, Hosseini SHS (2019) Nonlinear vibration and dynamic instability analysis nanobeams under thermo-magneto-mechanical loads: a parametric excitation study. Eng Comput:1–14

  21. Ebrahimi F, Hosseini SHS (2020) Effect of residual surface stress on parametrically excited nonlinear dynamics and instability of double-walled nanobeams: an analytical study. Eng Comput:1–12

  22. Ebrahimi F, Karimiasl M, Singhal A (2019) Magneto-electro-elastic analysis of piezoelectric–flexoelectric nanobeams rested on silica aerogel foundation. Eng Comput:1–8

  23. Eltaher MA, Alshorbagy AE, Mahmoud FF (2013) Determination of neutral axis position and its effect on natural frequencies of functionally graded macro/nanobeams. Compos Struct 99:193–201

    Google Scholar 

  24. Eltaher MA, Abdelrahman AA, Al-Nabawy A, Khater M, Mansour A (2014) Vibration of nonlinear graduation of nano-Timoshenko beam considering the neutral axis position. Appl Math Comput 235:512–529

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Fan F, Lei B, Sahmani S, Safaei B (2020) On the surface elastic-based shear buckling characteristics of functionally graded composite skew nanoplates. Thin Wall Struct 154:106841

    Google Scholar 

  26. Farrokhabadi A, Mohebshahedin A, Rach R, Duan JS (2016) An improved model for the cantilever NEMS actuator including the surface energy, fringing field and Casimir effects. Phys E 75:202–209

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fattahi AM, Sahmani S, Ahmed NA (2019) Nonlocal strain gradient beam model for nonlinear secondary resonance analysis of functionally graded porous micro/nano-beams under periodic hard excitations. Mech Based Des Struct Mach:1–30

  28. Gao XL (2015) A new Timoshenko beam model incorporating microstructure and surface energy effects. Acta Mech 226(2):457–474

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Gao XL, Mahmoud FF (2014) A new Bernoulli–Euler beam model incorporating microstructure and surface energy effects. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik 65(2):393–404

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Gao XL, Zhang GY (2016) A non-classical Kirchhoff plate model incorporating microstructure, surface energy and foundation effects. Continuum Mech Thermodyn 28(1–2):195–213

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Gurtin ME, Murdoch AI (1975) A continuum theory of elastic material surfaces. Arch Ration Mech Anal 57(4):291–323

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Gurtin ME, Murdoch AI (1978) Surface stress in solids. Int J Solids Struct 14(6):431–440

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Haluzan DT, Klymyshyn DM, Achenbach S, Börner M (2010) Reducing pull-in voltage by adjusting gap shape in electrostatically actuated cantilever and fixed-fixed beams. Micromachines 1(2):68–81

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hu YC, Chang CM, Huang SC (2004) Some design considerations on the electrostatically actuated microstructures. Sens Actuators A 112(1):155–161

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN'95-international conference on neural networks. IEEE, vol 4, pp 1942–1948

  36. Kuang JH, Chen CJ (2004) Dynamic characteristics of shaped micro-actuators solved using the differential quadrature method. J Micromech Microeng 14(4):647

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu H, Lyu Z (2020) Modeling of novel nanoscale mass sensor made of smart FG magneto-electro-elastic nanofilm integrated with graphene layers. Thin Wall Struct 151:106749

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liu H, Wu H, Lyu Z (2020) Nonlinear resonance of FG multilayer beam-type nanocomposites: effects of graphene nanoplatelet-reinforcement and geometric imperfection. Aerosp Sci Technol 98:105702

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lyu Z, Yang Y, Liu H (2020) High-accuracy hull iteration method for uncertainty propagation in fluid-conveying carbon nanotube system under multi-physical fields. Appl Math Model 79:362–380

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Ma Y, Gao Y, Yang W, He D (2020) Free vibration of a micro-scale composite laminated Reddy plate using a finite element method based on the new modified couple stress theory. Res Phys 16:102903

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mahmoud FF, Eltaher MA, Alshorbagy AE, Meletis EI (2012) Static analysis of nanobeams including surface effects by nonlocal finite element. J Mech Sci Technol 26(11):3555–3563

    Google Scholar 

  42. Miandoab EM, Pishkenari HN, Meghdari A, Fathi M (2017) A general closed-form solution for the static pull-in voltages of electrostatically actuated MEMS/NEMS. Phys E 90:7–12

    Google Scholar 

  43. Miller RE, Shenoy VB (2000) Size-dependent elastic properties of nanosized structural elements. Nanotechnology 11(3):139

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nayfeh AH, Younis MI, Abdel-Rahman EM (2005) Reduced-order models for MEMS applications. Nonlinear Dyn 41(1–3):211–236

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. O'Mahony C, Hill M, Duane R, Mathewson A (2003) Analysis of electromechanical boundary effects on the pull-in of micromachined fixed–fixed beams. J Micromech Microeng 13(4):S75

    Google Scholar 

  46. Osterberg PM, Senturia SD (1997) M-TEST: a test chip for MEMS material property measurement using electrostatically actuated test structures. J Microelectromech Syst 6(2):107–118

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ouakad HM, Sedighi HM, Younis MI (2017) One-to-one and three-to-one internal resonances in MEMS shallow arches. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 12(5):051025

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pamidighantam S, Puers R, Baert K, Tilmans HA (2002) Pull-in voltage analysis of electrostatically actuated beam structures with fixed–fixed and fixed–free end conditions. J Micromech Microeng 12(4):458

    Google Scholar 

  49. Radi E, Bianchi G, di Ruvo L (2017) Upper and lower bounds for the pull-in parameters of a micro-or nanocantilever on a flexible support. Int J Non-Linear Mech 92:176–186

    Google Scholar 

  50. Radi E, Bianchi G, di Ruvo L (2018) Analytical bounds for the electromechanical buckling of a compressed nanocantilever. Appl Math Model 59:571–582

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Rahaeifard M, Kahrobaiyan MH, Asghari M, Ahmadian MT (2011) Static pull-in analysis of microcantilevers based on the modified couple stress theory. Sens Actuators A 171(2):370–374

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Ramezani A, Alasty A, Akbari J (2007) Closed-form solutions of the pull-in instability in nano-cantilevers under electrostatic and intermolecular surface forces. Int J Solids Struct 44(14–15):4925–4941

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Ramezani A, Alasty A, Akbari J (2007) Closed-form approximation and numerical validation of the influence of van der Waals force on electrostatic cantilevers at nano-scale separations. Nanotechnology 19(1):015501

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rhoads JF, Shaw SW, Turner KL (2006) The nonlinear response of resonant microbeam systems with purely-parametric electrostatic actuation. J Micromech Microeng 16(5):890

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rokni H, Seethaler RJ, Milani AS, Hosseini-Hashemi S, Li XF (2013) Analytical closed-form solutions for size-dependent static pull-in behavior in electrostatic micro-actuators via Fredholm integral equation. Sens Actuators A 190:32–43

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sadeghian H, Rezazadeh G, Osterberg PM (2007) Application of the generalized differential quadrature method to the study of pull-in phenomena of MEMS switches. J Microelectromech Syst 16(6):1334–1340

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sahmani S, Safaei B (2020) Influence of homogenization models on size-dependent nonlinear bending and postbuckling of bi-directional functionally graded micro/nano-beams. Appl Math Model 82:336–358

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Sahmani S, Fattahi AM, Ahmed NA (2019) Analytical mathematical solution for vibrational response of postbuckled laminated FG-GPLRC nonlocal strain gradient micro-/nanobeams. Eng Comput 35(4):1173–1189

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sedighi HM (2014) The influence of small scale on the pull-in behavior of nonlocal nanobridges considering surface effect, Casimir and Van der Waals attractions. Int J Appl Mech 6(03):1450030

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sedighi HM (2014) Size-dependent dynamic pull-in instability of vibrating electrically actuated microbeams based on the strain gradient elasticity theory. Acta Astronaut 95:111–123

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sedighi HM, Daneshmand F, Abadyan M (2016) Modeling the effects of material properties on the pull-in instability of nonlocal functionally graded nano-actuators. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech 96(3):385–400

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  62. Shaat M, Mohamed SA (2014) Nonlinear-electrostatic analysis of micro-actuated beams based on couple stress and surface elasticity theories. Int J Mech Sci 84:208–217

    Google Scholar 

  63. Shaat M, Mahmoud FF, Gao XL, Faheem AF (2014) Size-dependent bending analysis of Kirchhoff nano-plates based on a modified couple-stress theory including surface effects. Int J Mech Sci 79:31–37

    Google Scholar 

  64. Shams Alizadeh M, Heidari Shirazi K, Moradi S, Sedighi HM (2018) Numerical analysis of the counter-intuitive dynamic behavior of the elastic-plastic pin-ended beams under impulsive loading with regard to linear hardening effects. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 232(24):4588–4600

    Google Scholar 

  65. Shanab RA, Mohamed SA, Mohamed NA, Attia MA (2020a) Comprehensive investigation of vibration of sigmoid and power law FG nanobeams based on surface elasticity and modified couple stress theories. Acta Mech:1–34

  66. Shanab RA, Attia MA, Mohamed SA (2017) Nonlinear analysis of functionally graded nanoscale beams incorporating the surface energy and microstructure effects. Int J Mech Sci 131:908–923

    Google Scholar 

  67. Shanab RA, Attia MA, Mohamed SA, Mohamed NA (2020) Effect of microstructure and surface energy on the static and dynamic characteristics of FG Timoshenko nanobeam embedded in an elastic medium. J Nano Res 61:97–117

    Google Scholar 

  68. Shenoy VB (2005) Atomistic calculations of elastic properties of metallic fcc crystal surfaces. Phys Rev B 71(9):094104

    Google Scholar 

  69. Soroush R, Koochi A, Kazemi AS, Noghrehabadi A, Haddadpour H, Abadyan M (2010) Investigating the effect of Casimir and van der Waals attractions on the electrostatic pull-in instability of nano-actuators. Phys Scr 82(4):045801

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Tahani M, Askari AR (2014) Accurate electrostatic and van der Waals pull-in prediction for fully clamped nano/micro-beams using linear universal graphs of pull-in instability. Phys E 63:151–159

    Google Scholar 

  71. Thanh CL, Tran LV, Vu-Huu T, Abdel-Wahab M (2019) The size-dependent thermal bending and buckling analyses of composite laminate microplate based on new modified couple stress theory and isogeometric analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 350:337–361

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  72. Tilmans HA, Legtenberg R (1994) Electrostatically driven vacuum-encapsulated polysilicon resonators: Part. II Theory and performance. Sens Actuators A Phys 45(1):67–84

    Google Scholar 

  73. Trinh LC, Groh RM, Zucco G, Weaver PM (2020) A strain-displacement mixed formulation based on the modified couple stress theory for the flexural behaviour of laminated beams. Compos B Eng 185:107740

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wang B, Zhou S, Zhao J, Chen X (2011) Size-dependent pull-in instability of electrostatically actuated microbeam-based MEMS. J Micromech Microeng 21(2):027001

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wang KF, Kitamura T, Wang B (2015) Nonlinear pull-in instability and free vibration of micro/nanoscale plates with surface energy–a modified couple stress theory model. Int J Mech Sci 99:288–296

    Google Scholar 

  76. Wu H, Liu H (2020) Nonlinear thermo-mechanical response of temperature-dependent FG sandwich nanobeams with geometric imperfection. Eng Comput:1–21

  77. Xie B, Sahmani S, Safaei B, Xu B (2020) Nonlinear secondary resonance of FG porous silicon nanobeams under periodic hard excitations based on surface elasticity theory. Eng Comput:1–24

  78. Yang FACM, Chong ACM, Lam DCC, Tong P (2002) Couple stress based strain gradient theory for elasticity. Int J Solids Struct 39(10):2731–2743

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  79. Yi H, Sahmani S, Safaei B (2020) On size-dependent large-amplitude free oscillations of FGPM nanoshells incorporating vibrational mode interactions. Arch Civ Mech Eng 20:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  80. Yin L, Qian Q, Wang L (2011) Size effect on the static behavior of electrostatically actuated microbeams. Acta Mech Sin 27(3):445

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  81. Younis MI (2011) MEMS linear and nonlinear statics and dynamics, vol 20. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  82. Younis MI, Abdel-Rahman EM, Nayfeh A (2003) A reduced-order model for electrically actuated microbeam-based MEMS. J Microelectromech Syst 12(5):672–680

    Google Scholar 

  83. Yuan Y, Zhao K, Sahmani S, Safaei B (2020) Size-dependent shear buckling response of FGM skew nanoplates modeled via different homogenization schemes. Appl Math Mech:1–18

  84. Yuan Y, Zhao K, Zhao Y, Sahmani S, Safaei B (2020) Couple stress-based nonlinear buckling analysis of hydrostatic pressurized functionally graded composite conical microshells. Mech Mater:103507

  85. Yuan Y, Zhao K, Han Y, Sahmani S, Safaei B (2020) Nonlinear oscillations of composite conical microshells with in-plane heterogeneity based upon a couple stress-based shell model. Thin Wall Struct 154:106857

    Google Scholar 

  86. Zhang G, Gao XL (2019) Elastic wave propagation in a periodic composite plate structure: band gaps incorporating microstructure, surface energy and foundation effects. J Mech Mater Struct 14(2):219–236

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  87. Zhang Q, Liu H (2020) On the dynamic response of porous functionally graded microbeam under moving load. Int J Eng Sci 153:103317

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. Zhang LX, Zhao YP (2003) Electromechanical model of RF MEMS switches. Microsyst Technol 9(6–7):420–426

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed A. Eltaher.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abo-Bakr, R.M., Eltaher, M.A. & Attia, M.A. Pull-in and freestanding instability of actuated functionally graded nanobeams including surface and stiffening effects. Engineering with Computers 38 (Suppl 1), 255–276 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01146-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01146-0

Keywords

Navigation