Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of average contact number of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in polymer nanocomposites to optimize the electrical conductivity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper suggests an equation for the average contact number of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in CNT-reinforced polymer nanocomposites (PCNT) by two developed equations for electrical conductivity. Several novel parameters in PCNT such as CNT size, CNT concentration, network fraction, interphase depth, tunneling effect, and CNT wettability by the polymer medium are considered to define the average contact number (m). “m” is calculated for some samples and the variation of “m” is explored over a range of parameters’ values. The results show that dense interphase, high fraction of networked CNTs, reedy and short CNTs, low CNT surface energy, high polymer surface energy, low tunneling distance, and small contact diameter increase the “m” improving the conductivity. Moreover, tunneling distance and CNT contact diameter have the greatest effects on the “m”. The optimized level for “m” is necessary to control the nanocomposite’s conductivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vinyas M, Harursampath D, Kattimani S (2020) On vibration analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced magneto-electro-elastic plates with different electro-magnetic conditions using higher order finite element methods. Def Technol (2020)

  2. Vinyas M (2019) A higher-order free vibration analysis of carbon nanotube-reinforced magneto-electro-elastic plates using finite element methods. Compos B Eng 158:286–301

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vinyas M, Harursampath D (2020) Nonlinear vibrations of magneto-electro-elastic doubly curved shells reinforced with carbon nanotubes. Compos Struct 253:112749

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mahesh V, Harursampath D (2020) Nonlinear vibration of functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic higher order plates reinforced by CNTs using FEM. Eng Comput 1–23

  5. Mallek H, Jrad H, Algahtani A, Wali M, Dammak F (2019) Geometrically non-linear analysis of FG-CNTRC shell structures with surface-bonded piezoelectric layers. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 347:679–699

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Mallek H, Jrad H, Wali M, Kessentini A, Gamaoun F, Dammak F (2020) Dynamic analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotube–reinforced shell structures with piezoelectric layers under dynamic loads. J Vib Contr 26:1157–1172

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Mellouli H, Jrad H, Wali M, Dammak F (2020) Free vibration analysis of FG-CNTRC shell structures using the meshfree radial point interpolation method. Comput Math Appl 11:3160

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebrahimi F, Mahesh V (2019) Chaotic dynamics and forced harmonic vibration analysis of magneto-electro-viscoelastic multiscale composite nanobeam. Eng Comput 1–14

  9. Ghassabi M, Zarastvand M, Talebitooti R (2019) Investigation of state vector computational solution on modeling of wave propagation through functionally graded nanocomposite doubly curved thick structures. Eng Comput 1–17

  10. Hajmohammad MH, Nouri AH, Zarei MS, Kolahchi R (2019) A new numerical approach and visco-refined zigzag theory for blast analysis of auxetic honeycomb plates integrated by multiphase nanocomposite facesheets in hygrothermal environment. Eng Comput 35:1141–1157

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zidan HM, Abdelrazek EM, Abdelghany AM, Tarabiah AE (2019) Characterization and some physical studies of PVA/PVP filled with MWCNTs. J Mat Res Technol 8:904–913

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hassanzadeh-Aghdam MK, Mahmoodi MJ, Ansari R, Mehdipour H (2019) Effects of adding CNTs on the thermo-mechanical characteristics of hybrid titanium nanocomposites. Mech Mat 131:121–135

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mallek H, Jrad H, Wali M, Dammak F (2019) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of piezoelectric-bonded FG-CNTR composite structures using an improved FSDT theory. Eng Comput 1–19

  14. Ebrahimi F, Habibi M, Safarpour H (2019) On modeling of wave propagation in a thermally affected GNP-reinforced imperfect nanocomposite shell. Eng Comput 35:1375–1389

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rostami A, Vahdati M, Alimoradi Y, Karimi M, Nazockdast H (2018) Rheology provides insight into flow induced nano-structural breakdown and its recovery effect on crystallization of single and hybrid carbon nanofiller filled poly (lactic acid). Polymer 134:143–154

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rostami A, Eskandari F, Masoomi M, Nowrouzi M (2019) Evolution of microstructure and physical properties of PMMA/MWCNTs nanocomposites upon the addition of organoclay. J Oil Gas Petrochem Technol (2019)

  17. Razavi R, Zare Y, Rhee KY (2019) The roles of interphase and filler dimensions in the properties of tunneling spaces between CNT in polymer nanocomposites. Polym Compos

  18. Zare Y, Rhee KY, Park S-J (2019) Modeling the roles of carbon nanotubes and interphase dimensions in the conductivity of nanocomposites. Res Phys 15:102562

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2019) Following the morphological and thermal properties of PLA/PEO blends containing carbon nanotubes (CNTs) during hydrolytic degradation. Compos Part B Eng 175:107132

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maiti S, Shrivastava NK, Khatua B (2013) Reduction of percolation threshold through double percolation in melt-blended polycarbonate/acrylonitrile butadiene styrene/multiwall carbon nanotubes elastomer nanocomposites. Polym Compos 34:570–579

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sagalianov I, Vovchenko L, Matzui L, Lazarenko O (2017) Synergistic enhancement of the percolation threshold in hybrid polymeric nanocomposites based on carbon nanotubes and graphite nanoplatelets. Nanoscale Res Lett 12:140

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seidel G, Puydupin-Jamin A-S (2011) Analysis of clustering, interphase region, and orientation effects on the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube–polymer nanocomposites via computational micromechanics. Mech Mater 43:755–774

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li C, Thostenson ET, Chou T-W (2007) Dominant role of tunneling resistance in the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube-based composites. Appl Phys Lett 91:223114

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2017) A simple methodology to predict the tunneling conductivity of polymer/CNT nanocomposites by the roles of tunneling distance, interphase and CNT waviness. RSC Adv 7:34912–34921

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hu N, Karube Y, Yan C, Masuda Z, Fukunaga H (2008) Tunneling effect in a polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposite strain sensor. Acta Mater 56:2929–2936

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bao W, Meguid S, Zhu Z, Weng G (2012) Tunneling resistance and its effect on the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube nanocomposites. J Appl Phys 111:093726

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li J, Ma PC, Chow WS, To CK, Tang BZ, Kim JK (2007) Correlations between percolation threshold, dispersion state, and aspect ratio of carbon nanotubes. Adv Func Mater 17:3207–3215

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kim S, Zare Y, Garmabi H, Rhee KY (2018) Variations of tunneling properties in poly (lactic acid)(PLA)/poly (ethylene oxide)(PEO)/carbon nanotubes (CNT) nanocomposites during hydrolytic degradation. Sens Actuat A 274:28–36

    Google Scholar 

  29. Razavi R, Zare Y, Rhee KY (2017) A two-step model for the tunneling conductivity of polymer carbon nanotube nanocomposites assuming the conduction of interphase regions. RSC Adv 7:50225–50233

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2017) Development of a conventional model to predict the electrical conductivity of polymer/carbon nanotubes nanocomposites by interphase, waviness and contact effects. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 100:305

    Google Scholar 

  31. Takeda T, Shindo Y, Kuronuma Y, Narita F (2011) Modeling and characterization of the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube-based polymer composites. Polymer 52:3852–3856

    Google Scholar 

  32. Feng C, Jiang L (2013) Micromechanics modeling of the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube (CNT)–polymer nanocomposites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 47:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2017) Multistep modeling of Young’s modulus in polymer/clay nanocomposites assuming the intercalation/exfoliation of clay layers and the interphase between polymer matrix and nanoparticles. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 102:137–144

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zare Y (2016) “a” interfacial parameter in Nicolais–Narkis model for yield strength of polymer particulate nanocomposites as a function of material and interphase properties. J Colloid Interface Sci 470:245–249

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zare Y (2016) Study on interfacial properties in polymer blend ternary nanocomposites: role of nanofiller content. Comput Mater Sci 111:334–338

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zare Y (2016) Modeling the strength and thickness of the interphase in polymer nanocomposite reinforced with spherical nanoparticles by a coupling methodology. J Colloid Interface Sci 465:342–346

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zare Y (2016) A two-step method based on micromechanical models to predict the Young’s modulus of polymer nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng 301:846–852

    Google Scholar 

  38. Li Y, Waas AM, Arruda EM (2011) A closed-form, hierarchical, multi-interphase model for composites—derivation, verification and application to nanocomposites. J Mech Phys Solids 59:43–63

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Sevostianov I, Kachanov M (2007) Effect of interphase layers on the overall elastic and conductive properties of matrix composites. Applications to nanosize inclusion. Int J Solids Struct 44:1304–1315

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2017) Prediction of tensile modulus in polymer nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes (CNT) above percolation threshold by modification of conventional model. Curr Appl Phys 17:873–879

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zare Y (2016) Development of Nicolais–Narkis model for yield strength of polymer nanocomposites reinforced with spherical nanoparticles. Int J Adhes Adhes 70:191–195

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zare Y, Rhee KY, Park S-J (2019) A developed equation for electrical conductivity of polymer carbon nanotubes (CNT) nanocomposites based on Halpin–Tsai model. Res Phys 14:102406

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2018) A multistep methodology for calculation of the tensile modulus in polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites above the percolation threshold based on the modified rule of mixtures. RSC Adv 8:30986–30993

    Google Scholar 

  44. Y. Zare, K.Y. Rhee, Accounting the reinforcing efficiency and percolating role of interphase regions in the tensile modulus of polymer/CNT nanocomposites, European Polymer Journal, (2017).

  45. Weber M, Kamal MR (1997) Estimation of the volume resistivity of electrically conductive composites. Polym Compos 18:711–725

    Google Scholar 

  46. Taherian R (2016) Experimental and analytical model for the electrical conductivity of polymer-based nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 123:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  47. Maiti S, Suin S, Shrivastava NK, Khatua B (2013) Low percolation threshold in polycarbonate/multiwalled carbon nanotubes nanocomposites through melt blending with poly (butylene terephthalate). J Appl Polym Sci 130:543–553

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mai F, Habibi Y, Raquez J-M, Dubois P, Feller J-F, Peijs T, Bilotti E (2013) Poly (lactic acid)/carbon nanotube nanocomposites with integrated degradation sensing. Polymer 54:6818–6823

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kim YJ, Shin TS, Do Choi H, Kwon JH, Chung Y-C, Yoon HG (2005) Electrical conductivity of chemically modified multiwalled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Carbon 43:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lisunova M, Mamunya YP, Lebovka N, Melezhyk A (2007) Percolation behaviour of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composites. Eur Polym J 43:949–958

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hassanzadeh-Aghdam M, Mahmoodi M, Ansari R, Darvizeh A (2018) Interphase influences on the mechanical behavior of carbon nanotube–shape memory polymer nanocomposites: a micromechanical approach. J Intell Mat Syst Struct 30:463

    Google Scholar 

  52. Amraei J, Jam JE, Arab B, Firouz-Abadi RD (2018) Modeling the interphase region in carbon nanotube–reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Polym Compos 40:E1219

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ashraf MA, Peng W, Zare Y, Rhee KY (2018) Effects of size and aggregation/agglomeration of nanoparticles on the interfacial/interphase properties and tensile strength of polymer nanocomposites. Nanoscale Res Lett 13:214

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zare Y, Rhee KY (2019) A simulation work for the influences of aggregation/agglomeration of clay layers on the tensile properties of nanocomposites. JOM 71:3989–3995

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Project number: 2020R1A2B5B02002203).

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyong Yop Rhee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zare, Y., Rhee, K.Y. Estimation of average contact number of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in polymer nanocomposites to optimize the electrical conductivity. Engineering with Computers 38 (Suppl 1), 243–253 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01153-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01153-1

Keywords

Navigation