Skip to main content
Log in

Phytoremediation: elimination of hexavalent chromium heavy metal using corn (Zea mays L.)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cereal Research Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are more natural and more cost-effective alternatives to economically over costing physical and chemical remediation of polluted agricultural soils. Heavy metals that exert a significant toxicity on the organisms in the environment are one of the primary dangerous materials. In the elimination of heavy metal toxicity in the soils, phytoremediation method is used as a new technology. In this study, the usability of corn (Zea mays L.) in the phytoremediation of hexavalent chromium-contaminated soil. Moreover, the hyperaccumulator ability of the corn for Cr+6 heavy metal was evaluated. In order to increase the solubility of chromium heavy metal in the soil different amounts of chelator (EDTA) were applied to the soils. The study was conducted according to the random blocks experimental design under controlled conditions with totally 18 pots of 3 replicates of control and 5 different chelate doses (0, 10, 20, 40, 80 mmol/kg). The soils in the pots were incubated with 30 mg/kg Cr+6 as Chromium (VI) oxide (Sigma-Aldrich No: 232653) for 30 days. During the sowing of the corn seeds 150 mg/kg N, 100 mg/kgP2O5, and 125 mg/kg K2O were applied to the pots and watering was done when needed. After the harvest, the chromium contents of the root and stem were determined. The chromium in the stem of the control was 2.81 mg/kg, and it was 31.46 mg/kg in the stem of 80 mmol/kg EDTA application trial. This result was statistically significant at 5%. The chromium content of the root was 18.57 mmol/kg in the control condition while it was 34.95 mmol/kg in the root of the highest concentration of applied chelate. This study revealed that corn is a hyperaccumulator plant to be used in phytoremediation of the soils contaminated by Cr+6.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adiloğlu S (2013) An ınvestigation of some heavy metal pollution along the TEM motorway soils in Tekirdağ. Ph.D thesis. Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Graduate of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Tekirdağ

  • Adiloğlu S (2017) Interaction of manganese and some heavy metals in dock (Rumex patientia L.) plant for remediation of contaminated soils. Desal Water Treat 93:335–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adiloglu S (2020) Interaction of some heavy metals with copper content in dock plant. KSU J Agric Nat 23(4):1078–1084. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.689443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adiloğlu S, Sağlam MT (2015a) The extractable (Co) contents of the near motorway soils in agricultural lands. Afyon Kocatepe Univ J Sci Eng Sci 15:24–29. https://doi.org/10.5578/fmbd.9981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adiloğlu S, Sağlam MT (2015b) Some statistical relationships between chrome and nickel contents and some physicochemical properties of Tekirdağ province soils. J Tekirdag Agric Fac 12(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.516676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adiloğlu S, Adiloğlu A, Eryılmaz Açıkgöz F, Yeniaras T, Solmaz Y (2015). An Investigation of dock plant (Rumex patientia L.) using capacity in phytoremediation. Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University Scientific research Project. NKUBAP.00.24.AR.14.03

  • Adiloğlu S, Sağlam MT, Sümer A (2015b) Chrome (Cr) pollution in agricultural areas ımprovement by phytoremediation method with canola (Brassica napus L.) plant growing. J Essent Oil Bear Plants 18:1180–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aliyeva G (2014) F Improving the quality of water and sediment via phytoremediation (by plant) method. Yıldız Technical University, Graduate of Natural and Applied Sciences, Environmental Engineering Department Environmental Engineering Program. Master Thesis. İstanbul

  • Asri Öktüren F, Sönmez S (2006) Ağır metal toksisitesinin bitki metabolizması Üzerine etkileri. Derim Dergisi 23(2):36–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin O, Orak HH, Korkut K, Başer İ, Orak A, Balkan A (2010) Interrelationships among some quality characteristics in dent corn (Zea mays L.). Cereal Res Commun 38:233–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen HJM (1966) Trace Element in Biochemistry. Academic Press, London, p 241

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Cutright T (2001) EDTA and HEDTA Effects on Cd, Cr, and Ni Uptake by Heliantus annus. Chemosphere 45:21–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2000) (Environmental Protection Agency), Introduction to phytoremediation, EPA/600/R-99/107, Cincinati, Ohio, U.S.A, p 72, http://www.clu-in.org. Date of access 13 Mar 2019

  • FAO (1990) Micronutrient, assesment and the country level: an ınternational study, vol 63. FAO Soils Bulletin, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardea-Torresdey JL, Tiemann KJ, Armendariz V, Bess-Oberto L, Chianelli RR, Rios J, Parsons JG, Gamez G (2000) Characterization of Cr(VI) binding and reduction to Cr(III) by the agricultural by products of Avena monida (Oat) biomass. J Hazard Mater 80:175–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilescu M (2004) Removal of heavy metals from environment by biosorption. Eng Life Sci 3:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyulai G, Bittsánszky A, Szabó Z, Waters L Jr, Gullner G, Gy Kampfl, Gy Heltai, Kőmíves T (2014) Phytoextraction potential of wild type and 35S-gshI transgenic poplar trees (Populus × canescens) for environmental pollutants herbicide paraquat, salt sodium, zinc sulfate and nitric oxide in vitro. Int J Phytoremediat 16:379–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain R, Srivastava S, Madan VK (2000) Influence of chromium on growth and cell division of sugarcane. Indian J Plant Physiol 5:228–231

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kacar B, İnal A (2010) Bitki Analizleri. Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaman MR, Adiloğlu A, Brohi R, Güneş A, İnal A, Kaplan M, Katkat V, Korkmaz A, Okur N, Ortaş İ, Saltalı K, Taban S, Turan M, Tüfenkçi Ş, Eraslan F, Zengin M (2012). Bitki Besleme. Dumat Ofset, Matbacılık San. Tic. Ltd. Şti., Ankara. ISBN 978-605-87103-2-0

  • Khan AG, Kuek C, Chaudhry TM, Khoo CS, Hayes WJ (2000) Role of plants, mycorrhizae and phytochelators in heavy metal contaminated land remediation. Chemosphere 41:197–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Chen C, Song X, Han Y, Liang Z (2011) Assessment of heavy metal pollution in soil and plants from Dunhua sewage ırrigation area. Int J Electrochem Sci 6:5314–5324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, ıron, manganase and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linger P, Müssing J, Fischer H, Kobert J (2002) Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) growing on heavy metal contaminated soil: fibre quality and phytoremediation potential. Ind Crops Prod 16:33–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lothe AG, Hansda A, Kumar V (2016) Phytoremediation of copper-contaminated soil using Helianthus annuus, Brassica nigra and Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.: a pot scale study. Environ Qual Manag 25(4):63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–889. eBook ISBN: 9780080571874

  • Mekwichai P, Tongcumpou C, Kittipongvises S, Tuntiwiwattanapun N (2020) Simultaneous biosurfactant-assisted remediation and corn cultivation on cadmium-contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 192:110298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okçu M, Tozlu E, Kumlay AM, Pehluvan M (2009) Ağır Metallerin Bitkiler Üzerine Etkileri. Alınteri 17(B):14–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. Methods of soil analysis part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy 9(2):403–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Sağlam MT (2012). Toprak ve Suyun Kimyasal Analiz Yöntemleri. Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, Yayın No: 2, Tekirdağ

  • Shanker AK, Cervantes C, Loza-Tavera H, Avudainayagam S (2005) Chromium toxicity in plants. Environ Int 31:739–753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Prasad SM (2015) Remediation of heavy metal contaminated ecosystem: an overview on technology advancement. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 12:353–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Soil Survey Staff (1951) Soil Survey Manuel. U.S. Department Agriculture Handbook 18 U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington

  • Tuncay H (1994). Toprak Fiziği Uygulama Kılavuzu. E.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi, Teksir No: 29, İzmir

  • Turan H, Horuz A (2012). Bitki Besleme (Ed: MR Karaman). Bölüm: 3, Bitki Beslemenin Temel İlkeleri. Dumat Ofset, Matbacılık San. Tic. Ltd. Şti., 1080s, Ankara

  • Wallace A, Soufi SM, Cha JW, Romney EM (1976) Some effects of chromium toxicity on bush bean plants grown in soil. Plant Soil 44:471–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei B, Yang L (2010) A review of heavy metal contaminations in urban soils, urban road dusts and agricultural soils from China. Microchem J 94:99–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sevinç Adiloğlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adiloğlu, S., Göker, M. Phytoremediation: elimination of hexavalent chromium heavy metal using corn (Zea mays L.). CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 49, 65–72 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-020-00070-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-020-00070-9

Keywords

Navigation