Abstract
There are more natural and more cost-effective alternatives to economically over costing physical and chemical remediation of polluted agricultural soils. Heavy metals that exert a significant toxicity on the organisms in the environment are one of the primary dangerous materials. In the elimination of heavy metal toxicity in the soils, phytoremediation method is used as a new technology. In this study, the usability of corn (Zea mays L.) in the phytoremediation of hexavalent chromium-contaminated soil. Moreover, the hyperaccumulator ability of the corn for Cr+6 heavy metal was evaluated. In order to increase the solubility of chromium heavy metal in the soil different amounts of chelator (EDTA) were applied to the soils. The study was conducted according to the random blocks experimental design under controlled conditions with totally 18 pots of 3 replicates of control and 5 different chelate doses (0, 10, 20, 40, 80 mmol/kg). The soils in the pots were incubated with 30 mg/kg Cr+6 as Chromium (VI) oxide (Sigma-Aldrich No: 232653) for 30 days. During the sowing of the corn seeds 150 mg/kg N, 100 mg/kgP2O5, and 125 mg/kg K2O were applied to the pots and watering was done when needed. After the harvest, the chromium contents of the root and stem were determined. The chromium in the stem of the control was 2.81 mg/kg, and it was 31.46 mg/kg in the stem of 80 mmol/kg EDTA application trial. This result was statistically significant at 5%. The chromium content of the root was 18.57 mmol/kg in the control condition while it was 34.95 mmol/kg in the root of the highest concentration of applied chelate. This study revealed that corn is a hyperaccumulator plant to be used in phytoremediation of the soils contaminated by Cr+6.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adiloğlu S (2013) An ınvestigation of some heavy metal pollution along the TEM motorway soils in Tekirdağ. Ph.D thesis. Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Graduate of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Tekirdağ
Adiloğlu S (2017) Interaction of manganese and some heavy metals in dock (Rumex patientia L.) plant for remediation of contaminated soils. Desal Water Treat 93:335–338
Adiloglu S (2020) Interaction of some heavy metals with copper content in dock plant. KSU J Agric Nat 23(4):1078–1084. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.689443
Adiloğlu S, Sağlam MT (2015a) The extractable (Co) contents of the near motorway soils in agricultural lands. Afyon Kocatepe Univ J Sci Eng Sci 15:24–29. https://doi.org/10.5578/fmbd.9981
Adiloğlu S, Sağlam MT (2015b) Some statistical relationships between chrome and nickel contents and some physicochemical properties of Tekirdağ province soils. J Tekirdag Agric Fac 12(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.516676
Adiloğlu S, Adiloğlu A, Eryılmaz Açıkgöz F, Yeniaras T, Solmaz Y (2015). An Investigation of dock plant (Rumex patientia L.) using capacity in phytoremediation. Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University Scientific research Project. NKUBAP.00.24.AR.14.03
Adiloğlu S, Sağlam MT, Sümer A (2015b) Chrome (Cr) pollution in agricultural areas ımprovement by phytoremediation method with canola (Brassica napus L.) plant growing. J Essent Oil Bear Plants 18:1180–1186
Aliyeva G (2014) F Improving the quality of water and sediment via phytoremediation (by plant) method. Yıldız Technical University, Graduate of Natural and Applied Sciences, Environmental Engineering Department Environmental Engineering Program. Master Thesis. İstanbul
Asri Öktüren F, Sönmez S (2006) Ağır metal toksisitesinin bitki metabolizması Üzerine etkileri. Derim Dergisi 23(2):36–45
Bilgin O, Orak HH, Korkut K, Başer İ, Orak A, Balkan A (2010) Interrelationships among some quality characteristics in dent corn (Zea mays L.). Cereal Res Commun 38:233–242
Bowen HJM (1966) Trace Element in Biochemistry. Academic Press, London, p 241
Chen H, Cutright T (2001) EDTA and HEDTA Effects on Cd, Cr, and Ni Uptake by Heliantus annus. Chemosphere 45:21–28
EPA (2000) (Environmental Protection Agency), Introduction to phytoremediation, EPA/600/R-99/107, Cincinati, Ohio, U.S.A, p 72, http://www.clu-in.org. Date of access 13 Mar 2019
FAO (1990) Micronutrient, assesment and the country level: an ınternational study, vol 63. FAO Soils Bulletin, Rome
Gardea-Torresdey JL, Tiemann KJ, Armendariz V, Bess-Oberto L, Chianelli RR, Rios J, Parsons JG, Gamez G (2000) Characterization of Cr(VI) binding and reduction to Cr(III) by the agricultural by products of Avena monida (Oat) biomass. J Hazard Mater 80:175–188
Gavrilescu M (2004) Removal of heavy metals from environment by biosorption. Eng Life Sci 3:219–232
Gyulai G, Bittsánszky A, Szabó Z, Waters L Jr, Gullner G, Gy Kampfl, Gy Heltai, Kőmíves T (2014) Phytoextraction potential of wild type and 35S-gshI transgenic poplar trees (Populus × canescens) for environmental pollutants herbicide paraquat, salt sodium, zinc sulfate and nitric oxide in vitro. Int J Phytoremediat 16:379–396
Jain R, Srivastava S, Madan VK (2000) Influence of chromium on growth and cell division of sugarcane. Indian J Plant Physiol 5:228–231
Kacar B, İnal A (2010) Bitki Analizleri. Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara
Karaman MR, Adiloğlu A, Brohi R, Güneş A, İnal A, Kaplan M, Katkat V, Korkmaz A, Okur N, Ortaş İ, Saltalı K, Taban S, Turan M, Tüfenkçi Ş, Eraslan F, Zengin M (2012). Bitki Besleme. Dumat Ofset, Matbacılık San. Tic. Ltd. Şti., Ankara. ISBN 978-605-87103-2-0
Khan AG, Kuek C, Chaudhry TM, Khoo CS, Hayes WJ (2000) Role of plants, mycorrhizae and phytochelators in heavy metal contaminated land remediation. Chemosphere 41:197–207
Liang J, Chen C, Song X, Han Y, Liang Z (2011) Assessment of heavy metal pollution in soil and plants from Dunhua sewage ırrigation area. Int J Electrochem Sci 6:5314–5324
Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, ıron, manganase and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428
Linger P, Müssing J, Fischer H, Kobert J (2002) Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) growing on heavy metal contaminated soil: fibre quality and phytoremediation potential. Ind Crops Prod 16:33–42
Lothe AG, Hansda A, Kumar V (2016) Phytoremediation of copper-contaminated soil using Helianthus annuus, Brassica nigra and Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.: a pot scale study. Environ Qual Manag 25(4):63–70
Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–889. eBook ISBN: 9780080571874
Mekwichai P, Tongcumpou C, Kittipongvises S, Tuntiwiwattanapun N (2020) Simultaneous biosurfactant-assisted remediation and corn cultivation on cadmium-contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 192:110298
Okçu M, Tozlu E, Kumlay AM, Pehluvan M (2009) Ağır Metallerin Bitkiler Üzerine Etkileri. Alınteri 17(B):14–26
Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. Methods of soil analysis part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy 9(2):403–427
Sağlam MT (2012). Toprak ve Suyun Kimyasal Analiz Yöntemleri. Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, Yayın No: 2, Tekirdağ
Shanker AK, Cervantes C, Loza-Tavera H, Avudainayagam S (2005) Chromium toxicity in plants. Environ Int 31:739–753
Singh A, Prasad SM (2015) Remediation of heavy metal contaminated ecosystem: an overview on technology advancement. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 12:353–366
U.S. Soil Survey Staff (1951) Soil Survey Manuel. U.S. Department Agriculture Handbook 18 U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington
Tuncay H (1994). Toprak Fiziği Uygulama Kılavuzu. E.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi, Teksir No: 29, İzmir
Turan H, Horuz A (2012). Bitki Besleme (Ed: MR Karaman). Bölüm: 3, Bitki Beslemenin Temel İlkeleri. Dumat Ofset, Matbacılık San. Tic. Ltd. Şti., 1080s, Ankara
Wallace A, Soufi SM, Cha JW, Romney EM (1976) Some effects of chromium toxicity on bush bean plants grown in soil. Plant Soil 44:471–473
Wei B, Yang L (2010) A review of heavy metal contaminations in urban soils, urban road dusts and agricultural soils from China. Microchem J 94:99–107
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adiloğlu, S., Göker, M. Phytoremediation: elimination of hexavalent chromium heavy metal using corn (Zea mays L.). CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 49, 65–72 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-020-00070-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-020-00070-9