Abstract
Due to the absence of adequate control at different stages of complex manufacturing process, material and geometric properties of composite structures are often uncertain. For a secure and safe design, tracking the impact of these uncertainties on the structural responses is of utmost significance. Composite materials, commonly adopted in various modern aerospace, marine, automobile and civil structures, are often susceptible to low-velocity impact caused by various external agents. Here, along with a critical review, we present machine learning based probabilistic and non-probabilistic (fuzzy) low–velocity impact analyses of composite laminates including a detailed deterministic characterization to systematically investigate the consequences of source- uncertainty. While probabilistic analysis can be performed only when complete statistical description about the input variables are available, the non-probabilistic analysis can be executed even in the presence of incomplete statistical input descriptions with sparse data. In this study, the stochastic effects of stacking sequence, twist angle, oblique impact, plate thickness, velocity of impactor and density of impactor are investigated on the crucial impact response parameters such as contact force, plate displacement, and impactor displacement. For efficient and accurate computation, a hybrid polynomial chaos based Kriging (PC-Kriging) approach is coupled with in-house finite element codes for uncertainty propagation in both the probabilistic and non- probabilistic analyses. The essence of this paper is a critical review on the hybrid machine learning algorithms followed by detailed numerical investigation in the probabilistic and non-probabilistic regimes to access the performance of such hybrid algorithms in comparison to individual algorithms from the viewpoint of accuracy and computational efficiency.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data used to generate these results is available in the main paper. Further details could be obtained from the corresponding author(s) upon request.
Abbreviations
- 1.:
-
Introduction
- 2.:
-
Review of the governing equations for low-velocity impact on laminated composites
- 2.1:
-
Contact law
- 2.2:
-
Newmark′s time integration scheme
- 3.:
-
A critical review of hybrid machine learning techniques
- 3.1:
-
Polynomial chaos expansion
- 3.2:
-
Kriging
- 3.3:
-
Polynomial chaos based Kriging (PC-Kriging)
- 4.:
-
Machine learning based stochastic impact analysis
- 4.1:
-
Probabilistic impact analysis
- 4.2:
-
Fuzzy impact analysis
- 5.:
-
Numerical investigation and discussion
- 5.1:
-
Deterministic impact analysis
- 5.2:
-
Stochastic impact analysis
- 5.2.1:
-
Surrogate modelling and validation
- 5.2.2:
-
Probabilistic impact analysis
- 5.2.3:
-
Fuzzy based non-probabilistic impact analysis
- 6.:
-
Remarks and perspective on hybrid machine learning models
- 7.:
-
Conclusions
- 8.:
-
References
References
Naskar S (2018) Spatial variability characterisation of laminated composites, University of Aberdeen
Xu S, Chen PH (2013) Prediction of low velocity impact damage in carbon/epoxy laminates. Procedia Eng 67:489–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.049
Liu J, He W, Xie D, Tao B (2017) The effect of impactor shape on the low-velocity impact behavior of hybrid corrugated core sandwich structures. Compos Part B Eng 111:315–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.060
Jagtap KR, Ghorpade SY, Lal A, Singh BN (2017) Finite element simulation of low velocity impact damage in composite laminates. Mater Today Proc 4:2464–2469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.098
Balasubramani V, Boopathy SR, Vasudevan R (2013) Numerical analysis of low velocity impact on laminated composite plates. Procedia Eng 64:1089–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.187
Tan TM, Sun CT (1985) Use of statical indentation laws in the impact analysis of laminated composite plates. J Appl Mech 52:6. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3169029
Sun CT, Chen JK (1985) On the impact of initially stressed composite laminates. J Compos Mater 19:490–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838501900601
Richardson MOW, Wisheart MJ (1996) Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 27:1123–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-835X(96)00074-7
Ahmed A, Wei L (2015) The low velocity impact damage resistance of the composite structures. Rev Adv Mater 40:127–145
Yuan Y, Xu C, Xu T, Sun Y, Liu B, Li Y (2017) An analytical model for deformation and damage of rectangular laminated glass under low-velocity impact. Compos Struct 176:833–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.029
Zhang J, Zhang X (2015) An efficient approach for predicting low-velocity impact force and damage in composite laminates. Compos Struct 130:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.023
Feng D, Aymerich F (2014) Finite element modelling of damage induced by low-velocity impact on composite laminates. Compos Struct 108:161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.004
Maio L, Monaco E, Ricci F, Lecce L (2013) Simulation of low velocity impact on composite laminates with progressive failure analysis. Compos Struct 103:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.027
Kim E-H, Rim M-S, Lee I, Hwang T-K (2013) Composite damage model based on continuum damage mechanics and low velocity impact analysis of composite plates. Compos Struct 95:123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.002
Lipeng W, Ying Y, Dafang W, Hao W (2008) Low-velocity impact damage analysis of composite laminates using self-adapting delamination element method. Chin J Aeronaut 21:313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(08)60041-2
Johnson A, Pickett A, Rozycki P (2001) Computational methods for predicting impact damage in composite structures. Compos Sci Technol 61:2183–2192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00111-7
Coutellier D, Walrick JC, Geoffroy P (2006) Presentation of a methodology for delamination detection within laminated structures. Compos Sci Technol 66:837–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.037
Jih CJ, Sun CT (1993) Prediction of delamination in composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact. J Compos Mater 27:684–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839302700703
Mukhopadhyay T, Chakraborty S, Dey S, Adhikari S, Chowdhury R (2017) A critical assessment of kriging model variants for high-fidelity uncertainty quantification in dynamics of composite shells. Arch Comput Methods Eng 24:495–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-016-9178-z
Biswas S, Chakraborty S, Chandra S, Ghosh I (2017) Kriging-based approach for estimation of vehicular speed and passenger car units on an urban arterial. J Transp Eng Part A Syst 143:04016013
Kaymaz I (2005) Application of Kriging method to structural reliability problems. Struct Saf 27:133–151
Nayek R, Chakraborty S, Narasimhan S (2019) A Gaussian process latent force model for joint input-state estimation in linear structural systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 128:497–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.03.048
Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2002) The Wiener–Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J Sci Comput 24:619–644
Blatman G, Sudret B (2010) An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis. Probab Eng Mech 25:183–197
Sudret B (2008) Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:964–979
Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2017) Hybrid framework for the estimation of rare failure event probability. J Eng Mech. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001223
Chakraborty S, Goswami S, Rabczuk T (2019) A surrogate assisted adaptive framework for robust topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 346:63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.030
Chakraborty S, Chatterjee T, Chowdhury R, Adhikari S (2017) A surrogate based multi- fidelity approach for robust design optimization. Appl Math Model 47:726–744
Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2016) Polynomial correlated function expansion. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0588-4.ch012
Schobi R, Sudret B, Wiart J (2015) Polynomial chaos based Kriging. Int J Uncertain Quantif 5:171–193. https://doi.org/10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2015012467
Kersaudy P, Sudret B, Varsier N, Picon O, Wiart J (2015) A new surrogate modeling technique combining Kriging and polynomial chaos expansions: application to uncertainty analysis in computational dosimetry. J Comput Phys 286:103–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.01.034
Goswami S, Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R, Rabczuk T (2019) Threshold shift method for reliability-based design optimization. http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.11424
Naskar S, Sriramula S (2017) Random field based approach for quantifying the spatial variability in composite laminates. In: 20th International conference on composite structures (ICCS20)
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Spickenheuer A, Adhikari S, Heinrich G (2016) Bottom up surrogate based approach for stochastic frequency response analysis of laminated composite plates. Compos Struct 140:712–727
Dey S, Karmakar A (2014) Effect of oblique angle on low velocity impact response of delaminated composite conical shells. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 228:2663–2677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406214521799
Yang S, Sun C (1982) Indentation law for composite laminates. In: Composite materials: testing and design (6th conference), p 425. https://doi.org/10.1520/stp28494s
Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Wiener N (1938) The homogeneous chaos. Am J Math 60:897–936
Hampton J, Doostan A (2015) Coherence motivated sampling and convergence analysis of least squares polynomial Chaos regression. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 290:73–97
Coelho RF, Lebon J, Bouillard P (2011) Hierarchical stochastic metamodels based on moving least squares and polynomial chaos expansion. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43:707–729
Madankan R, Singla P, Patra A, Bursik M, Dehn J, Jones M, Pavolonis M, Pitman B, Singh T, Webley P (2012) Polynomial chaos quadrature-based minimum variance approach for source parameters estimation. Procedia Comput Sci 9:1129–1138
Zhang Z, El-Moselhy TA, Elfadel IM, Daniel L (2014) Calculation of generalized polynomial-chaos basis functions and Gauss quadrature rules in hierarchical uncertainty quantification. IEEE Trans Comput Des Integr Circuits Syst 33:728–740
Blatman G, Sudret B (2011) Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression. J Comput Phys 230:2345–2367
Jacquelin E, Adhikari S, Sinou JJ, Friswell MI (2015) Polynomial chaos expansion in structural dynamics: accelerating the convergence of the first two statistical moment sequences. J Sound Vib 356:144–154
Pascual B, Adhikari S (2012) Hybrid perturbation-polynomial chaos approaches to the random algebraic eigenvalue problem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 217–220:153–167
Bilionis I, Zabaras N (2012) Multi-output local Gaussian process regression: applications to uncertainty quantification. J Comput Phys 231:5718–5746
Bilionis I, Zabaras N, Konomi BA, Lin G (2013) Multi-output separable Gaussian process: towards an efficient, fully Bayesian paradigm for uncertainty quantification. J Comput Phys 241:212–239
Krige DG (1951) A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the witwatersrand. J Chem Metall Min Soc S Afr 52:119–139
Krige DG (1951) A statisitcal approach to some mine valuations and allied problems at the Witwatersrand, University of Witwatersrand
Olea RA (2011) Optimal contour mapping using Kriging. J Geophys Res 79:695–702
Warnes JJ (1986) A sensitivity analysis for universal kriging. Math Geol 18:653–676
Joseph VR, Hung Y, Sudjianto A (2008) Blind Kriging: a new method for developing metamodels. J Mech Des 130:031102
Hung Y (2011) Penalized blind kriging in computer experiments. Stat Sin 21:1171–1190
Couckuyt I, Forrester A, Gorissen D, De Turck F, Dhaene T (2012) Blind Kriging: implementation and performance analysis. Adv Eng Softw 49:1–13
Kennedy M, O’Hagan A (2000) Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika 87:1–13
Kamiński B (2015) A method for the updating of stochastic kriging metamodels. Eur J Oper Res 247:859–866
Qu H, Fu MC (2014) Gradient extrapolated stochastic kriging. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul 24:1–25
Wang B, Bai J, Gea HC (2013, Stochastic Kriging for random simulation metamodeling with finite sampling. In: 39th Design automation conference, vol 3B, ASME, p V03BT03A056. https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2013-13361
Rivest M, Marcotte D (2012) Kriging groundwater solute concentrations using flow coordinates and nonstationary covariance functions. J Hydrol 472–473:238–253
Putter H, Young GA (2001) On the effect of covariance function estimation on the accuracy of Kriging predictors. Bernoulli 7:421–438
BiscayLirio R, Camejo DG, Loubes JM, MuñizAlvarez L (2013) Estimation of covariance functions by a fully data-driven model selection procedure and its application to Kriging spatial interpolation of real rainfall data. Stat Methods Appl 23:149–174
Saha A, Chakraborty S, Chandra S, Ghosh I (2018) Kriging based saturation flow models for traffic conditions in Indian cities. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 118:38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.037
Sobol IM (1976) Uniformly distributed sequences with an additional uniform property. USSR Comput Math Math Phys 16:236–242
Bratley P, Fox BL (1988) Implementing Sobol’s quasirandom sequence generator. ACM Trans Math Softw 14:88–100
Witteveen JAS, Bijl H (2006) Modeling arbitrary uncertainties using gram-schmidt polynomial chaos. In: 44th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibition, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virigina. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-896
Hanss M, Willner K (2000) A fuzzy arithmetical approach to the solution of finite element problems with uncertain parameters. Mech Res Commun 27:257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-6413(00)00091-4
Moens D, Hanss M (2011) Non-probabilistic finite element analysis for parametric uncertainty treatment in applied mechanics: recent advances. Finite Elem Anal Des 47:4–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2010.07.010
Kollár LP, Springer GS (2003) Mechanics of composite structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511547140
Kalita K, Mukhopadhyay T, Dey P, Haldar S (2020) Genetic programming assisted multi- scale optimization for multi-objective dynamic performance of laminated composites: the advantage of more elementary-level analyses. Neural Comput Appl 32:7969–7993
Kumar RR, Mukhopadhyay T, Pandey KM, Dey S (2019) Stochastic buckling analysis of sandwich plates: the importance of higher order modes. Int J Mech Sci 152:630–643
Naskar S, Mukhopadhyay T, Sriramula S (2019) Spatially varying fuzzy multi-scale uncertainty propagation in unidirectional fibre reinforced composites. Compos Struct 209:940–967
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Naskar S, Dey TK, Chalak HD, Adhikari S (2019) Probabilistic characterization for dynamics and stability of laminated soft core sandwich plates. J Sandwich Struct Mater 21(1):366–397
Mukhopadhyay T, Naskar S, Karsh PK, Dey S, You Z (2018) Effect of delamination on the stochastic natural frequencies of composite laminates. Compos B Eng 154:242–256
Naskar S, Mukhopadhyay T, Sriramula S (2018) Probabilistic micromechanical spatial variability quantification in laminated composites. Compos B Eng 151:291–325
Karsh PK, Mukhopadhyay T, Dey S (2019) Stochastic low-velocity impact on functionally graded plates: probabilistic and non-probabilistic uncertainty quantification. Compos B Eng 159:461–480
Karsh PK, Mukhopadhyay T, Chakraborty S, Naskar S, Dey S (2019) A hybrid stochastic sensitivity analysis for low-frequency vibration and low-velocity impact of functionally graded plates. Compos B Eng 176:107221
Kumar RR, Mukhopadhyay T, Naskar S, Pandey KM, Dey S (2019) Stochastic low-velocity impact analysis of sandwich plates including the effects of obliqueness and twist. Thin Walled Struct 145:106411
Naskar S, Mukhopadhyay T, Sriramula S (2017) Non-probabilistic analysis of laminated composites based on fuzzy uncertainty quantification. In: 20th International conference on composite structures (ICCS20)
Naskar S, Sriramula S (2017) Vibration analysis of hollow circular laminated composite beams: a stochastic approach. In: 12th International conference on structural safety and reliability
Goel T, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Queipo NV (2007) Ensemble of surrogates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33:199–216
Müller J, Shoemaker CA (2014) Influence of ensemble surrogate models and sampling strategy on the solution quality of algorithms for computationally expensive black-box global optimization problems. J Glob Optim 60:123–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-014-0184-0
Müller J, Piché R (2011) Mixture surrogate models based on Dempster–Shafer theory for global optimization problems. J Glob Optim 51:79–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-010-9620-y
Viana FAC, Haftka RT, Watson LT (2013) Efficient global optimization algorithm assisted by multiple surrogate techniques. J Glob Optim 56:669–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-012-9892-5
Yang X, Choi M, Lin G, Karniadakis GE (2012) Adaptive ANOVA decomposition of stochastic incompressible and compressible flows. J Comput Phys 231:1587–1614
Rabitz H, Aliş ÖF (1999) General foundations of high dimensional model representations. J Math Chem 25:197–233
Shan S, Wang GG (2010) Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41:219–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0420-2
Shan S, Wang GG (2011) Turning black-box functions into white functions. J Mech Des. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002978
Chowdhury R, Rao BN (2009) Assessment of high dimensional model representation techniques for reliability analysis. Probab Eng Mech 24:100–115
Chowdhury R, Rao BN, Prasad AM (2007) High dimensional model representation for piece-wise continuous function approximation. Commun Numer Methods Eng 24:1587–1609
Chowdhury R, Rao BN, Prasad AM (2009) High-dimensional model representation for structural reliability analysis. Commun Numer Methods Eng 25:301–337
Huang Z, Qiu H, Zhao M, Cai X, Gao L (2015) An adaptive SVR-HDMR model for approximating high dimensional problems. Eng Comput 32:643–667. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-08-2013-0208
Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2016) Sequential experimental design based generalised ANOVA. J Comput Phys 317:15–32
Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2017) Polynomial correlated function expansion. In: Modeling and simulation techniques in structural engineering, IGI Global, pp 348–373
Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2015) Polynomial correlated function expansion for nonlinear stochastic dynamic analysis. J Eng Mech 141:04014132. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000855
Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2017) Towards ‘h-p adaptive’ generalized ANOVA. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 320:558–581
Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2016) Moment independent sensitivity analysis: H-PCFE–based approach. J Comput CivEng 31:06016001-1–06016001-11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000608
Majumder D, Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2017) Probabilistic analysis of tunnels: a hybrid polynomial correlated function expansion based approach. Tunn Undergr Space Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.07.009
Chatterjee T, Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2016) A bi-level approximation tool for the computation of FRFs in stochastic dynamic systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 70–71:484–505
Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2019) Graph-theoretic-approach-assisted gaussian process for nonlinear stochastic dynamic analysis under generalized loading. J Eng Mech 145:04019105. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001685
Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2017) An efficient algorithm for building locally refined hp—adaptive H-PCFE: application to uncertainty quantification. J Comput Phys 351:59–79
Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2017) Hybrid framework for the estimation of rare failure event probability. J Eng Mech 143:04017010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001223
Tapoglou E, Karatzas GP, Trichakis IC, Varouchakis EA (2014) A spatio-temporal hybrid neural network-Kriging model for groundwater level simulation. J Hydrol 519:3193–3203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.040
Pang G, Yang L, Karniadakis GE (2019) Neural-net-induced Gaussian process regression for function approximation and PDE solution. J Comput Phys 384:270–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.01.045
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Khodaparast HH, Adhikari S (2016) A response surface modelling approach for resonance driven reliability based optimization of composite shells. Periodica Polytechnica Civ Eng 60(1):103–111
Naskar S, Mukhopadhyay T, Sriramula S (2018) A comparative assessment of ANN and PNN model for low-frequency stochastic free vibration analysis of composite plates Handbook of probabilistic models for engineers and scientists, Elsevier Publication, pp 527–547
Mukhopadhyay T, Dey TK, Dey S, Chakrabarti A (2015) Optimization of fiber reinforced polymer web core bridge deck: a hybrid approach. Struct Eng Int 25(2):173–183
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Sahu SK, Adhikari S (2018) Stochastic dynamic stability analysis of composite curved panels subjected to non-uniform partial edge loading. Eur J Mech A Solids 67:108–122
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Adhikari S (2017) Metamodel based high-fidelity stochastic analysis of composite laminates: a concise review with critical comparative assessment. Compos Struct 171:227–250
Naskar S, Mukhopadhyay T, Sriramula S, Adhikari S (2017) Stochastic natural frequency analysis of damaged thin-walled laminated composite beams with uncertainty in micromechanical properties. Compos Struct 160:312–334
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Sahu SK, Adhikari S (2016) Effect of cutout on stochastic natural frequency of composite curved panels. Compos B Eng 105:188–202
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Spickenheuer A, Gohs U, Adhikari S (2016) Uncertainty quantification in natural frequency of composite plates: an artificial neural network based approach. Adv Compos Lett 25(2):43–48
Dey TK, Mukhopadhyay T, Chakrabarti A, Sharma UK (2015) Efficient lightweight design of FRP bridge deck. Proc Inst Civ Eng Struct Build 168(10):697–707
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Khodaparast HH, Adhikari S (2016) Fuzzy uncertainty propagation in composites using Gram-Schmidt polynomial chaos expansion. Appl Math Model 40(7–8):4412–4428
Mukhopadhyay T, Naskar S, Dey S, Adhikari S (2016) On quantifying the effect of noise in surrogate based stochastic free vibration analysis of laminated composite shallow shells. Compos Struct 140:798–805
Dey S, Naskar S, Mukhopadhyay T, Gohs U, Sriramula S, Adhikari S, Heinrich G (2016) Uncertain natural frequency analysis of composite plates including effect of noise: a polynomial neural network approach. Compos Struct 143:130–142
Naskar S, Sriramula S (2018) On quantifying the effect of noise in radial basis based stochastic free vibration analysis of laminated composite beam. In: 8th European conference on composite materials
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Khodaparast HH, Kerfriden P, Adhikari S (2015) Rotational and ply-level uncertainty in response of composite shallow conical shells. Compos Struct 131:594–605
Mukhopadhyay T, Dey TK, Chowdhury R, Chakrabarti A, Adhikari S (2015) Optimum design of FRP bridge deck: an efficient RS-HDMR based approach. Struct Multidiscip Optim 52(3):459–477
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Adhikari S (2018) Uncertainty quantification in laminated composites: a meta-model based approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Vaishali Mukhopadhyay T, Karsh PK, Basu B, Dey S (2020) Machine learning based stochastic dynamic analysis of functionally graded shells. Compos Struct 237:111870
Mukhopadhyay T (2018) A multivariate adaptive regression splines based damage identification methodology for web core composite bridges including the effect of noise. J Sandwich Struct Mater 20(7):885–903
Karsh PK, Mukhopadhyay T, Dey S (2018) Stochastic dynamic analysis of twisted functionally graded plates. Compos B Eng 147:259–278
Maharshi K, Mukhopadhyay T, Roy B, Roy L, Dey S (2018) Stochastic dynamic behaviour of hydrodynamic journal bearings including the effect of surface roughness. Int J Mech Sci 142–143:370–383
Metya S, Mukhopadhyay T, Adhikari S, Bhattacharya G (2017) System reliability analysis of soil slopes with general slip surfaces using multivariate adaptive regression splines. Comput Geotech 87:212–228
Mukhopadhyay T, Mahata A, Dey S, Adhikari S (2016) Probabilistic analysis and design of HCP nanowires: an efficient surrogate based molecular dynamics simulation approach. J Mater Sci Technol 32(12):1345–1351
Mukhopadhyay T, Chowdhury R, Chakrabarti A (2016) Structural damage identification: a random sampling-high dimensional model representation approach. Adv Struct Eng 19(6):908–927
Mahata A, Mukhopadhyay T, Adhikari S (2016) A polynomial chaos expansion based molecular dynamics study for probabilistic strength analysis of nano-twinned copper. Mater Res Express 3:036501
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Sahu SK, Li G, Rabitz H, Adhikari S (2015) Thermal uncertainty quantification in frequency responses of laminated composite plates. Compos B Eng 80:186–197
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Khodaparast HH, Adhikari S (2015) Stochastic natural frequency of composite conical shells. Acta Mech 226(8):2537–2553
Mukhopadhyay T, Dey TK, Chowdhury R, Chakrabarti A (2015) Structural damage identification using response surface based multi-objective optimization: a comparative study. Arab J Sci Eng 40(4):1027–1044
Naskar S, Sriramula S (2017) Effective elastic property of randomly damaged composite laminates, Engineering postgraduate research symposium, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Adhikari S (2015) Stochastic free vibration analyses of composite doubly curved shells: a Kriging model approach. Compos B Eng 70:99–112
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T, Adhikari S (2015) Stochastic free vibration analysis of angle-ply composite plates: a RS-HDMR approach. Compos Struct 122:526–536
Acknowledgements
TM and SN acknowledge the initiation grants received from IIT Kanpur and IIT Bombay, respectively. PKK and RC are grateful for the financial support from MHRD, India during the research work. SC acknowledges the support of XSEDE and Center for Research Computing, University of Notre Dame for providing computational resources required for carrying out this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mukhopadhyay, T., Naskar, S., Chakraborty, S. et al. Stochastic Oblique Impact on Composite Laminates: A Concise Review and Characterization of the Essence of Hybrid Machine Learning Algorithms. Arch Computat Methods Eng 28, 1731–1760 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09438-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09438-w