Elsevier

Discrete Optimization

Volume 38, November 2020, 100608
Discrete Optimization

A convex cover for closed unit curves has area at least 0.1

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disopt.2020.100608Get rights and content

Abstract

We improve a lower bound for the smallest area of convex covers for closed unit curves from 0.0975 to 0.1, which makes it substantially closer to the current best upper bound 0.11023. We did this by considering the minimal area of convex hull of circle, line of length 12, and rectangle with side 0.1727×0.3273. By using geometric methods and the Box-search algorithm, we proved that this area is at least 0.1. We give informal numerical evidence that the obtained lower bound is close to the limit of current techniques, and substantially new idea is required to go significantly beyond 0.10044.

Introduction

Moser’s worm problem is one of many unsolved problems in geometry posed by Leo Moser [1] in 1966 (see [2] for a new version). It asks about the smallest area of region S in the plane which can be rotated and translated to cover every curve of length 1 (unit curve). While this problem is still open, lower and upper bounds for this smallest area are available in the literature. The current best upper bound 0.260437 was established by Norwood and Poole [3]. For the lower bound, it is known only that the area of S is strictly positive [4].

This problem can be modified by restricting region S (e.g. triangle, rectangle, convex, non-convex, etc.) or restricting unit curves (e.g. closed, polygonal, etc.). Numerous problems in the worm family have been solved, see Wetzel [5] for a survey.

If we require S to be convex, and cover arbitrary unit curves, the existence of the solution is shown by Laidacker and Poole [6] using Blaschke Selection Theorem. In 2019, Panraksa and Wichiramala [7] showed that the Wetzel’s sector is a cover for unit curves which has an area of π120.2618. This cover is the current upper bound for this problem, whereas the current lower bound 0.232239 was found by Khandhawit, Sriswasdi and Pagonakis [8] in 2013.

The problem of finding smallest convex region S to cover all (not necessarily unit) curves of diameter one was posed by Henri Lebesgue in 1914 and is known as Lebesgue’s universal covering problem. In this case, the current best lower and upper bounds are 0.832 and 0.8440936 due to Peter Brass and Mehrbod Sharifi [9] and Philip Gibbs [10], respectively.

In this paper, we consider the problem of covering closed unit curves by a convex region of the smallest area.

In 1957, H.G. Eggleston [11] showed that the equilateral triangle of side 3π is the smallest triangle which can cover all closed unit curves and its area is 334π20.13162. Twenty-five years later, the smallest rectangle with lengths 1π and 141π2 is found by Shaer and Wetzel [12] and its area is about 0.12274.

Füredi and Wetzel [13] decreased this area to about 0.11222 by clipping one corner of this rectangle. Also, they modified the resulted pentagon to a curvilinear hexagon which has an area of less than 0.11213. In 2018, Wichiramala [14] showed that a corner of the pentagon can be clipped to obtain a hexagonal cover with area less than 0.11023, which is the best currently known upper bound.

Our work focuses on a lower bound for this problem. In 1973, Chakerian and Klamkin [15] applied Fáry and Rédei’s theorem [16] to find the first lower bound 0.0963275 by considering the convex hull of circle and line segment. Further, Füredi and Wetzel [13] showed that the minimum area of convex hull of circle and the 0.0261682×0.4738318 rectangle has area 0.0966675. Moreover, they replaced this rectangle by curvilinear rectangle and give a new lower bound about 0.096694.

To improve this bound, one may consider the minimal convex hull of three given closed curves. However, in this case Fáry and Rédei’s theorem [16] cannot be applied to find smallest area analytically, which complicates the analysis and call for the mix of geometric and numerical methods. Som-am [17] applied Brass grid method [9] to prove that the area of convex hull of circle, line segment, and equilateral triangle is at least 0.096905. In 2019, Grechuk and Som-am [18] used the Box search method to show that the minimal-area convex hull of a rectangle of perimeter 1, circle with perimeter 1, and the equilateral triangle with perimeter 1, is greater than 0.0975. Thus, if we denote α to be the area of smallest cover of closed unit curves, then 0.0975α0.11023.

In this paper, we use geometric methods combined with the Box-search algorithm to prove that the area of convex cover for the line segment, circle, and certain rectangle of perimeter 1 is at least 0.1.

Theorem 1.1

The area of convex cover S for circle of circumference 1, line of length 12, and rectangle of size 0.1727×0.3273 is at least 0.1.

By Theorem 1.1, we have 0.1<α,which improves the previous bound 0.0975. In fact, the true minimal area of S in Theorem 1.1 is about 0.10044, but we have rounded the bound to 0.1 to simplify the proof.

The choice of line segment, circle, and rectangle in Theorem 1.1 was not an arbitrary or lucky one. In fact, we have used a systematic search for three shapes which give the best possible lower bound.

The organization of this paper is as follows. A systematic search for three shapes with maximal possible area of minimal convex hull is presented in Section 2. The remaining sections are devoted to the proof of Theorem 1.1. Section 3 proves some geometric lemmas. Section 4 describes numerical Box-search algorithm and computational results. The proof of Theorem 1.1 is finished in Section 5. We give some conclusions in Section 6.

Section snippets

A systematic search for shape

Theorem 1.1 establishes a new lower bound for the area of a convex cover for closed unit curves, by proving that a convex hull of three such curves, circle, line, and certain rectangle, must have area at least 0.1. In fact, the choice of these three curves was not an arbitrary or lucky one, but was the result of a systematic numerical search, which we will describe in this section.

This section contains neither proofs nor any form of rigorous analysis, and the reader who is interested only in

Geometric analysis

Let C be a circle of circumference 1, R be a rectangle of size u×v where u=0.1727 and v=12u, and L be line of length 12.

Let us fix the center of the circle to be C0(0,0). Let F be a regular 500-gon inscribed in C, such that the sides of R are parallel to some longest diagonals of F. Let X be the union FRL. We call X a configuration. Let H(X) be the convex hull of X, and A(X) be the area of H(X). Our aim is to find a configuration X with the smallest A(X).

Let R0(x1,y1) be the center of R. By

Computational results

Let Z be a region in Lemma 3.1. In this section, we prove that f(z)=f(x1,y1,x2,y2,θ)>0.1,zZby using box-search method as described in [18]. The method works as follows. Let z be the center of a box B which has the form B=[a1,b1]×[a2,b2]×[a3,b3]×[a4,b4]×[a5,b5]. On every step, we check if f(z)d1C1d2C2d3C3d4C4d5C50.1,where di is half the length of [ai,bi]. If (4.1) holds, then inequality f(z)>0.1 holds for every zB by Lemma 3.3.

If (4.1) does not hold, we will select the largest length,

Main theorem

Theorem 1.1

The area of convex cover S for circle of circumference 1, line of length 12, and rectangle of size 0.1727×0.3273 is at least 0.1.

Proof

Let Z be a region in Lemma 3.1. The fact that Box-search algorithm halted, together with Lemma 3.3, implies that f(z)>0.1 for all zZ. Then, by Lemma 3.1, f(z)>0.1 holds for all zR5. Thus, A(F,R,L)>0.1. Since FC, A(C,R,L)A(F,R,L)>0.1.  

Corollary 5.1

Any convex cover for closed unit curves has area of at least 0.1.

Proof

Let S be a convex cover for closed unit curves. Then S can

Conclusion

In this work, we improve the lower bound for the area of convex covers for closed unit curves from 0.0975 to 0.1. First, we used the geometric method to prove Lipschitz bounds for configuration function in 5 parameters which represents the circle, 0.1727×0.3273 rectangle, and line. Next, we used the numerical Box-search algorithm developed in [18] to prove the main theorem. In fact, we have used regular 500-gon in place of circle for convenience of Matlab numerical computations.

The best bound

References (18)

  • MoserW.O.J.

    Problems, problems, problems

    Discrete Appl. Math.

    (1991)
  • MoserL.

    Poorly formulated unsolved problems of combinatorial geometry

    Mimeographed list

    (1966)
  • NorwoodR. et al.

    An improved upper bound for Leo Moser’s worm problem

    Discrete Comput. Geom.

    (2003)
  • MarstrandJ.M.

    Packing smooth curves in Rq

    Mathematika.

    (1979)
  • WetzelJ.E.

    The classical worm problem—A status report

    Geombinatorics.

    (2005)
  • LaidackerM. et al.

    On the existence of minimal covers for families of closed bounded convex sets

    (1986)
  • PanraksaC. et al.

    Wetzel’s sector covers unit arcs

    Period. Math. Hungar.

    (2020)
  • KhandhawitT. et al.

    Lower bound for convex hull area and universal cover problems

    Internat. J. Comput. Geom. Appl.

    (2013)
  • BrassP. et al.

    A lower bound for Lebesgue’s universal cover problem

    Internat. J. Comput. Geom. Appl.

    (2005)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text