Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical investigation on the fracture driving force of laser welds and arc welds

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Welding in the World Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The brittle fracture driving forces of laser beam welds (LBWs) and arc welds (AWs) are investigated and compared numerically with a center through-thickness cracked panel (CTCP) and a standard fracture toughness specimen (3-point bending specimen, 3PB). The effects of hard zone width (H) and strength mismatch ratio (Sr) were systematically studied at global strain (ε) of 0.1% and 0.2%. It was found that the peak opening stress near the crack tip decreased with narrower H for LBW at ε = 0.2%, which can be ascribed to the better shielding effect provided by the softer base metal (BM) on hard zone welds. The peak normalized opening stress σyy/σY,WM was found nearly to be 3.0 for different Sr at ε = 0.1%, which decreased to 2.5 at ε = 0.2% due to more plastic deformation in the BM. The shielding effect ΔσW increased with higher Sr or narrower H. The effect of H and Sr on required CTOD fracture toughness in 3PB was also discussed basing on Weibull stress criterion. The required CTOD in 3PB of LBW can be decreased to be much lower than the AW with sufficiently narrow H. The harm effect of higher Sr on required toughness is less compared with the influence of lower H.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bezensek B, Hancock JW (2007) The toughness of laser welded joints in the ductile–brittle transition. Eng Fract Mech 74:2395–2419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jallouf S, Casavola K, Pappalettere C, Pluvinage G (2016) Assessment of undercut defect in a laser welded plate made of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy with probabilistic domain failure assessment diagram. Eng Fail Anal 59:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nishimoto K, Mori H (2004) Hot cracking susceptibility in laser weld metal of high nitrogen stainless steels. Sci Technol Adv Mater 5:231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stam.2003.10.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jing H, Fumiyoshi M (2000) Transferability of toughness result to fracture performance evaluation of welded joints considering stable crack growth. Chin J Mech Eng 13:122–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu X-K, Joyce JA (2012) Review of fracture toughness (G, K, J, CTOD, CTOA) testing and standardization. Eng Fract Mech 85:1–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wells AA (1963) Application of fracture mechanics at and beyond general yield. Br Weld J 10:563–570

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. International (2018) ASTM E1820–18 Standard Test Method for Measurement of fracture toughness, in: annual book of ASTM standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken. https://doi.org/10.1520/E1820-18

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Rathbun HJ, Odette GR, Yamamoto MYHT (2006) Influence of statistical and constraint loss size effects on cleavage fracture toughness in the transition - a model based analysis. Eng Fract Mech 73:2723–2747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MacLennan I, Hancock JW (1995) Constraint-based failure assessment diagrams. Int J Press Vess Pip 64:287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-0161(95)98950-B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ainsworth RA, O’Dowd NP (1995) Constraint in the failure assessment diagram approach for fracture assessment. J Press Vess Technol.:260–267. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2842121

  11. de Souza RF, Ruggieri C (2015) J-dominance and size requirements in strength-mismatched fracture specimens with weld centerline cracks. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 37:1083–1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-014-0249-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Takashima Y, Yamada YS, Handa T, Igi S, Oi K, Minami F (2015) Numerical analysis of strength mismatch effect on stress field in Charpy specimen. Weld World 59:433–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-014-0217-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Minami F, Ohata M, Shimanuki H, Handa T, Igi S, Kurihara M, Kawabata T, Yamashita Y, Tagawa T, Hagihara Y (2006) Method of constraint loss correction of CTOD fracture toughness for fracture assessment of steel components. Eng Fract Mech 73:1996–2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Takashima Y, Ohata M, Inose K, Yamaoka H, Nakanishi Y, Minami F (2016) Evaluation of Charpy impact toughness using side-grooved specimen for hybrid laser-arc welds of ultra-high-strength steel. Weld World 60:1191–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-016-0383-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Beremin FM, Pineau A, Mudry F, Devaux J-C, D’Escatha Y, Ledermann P (1983) A local criterion for cleavage fracture of a nuclear pressure vessel steel. Metall Trans A 14:2277–2287. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02663302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Minami F, Brückner-Foit A, Munz D, Trolldenier B (1992) Estimation procedure for the Weibull parameters used in the local approach. Int J Fract 54:197–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00035355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruggieri C, Minami F, Toyoda M, Hagiwara Y, Inoue T (1992) Local approach to notch depth dependence of CTOD results. J Soc Naval Architects Japan 171:493–499. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.1992.493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bilby BA, Cottrell AH, Smith E, Swinden KH (1964) Plastic yielding from sharp notches. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 279:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1964.0085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ISO 12135: 2016 Metallic materials — unified method of test for the determination of quasistatic fracture toughness. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. https://www.iso.org/standard/60891.html. Accessed 15 Nov 2016

  20. Takashima Y, Ohata M, Minami F (2009) Fracture performance evaluation of laser beam welded joints based on the Weibull stress criterion, in: ASME 2009 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, pp. 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2009-77956

  21. Takashima Y, Ohata M, Minami F (2014) CTOD toughness correction for laser welded joints with narrow hardened zone. Procedia Mater Sci 3:1009–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yasuhito Takashima or Fenggui Lu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Recommended for publication by Commission X - Structural Performances of Welded Joints - Fracture Avoidance

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shao, C., Cui, H., Takashima, Y. et al. Numerical investigation on the fracture driving force of laser welds and arc welds. Weld World 64, 2075–2082 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-020-00983-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-020-00983-3

Keywords

Navigation