Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating the Performance of Laboratories Testing Sphygmomanometers in Legal Metrology due to Proficiency Testing

  • Case Report
  • Published:
MAPAN Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Proficiency testing is a vital component to ensure quality of tests and calibrations. In particular in legal metrology, the scope of activities claiming for accreditation demands for specific proficiency testing. This study presents the results of the proficiency testing conducted in 2019, in Brazil, for sphygmomanometers, an instrument usually under legal metrology regulation, whose measurements have a direct impact on clinical diagnosis and treatments, according to the International Organization of Legal Metrology Recommendation. The tests comprised initial verification, encompassing general inspection, rapid exhaust valve and maximum permissible error for the cuff indication tests, using the Z-Score as the criteria for the performance of the participants. Five ISO/IEC 17025-accredited laboratories, in Brazil, participated in the proficiency testing. The results show that all five laboratories obtained satisfactory results for the rapid exhaust valve test. One laboratory obtained a questionable result in one measurement for the maximum permissible error test. All laboratories obtained unsatisfactory results for the general inspection. Since the legal metrology requirement comprises all three tests, all laboratories obtained unsatisfactory performance. The results unveiled the necessity for corrective actions to improve the legal control of sphygmomanometers in Brazil. This proficiency testing was also included on the European PT Information System (Eptis) platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. M.V.B. Malachias, R.M.S. Póvoa, A.R. Nogueira, et al., 7a Diretriz Brasileira de Hipertensão Arterial: Capítulo 3 - Avaliação Clínica e Complementar. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 107 (2016) 14–17 (in portuguese).

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. LeWine, New guidelines published for managing high blood pressure, https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/new-guidelines-published-for-managing-high-blood-pressure-201312186953 (2016) Accessed 10 December 2017.

  3. B.A. Rodrigues Filho, R.F. Farias and W. dos Anjos, Evaluating the impact of measurement uncertainty in blood pressure measurement on hypertension diagnosis. Blood Pressure Monitoring, 23 (2018) 141.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.J. Turner, A.B. Baker and P.C. Kam, Effects of systematic errors in blood pressure measurements on the diagnosis of hypertension. Blood Press Monit, 9 (2004) 249–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. OIML. R 16 -1 Non-invasive mechanical sphygmomanometers, https://www.oiml.org/en/publications/recommendations/publication_view?p_type=1&p_status=1 (2002).

  6. OIML. R 16 - 2 Non-invasive automated sphygmomanometers, https://www.oiml.org/en/publications/recommendations/publication_view?p_type=1&p_status=1 (2002).

  7. P. Klenovsky, Legal metrological control over measuring instruments in use: current situation. OIML Bull, XLVII (2006) 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B.A.R. Filho, R.F. Farias and W. Anjos, Implementing a proficiency test provider for sphygmomanometers in Brazil. J Phys: Conf Ser, 1044 (2018) 012033.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISO/IEC. ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

  10. S. Yadav and A.K. Bandyopadhyay, Evaluation of laboratory performance through interlaboratory comparison. MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India, 24 (2009) 125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Singh, N. Dilawar Sharma, A. Kumar and A. K. Bandyopadhyay, Report of the proficiency testing in the pneumatic pressure region up to 5 MPa. MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India, 29 (2014) 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ISO/IEC 17043:2010 - Conformity assessment – General requirements for proficiency testing, https://www.iso.org/standard/29366.html (2010), Accessed 23 July 2018).

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge FAPESP for funding this research (Grant 2017/50173-0).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology–Inmetro, São Paulo Office, 1922 Santa Cruz St, São Paulo, SP, 04122-002, Brazil

    Bruno Amado Rodrigues Filho & Rafael Feldmann Farias

  2. Department of Scientific and Industrial Metrology, Weights and Measures Institute of São Paulo – IPEM – SP, 154 Muriaé St, São Paulo, SP, 04269-900, Brazil

    William Escaletti dos Anjos

Authors
  1. Bruno Amado Rodrigues Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rafael Feldmann Farias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. William Escaletti dos Anjos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Amado Rodrigues Filho.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodrigues Filho, B.A., Farias, R.F. & dos Anjos, W.E. Evaluating the Performance of Laboratories Testing Sphygmomanometers in Legal Metrology due to Proficiency Testing. MAPAN 35, 447–456 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-020-00388-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-020-00388-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation